Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Some prior studies have found that, for boys, earlier puberty is linked to higher crime and delinquency, while other studies have found that earlier puberty is associated with greater social competence and beneficial psychosocial development. The current study suggests that these seemingly contradictory results actually represent two divergent pathways by which earlier pubertal timing can affect adjustment. Which pathway boys take is highly dependent on psychosocial context. Using a sample of 310 African American boys and their primary caregivers tracked across three waves of data collection from ages 10.55–18.84 from the Family and Community Health Study (FACHS), the current study utilizes Latent Moderated Structural Equation Modeling (LMS) to analyze effects of interactions between pubertal timing and social contextual factors on criminal behavior and social competence. Results suggest that criminogenic effects of early puberty are contingent on deviant peer group, poor school experience, harsh parenting, and neighborhood disorganization, whereas the association between earlier puberty and social competence is attenuated by harsh parenting. Results suggest that modeling both positive and negative development outcomes together may give a clearer picture of the developmental consequences of pubertal timing for boys. In addition, this study shows the importance of social context in shaping the meaning and consequences of biological variables like pubertal timing.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Becker, B. E., & Luthar, S. S. (2007). Peer-perceived admiration and social preference: contextual correlates of positive peer regard among suburban and urban adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(1), 117–144. CrossRef
Blyth, D. A. (1981). The effects of physical development on self-image and satisfaction with body-image for early adolescent males. Research in Community & Mental Health, 2, 43–73.
Bolger, K. E., & Patterson, C. J. (2001). Developmental pathwyas from child maltreatment to peer rejection. Child Development, 72, 549–568. CrossRef
Brody, G. H., Kogan, K. M., Chen, Y. F., & Murry, V. M. (2008). Long-term effects of the Strong African American Families program on youths’ conduct problems. Journal of Adoelscent Health, 43, 474–481. CrossRef
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 230–259). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Carlo, G., Crockett, L. J., Wolff, J. M., & Beal, S. J. (2012). The Role of Emotional Reactivity, Self-regulation, and Puberty in Adolescents’ Prosocial Behaviors. Social Development, 21(4), 667–685. CrossRef
Chen, X., Li, D., Li, Z., Li, B., & Liu, M. (2000). Sociable and prosocial dimensions of social competence in Chinese children: common and unique contributions to social, academic, and psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 36(3), 302–314. CrossRef
Choukas-Bradley, S., Giletta, M., Neblett, E. W., & Prinstein, M. J. (2015). Ethnic differences in associations among populairty, likeability, and trajectories of adoelscents’ alcohol use and frequency. Child Development, 86(2), 519–535. CrossRef
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 102–105. CrossRef
Clausen, J. A. (1975). The social meaning of differential physical and sexual maturation. In S. E. Dragastin & G. H. Elder, Jr. (Eds), Adolescence in the life cycle: psychological change and social context (pp. 25–47). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Conger, R., & Elder, G. H. (1994). Families in troubled times: adapting to change in rural America. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Crosswhite, J. M., & Kerpleman, J. L. (2009). Coercion theory, self-control, and social information processing: understanding potential mediators for how parents influence deviant behaviors. Deviant Behavior, 30, 611–646. CrossRef
Dimler, L. M., & Natsuaki, M. N. (2015). The effects of pubertal timing on externalizing behaviors in adolescence and early adulthood: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Adolescence, 45, 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.07.021. CrossRefPubMed
Ellis, B. J., Figueredo, A. J., Brumbach, B. H., & Schlomer, G. L. (2009). Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk: the impact of harsh versus unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies. Human Nature, 20(2), 204–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-009-9063-7. CrossRefPubMed
Ellis, B. J., Shirtcliff, E. A., Boyce, W. T., Deardorff, J., & Essex, M. J. (2011). Quality of early family relationships and the timing and tempo of puberty: effects depend on biological sensitivity to context. Development and Psychopathology, 23(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000660. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Felson, R. B., & Haynie, D. L. (2002). Pubertal development, social factors, and delinquency among adolescent boys. Criminology, 40(4), 967–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00979.x. CrossRef
Galambos, N. L., & Tilton-Waver, L. C. (2000). Adoelscents’ psychosocial maturity, problem behavior, and subjective age: in search of the adultoid. Applied Developmental Sceince, 4(4), 178–192. CrossRef
Ge, X. J., Brody, G. H., Conger, R. D., Simons, R. L., & Murry, V. M. (2002). Contextual amplification of pubertal transition effects on deviant peer affiliation and externalizing behavior among African American children. Developmental Psychology, 38(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-16184.108.40.206. CrossRefPubMed
Ge, X. J., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. (2001). Pubertal transition, stressful life events, and the emergence of gender differences in adolescent depressive symptoms. Developmental Psychology, 37(3), 404–417. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-16220.127.116.114. CrossRefPubMed
Ge, X. J., & Natsuaki, M. N. (2009). In search of explanations for early pubertal timing effects on developmental psychopathology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(6), 327–331. CrossRef
Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In J. Brooks-Gunn & A. C. Petersen (Eds), Girls at puberty. Boston, MA: Springer.
Huddleston, J., & Ge, X. J. (2003). Boys at puberty: psychosocial implications. In C. Hayward (Ed.), Gender differences at puberty (pp. 113–134). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Ireland, T. O., Smith, C. A., & Thornberry, T. P. (2002). Developmental issues in the impact of child maltreatment on later delinquency and drug use. Criminology, 40, 359–399. CrossRef
Klopack, E. T., Simons, R. L., & Simons, L. G. (2018). Puberty and girls’ delinquency: a test of competing models explaining the relationship between pubertal development and delinquent behavior. Justice Quarterly, Advance online publication, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1472291.
Kweon, H. S., Yun, I., Park, J., & Kim, S. G. (2017). Pubertal development, social factors, and delinquent involvement among South Korean male adolescents. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 51, 1–13. CrossRef
Martin, K. A. (1996). Puberty, sexuality, and the self: boys and girls at adolescence. New York, NY: Routledge.
Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674. CrossRefPubMed
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user's guide. 7th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Najaka, S. S., Gottfredson, D. C., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). A meta-analytic inquiry into the relationship between selected risk factors and problem behavior. Prevention Science, 2(4), 257–271. CrossRef
Najman, J. M., Hayatbakhsh, M. R., McGee, T. R., Bor, W., O'Callaghan, M. J., & Williams, G. M. (2009). The impact of puberty on aggression/delinquency: adolescence to young adulthood. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 42(3), 369–386. CrossRef
Obeidallah, D. A., Brennan, R. T., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Earls, F. (2004). Links between pubertal timing and neighborhood contexts: implications for girls’ violent behavior. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43(12), 1460–1468. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000142667.52062.le. CrossRefPubMed
Obeidallah, D. A., Brennan, R. T., Brooks-Gunn, J., Kindlon, D., & Earls, F. (2000). Socioeconomic status, race, and girls’ pubertal maturation: results from the project on human development in Chicago neighborhoods. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10(4), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1207/sjra1004_04. CrossRef
Payne, A. A. (2009). Girls, boys, and schools: gender differences in the relationships between school-related factors and student deviance. Criminology, 47(4), 1167–1200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00172.x. CrossRef
Rios, V. (2011). Punished: policing the lives of black and latino boys. New York, NY: New York University Press.
Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5328.918. CrossRefPubMed
Sampson, R. J., & Wilson, W. J. (1995). Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In J. Hagan & R. D. Peterson (Eds), Crime and Inequality (pp. 36–54). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Sampson, R. J. (2006). Collective efficacy theory: Lessons learned and directions for future inquiry. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 149–167). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Schwartz, D., & Gorman, A. (2011). The high price of high status: popularity as a mechanism of risk. In A. N. Cilessen, D. Schwartz & L. Myeux (Eds.), Popularity in the Peer System (pp. 245–270). NY: Guilford Press.
Shaffer, D., Schwab-Stone, M., Fisher, P. W., Cohen, P., Placentini, J., Davies, M., & Regier, D. (1993). The diagnostic interview schedule for children-revised version (DISC-R): I. Preparation, field testing, interrater reliability, and acceptability. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 32(3), 643–650. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199305000-00023. CrossRef
Simons, L. G., Sutton, T. E., Simons, R. L., Gibbons, F. X., & Murry, V. M. (2016). Mechanisms that link parenting practices to adolescents’ risky sexual behavior: a test of six competing theories. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0409-7. CrossRefPubMed
Simons, R. L., Simons, L. G., Chen, Y.-F., Brody, G. H., & Lin, K.-H. (2007). Identifying the psychological factors that mediate the association between parenting practices and delinquency. Criminology, 45(3), 481–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00086.x. CrossRef
Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: the social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Disentangling the Effects of Boys’ Pubertal Timing: The Importance of Social Context
Eric T. Klopack
Tara E. Sutton
Ronald L. Simons
Leslie Gordon Simons
- Springer US
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
A Multidisciplinary Research Publication
Print ISSN: 0047-2891
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6601