Top

Gepubliceerd in:

23-01-2022

Diabetes support from romantic partners during early emerging adulthood

Auteurs: Robert G. Kent de Grey, Cynthia A. Berg, MaryJane S. Campbell, A. K. Munion, Koen Luyckx, Koen Raymaekers, Michelle L. Litchman, Deborah J. Wiebe

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Uitgave 4/2022

Abstract

We examined support for type 1 diabetes in casual versus committed romantic relationships and links to blood glucose, self-care, and affect in 101 young adults (M_age 18.8). Individuals provided survey and daily measures of support and blood glucose and affect during a 14-day diary period. Survey data indicated individuals viewed partners as helpful, with partners in committed relationships rated more helpful than those in casual relationships. Daily assessments indicated partners were seen as only moderately helpful. Individuals in committed relationships discussed diabetes with partners on more diary days than those in casual relationships. When individuals in any relationship type experienced more helpful partner support than their average, they reported higher positive and lower negative affect. However, those in casual relationships also experienced more negative affect and higher mean blood glucose the next day. Results suggest tradeoffs between immediate benefits and subsequent costs of partner support to adults in casual relationships.

vorige artikel Beliefs about marijuana use during pregnancy and breastfeeding held by residents of a Latino-majority, rural region of California

volgende artikel Sexual minorities are at elevated risk of cardiovascular disease from a younger age than heterosexuals

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

All analyses in the present study were repeated while omitting PWD who lived with their partners (Aim 1 analyses) or controlling for cohabitation (Aim 2 & 3 multilevel models). Results remained unchanged, suggesting the observed effects were not due to cohabitation; see Roberson et al. (2017). Similarly, all multilevel models were repeated including gender as a potential moderator; gender was not found to moderate any effects. Finally, due to the possibility that PWD who indicated they were “dating but not in a committed relationship” may be dating multiple persons simultaneously or have only one partner but no formally-defined relationship, additional analyses were performed on the advice of an anonymous reviewer. In these models, which retained only PWD who indicated having a specific romantic partner (n = 78), the pattern of results remained intact.

American Diabetes Association. (2019). 5. Lifestyle management: standards of medical care in diabetes—2019. Diabetes Care, 42(Suppl 1), S46-s60. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-S005CrossRef

Berg, C. A., Helgeson, V. S., Tracy, E. L., Butner, J. E., Kelly, C. S., Van Vleet, M., & Litchman, M. L. (2020). Daily illness appraisal and collaboration in couples with type 1 diabetes. Health Psychology, 39(8), 689–699. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000871CrossRefPubMed

Berg, C. A., Queen, T., Butner, J. E., Turner, S. L., Hughes Lansing, A., Main, A., Anderson, J. H., Thoma, B. C., Winnick, J. B., & Wiebe, D. J. (2017). Adolescent disclosure to parents and daily management of type 1 diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 42(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsw056CrossRefPubMed

Berg, C. A., Wiebe, D. J., Lee Tracy, E., Kelly, C. S., Mello, D., Turner, S. L., Butner, J. E., Munion, A. K., Mansfield, J. H., White, P. C., Murray, M., & Suchy, Y. (2019). Parental involvement and executive function in emerging adults with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 44(8), 970–979. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsz025CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Beveridge, R. M., Berg, C. A., Wiebe, D. J., & Palmer, D. L. (2006). Mother and adolescent representations of illness ownership and stressful events surrounding diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31(8), 818–827. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsj094CrossRefPubMed

Biehle, S. N., & Mickelson, K. D. (2012). Provision and receipt of emotional spousal support: the impact of visibility on well-being. Couple Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 1(3), 244–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028480CrossRef

Birmingham, W. C., Uchino, B. N., Smith, T. W., Light, K. C., & Butner, J. (2015). It’s complicated: Marital ambivalence on ambulatory blood pressure and daily interpersonal functioning. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49(5), 743–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-015-9709-0CrossRefPubMed

Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A., & Kessler, R. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 953–961. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.953CrossRefPubMed

Bryden, K. S., Peveler, R. C., Stein, A., Neil, A., Mayou, R. A., & Dunger, D. B. (2001). Clinical and psychological course of diabetes from adolescence to young adulthood: A longitudinal cohort study. Diabetes Care, 24(9), 1536–1540. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.9.1536CrossRefPubMed

Campbell, M. S., Gray, A., Wiebe, D. J., & Berg, C. A. (2021). Understanding the role of romantic partner and parental involvement in emerging adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Spectrum. https://doi.org/10.2337/ds21-0011

Cranford, J. A., Shrout, P. E., Iida, M., Rafaeli, E., Yip, T., & Bolger, N. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 917–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206287721CrossRefPubMed

Crockett, E. E., & Neff, L. A. (2013). When receiving help hurts: Gender differences in diurnal cortisol responses to spousal support. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(2), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612451621CrossRef

Enders, C. K., Keller, B. T., & Levy, R. (2018). A chained equations imputation approach for multilevel data with categorical and continuous variables. Psychologial Methods, 23, 298–317.CrossRef

Exton, J. H. (1979). Regulation of gluconeogenesis by glucocorticoids. Monographs on Endocrinology, 12, 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_28CrossRefPubMed

Girme, Y. U., Overall, N. C., & Simpson, J. A. (2013). When visibility matters: Short-term versus long-term costs and benefits of visible and invisible support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(11), 1441–1454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213497802CrossRefPubMed

La Greca, A. M., Swales, T., Klemp, S., & Madigan, S. (1988). Self care behaviors among adolescents with diabetes. Ninth Annual Sessions of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, A42.

Hanna, K. M., Weaver, M. T., Stump, T. E., DiMeglio, L. A., Miller, A. R., Crowder, S., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2013). Initial findings: primary diabetes care responsibility among emerging adults with type 1 diabetes post high school and move out of parental home. Child Care, Health and Development, 39(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01320.xCrossRefPubMed

Helgeson, V. S. (2017). Young adults with type 1 diabetes: Romantic relationships and implications for well-being. Diabetes Spectrum, 30(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.2337/ds16-0020CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352CrossRefPubMed

Holt-Lunstad, J., & Uchino, B. N. (2019). Social ambivalence and disease (SAD): A theoretical model aimed at understanding of the health implications of ambivalent social relationships. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(6), 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619861392CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hooker, E. D., Campos, B., Hoffman, L., Zoccola, P., & Dickerson, S. S. (2020). Is receiving social support costly for those higher in subjective socioeconomic status? International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 27(3), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-019-09836-wCrossRefPubMed

Insabella, G., Grey, M., Knafl, G., & Tamborlane, W. (2007). The transition to young adulthood in youth with type 1 diabetes on intensive treatment. Pediatric Diabetes, 8(4), 228–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5448.2007.00266.xCrossRefPubMed

Kaufman, F. R. (Ed.). (2012). Medical management of type 1 diabetes (F. R. Kaufman, Ed. 6 ed.). American Diabetes Association

Keller, B. T., & Enders, C. K. (2018). Blimp User’s Manual (Version 2.0). Los Angeles, CA.

Kent de Grey, R. G., Berg, C. A., Tracy, E. L., Kelly, C. S., Lee, J., Lichtman, M. L., Butner, J., Munion, A. K., & Helgeson, V. S. (2021). Can’t you see I’m trying to help? Relationship satisfaction and the visibility and benefit of social support in type 1 diabetes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(3), 805–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520973762CrossRef

Khan, C. M., Stephens, M. A. P., Franks, M. M., Rook, K. S., & Salem, J. K. (2013). Influences of spousal support and control on diabetes management through physical activity. Health Psychology, 32(7), 739–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028609CrossRefPubMed

Kumari, M., Shipley, M., Stafford, M., & Kivimaki, M. (2011). Association of diurnal patterns in salivary cortisol with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: Findings from the Whitehall II study. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 96(5), 1478–1485. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-2137CrossRef

Kuo, T., McQueen, A., Chen, T.-C., & Wang, J.-C. (2015). Regulation of glucose homeostasis by glucocorticoids. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 872, 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2895-8_5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lantagne, A., & Furman, W. (2017). Romantic relationship development: The interplay between age and relationship length. Developmental Psychology, 53(9), 1738–1749. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000363CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lewin, A. B., LaGreca, A. M., Geffken, G. R., Williams, L. B., Duke, D. C., Storch, E. A., & Silverstein, J. H. (2009). Validity and reliability of an adolescent and parent rating scale of type 1 diabetes adherence behaviors: The self-care inventory (SCI). Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34(9), 999–1007. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsp032CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lüscher, J., Stadler, G., Ochsner, S., Rackow, P., Knoll, N., Hornung, R., & Scholz, U. (2015). Daily negative affect and smoking after a self-set quit attempt: The role of dyadic invisible social support in a daily diary study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 20(4), 708–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12135CrossRefPubMed

Maisel, N. C., & Gable, S. L. (2009). The paradox of received social support: The importance of responsiveness. Psychological Science, 20(8), 928–932. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02388.xCrossRefPubMed

Morelli, S. A., Lee, I. A., Arnn, M. E., & Zaki, J. (2015). Emotional and instrumental support provision interact to predict well-being. Emotion, 15(4), 484–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000084CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Nathan, D. M., Genuth, S., Lachin, J., Cleary, P., Crofford, O., Davis, M., Rand, L., & Siebert, C. (1993). The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. New England Journal of Medicine, 329(14), 977–986. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199309303291401CrossRefPubMed

Nordfeldt, S., & Jonsson, D. (2001). Short-term effects of severe hypoglycaemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A cost-of-illness study. Acta Paediatrica, 90(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2001.tb00274.xCrossRefPubMed

Roberson, P. N. E., Norona, J. C., Fish, J. N., Olmstead, S. B., & Fincham, F. (2017). Do differences matter? A typology of emerging adult romantic relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(3), 334–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516661589CrossRef

Shrout, P. E., Herman, C. M., & Bolger, N. (2006). The costs and benefits of practical and emotional support on adjustment: A daily diary study of couples experiencing acute stress. Personal Relationships, 13(1), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00108.xCrossRef

Song, Y., Nam, S., Park, S., Shin, I.-S., & Ku, B. J. (2017). The impact of social support on self-care of patients with diabetes: What is the effect of diabetes type? Systematic review and meta-analysis. The Diabetes Educator, 43(4), 396–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721717712457CrossRefPubMed

Sparud-Lundin, C., Öhrn, I., Danielson, E., & Forsander, G. (2008). Glycaemic control and diabetes care utilization in young adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine, 25(8), 968–973. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02521.xCrossRefPubMed

Stephens, M. A. P., Franks, M. M., Rook, K. S., Iida, M., Hemphill, R. C., & Salem, J. K. (2013). Spouses’ attempts to regulate day-to-day dietary adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes. Health Psychology, 32(10), 1029–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030018CrossRefPubMed

Thau, L., Gandhi, J., & Sharma, S. (2021). Physiology, cortisol. In StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538239/

Tracy, E. L., Berg, C. A., Kent de Grey, R. G., Allen, N. A., Litchman, M. L., Butner, J., & Helgeson, V. S. (2020). The benefits of daily exercise on blood glucose levels and affect among adults with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 43(6), 1056–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-020-00158-xCrossRefPubMed

Trief, P. M., Jiang, Y., Beck, R., Huckfeldt, P. J., Knight, T., Miller, K. M., & Weinstock, R. S. (2017). Adults with type 1 diabetes: Partner relationships and outcomes. Journal of Health Psychology, 22(4), 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105315605654CrossRefPubMed

Trief, P. M., Sandberg, J. G., Dimmock, J. A., Forken, P. J., & Weinstock, R. S. (2013). Personal and relationship challenges of adults with type 1 diabetes: A qualitative focus group study. Diabetes Care, 36(9), 2483–2488. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-1718CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Uchino, B. N. (2004). Social support and physical health: Understanding the health consequences of relationships. Yale University Press.CrossRef

Van Vleet, M., & Helgeson, V. S. (2020). Friend and peer relationships among youth with type 1 diabetes. In A. M. Delamater & D. G. Marrero (Eds.), Behavioral diabetes: social ecological perspectives for pediatric and adult populations (pp. 121–138). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33286-0_10CrossRef

Whittemore, R., Delvy, R., & McCarthy, M. M. (2018). The experience of partners of adults with type 1 diabetes: An integrative review. Current Diabetes Reports, 18(4), 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-018-0986-4CrossRefPubMed

Wiebe, D. J., Helgeson, V., & Berg, C. A. (2016). The social context of managing diabetes across the life span. American Psychologist, 71(7), 526–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040355CrossRefPubMed

Wolpert, H. A., Anderson, B. J., & Weissberg-Benchell, J. (2009). Transitions in care: Meeting the challenges of type 1 diabetes in young adults. American Diabetes Association.

Writing Team for the Diabetes Control & Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions & Complications Research Group. (2003). Sustained effect of intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus on development and progression of diabetic nephropathy: The epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications (EDIC) study. JAMA, 290(16), 2159–2167. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.16.2159CrossRef

Titel: Diabetes support from romantic partners during early emerging adulthood
Auteurs: Robert G. Kent de Grey
Cynthia A. Berg
MaryJane S. Campbell
A. K. Munion
Koen Luyckx
Koen Raymaekers
Michelle L. Litchman
Deborah J. Wiebe
Publicatiedatum: 23-01-2022
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Uitgave 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-021-00271-5

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2022

Trajectories and biopsychosocial predictors of daily acute pain in adolescents receiving treatment for pain: a daily diary study

Mindfulness is inversely associated with psychological symptoms in long-term cardiac arrest survivors

Binge size and loss of control as correlates of eating behavior and psychopathology among individuals with binge eating disorder and higher weight

Perceived social support predicts self-reported and objective health and health behaviors among pregnant women

Perceived social support and ambulatory blood pressure during daily life: a meta-analysis

Associations of light physical activity, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behavior with quality of life in men on androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a quantile regression analysis