Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

25-10-2022

Development of the functional assessment of migraine scale using a patient guided approach

Auteurs: Erin M. Buchanan, Heather R. Manley, James S. Sly, Ryan J. Cady, Addie Wikowsky, Ari L. Cunningham

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2023

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

A better understanding of the multi-dimensional burden and impact of migraine has grown over recent years, yet the tools used to measure these concepts have not been updated to reflect such findings. Additionally, due to the increase in the number of both prophylactic and acute therapeutic options for migraine, a comprehensive assessment of treatment response is necessary. The goal of this project was to develop a patient guided outcome measure which evaluates patient identified efficacy factors when appraising migraine treatment response.

Methods

A group of patients with migraine (N = 10) were given an in-person semi-structured interview collecting information regarding a patient’s perspective on meaningful response to headache and migraine treatment. Using the patient information collected during these interviews, a set of questions aimed at evaluating meaningful response were developed. Two additional groups (N = 100, 200) of patients with migraine then provided feedback on the drafted questions in an online setting.

Results

Interviews indicated thematic areas of interest to patients with migraine are not commonly assessed on popular measures. Over two hundred items were developed to assess thematic areas indicated by patients. Factor analysis used on the focus groups’ results led to the development of an 18-item scale (Functional Assessment of Migraine Scale-Research: FAMS-R) that assesses the impact of migraine on a patient and shows the potential to measure treatment response.

Conclusion

The FAMS portrays promising results at measuring a multi-faceted migraine treatment response and disease impact.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
This item was presented as please indicate all headache/migraine diagnoses that you have received from a medical professional. Participants could indicate both chronic and episodic, as well as list other options. Therefore, percentages represent percent of the total sample that checked each box.
 
2
This item was presented as the multiple select described in the previous experiment.
 
Literatuur
6.
go back to reference Bonafede, M., Sapra, S., Shah, N., Tepper, S., Cappell, K., & Desai, P. (2018). Direct and indirect healthcare resource utilization and costs among migraine patients in the United States. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 58(5), 700–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13275CrossRef Bonafede, M., Sapra, S., Shah, N., Tepper, S., Cappell, K., & Desai, P. (2018). Direct and indirect healthcare resource utilization and costs among migraine patients in the United States. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 58(5), 700–714. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​head.​13275CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gibbs, G. (2012). Thematic coding and categorizing. In G. Gibbs (Ed.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 38–55). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Gibbs, G. (2012). Thematic coding and categorizing. In G. Gibbs (Ed.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 38–55). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
18.
23.
go back to reference Revelle, W. (2017). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Evanston, Illinois. Revelle, W. (2017). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Evanston, Illinois.
29.
go back to reference Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
31.
go back to reference Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1981). LISERL 5: Analysis of linear structural relations by the method of maximum likelihood. International Education Services. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1981). LISERL 5: Analysis of linear structural relations by the method of maximum likelihood. International Education Services.
35.
go back to reference Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne Jr., R. P., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel (No. ADA006655). Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center. Retrieved from https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA006655 Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne Jr., R. P., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel (No. ADA006655). Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center. Retrieved from https://​apps.​dtic.​mil/​sti/​citations/​ADA006655
36.
go back to reference Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Methodology in the Social Sciences. The Guilford Press. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Methodology in the Social Sciences. The Guilford Press.
Metagegevens
Titel
Development of the functional assessment of migraine scale using a patient guided approach
Auteurs
Erin M. Buchanan
Heather R. Manley
James S. Sly
Ryan J. Cady
Addie Wikowsky
Ari L. Cunningham
Publicatiedatum
25-10-2022
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2023
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03279-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2023

Quality of Life Research 3/2023 Naar de uitgave