Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Introduction Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses can be used to explore translation, cultural, gender or other differences in the performance of quality of life (QoL) instruments. These analyses are commonly performed using “baseline” or pretreatment data. We previously reported DIF analyses to examine the pattern of item responses for translations of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 QoL instrument, using only data collected prior to cancer treatment. We now compare the consistency of these results with similar analyses of on-treatment and off-treatment assessments and explore whether item relationships differ from those at baseline.
Methods Logistic regression DIF analyses were used to examine the translation of each item in each multi-item scale at the three time points, after controlling for the overall scale score and other covariates. The consistency of results at the three time points was explored.
Results For most EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales, the DIF results were very consistent across the three time points. Results for the Nausea and Vomiting scale varied the most across assessments.
Discussion The results indicated that DIF analyses were stable across each time point and that the same DIF effects were usually found regardless of the treatment status of the respondent.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Groenvold, M., & Petersen, M. A. (2005). The role and use of differential item functioning (DIF) analysis of quality of life data from clinical trials. In P. Fayers & R. Hays (Eds.), Assessing quality of life in clinical trials (pp. 195–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scott, N. W., Fayers, P. M., Aaronson, N. K., Bottomley, A., de Graeff, A., Groenvold, M., et al. (2007). The use of differential item functioning analyses to identify cultural differences in responses to the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research, 16, 115–129. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-9120-1. PubMedCrossRef
Scott, NW., Fayers, PM., Aaronson, NK., Bottomley, A., de Graeff A., Groenvold, M., Gundy, C., Koller, M., Petersen, MA., & Sprangers, MAG. (2009). A simulation study provided sample size guidance for differential item functioning (DIF) studies using short scales. J Clin Epidemiol 62, 288–295. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.003. PubMedCrossRef
Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2007). Quality of life. The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
- Differential item functioning (DIF) in the EORTC QLQ-C30: a comparison of baseline, on-treatment and off-treatment data
Neil W. Scott
Peter M. Fayers
Neil K. Aaronson
Alexander de Graeff
Morten A. Petersen
Mirjam A. G. Sprangers
The EORTC Quality of Life Group and the Quality of Life Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis Group
- Springer Netherlands