Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Intensive mothering (IM) attitudes have been considered the dominant discourse of motherhood, but have only been assessed qualitatively The goal of this study was to develop a quantitative scale to assess these ideologies, their construct validity, and their relationship to relevant constructs (i.e., work status and division of household labor). An on-line questionnaire was given to 595 mothers asking 56 questions assessing different aspects of IM attitudes as well as several validation measures. An Exploratory Factor Analysis on 315 randomly selected mothers yielded a 5 factor solution. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis on the remaining 280 mothers demonstrated good fit. The five factors expressed the ideas that (1) women are inherently better at parenting than men (Essentialism), (2) parenting should be fulfilling (Fulfillment), (3) children should be cognitively stimulated by parents (Stimulation), (4) mothering is difficult (Challenging), and (5) parents should prioritize the needs of the child (Child-Centered). Scales had adequate reliability and construct validity compared to the Parental Investment in the Child questionnaire, the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale, and Beliefs about Maternal Employment. The Essentialism, Fulfillment, and Challenging scales were positively related to having more responsibility for child care and household chores. Stay-at-home mothers had higher scores on Essentialism and lower scores on Stimulation than both part-time and full-time working mothers supporting the notion that both working and non-working mothers have intensive parenting ideologies that are manifested in different ways.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Alwin, D. F., & Krosnick, J. A. (1991). The reliability of survey attitude measurement: The influence of question and respondent attributes. Sociological Methods & Research, 20, 139–181. CrossRef
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Basic Books.
Costell, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(7). Available online: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=7.
DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development. Newbury Park, NJ: Sage Publications.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Guendouzi, J. (2006). “The Guilt Thing”: Balancing professional and domestic roles. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 901–909. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00303.x.
Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2005). Mplus user’s guide (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
National Research Council. (2001). National research council committee on educational interventions for children with autism. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Rubin, E., & Wooten, H. (2007). Highly educated stay-at-home mothers: A study of commitment and conflict. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 15, 336–345. doi: 10.1177/1066480707304945.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Warner, J. (2006). Perfect madness: Motherhood in the age of anxiety. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
- Development and Validation of a Quantitative Measure of Intensive Parenting Attitudes
Holly H. Schiffrin
Virginia H. Mackintosh
Mindy J. Erchull
- Springer US