Does Maintenance Treatment Matter?
- 01-04-2014
- Auteurs
- Sheila Eyberg
- Stephen Boggs
- James Jaccard
- Gepubliceerd in
- Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology | Uitgave 3/2014
Abstract
This study examined the effects of a two-year maintenance treatment assessed at 1 and 2 years following Parent–child Interaction Therapy (PCIT). Sixty-one of 100 clinic-referred children (M age = 4 years, 4 months) originally diagnosed with oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) completed the standard treatment and were then randomized to PCIT maintenance treatment (MT) or to an assessment-only follow-up condition (AO). Rating scale and observational measures from fathers, mothers, and children were collected before and after standard treatment and at one- and two-year follow-up assessments. Maintenance treatment involved monthly telephone contacts from the original therapist focused on relapse prevention based on principles of PCIT. At the two-year follow-up, MT families showed few changes from post-treatment, as expected. However, the expected decrements for AO control families were not seen. Few differences between MT and AO were found at either follow-up assessment, and there were no significant differences in the rates of change during follow-up. The maintenance of gains among AO families may have resulted from the continuous enhancement of standard treatment or from inadvertent reinforcement for maintenance provided by the assessments of change alone.
- Titel
- Does Maintenance Treatment Matter?
- Auteurs
-
Sheila Eyberg
Stephen Boggs
James Jaccard
- Publicatiedatum
- 01-04-2014
- Uitgeverij
- Springer US
- Gepubliceerd in
-
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology / Uitgave 3/2014
Print ISSN: 2730-7166
Elektronisch ISSN: 2730-7174 - DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9842-9
Deze inhoud is alleen zichtbaar als je bent ingelogd en de juiste rechten hebt.