Skip to main content

Mijn bibliotheek

Shop

Nieuws
Boeken
Tijdschriften
E-learning
Web-tv
Video
Audio

Tips voor Mijn BSL

UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 12/2021

09-06-2021 | Review

Diabetic foot disease: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures

Auteurs: Alberto J. Pérez-Panero, María Ruiz-Muñoz, Raúl Fernández-Torres, Cynthia Formosa, Alfred Gatt, Manuel Gónzalez-Sánchez

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 12/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

Diabetic foot disease is one of the most serious and expensive complications of diabetes. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) analyse patients’ perception of their disability, functionality and health. The goal of this work was to conduct a systematic review regarding the specific PROMs related to the evaluation of diabetic foot disease and to extract and analyse the values of their measurement properties.

Methods

Electronic databases included were PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PEDro, Cochrane, SciELO and EMBASE. The search terms used were foot, diabet*, diabetic foot, questionnaire, patient-reported outcome, self-care, valid*, reliabil*. Studies whose did not satisfy the Critical Appraisals Skills Programme (CASP) Diagnostic Study Checklist were excluded. The measurement properties extracted were: Internal Consistency, Test–retest, Inter-rater and Intra-rater, Standard Error of Measurement, Minimum Detectable Measurement Difference, Content Validity, Construct Validity, Criterion Validity and Responsiveness.

Results

The PROMs selected for this review were 12 questionnaires. The Diabetic foot self-care questionnaire (DFSQ-UMA) and the Questionnaire for Diabetes Related Foot Disease (Q-DFD) were the PROMs that showed the highest number of completed measurement properties.

Conclusion

According to the results, it is relevant to create specific questionnaires for the evaluation of diabetic foot disease. It seems appropriate to use both DFSQ-UMA and Q-DFD when assessing patients with diabetic foot disease.
vorige artikel Health-related quality of life outcome measures for children surviving critical care: a scoping review
volgende artikel Effects of school-based mindfulness intervention on health-related quality of life: moderating effect of gender, grade, and independent practice in cluster randomized controlled trial
Literatuur
1.
Singh, R., Kishore, L., & Kaur, N. (2014). Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: Current perspective and future directions. Pharmacological Research. 80, 21–35. PubMed
2.
3.
Salvo, P., Calisi, N., Melai, B., Dini, V., Paoletti, C., Lomonaco, T., Pucci, A., Di Francesco, F., Piaggesi, A., & Romanelli, M. (2017). Temperature-and pH-sensitive wearable materials for monitoring foot ulcers. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 12, 949. PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Shaw, J. E., Sicree, R. A., & Zimmet, P. Z. (2010). Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 87(1), 4–14. PubMed
5.
Pérez-Panero, A. J., Ruiz-Muñoz, M., Cuesta-Vargas, A. I., & Gónzalez-Sánchez, M. (2019). Prevention, assessment, diagnosis and management of diabetic foot based on clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore), 98(35), e16877.
6.
Melmed, S., Polonsky, K. S., Larsen, P. R., & Kronenberg, H. M. (2015). Williams textbook of endocrinology (13th ed.). . Elsevier.
7.
Lepäntalo, M., Apelqvist, J., Setacci, C., Ricco, J. B., De Donato, G., Becker, F., Robert-Ebadi, H., Cao, P., Eckstein, H. H., De Rango, P., & Diehm, N. (2011). Chapter V: diabetic foot. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery., 42, S60-74. PubMed
8.
Driver, V. R., Fabbi, M., Lavery, L. A., & Gibbons, G. (2010). The costs of diabetic foot: the economic case for the limb salvage team. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 52(3 Suppl), 17S-22S. PubMed
9.
International Diabetes Federation. Clinical Practice Recommendation on the Diabetic Foot: A guide for health care professionals. International Diabetes Federation, 2017
10.
Cuesta-Vargas, A. I., & González-Sánchez, M. (2014). Ability to discriminate between healthy and low back pain sufferers using ultrasound during maximum lumbar extension. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95(6), 1093–1099. PubMed
11.
González-Sánchez, M., Velasco-Ramos, E., Muñoz, M. R., & Cuesta-Vargas, A. I. (2016). Relationship between patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and three measures of foot-ankle alignment in patients with metatarsal head pain: a cross-sectional study. J Foot Ankle Res., 9, 49. PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology., 62(10), e1-34. PubMed
13.
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549. PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745. PubMed
15.
Chin, Y.-F., & Huang, T.-T. (2013). Development and validation of a diabetes foot self-care behavior scale. Journal of Nursing Research., 21(1), 19–25.
16.
Bann, C. M., Fehnel, S. E., & Gagnon, D. D. (2003). Development and validation of the diabetic foot ulcer scale???Short form (DFS-SF). PharmacoEconomics, 21(17), 1277–1290. PubMed
17.
Kontodimopoulos, N., Veniou, A., Tentolouris, N., & Niakas, D. (2016). Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the diabetic foot ulcer scale—short form (DFS-SF). Hormones (Athens, Greece), 15(3), 394–403.
18.
Macioch, T., Sobol, E., Krakowiecki, A., Mrozikiewicz-Rakowska, B., Kasprowicz, M., & Hermanowski, T. (2017). Health related quality of life in patients with diabetic foot ulceration—translation and Polish adaptation of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale short form. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 15. PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Hui, L. F., Yee-Tak Fong, D., Yam, M., & Yuk, I. W. (2008). Translation and validation of the Chinese diabetic foot ulcer scale—short form. Patient., 1(2), 137–145. PubMed
20.
Lee, Y.-N. (2019). Translation and validation of the Korean version of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form. International Wound Journal, 16(Suppl 1), 3–12. PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Abetz, L., Sutton, M., Brady, L., McNulty, P., & Gagnon, D. D. (2002). The Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale (DFS): A quality of life instrument for use in clinical trials. Practical Diabetes International., 19(6), 167–175.
22.
Martin, R. L., Hutt, D. M., & Wukich, D. K. (2009). Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) in Diabetes Mellitus. Foot & Ankle International., 30(4), 297–302.
23.
Cervera-Garvi, P., Ortega-Avila, A. B., Morales-Asencio, J. M., Cervera-Marin, J. A., Martin, R. R., & Gijon-Nogueron, G. (2017). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Spanish version of The Foot and Ankle Ability Measures (FAAM-Sp). J Foot Ankle Res., 10, 39. PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Çelik, D., Malkoç, M., & Martin, R. (2016). Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Rheumatology International, 36(10), 1469–1476. PubMed
25.
Borloz, S., Crevoisier, X., Deriaz, O., Ballabeni, P., Martin, R. L., & Luthi, F. (2011). Evidence for validity and reliability of a French version of the FAAM. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders., 12(1), 40. PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Uematsu, D., Suzuki, H., Sasaki, S., Nagano, Y., Shinozuka, N., Sunagawa, N., & Fukubayashi, T. (2015). Evidence of validity for the Japanese version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure. Journal of Athletic Training, 50(1), 65–70. PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
González-Sánchez, M., Li, G. Z., Ruiz Muñoz, M., & Cuesta-Vargas, A. I. (2017). Foot and ankle ability measure to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders: a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(21), 2182–2189. PubMed
28.
Mazaheri, M., Salavati, M., Negahban, H., Sohani, S. M., Taghizadeh, F., Feizi, A., et al. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Persian version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage., 18(6), 755–759. PubMed
29.
Sartorio, F., Vercelli, S., Bravini, E., Bargeri, S., Moroso, M., Plebani, G., & Ferriero, G. (2014). Foot and ankle ability measure: Cross-cultural translation and validation of the Italian version of the ADL module (FAAM-I/ADL). Medicina del Lavoro, 105, 357–365. PubMed
30.
Moreira, T. S., de Magalhães, L. C., Silva, R. D., Martin, R. L., & de Resende, M. A. (2016). Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Brazilian version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure questionnaire. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38(25), 2479–2490. PubMed
31.
Weel, H., Zwiers, R., Azim, D., Sierevelt, I. N., Haverkamp, D., van Dijk, C. N., et al. (2016). Validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle ability measure. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 24(4), 1348–1354. PubMed
32.
Arunakul, M., Arunakul, P., Suesiritumrong, C., Angthong, C., & Chernchujit, B. (2015). Validity and reliability of Thai version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) subjective form. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 98(6), 561–567. PubMed
33.
Nauck, T., & Lohrer, H. (2011). Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation of the German version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for patients with chronic ankle instability. British Journal of Sports Medicine., 45(10), 785–790. PubMed
34.
Navarro-Flores, E., Morales-Asencio, J. M., Cervera-Marín, J. A., Labajos-Manzanares, M. T., & Gijon-Nogueron, G. (2015). Development, validation and psychometric analysis of the diabetic foot self-care questionnaire of the University of Malaga, Spain (DFSQ-UMA). Journal of Tissue Viability., 24(1), 24–34. PubMed
35.
Garcia-Paya, I., Lescure, Y., Delacroix, S., & Gijon-Nogueron, G. (2019). Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the French Version of the Diabetic Foot Self-care Questionnaire of the University of Malaga. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 109(5), 357–366. PubMed
36.
Kateel, R., Augustine, A. J., Ullal, S., Prabhu, S., Bhat, R., & Adhikari, P. (2017). Development and validation of health related quality of life questionnaire (Indian scenario) in diabetic foot ulcer patients. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 11, S651–S653.
37.
Vileikyte, L., Gonzalez, J. S., Leventhal, H., Peyrot, M. F., Rubin, R. R., Garrow, A., Ulbrecht, J. S., Cavanagh, P. R., & Boulton, A. J. (2006). Patient Interpretation of Neuropathy (PIN) Questionnaire: An instrument for assessment of cognitive and emotional factors associated with foot self-care. Diabetes Care, 29(12), 2617–2624. PubMed
38.
Dhawan, V., Spratt, K. F., Pinzur, M. S., Baumhauer, J., Rudicel, S., & Saltzman, C. L. (2005). Reliability of AOFAS Diabetic Foot Questionnaire in Charcot Arthropathy: Stability, Internal Consistency, and Measurable Difference. Foot & Ankle International., 26(9), 717–731.
39.
Kostuj, T., Krummenauer, F., Schaper, K., Stief, F., Zettersten, K., Baums, M. H., Meurer, A., & Lieske, S. (2014). Analysis of agreement between the German translation of the American Foot and Ankle Society’s Ankle and Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS-AHS) and the Foot Function Index in its validated German translation by Naal et al. (FFI-D). Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery., 134(9), 1205–1210. PubMed
40.
Van Lieshout, E. M., De Boer, A. S., Meuffels, D. E., Den Hoed, P. T., Van der Vlies, C. H., Tuinebreijer, W. E., & Verhofstad, M. H. (2017). American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score: A study protocol for the translation and validation of the Dutch language version. British Medical Journal Open, 7(2), e012884.
41.
Sayyed-Hosseinian, S. H., Hassankhani, G. G., Bagheri, F., Alavi, N., Shojaie, B., & Mousavian, A. (2018). Validation of the Persian version of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS) Questionnaire. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery, 233, 233–239.
42.
Analay Akbaba, Y., Celik, D., & Ogut, R. T. (2016). Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of Turkish version of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 55(6), 1139–1142.
43.
Rodrigues, R. C., Masiero, D., Mizusaki, J. M., Imoto, A. M., Peccin, M. S., Cohen, M., & Alloza, J. F. M. (2008). Tradução, adaptação cultural e validação do" American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale". Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, 16(2), 107–111.
44.
Ahn, J., Del Core, M. A., Wukich, D. K., Liu, G. T., Lalli, T., VanPelt, M. D., & Raspovic, K. M. (2018). Scoring Mental Health Quality of Life with the SF-36 in patients with and without Diabetes Foot complications. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, 17(1), 30–35. PubMed
45.
Bagheri, Z., Jafari, P., Mahmoodi, M., & Dabbaghmanesh, M. H. (2017). Testing whether patients with diabetes and healthy people perceive the meaning of the items in the Persian version of the SF-36 questionnaire similarly: a differential item functioning analysis. Quality of Life Research, 26(4), 835–845. PubMed
46.
Palomo-López, P., Losa-Iglesias, M. E., Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo, R., López-López, D., Rodríguez-Sanz, D., Romero-Morales, C., & Calvo-Lobo, C. (2019). Specific foot health-related quality-of-life impairment in patients with type II versus type I diabetes. International Wound Journal, 16(1), 47–51. PubMed
47.
Ferreira, A. F. B., Laurindo, I. M. M., Rodrigues, P. T., Ferraz, M. B., Kowalski, S. C., & Tanaka, C. (2008). Brazilian version of the foot health status questionnaire (FHSQ-BR): cross-cultural adaptation and evaluation of measurement properties. Clinics (São Paulo, Brazil), 63(5), 595–600.
48.
Cuesta-Vargas, A., Bennett, P., Jimenez-Cebrian, A. M., & Labajos-Manzanares, M. T. (2013). The psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 22(7), 1739–1743. PubMed
49.
50.
51.
52.
Xavier, A. T., Foss, M. C., Marques Junior, W., dos Santos, C. B., Onofre, P. T. B. N., Pace, A. E. Cultural adaptation and validation of the Neuropathy- and Foot Ulcer—Specific Quality of Life instrument (NeuroQol) for Brazilian Portuguese—Phase 1.  Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. 2011;19:1352–1361. doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1590/​S0104-1169201100060001​1.
53.
Bergin, S. M., Brand, C. A., Colman, P. G., & Campbell, D. A. (2009). A questionnaire for determining prevalence of diabetes related foot disease (Q-DFD): Construction and validation. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 2, 1–10.
54.
Castillo-Tandazo, W., Flores-Fortty, A., Feraud, L., & Tettamanti, D. (2013). Spanish translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Questionnaire for Diabetes-Related Foot Disease (Q-DFD). Vascular Health and Risk Management, 9, 501. PubMedPubMedCentral
55.
56.
57.
Anguita, J. C., Labrador, J. R., Campos, J. D., Casas Anguita, J., Repullo Labrador, J., & Donado Campos, J. (2003). La encuesta como técnica de investigación. Elaboración de cuestionarios y tratamiento estadístico de los datos (I).  Atención primaria,  31(8), 527-538
58.
Stetson, B., Schlundt, D., Rothschild, C., Floyd, J. E., Rogers, W., & Mokshagundam, S. P. (2011). Development and validation of the personal diabetes questionnaire (PDQ): A measure of diabetes self-care behaviors, perceptions and barriers. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 91(3), 321–332. PubMed
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
Metagegevens
Titel
Diabetic foot disease: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures
Auteurs
Alberto J. Pérez-Panero
María Ruiz-Muñoz
Raúl Fernández-Torres
Cynthia Formosa
Alfred Gatt
Manuel Gónzalez-Sánchez
Publicatiedatum
09-06-2021
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 12/2021
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02892-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 12/2021

Quality of Life Research 12/2021 Naar de uitgave

Review

Health-related quality of life issues, including symptoms, in patients with active COVID-19 or post COVID-19; a systematic literature review

OriginalPaper

An investigation of the effect of smartphone-based pain management application on pain intensity and the quality-of-life dimensions in adolescents with chronic pain: a cluster randomized parallel-controlled trial

Correction

Correction to: Health‑related quality of life of a conflict‑affected population in Colombia

OriginalPaper

Response shift in patient-reported outcomes: definition, theory, and a revised model

Letter to the Editor

Progress in response-shift research needs diverse approaches

Commentary

Response shift in results of patient-reported outcome measures: a commentary to The Response Shift—in Sync Working Group initiative