Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 4/2020

28-10-2018 | Original Article

Does CaSe-MiXinG disrupt the access to lexico-semantic information?

Auteurs: Manuel Perea, María Fernández-López, Ana Marcet

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Mixed-case WoRdS disrupt performance in word recognition tasks and sentence reading. There is, however, a controversial issue around this finding as the hindered performance could be related to impoverished lexico-semantic access or to lack of visual familiarity. The present experiments aim to examine whether there is a genuine mixed-case effect during lexico-semantic access or whether the effect is driven by a visual familiarity bias (i.e., lack of familiarity may induce a bias toward “no” responses in word/nonword decisions). Participants were presented with same-case vs. mixed-case items in a word/nonword discrimination task (lexical decision) and in a task that requires access to semantic information (semantic categorization). In lexical decision, responses were faster and more accurate to same-case words than to mixed-case words, whereas the nonwords showed the opposite pattern. In two semantic categorization experiments, we failed to find any signs of a case-mixing effect for words. Therefore, the case-mixing effect in word recognition is not due to an impoverished access to lexico-semantic information but rather to lack of visual familiarity.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
What we should also note is that there is ERP evidence that N170 amplitude is sensitive to case mixing (Lien, Allen, & Crawford, 2012), and this may be taken as an early signature of case-mixing. However, as Perea et al. (2015) noted, “it is difficult to make strong inferences on the connection between this early, perceptual ERP effect and lexical access” (p. 42).
 
2
We thank Ken Forster for suggesting this explanation.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Besner, D., & McCann, R. S. (1987). Word frequency and pattern distortion in visual word identification and production: An examination of four classes of models. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 201–219). Hove: Erlbaum. Besner, D., & McCann, R. S. (1987). Word frequency and pattern distortion in visual word identification and production: An examination of four classes of models. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 201–219). Hove: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Frederiksen, J. R. (1978). Assessment of lexical decoding and lexical skills and their relation to reading proficiency. In A. M. Lesgold, J. W. Pellegrino, S. D. Fokkema & R. Glaser (Eds.), Cognitive psychology and instruction (pp. 153–169). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRef Frederiksen, J. R. (1978). Assessment of lexical decoding and lexical skills and their relation to reading proficiency. In A. M. Lesgold, J. W. Pellegrino, S. D. Fokkema & R. Glaser (Eds.), Cognitive psychology and instruction (pp. 153–169). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Houston, J. R., Rossmiller, A. C., & Allen, P. A. (2016). Case mixing does not modulate the Stroop effect. Poster presented at the 2016 Midwestern Psychological Association Annual Conference, Chicago, IL. Houston, J. R., Rossmiller, A. C., & Allen, P. A. (2016). Case mixing does not modulate the Stroop effect. Poster presented at the 2016 Midwestern Psychological Association Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.
go back to reference R Development Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R Development Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
go back to reference Reingold, E. M., Yang, J., & Rayner, K. (2010). The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: Evidence for lexical control of eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1677–1683. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019959.CrossRefPubMed Reingold, E. M., Yang, J., & Rayner, K. (2010). The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: Evidence for lexical control of eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1677–1683. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​a0019959.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Does CaSe-MiXinG disrupt the access to lexico-semantic information?
Auteurs
Manuel Perea
María Fernández-López
Ana Marcet
Publicatiedatum
28-10-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1111-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2020

Psychological Research 4/2020 Naar de uitgave