Top

Gepubliceerd in:

18-04-2018

Dismantling the theory of planned behavior: evaluating the relative effectiveness of attempts to uniquely change attitudes, norms, and perceived behavioral control

Auteurs: Erika A. Montanaro, Trace S. Kershaw, Angela D. Bryan

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Uitgave 6/2018

Abstract

The current study compares the effectiveness of interventions that attempted to uniquely influence hypothesized determinants of behavior in the Theory of Planned Behavior versus some optimal combination of constructs (three constructs vs. four) to increase condom use among intentions and behavior college students. 317 participants (M_age = 19.31; SD_age = 1.31; 53.3% female; 74.1% Caucasian) were randomly assigned to one of seven computer-based interventions. Interventions were designed using the Theory of Planned Behavior as the guiding theoretical framework. 196 (61.8%) completed behavioral follow-up assessments 3-month later. We found that the four construct intervention was marginally better at changing intentions (estimate = − .06, SE = .03, p = .06), but the single construct interventions were more strongly related to risky sexual behavior at follow-up (estimate = .04, SE = .02, p = .05). This study suggests that these constructs may work together synergistically to produce change (ClinicalTrials.gov Number NCT# 02855489).

vorige artikel Targeting and tailoring message-framing: the moderating effect of racial identity on receptivity to colorectal cancer screening among African–Americans

volgende artikel Effects of respiratory and applied muscle tensing interventions on responses to a simulated blood draw among individuals with high needle fear

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Aiken, L. S. (2010). Advancing health behavior theory: The interplay among theories of health behavior, empirical modeling of health behavior, and behavioral interventions. In H. Friedman (Ed.), Oxford handbook of health psychology (pp. 1–39). New York City: Oxford University Press.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRef

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453–474.CrossRef

Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., Fishbein, M., & Muellerleile, P. A. (2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 142–161.CrossRef

American College Health Association (ACHA). (2014). American college health association-national college health assessment II: Undergraduate students reference group data report spring 2014. Hanover, MD: American College Health Association.

Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.CrossRef

Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70, 1–70.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1985). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359–373.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. The American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184.CrossRef

Bauman, L. J., Karasz, A., & Hamilton, A. (2007). Understanding failure of condom use intention among adolescents completing an intensive preventive intervention. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 248–274.CrossRef

Brien, T. M., Thombs, D. L., Mahoney, C. A., & Wallanu, L. (1994). Dimensions of self-efficacy among three distinct groups of condom users. Journal of American College Health, 42, 167–174.CrossRef

Bryan, A. D., Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1996). Increasing condom use: Evaluations of a theory-based intervention to prevent sexually transmitted diseases in young women. Health Psychology, 15, 371–382.CrossRef

Bryan, A., Schmiege, S. J., & Broaddus, M. R. (2007). Mediational analysis in HIV/AIDS research: Estimating multivariate path analytic models in a structural equation modeling framework. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 365–383.CrossRef

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2012). STDs in adolescents and young adults. Retrieved March 23, 2014, from http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats11/adol.htm

Conner, M. (2014). Extending not retiring the theory of planned behaviour: A commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau and Araújo-Soares. Health Psychology Review, 9, 141–145.CrossRef

Conner, M., Rhodes, R. E., Morris, B., McEachan, R., & Lawton, R. (2011). Changing exercise through targeting affective or cognitive attitudes. Psychology and Health, 26(2), 133–149.CrossRef

Desmond, D. P., Maddux, J. F., Johnson, T. H., & Confer, B. A. (1995). Obtaining follow-up interviews for treatment evaluation. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 12, 95–102.CrossRef

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1993). Goal achievement: The role of intentions. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 141–185). London: Wiley.

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.CrossRef

Hagger, M. S., Chan, D. K., Protogerou, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. (2016). Using meta-analytic path analysis to test theoretical predictions in health behavior: An illustration based on meta-analyses of the theory of planned behavior. Preventive Medicine, 89, 154–161.CrossRef

Hagger, M. S., Gucciardi, D. F., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. (2017). On nomological validity and auxiliary assumptions: The importance of simultaneously testing effects in social cognitive theories applied to health behavior and some guidelines. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–14.CrossRef

Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Baeyens, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390–421.CrossRef

Holtforth, M. G., Castonguay, L. G., Borkovec, T. D., & Building, M. (2004). Expanding our strategies to study the process of change. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 396–404.

Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The health belief model: A decade later. Health Education Quarterly, 11, 1–47.CrossRef

Jemmott, J. B., III, Jemmott, L. S., & Fong, G. T. (1998). Abstinence and safer sex HIV risk-reduction interventions for African American adolescents: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 279, 1529–1536.CrossRef

Lo, S. H., Good, A., Sheeran, P., Baio, G., Rainbow, S., Vart, G., et al. (2014). Preformulated implementation intentions to promote colorectal cancer screening: A cluster-randomized trial. Health Psychology, 33, 998–1002.CrossRef

Magnan, R. E., Callahan, T. J., Ladd, B. O., Claus, E. D., Hutchison, K. E., & Bryan, A. D. (2013). Evaluating an integrative theoretical framework for HIV sexual risk among juvenile justice involved adolescents. Journal of AIDS & Clinical Research, 4, 217.CrossRef

McEachan, R. R. C., Conner, M., Taylor, N. J., & Lawton, R. J. (2011). Prospective prediction of health-related behaviours with the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5, 97–144.CrossRef

Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., et al. (2013). The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46, 81–95.CrossRef

Milgram, S. (1964). Group pressure and action against a person. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 137–143.CrossRef

Montanaro, E. A., & Bryan, A. D. (2014). Comparing theory-based condom interventions: Health belief model versus theory of planned behavior. Health Psychology, 33, 1251–1260.CrossRef

Montanaro, E., Fiellin, L. E., Fakhouri, T., Kyriakides, T., & Duncan, L. R. (2015). Using videogame applications to assess gains in substance use knowledge in adolescents: New opportunities for evaluating intervention exposure and content mastery. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17, e245.CrossRef

Noar, S. M., & Zimmerman, R. S. (2005). Health behavior theory and cumulative knowledge regarding health behaviors: Are we moving in the right direction? Health Education Research, 20, 275–290.CrossRef

Peters, E., Klein, W., Kaufman, A., Meilleur, L., & Dixon, A. (2013). More is not always better: Intuitions about effective public policy can lead to unintended consequences. Social Issues and Policy Review, 7, 114–148.CrossRef

Reid, A. E., & Aiken, L. S. (2011). Integration of five health behavior models: Common strengths and unique contributions to understanding condom use. Psychology & Health, 26, 1499–1520.CrossRef

Rivis, A., & Sheeran, P. (2003). Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 22, 218–233.CrossRef

Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.CrossRef

Schmiege, S. J., Broaddus, M. R., Levin, M., & Bryan, A. D. (2009). Randomized trial of group interventions to reduce HIV/STD risk and change theoretical mediators among detained adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 38–50.CrossRef

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Leaning.

Sheeran, P., Klein, W. M., & Rothman, A. J. (2017). Health behavior change: Moving from observation to intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 573–600.CrossRef

Sheeran, P., Maki, A., Montanaro, E., Avishai-Yitshak, A., Bryan, A. D., Klein, W. M. P., et al. (2016). The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 35, 1178–1188.CrossRef

Sherman, D. K., Kinias, Z., Major, B., Kim, H. S., & Prenovost, M. (2007). The group as a resource: Reducing biased attributions for group success and failure via group affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1100–1112.CrossRef

Sniehotta, F. F., Presseau, J., & Araújo-Soares, V. (2014). Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour. Health Psychology Review, 8, 1–7.CrossRef

Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective in examining psychological process than mediational analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851.CrossRef

Stangor, C., Sechrist, G. B., & Jost, J. T. (2001). Changing racial beliefs by providing consensus information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 486–496.CrossRef

Trafimow, D., & Finlay, K. A. (1996). The importance of subjective norms for a minority of people: Between subjects and within-subjects analyses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 820–828.CrossRef

Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2008). Mechanisms of implementation intention effects: The role of goal intentions, self-efficacy, and accessibility of plan components. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 373–395.CrossRef

Williams, G. C., Freedman, Z. R., & Deci, E. L. (1998). Supporting autonomy to motivate patients with diabetes for glucose control. Diabetes Care, 21, 1644–1651.CrossRef

Titel: Dismantling the theory of planned behavior: evaluating the relative effectiveness of attempts to uniquely change attitudes, norms, and perceived behavioral control
Auteurs: Erika A. Montanaro
Trace S. Kershaw
Angela D. Bryan
Publicatiedatum: 18-04-2018
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Uitgave 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-018-9923-x

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2018

Relationships between dispositional mindfulness, health behaviors, and hemoglobin A1c among adults with type 2 diabetes

Parents have both implicit and explicit biases against children with obesity

Recovery from stress: an experimental examination of focused attention meditation in novices

Past, present or future? Word tense and affect in autobiographical narratives of women with HIV in relation to health indicators

Targeting and tailoring message-framing: the moderating effect of racial identity on receptivity to colorectal cancer screening among African–Americans

Independent and relative effects of stress, depressive symptoms, and affect on college students’ daily health behaviors