Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 1/2011

01-03-2011

Distress Tolerance Scale: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Among Daily Cigarette Smokers

Auteurs: Teresa M. Leyro, Amit Bernstein, Anka A. Vujanovic, Alison C. McLeish, Michael J. Zvolensky

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 1/2011

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The present investigation evaluated the factor structure of the Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS; Simons and Gaher 2005) among a sample of 173 (54.9% males) daily cigarette smokers (M = 16.64 cigarettes per day, SD = 7.83). Comparison of a single higher-order model and a hierarchical multidimensional model was conducted using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). In addition, evaluation of the internal consistency and convergent and discriminant validity of the better-fitting model was completed. CFA of the DTS indicated a single second-order factor of distress tolerance, and four lower-order factors including Tolerance, Appraisal, Absorption, and Regulation; each factor demonstrated acceptable levels of internal consistency. In addition, the DTS displayed good convergent and discriminant validity with theoretically relevant smoking and affect variables. Results are discussed in terms of explicating the latent structure of distress tolerance, as measured by the DTS, within the context of smoking research.
Voetnoten
1
Suggested cutoff values for fit indices have varied throughout the years in the interpretation of structural equation model fit. Many fit indices have shown sensitivity to aspects of data including sample size and model parsimony (Hooper et al. 2008). In addition, interpretation of model fit is sometimes hindered by stringent criteria cutoff values (Hooper et al. 2008). To aid in the interpretation of the currently proposed goodness-of-fit was evaluated using both conservative (Brown 2006; Hooper et al. 2008; Hu and Bentler 1999; Kline 2005) and liberal (Anderson and Gerbing 1984; Bentler 1992; Hu and Bentler 1999; MacCallum et al. 1996; Marsh et al. 1988; Wheaton et al. 1977) index cutoffs to better facilitate interpretation of model fit in the event values fall outside the conservative range. Goodness-of-fit was specifically evaluated using the following indices: χ2 (p > .05) (Hu and Bentler 1999), Normed χ2 (NC; Wheaton et al. 1977) of 2.0 (Tabachnick and Fidell 2007) to 5.0 (Wheaton et al. 1977), Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI; Jöreskog and Sörbom 1981) > .95 (Miles and Shevlin 1998) to .85 (Anderson and Gerbing 1984), Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index > .95 (Miles and Shevlin 1998) to .8 (Marsh et al. 1988) (AGFI; Jöreskog and Sörbom 1981); Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (Hu and Bentler 1995) < .05 (Byrne 1998) to .1 (Marsh et al. 1988), Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA; Steiger 1990) < .06 (Hu and Bentler 1999) to .08 (MaCallum et al. 1996), the Comparative Fit Index (CFI; Bentler 1990) > .95 (Hu and Bentler 1999) to 90 (Bentler 1992), and the Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI; Bentler and Bonett 1980) > .95 (Hu and Bentler 1999) to .90 (Bentler and Bonett 1980).
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155–73. doi:10.1007/BF02294170.CrossRef Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155–73. doi:10.​1007/​BF02294170.CrossRef
go back to reference Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R., Saunders, J., & Grant, M. (1992). AUDIT- Alcohol Use Disorders Identification test: Guidelines for use in primary health care. Geneva: World Health Organization. Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R., Saunders, J., & Grant, M. (1992). AUDIT- Alcohol Use Disorders Identification test: Guidelines for use in primary health care. Geneva: World Health Organization.
go back to reference Bentler, P. M. (1992). EQS structural equations program manual, Los Angelas, CA. BMDP Statistical Software. Bentler, P. M. (1992). EQS structural equations program manual, Los Angelas, CA. BMDP Statistical Software.
go back to reference Bernstein, A., Vujanovic, A. A., Leyro, T. M., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2010). Distress tolerance: Research synthesis and future directions. In A. Bernstein, M. J. Zvolensky, & A. A. Vujanovic (Eds.), Distress tolerance. New York: Guilford. Bernstein, A., Vujanovic, A. A., Leyro, T. M., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2010). Distress tolerance: Research synthesis and future directions. In A. Bernstein, M. J. Zvolensky, & A. A. Vujanovic (Eds.), Distress tolerance. New York: Guilford.
go back to reference Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.
go back to reference Brown, R. A., Palm, K. M., Strong, D. R., Lejuez, C. W., Kahler, C. W., Zvolensky, M. J., et al. (2008). Distress tolerance treatment for early-lapse smokers: rationale, program description, and preliminary findings. Behavior Modification, 32, 302–332. doi:10.1177/0145445507309024.PubMedCrossRef Brown, R. A., Palm, K. M., Strong, D. R., Lejuez, C. W., Kahler, C. W., Zvolensky, M. J., et al. (2008). Distress tolerance treatment for early-lapse smokers: rationale, program description, and preliminary findings. Behavior Modification, 32, 302–332. doi:10.​1177/​0145445507309024​.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills: Sage. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills: Sage.
go back to reference Buckley, T. C., Kamholz, B. W., Mozley, S. L., Gulliver, S. B., Holohan, D. R., Helstrom, A. W., et al. (2005). A psychometric evaluation of the Smoking Consequences Questionnaire-Adult in smokers with psychiatric conditions. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 7, 739–745. doi:10.1080/14622200500259788.CrossRef Buckley, T. C., Kamholz, B. W., Mozley, S. L., Gulliver, S. B., Holohan, D. R., Helstrom, A. W., et al. (2005). A psychometric evaluation of the Smoking Consequences Questionnaire-Adult in smokers with psychiatric conditions. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 7, 739–745. doi:10.​1080/​1462220050025978​8.CrossRef
go back to reference Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modelling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah: Erlbaum. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modelling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Cocores, J. (1993). Nicotine dependence: diagnosis and treatment. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 16, 49–60. PMid:8456047.PubMed Cocores, J. (1993). Nicotine dependence: diagnosis and treatment. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 16, 49–60. PMid:8456047.PubMed
go back to reference First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1994). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV patient edition (SCID-N/P, Version 2.0). New York: Biometrics Research Department. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1994). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV patient edition (SCID-N/P, Version 2.0). New York: Biometrics Research Department.
go back to reference Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling. Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). London: Sage. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling. Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). London: Sage.
go back to reference Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
go back to reference Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1981). Lisrel user’s guide. Version V. Chicago: International Educational Services. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1981). Lisrel user’s guide. Version V. Chicago: International Educational Services.
go back to reference Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
go back to reference Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
go back to reference Leyro, T. M., Zvolensky, M. J., Vujanovic, A. A., & Bernstein, A. (2008). Anxiety sensitivity and smoking motives and outcome expectancies among adult daily smokers: replication and extension. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 10, 985–994. doi:10.1080/14622200802097555.CrossRef Leyro, T. M., Zvolensky, M. J., Vujanovic, A. A., & Bernstein, A. (2008). Anxiety sensitivity and smoking motives and outcome expectancies among adult daily smokers: replication and extension. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 10, 985–994. doi:10.​1080/​1462220080209755​5.CrossRef
go back to reference Leyro, T. M., Zvolensky, M. J., & Bernstein, A. (2010). Distress tolerance and psychopathological symptoms and disorders: A review of the empirical literature among adults. Psychological Bulletin. Leyro, T. M., Zvolensky, M. J., & Bernstein, A. (2010). Distress tolerance and psychopathological symptoms and disorders: A review of the empirical literature among adults. Psychological Bulletin.
go back to reference Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Payne, T. J., Smith, P. O., McCracken, L. M., McSherry, W. C., & Antony, M. M. (1994). Assessing nicotine dependence: a comparison of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire (FTQ) with the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) in a clinical sample. Addictive Behaviors, 19, 307–317. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(94)90032-9.PubMedCrossRef Payne, T. J., Smith, P. O., McCracken, L. M., McSherry, W. C., & Antony, M. M. (1994). Assessing nicotine dependence: a comparison of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire (FTQ) with the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) in a clinical sample. Addictive Behaviors, 19, 307–317. doi:10.​1016/​0306-4603(94)90032-9.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pomerleau, C. S., Carton, S. M., Lutzke, M. L., Flessland, K. A., & Pomerleau, O. F. (1994). Reliability of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire and the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence. Addictive Behaviors, 19, 33–39. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(94)90049-3.PubMedCrossRef Pomerleau, C. S., Carton, S. M., Lutzke, M. L., Flessland, K. A., & Pomerleau, O. F. (1994). Reliability of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire and the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence. Addictive Behaviors, 19, 33–39. doi:10.​1016/​0306-4603(94)90049-3.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Richards, J. M., Daughters, S. B., Bornovalova, M. A., Brown, R. A., & Lejuez, C. W. (2010). Substance use disorders. In M. Zvolensky, A. Bernstien, & A. Vujanovic (Eds.), Distress tolerance. New York: Guilford. Richards, J. M., Daughters, S. B., Bornovalova, M. A., Brown, R. A., & Lejuez, C. W. (2010). Substance use disorders. In M. Zvolensky, A. Bernstien, & A. Vujanovic (Eds.), Distress tolerance. New York: Guilford.
go back to reference Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., De La Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption: II. Addiction, 88, 791–804. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.PubMedCrossRef Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., De La Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption: II. Addiction, 88, 791–804. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1360-0443.​1993.​tb02093.​x.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
go back to reference Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
go back to reference Watson, D. (2000). Mood and temperament. New York: Guilford. Watson, D. (2000). Mood and temperament. New York: Guilford.
go back to reference Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing Reliability and Stability in Panel Models. In D. R. Heise (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 84–136). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing Reliability and Stability in Panel Models. In D. R. Heise (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 84–136). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
go back to reference Zvolensky, M. J., Bernstein, A., & Vujanovic, A. A. (Eds.). (2010). Distress tolerance. New York: Guilford. Zvolensky, M. J., Bernstein, A., & Vujanovic, A. A. (Eds.). (2010). Distress tolerance. New York: Guilford.
Metagegevens
Titel
Distress Tolerance Scale: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Among Daily Cigarette Smokers
Auteurs
Teresa M. Leyro
Amit Bernstein
Anka A. Vujanovic
Alison C. McLeish
Michael J. Zvolensky
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2011
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-010-9197-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2011

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 1/2011 Naar de uitgave