Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0589-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The 47-item positive mental health (PMH) instrument measures the level of PMH in multiethnic adult Asian populations. This study aimed to (1) develop a short PMH instrument and (2) establish its validity and reliability among the adult Singapore population.
Two separate studies were conducted among adult community-dwelling Singapore residents of Chinese, Malay or Indian ethnicity where participants completed self-administered questionnaires. In the first study, secondary data analysis was conducted using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to shorten the PMH instrument. In the second study, the newly developed short PMH instrument and other scales were administered to 201 residents to establish its factor structure, validity and reliability.
A 20-item short PMH instrument fulfilling a higher-order six-factor structure was developed following secondary analysis. The mean age of the participants in the second study was 41 years and about 53 % were women. One item with poor factor loading was further removed to generate a 19-item version of the PMH instrument. CFA demonstrated a first-order six-factor model of the short PMH instrument. The PMH-19 instrument and its subscales fulfilled criterion validity hypotheses. Internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the PMH-19 instrument were high (Cronbach’s α coefficient = 0.87; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93, respectively).
The 19-item PMH instrument is multidimensional, valid and reliable, and most importantly, with its reduced administration time, the short PMH instrument can be used to measure and evaluate PMH in Asian communities.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 114 kb)11136_2013_589_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155. CrossRef
Fordyce, M. W. (1988). A review of research on the happiness measures: A sixty-second index of happiness and mental health. Social Indicators Research, 20(4), 355–381. CrossRef
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1063–1070. CrossRef
Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman & E. Diener (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2004). Are Scandinavians happier than Asians? Issues in comparing nations on subjective well-being. Asian Economic and Political Issues, 10, 1–25.
Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80–93. CrossRef
Davidson, S., Sewel, K., Tse, D., & O’Connor, R. (2009). Well? What do you think? (2008) The Fourth National Scottish Survey of Public Attitudes to Mental Wellbeing and Mental Health Problems. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Research Queens Printers of Scotland.
Waldron, S. (2010). Measuring subjective wellbeing in the UK. Working paper, Office for National Statistics.
Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., et al. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 27(5), 63. CrossRef
Puchalski, C. M. (2010). Religion, medicine and spirituality: what we know, what we don’t know and what we do. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 11(Suppl 1), 45–49. PubMed
Singh, Y., Sharma, R., & Talwar, A. (2012). Immediate and long-term effects of meditation on acute stress reactivity, cognitive functions, and intelligence. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 18, 46–53. PubMed
Vaingankar, J. A., Subramaniam, M., Chong, S. A., Abdin, E., Edelen, M. O., Picco, L., et al. (2011). The positive mental health instrument: Development and validation of a culturally relevant scale in a multi-ethnic Asian population. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 92. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Smart, R. G., Hughes, D. P. H., Johnston, L. D., Anumonye, A., Khant, U., Medina-Mora, M. E., et al. (1980). A methodology for student drug-use surveys. Geneva: World Health Organization, Offset Publication, 50.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide. Sixth edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. CrossRef
Browne, M. W., & Cudek, R. (1993). Alternate ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Cramm, J. M., Strating, M. M., de Vreede, P. L., Steverink, N., & Nieboer, A. P. (2012). Validation of the self-management ability scale (SMAS) and development and validation of a shorter scale (SMAS-S) among older patients shortly after hospitalization. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10(1), 9. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-9. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Robitschek, C. (1998). Personal growth initiative: The construct and its measure. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30(4), 183–198.
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30–41. CrossRef
Underwood, L. G. (2006). Ordinary spiritual experience: Qualitative research, interpretive guidelines, and population distribution for the daily spiritual experience scale. Archive for the Psychology of Religion/Archiv für Religionspsychologie, 28, 181–218.
Stewart-Brown, S., Tennant, A., Tennant, R., Platt, S., Parkinson, J., & Weich, S. (2009). Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS): A Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 15. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Kroenke, K., & Spitzer, R. L. (2002). The PHQ-9: A new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatric Annals, 32, 509–521. CrossRef
Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. London: Oxford University Press.
Andrich, D. (1988). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrica, 43, 561–573. CrossRef
Master, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrica, 47, 149–174. CrossRef
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.
Mair, P., & Hatzinger, R. (2007). Extended Rasch modeling: The eRm package for the application of IRT models in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 20, 1–25.
Batinic, B., & Gnambs, T. (2011). Evaluation of measurement precision with Rasch-type models: The case of the short Generalized Opinion Leadership Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 53–54. CrossRef
Kline, P. (1979). Psychometrics and psychology. London: Academic Press.
NHS Health Scotland. (2008). Mental Health Improvement: Evidence and Practice Guide 5: Selecting scales to assess mental wellbeing in adults. Edinburgh: NHS Health Scotland.
Stewart-Brown, S., Tennant, A., Tennant, R., Platt, S., Parkinson, J., & Weich, S. (2009). Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): A Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish health education population survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19(7), 15. CrossRef
Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Lewis, F. M. (2002). Health behavior and health education, theory, research and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
World Health Organization. (2004). Promoting mental health: Concepts emerging evidence and practice. Summary report 2004.
Worsley, L. (Ed.). (2006). The resilience donut: The secrets of strong kids. Sydney: Wild and Wolley Press.
Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(30), 370.
Bartram, D. J., Sinclair, J. M., & Baldwin, D. S. (2013). Further validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) in the UK veterinary profession: Rasch analysis. Quality Life Research, 22, 379–391. CrossRef
Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessessment, 92(6), 544–559. CrossRef
- Development, validity and reliability of the short multidimensional positive mental health instrument
Janhavi Ajit Vaingankar
Boon Yiang Chua
Goi Khia Eng
Siow Ann Chong
- Springer International Publishing