Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 6/2012

01-11-2012 | Original Article

Do action goals mediate social inhibition of return?

Auteurs: Geoff G. Cole, Paul A. Skarratt, Rebeccah-Claire Billing

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Social inhibition of return is the phenomenon whereby an individual is slower to reach to locations to which another individual has recently responded. Although this suggests that an observer represents another person’s action, little is known about which aspects of the action are encoded. The present work describes a series of three experiments examining whether social inhibition of return represents the endpoint goal of the action, i.e., is ‘goal based’. Pairs of participants sat opposite to one another and alternated responses to a cued or non-cued object presented on a table top. Importantly, either the two participants performed the same interaction with the object or a different interaction. Although all our experiments showed social inhibition of return, the size of the effect was not modulated according to whether each participant had the same or different goal. We conclude that although the mechanisms giving rise to social inhibition of return do encode some aspects of a response they do not code for terminal action goals.
Literatuur
go back to reference Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science, 14, 427–432.CrossRefPubMed Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science, 14, 427–432.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Gattis, G. (2000). Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53(A), 153–164.CrossRefPubMed Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Gattis, G. (2000). Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53(A), 153–164.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Berger, A., & Henik, A. (2000). The endogenous modulation of IOR is nasal-temporal asymmetric. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 421–428.CrossRefPubMed Berger, A., & Henik, A. (2000). The endogenous modulation of IOR is nasal-temporal asymmetric. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 421–428.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Brennan, S. E., Chen, X., Dickinson, C. A., Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search. Cognition, 106, 1465–1477.CrossRefPubMed Brennan, S. E., Chen, X., Dickinson, C. A., Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search. Cognition, 106, 1465–1477.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Carpenter, M., Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Fourteen- through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 315–330.CrossRef Carpenter, M., Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Fourteen- through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 315–330.CrossRef
go back to reference Cattaneo, L., Fabbri-Destro, M., Boria, S., Pieraccini, C., Monti, A., Cossu, G., et al. (2007). Impairment of actions chains in autism and its possible role in intention understanding. Proceedings of the Nation Academy of Sciences, 104, 17825–17830.CrossRef Cattaneo, L., Fabbri-Destro, M., Boria, S., Pieraccini, C., Monti, A., Cossu, G., et al. (2007). Impairment of actions chains in autism and its possible role in intention understanding. Proceedings of the Nation Academy of Sciences, 104, 17825–17830.CrossRef
go back to reference Cave, K. R., Bush, W. S., & Taylor, T. G. G. (2010). Split attention as part of a flexible attentional system for complex scenes: Comment on Jans, Peters, and De Weerd (2010). Psychological Review, 117, 685–696.CrossRefPubMed Cave, K. R., Bush, W. S., & Taylor, T. G. G. (2010). Split attention as part of a flexible attentional system for complex scenes: Comment on Jans, Peters, and De Weerd (2010). Psychological Review, 117, 685–696.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cole, G. G., Gellatly, A. R. H., & Blurton, A. (2001). Effect of object onset on the distribution of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1356–1368.PubMed Cole, G. G., Gellatly, A. R. H., & Blurton, A. (2001). Effect of object onset on the distribution of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1356–1368.PubMed
go back to reference Cole, G. G., & Kuhn, G. (2009). Appearance matters: Attentional orienting by new objects in the precuing paradigm. Visual Cognition, 17, 755–776.CrossRef Cole, G. G., & Kuhn, G. (2009). Appearance matters: Attentional orienting by new objects in the precuing paradigm. Visual Cognition, 17, 755–776.CrossRef
go back to reference Cole, G. G., & Kuhn, G. (2010). What the experimenter’s prime tells the observer’s brain. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1367–1376.CrossRef Cole, G. G., & Kuhn, G. (2010). What the experimenter’s prime tells the observer’s brain. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1367–1376.CrossRef
go back to reference Cole, G. G., Kuhn, G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2007). Onset of illusory figures attenuates change blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 939–942.CrossRef Cole, G. G., Kuhn, G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2007). Onset of illusory figures attenuates change blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 939–942.CrossRef
go back to reference Cole, G. G., & Liversedge, S. L. (2006). Change blindness and the primacy of object appearance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 588–593.CrossRef Cole, G. G., & Liversedge, S. L. (2006). Change blindness and the primacy of object appearance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 588–593.CrossRef
go back to reference Croson, R., & Sundali, J. (2005). The Gambler’s fallacy and the hot hand: Empirical data from casinos. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30, 195–209.CrossRef Croson, R., & Sundali, J. (2005). The Gambler’s fallacy and the hot hand: Empirical data from casinos. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30, 195–209.CrossRef
go back to reference Daprati, E., & Sirigu, A. (2006). How we interact with objects: Learning from brain lesions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 265–270.CrossRefPubMed Daprati, E., & Sirigu, A. (2006). How we interact with objects: Learning from brain lesions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 265–270.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176–180.CrossRefPubMed di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176–180.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737–1747.PubMed Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737–1747.PubMed
go back to reference Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chaersi, F., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Parietal lobe: From action organization to intention understanding. Science, 308, 662–667.CrossRefPubMed Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chaersi, F., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Parietal lobe: From action organization to intention understanding. Science, 308, 662–667.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593–609.CrossRefPubMed Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593–609.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gattis, M., Bekkering, H., & Wohlschläger, A. (2002). Goal-directed imitation. In A. N. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The Imitative Mind (pp. 183–205). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Gattis, M., Bekkering, H., & Wohlschläger, A. (2002). Goal-directed imitation. In A. N. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The Imitative Mind (pp. 183–205). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Hayes, S. J., Hansen, S., & Elliot, D. (2009). Between-person effects on attention and action: Joe and Fred revisited. Psychological Research, 74, 302–312.CrossRefPubMed Hayes, S. J., Hansen, S., & Elliot, D. (2009). Between-person effects on attention and action: Joe and Fred revisited. Psychological Research, 74, 302–312.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jeannerod, M. (1999). The 25th Bartlett Lecture: To act or not to act: Perspectives on the representation of actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 1–29.CrossRefPubMed Jeannerod, M. (1999). The 25th Bartlett Lecture: To act or not to act: Perspectives on the representation of actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 1–29.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Khatoon, S., Briand, K. A., & Sereno, A. B. (2002). The role of response in spatial attention: Direct versus indirect stimulus–response mappings. Vision Research, 42, 2693–2708.CrossRefPubMed Khatoon, S., Briand, K. A., & Sereno, A. B. (2002). The role of response in spatial attention: Direct versus indirect stimulus–response mappings. Vision Research, 42, 2693–2708.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kingstone, A., & Pratt, J. (1999). Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1046–1054.CrossRef Kingstone, A., & Pratt, J. (1999). Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1046–1054.CrossRef
go back to reference Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346–352.CrossRef Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346–352.CrossRef
go back to reference Kuhn, G., Tatler, B. W., & Cole, G. G. (2009). You look where I look! Effect of gaze cues on overt and covert attention in misdirection. Visual Cognition, 17, 925–944.CrossRef Kuhn, G., Tatler, B. W., & Cole, G. G. (2009). You look where I look! Effect of gaze cues on overt and covert attention in misdirection. Visual Cognition, 17, 925–944.CrossRef
go back to reference Lupiàñez, J., & Milliken, B. (1999). Inhibition of return and the attentional set for integrating vs. differentiating information. Journal of General Psychology, Theme Issue on Visual Attention, Part 2, 126, 392–418. Lupiàñez, J., & Milliken, B. (1999). Inhibition of return and the attentional set for integrating vs. differentiating information. Journal of General Psychology, Theme Issue on Visual Attention, Part 2, 126, 392–418.
go back to reference Lupiàñez, J., Milliken, B., Solano, C., Weaver, B., & Tipper, S. P. (2001). On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 753–773.CrossRef Lupiàñez, J., Milliken, B., Solano, C., Weaver, B., & Tipper, S. P. (2001). On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 753–773.CrossRef
go back to reference Mayer, A. R., Seidenberg, M., Dorflinger, J. M., & Rao, S. M. (2004). An event-related fMRI study of exogenous orienting: Supporting evidence for the cortical basis of inhibition of return? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1262–1271.CrossRefPubMed Mayer, A. R., Seidenberg, M., Dorflinger, J. M., & Rao, S. M. (2004). An event-related fMRI study of exogenous orienting: Supporting evidence for the cortical basis of inhibition of return? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1262–1271.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mukamel, R., Ekstrom, A. D., Kaplan, J., Iacoboni, M., & Fried, I. (2010). Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Current Biology, 20, 750–756.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mukamel, R., Ekstrom, A. D., Kaplan, J., Iacoboni, M., & Fried, I. (2010). Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Current Biology, 20, 750–756.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211–228.CrossRef Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211–228.CrossRef
go back to reference Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.CrossRef Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.CrossRef
go back to reference Rieger, M., & Gauggel, S. (1999). Inhibitory after-effects in the stop-signal paradigm. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 509–518.CrossRef Rieger, M., & Gauggel, S. (1999). Inhibitory after-effects in the stop-signal paradigm. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 509–518.CrossRef
go back to reference Riess-Jones, M., Moynihan, H., MacKenzie, N., & Puente, J. (2002). Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays. Psychological Science, 13, 313–319.CrossRef Riess-Jones, M., Moynihan, H., MacKenzie, N., & Puente, J. (2002). Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays. Psychological Science, 13, 313–319.CrossRef
go back to reference Rizzolatti, G., Fabbri-Destro, M., & Cattaneo, L. (2008). Mirror neurons and their clinical relevance. Nature Clinical Practice Neurology, 5, 24–34.CrossRef Rizzolatti, G., Fabbri-Destro, M., & Cattaneo, L. (2008). Mirror neurons and their clinical relevance. Nature Clinical Practice Neurology, 5, 24–34.CrossRef
go back to reference Rubichi, S., Nicoletti, R., Iani, C., & Umilta, C. (1997). The simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attentional shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1353–1364.PubMed Rubichi, S., Nicoletti, R., Iani, C., & Umilta, C. (1997). The simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attentional shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1353–1364.PubMed
go back to reference Schuch, S., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). On observing another person’s actions: Influences of observed inhibition and errors. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 828–837.CrossRef Schuch, S., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). On observing another person’s actions: Influences of observed inhibition and errors. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 828–837.CrossRef
go back to reference Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others’ actions: Just like one’s own? Cognition, 88, 11–21.CrossRef Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others’ actions: Just like one’s own? Cognition, 88, 11–21.CrossRef
go back to reference Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174–176.CrossRefPubMed Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174–176.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sirigu, A., Cohen, L., Duhamel, J. R., Pillon, B., Dubois, B., & Agid, Y. (1995). A selective impairment of hand posture for object utilisation in apraxia. Cortex, 31, 41–55.CrossRefPubMed Sirigu, A., Cohen, L., Duhamel, J. R., Pillon, B., Dubois, B., & Agid, Y. (1995). A selective impairment of hand posture for object utilisation in apraxia. Cortex, 31, 41–55.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Skarratt, P. A., Cole, G. G., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Social inhibition of return. Acta Psychologica, 134, 48–54.CrossRefPubMed Skarratt, P. A., Cole, G. G., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Social inhibition of return. Acta Psychologica, 134, 48–54.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Suzuki, S., & Cavanagh, P. (1997). Focused attention distorts visual space: A attentional repulsion effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 443–463.PubMed Suzuki, S., & Cavanagh, P. (1997). Focused attention distorts visual space: A attentional repulsion effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 443–463.PubMed
go back to reference Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (2000). Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1639–1656.PubMed Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (2000). Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1639–1656.PubMed
go back to reference Tipper, C., & Kingstone, A. (2005). Is inhibition of return a reflexive effect? Cognition, 97, B55–B62.CrossRefPubMed Tipper, C., & Kingstone, A. (2005). Is inhibition of return a reflexive effect? Cognition, 97, B55–B62.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Welsh, T. N., Elliot, D., Anson, J. G., Dhillon, V., Weeks, D. J., Lyons, J. L., et al. (2005). Does Joe influence Fred’s actions? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems. Neuroscience Letters, 385, 99–104.CrossRefPubMed Welsh, T. N., Elliot, D., Anson, J. G., Dhillon, V., Weeks, D. J., Lyons, J. L., et al. (2005). Does Joe influence Fred’s actions? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems. Neuroscience Letters, 385, 99–104.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Welsh, T. N., Lyons, J., Weeks, D. J., Anson, J. G., Chua, R., Mendoza, J., & Elliot, D. (2007). Within- and between-person inhibition of return: Observation is as good as performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 960–956.CrossRef Welsh, T. N., Lyons, J., Weeks, D. J., Anson, J. G., Chua, R., Mendoza, J., & Elliot, D. (2007). Within- and between-person inhibition of return: Observation is as good as performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 960–956.CrossRef
go back to reference Welsh, T. N., McDougall, L. M., & Weeks, D. J. (2009a). The performance and observation of action shape future behaviour. Brain and Cognition, 71, 64–71.CrossRefPubMed Welsh, T. N., McDougall, L. M., & Weeks, D. J. (2009a). The performance and observation of action shape future behaviour. Brain and Cognition, 71, 64–71.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Welsh, T. N., Ray, M. C., Weeks, D. J., Deweyd, D., & Elliott, D. (2009b). Does Joe influence Fred’s action? Not if Fred has autism spectrum disorder. Brain Research, 1248, 141–148.CrossRefPubMed Welsh, T. N., Ray, M. C., Weeks, D. J., Deweyd, D., & Elliott, D. (2009b). Does Joe influence Fred’s action? Not if Fred has autism spectrum disorder. Brain Research, 1248, 141–148.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Do action goals mediate social inhibition of return?
Auteurs
Geoff G. Cole
Paul A. Skarratt
Rebeccah-Claire Billing
Publicatiedatum
01-11-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0395-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2012

Psychological Research 6/2012 Naar de uitgave