Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

vorige artikel The roles of consistency and exclusivity in per...

volgende artikel My hand in my ear: a phantom limb re-induced by...

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

17-12-2018 | Original Article | Uitgave 1/2019

Do movements contribute to sense of body ownership? Rubber hand illusion in expert pianists

Tijdschrift:: Psychological Research > Uitgave 1/2019

Auteurs:: Maria Pyasik, Adriana Salatino, Lorenzo Pia

Extra’s

» Toegang tot de volledige tekst krijgen

Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1137-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Currently, it is still debated whether, how and to what extent movements contribute to the sense of body ownership (i.e., the feeling that one’s body belongs to oneself). To answer this question, here we examined if a prolonged increase of the amount of movements affects body ownership. Specifically, we administered the rubber hand illusion paradigm within a natural condition of long-term motor practice, namely in expert pianists. We compared the illusory effects of both static (visuotactile stimulation) and dynamic (active/passive movements) versions of that paradigm in a group of expert pianists and a group of non-musicians. The illusion was measured behaviorally (proprioceptive drift) and subjectively (questionnaire). Our results showed that pianists were significantly less susceptible to any type of the illusion, compared to the non-musicians. Moreover, they did not experience the illusion in general (presenting neither the proprioceptive drift, nor the subjective feeling of ownership). These findings suggest that the increased amount of motor-related afferent and efferent signals does affect the construction and the coherence of body ownership, thus showing the role of movements in this process.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Hier inloggen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijft u als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen uw vak. Met het online abonnement heeft u toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kunt u op uw gemak en wanneer het u het beste uitkomt verdiepen in uw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 18 KB)

426_2018_1137_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx

Adamo, D. E., Scotland, S., & Martin, B. J. (2012). Upper limb kinesthetic asymmetries: Gender and handedness effects. Neuroscience Letters, 516(2), 188–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.077. CrossRefPubMed

Blakemore, S. J., Frith, C. D., & Wolpert, D. M. (1999). Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(5), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892999563607. CrossRefPubMed

Blakemore, S. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (1998). Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience, 1(7), 635–640. https://doi.org/10.1038/2870. CrossRefPubMed

Bottini, G., Sedda, A., Ferre, E. R., Invernizzi, P., Gandola, M., & Paulesu, E. (2009). Productive symptoms in right brain damage. Current Opinion in Neurology, 22(6), 589–593. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0b013e328332c71d. CrossRefPubMed

Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands “feel” touch that eyes see. Nature, 391(6669), 756. https://doi.org/10.1038/35784. CrossRefPubMed

Burin, D., Garbarini, F., Bruno, V., Fossataro, C., Destefanis, C., Berti, A., & Pia, L. (2017). Movements and body ownership: Evidence from the rubber hand illusion after mechanical limb immobilization. Neuropsychologia, 107, 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.11.004. CrossRefPubMed

Burin, D., Livelli, A., Garbarini, F., Fossataro, C., Folegatti, A., Gindri, P., & Pia, L. (2015). Are movements necessary for the sense of body ownership? Evidence from the rubber hand illusion in pure hemiplegic patients. PLoS One, 10, 3. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117155.

Burin, D., Pyasik, M., Ronga, I., Cavallo, M., Salatino, A., & Pia, L. (2018). As long as that is my hand, that willed action is mine”: Timing of agency triggered by body ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 58, 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONCOG.2017.12.005. CrossRefPubMed

Burin, D., Pyasik, M., Salatino, A., & Pia, L. (2017). That’s my hand! Therefore, that’s my willed action: How body ownership acts upon conscious awareness of willed actions. Cognition, 166, 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.035. CrossRefPubMed

Costantini, M., & Haggard, P. (2007). The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.01.001. CrossRefPubMed

Costantini, M., Robinson, J., Migliorati, D., Donno, B., Ferri, F., & Northoff, G. (2016). Temporal limits on rubber hand illusion reflect individuals’ temporal resolution in multisensory perception. Cognition, 157, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.010. CrossRefPubMed

David, N., Fiori, F., & Aglioti, S. M. (2014). Susceptibility to the rubber hand illusion does not tell the whole body-awareness story. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(1), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-013-0190-6. CrossRefPubMed

Dummer, T., Picot-Annand, A., Neal, T., & Moore, C. (2009). Movement and the rubber hand illusion. Perception, 38(2), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5921. CrossRefPubMed

Ehrsson, H. H., Spence, C., & Passingham, R. E. (2004). That’s my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science, 305(5685), 875–877. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097011. CrossRefPubMed

Ericsson, K. A. (2014). Why expert performance is special and cannot be extrapolated from studies of performance in the general population: A response to criticisms. Intelligence, 45, 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INTELL.2013.12.001. CrossRef

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.100.3.363. CrossRef

Farnè, A., Pavani, F., Meneghello, F., & Ladavas, E. (2000). Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand. Brain, 123(11), 2350–2360. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.11.2350. CrossRefPubMed

Fiorio, M., Weise, D., Önal-Hartmann, C., Zeller, D., Tinazzi, M., & Classen, J. (2011). Impairment of the rubber hand illusion in focal hand dystonia. Brain, 134(5), 1428–1437. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr026. CrossRefPubMed

Frith, C. (2005). The self in action: Lessons from delusions of control. Consciousness and Cognition, 14(4), 752–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.04.002. CrossRefPubMed

Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5. CrossRefPubMed

Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C. (2010). The bodily self as power for action. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 746–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.038 CrossRefPubMed

Gaser, C., & Schlaug, G. (2003). Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23(27), 9240–9245. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.23-27-09240.2003. CrossRefPubMed

Hartcher-O’Brien, J., Gallace, A., Krings, B., Koppen, C., & Spence, C. (2008). When vision ‘extinguishes’ touch in neurologically-normal people: Extending the Colavita visual dominance effect. Experimental Brain Research, 186(4), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1272-5. CrossRefPubMed

Hartcher-O’Brien, J., Levitan, C., & Spence, C. (2010). Extending visual dominance over touch for input off the body. Brain Research, 1362, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BRAINRES.2010.09.036. CrossRefPubMed

Head, H., & Holmes, J. (1911). Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain, 34, 102–254. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/34.2-3.102. CrossRef

Hosoda, M., & Furuya, S. (2016). Shared somatosensory and motor functions in musicians. Scientific Reports, 6, 37632. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37632. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ismail, M. A. F., & Shimada, S. (2016). “Robot” hand illusion under delayed visual feedback: Relationship between the senses of ownership and agency. PLoS One, 11(7), e0159619. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159619. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover.

Jenkinson, P. M., Haggard, P., Ferreira, N. C., & Fotopoulou, A. (2013). Body ownership and attention in the mirror: Insights from somatoparaphrenia and the rubber hand illusion. Neuropsychologia, 51(8), 1453–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.029. CrossRefPubMed

Kalckert, A., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2012). Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: A dissociation of ownership and agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 40. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00040. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kalckert, A., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2014). The moving rubber hand illusion revisited: Comparing movements and visuotactile stimulation to induce illusory ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 26C, 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.02.003. CrossRef

Kammers, M. P. M., de Vignemont, F., Verhagen, L., & Dijkerman, H. C. (2009). The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia, 47(1), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.028. CrossRefPubMed

Kerr, C. E., Agrawal, U., & Nayak, S. (2016). The effects of tai chi practice on intermuscular beta coherence and the rubber hand illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 37. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00037. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kilteni, K., Maselli, A., Kording, K. P., & Slater, M. (2015). Over my fake body: Body ownership illusions for studying the multisensory basis of own-body perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00141. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lehmann, A. C. (1997). The acquisition of expertise in music: Efficiency of deliberate practice as a moderating variable in accounting for sub-expert performance. In I. Deliège & J. Sloboda (Eds.), Perception and cognition of music (pp. 161–187). Hove: Psychology Press.

Lenggenhager, B., Tadi, T., Metzinger, T., & Blanke, O. (2007). Video ergo sum: Manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science, 317(5841), 1096–1099. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1143439 CrossRefPubMed

Lloyd, D. M. (2007). Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand. Brain and Cognition, 64(1), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BANDC.2006.09.013. CrossRefPubMed

Longo, M. R., & Haggard, P. (2009). Sense of agency primes manual motor responses. Perception, 38(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6045. CrossRefPubMed

Longo, M. R., Schüür, F., Kammers, M. P. M., Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2008). What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition, 107(3), 978–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.004. CrossRefPubMed

Luo, C., Guo, Z., Lai, Y., Liao, W., Liu, Q., Kendrick, K. M., … Li, H. (2012). Musical training induces functional plasticity in perceptual and motor networks: Insights from resting-state fMRI. PLoS One, 7(5), e36568. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036568. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ma, K., & Hommel, B. (2015). The role of agency for perceived ownership in the virtual hand illusion. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.07.008. CrossRefPubMed

Makin, T. R., Holmes, N. P., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2008). On the other hand: Dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behavioural Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2008.02.041. CrossRefPubMed

Ocklenburg, S., Rüther, N., Peterburs, J., Pinnow, M., & Güntürkün, O. (2011). Laterality in the rubber hand illusion. Laterality, 16(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500903483515. CrossRefPubMed

Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4. CrossRefPubMed

Pia, L., Garbarini, F., Fossataro, C., Burin, D., & Berti, A. (2016). Sensing the body, representing the body: Evidence from a neurologically based delusion of body ownership. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 33(1–2), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2016.1185404. CrossRefPubMed

Pia, L., Spinazzola, L., Garbarini, F., Bellan, G., Piedimonte, A., Fossataro, C., Berti, A. (2014). Anosognosia for hemianaesthesia: A voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping study. Cortex, 61, 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.08.006. CrossRefPubMed

Piedimonte, A., Garbarini, F., Pia, L., Mezzanato, T., & Berti, A. (2016). From intention to perception: The case of anosognosia for hemiplegia. Neuropsychologia, 87, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.007. CrossRefPubMed

Preston, C. (2013). The role of distance from the body and distance from the real hand in ownership and disownership during the rubber hand illusion. Acta Psychologica, 142(2), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTPSY.2012.12.005. CrossRefPubMed

Pyasik, M., Burin, D., & Pia, L. (2018). On the relation between body ownership and sense of agency: A link at the level of sensory-related signals. Acta Psychologica, 185, 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTPSY.2018.03.001. CrossRefPubMed

Ragert, P., Schmidt, A., Altenmüller, E., & Dinse, H. R. (2004). Superior tactile performance and learning in professional pianists: Evidence for meta-plasticity in musicians. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19(2), 473–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0953-816X.2003.03142.x. CrossRefPubMed

Riemer, M., Kleinbohl, D., Holzl, R., & Trojan, J. (2013). Action and perception in the rubber hand illusion. Experimental Brain Research, 229(3), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3374-3. CrossRefPubMed

Scandola, M., Tidoni, E., Avesani, R., Brunelli, G., Aglioti, S. M., & Moro, V. (2014). Rubber hand illusion induced by touching the face ipsilaterally to a deprived hand: Evidence for plastic “somatotopic” remapping in tetraplegics. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 404. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00404. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Schulz, M., Ross, B., & Pantev, C. (2003). Evidence for training-induced crossmodal reorganization of cortical functions in trumpet players. Neuroreport, 14(1), 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000053061.10406.c7. CrossRefPubMed

Shimada, S., Fukuda, K., & Hiraki, K. (2009). Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback. PLoS One, 4, 7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006185. CrossRef

Smit, M., Kooistra, D. I., van der Ham, I. J. M., & Dijkerman, H. C. (2017). Laterality and body ownership: Effect of handedness on experience of the rubber hand illusion. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition, 22(6), 703–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2016.1273940. CrossRef

Tidoni, E., Grisoni, L., Liuzza, M. T., & Aglioti, S. M. (2014). Rubber hand illusion highlights massive visual capture and sensorimotor face-hand remapping in a tetraplegic man. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 32(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-130385. CrossRefPubMed

Tsakiris, M. (2010). My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 703–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.034 CrossRefPubMed

Tsakiris, M., Prabhu, G., & Haggard, P. (2006). Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(2), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.09.004. CrossRefPubMed

Vallar, G., & Ronchi, R. (2009). Somatoparaphrenia: A body delusion. A review of the neuropsychological literature. Experimental Brain Research, 192(3), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1562-y. CrossRefPubMed

Vaquero, L., Hartmann, K., Ripollés, P., Rojo, N., Sierpowska, J., François, C., Altenmüller, E. (2016). Structural neuroplasticity in expert pianists depends on the age of musical training onset. NeuroImage, 126, 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.008. CrossRefPubMed

Walsh, L. D., Moseley, G. L., Taylor, J. L., & Gandevia, S. C. (2011). Proprioceptive signals contribute to the sense of body ownership. Journal of Physiology, 589(Pt 12), 3009–3021. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2011.204941. CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Do movements contribute to sense of body ownership? Rubber hand illusion in expert pianists
Auteurs:: Maria Pyasik
Adriana Salatino
Lorenzo Pia
Publicatiedatum: 17-12-2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1137-x
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Tijdschrift: Psychological Research An International Journal of Perception, Attention, Memory, and Action
Uitgave 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Electronic supplementary material

Publisher’s Note

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2019

A cross-sectional analysis on the effects of age on dual tasking in typically developing children

Embracing your emotions: affective state impacts lateralisation of human embraces

On the linear representation of numbers: evidence from a new two-numbers-to-two positions task

Interactions between incentive valence and action information in a cued approach–avoidance task

The roles of consistency and exclusivity in perceiving body ownership and agency

Recognising and reacting to angry and happy facial expressions: a diffusion model analysis