Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 1/2018

21-08-2017

Development and psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS Pediatric Life Satisfaction item banks, child-report, and parent-proxy editions

Auteurs: Christopher B. Forrest, Janine Devine, Katherine B. Bevans, Brandon D. Becker, Adam C. Carle, Rachel E. Teneralli, JeanHee Moon, Carole A. Tucker, Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 1/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the psychometric evaluation and item response theory calibration of the PROMIS Pediatric Life Satisfaction item banks, child-report, and parent-proxy editions.

Methods

A pool of 55 life satisfaction items was administered to 1992 children 8–17 years old and 964 parents of children 5–17 years old. Analyses included descriptive statistics, reliability, factor analysis, differential item functioning, and assessment of construct validity. Thirteen items were deleted because of poor psychometric performance. An 8-item short form was administered to a national sample of 996 children 8–17 years old, and 1294 parents of children 5–17 years old. The combined sample (2988 children and 2258 parents) was used in item response theory (IRT) calibration analyses.

Results

The final item banks were unidimensional, the items were locally independent, and the items were free from impactful differential item functioning. The 8-item and 4-item short form scales showed excellent reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. Life satisfaction decreased with declining socio-economic status, presence of a special health care need, and increasing age for girls, but not boys. After IRT calibration, we found that 4- and 8-item short forms had a high degree of precision (reliability) across a wide range (>4 SD units) of the latent variable.

Conclusions

The PROMIS Pediatric Life Satisfaction item banks and their short forms provide efficient, precise, and valid assessments of life satisfaction in children and youth.
vorige artikel Physical activity and health-related quality of life among schoolchildren from disadvantaged neighbourhoods in Port Elizabeth, South Africa
volgende artikel Differential item functioning by language on the PROMIS® physical functioning items for children and adolescents
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Shin, D. C., & Johnson, D. M. (1978). Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 5, 475–492.CrossRef
2.
Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R., & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRef
3.
Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory. Social Indicators Research, 16(4), 347–413.CrossRef
4.
Schulz, W. (1995). Multiple-discrepancies theory versus resource theory. Social Indicators Research, 34(1), 153–169.CrossRef
5.
Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010). Investigating the substantive aspect of construct validity for the satisfaction with life scale adapted for children: A focus on cognitive processes. Social Indicators Research, 100(1), 37–60.CrossRef
6.
National Research Council. (2013). Subjective well-being: Measuring happiness, suffering, and other dimensions of experience. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
7.
Adelman, H. S., Taylor, L., & Nelson, P. (1989). Minors’ dissatisfaction with their life circumstances. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 20(2), 135–147.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Haranin, E. C., Huebner, E. S., & Suldo, S. M. (2007). Predictive and incremental validity of global and domain-based adolescent life satisfaction reports. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25(2), 127–138.CrossRef
9.
Besier, T., & Goldbeck, L. (2012). Growing up with cystic fibrosis: Achievement, life satisfaction, and mental health. Quality of Life Research, 21(10), 1829–1835.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Gilman, R., & Huebner, S. (2003). A review of life satisfaction research with children and adolescents. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 192.CrossRef
11.
Zullig, K. J., Valois, R. F., Huebner, E. S., Oeltmann, J. E., & Drane, J. W. (2001). Relationship between perceived life satisfaction and adolescents’ substance abuse. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29(4), 279–288.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Huang, J. Y., Wang, K. Y., & Ringel-Kulka, T. (2015). Predictors of life satisfaction among Asian American adolescents—Analysis of add health data. Springerplus, 4, 216.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Ng, Z. J., Heubner, E., S., & Hills, K.J. (2015). Life satisfaction and academic performance in early adolescents: Evidence for reciprocal association. Journal of School Psychology, 53(6), 479–491
14.
Bannink, R., Pearce, A., & Hope, S. (2016). Family income and young adolescents’ perceived social position: Associations with self-esteem and life satisfaction in the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Archives Disease Childhood, 101(10), 917–921
15.
Matin, N., Kelishadi, R., Heshmat, R., Motamed-Gorji, N., Djalalinia, S., Motlagh, M. E., et al. (2017). Joint association of screen time and physical activity on self-rated health and life satisfaction in children and adolescents: The CASPIAN-IV study. International Health, 9(1), 58–68.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Maatta, H., Hurtig, T., Taanila, A., Honkanen, M., Ebeling, H., & Koivumaa-Honkanen, H. (2013). Childhood chronic physical condition, self-reported health, and life satisfaction in adolescence. European Journal of Pediatrics, 172(9), 1197–1206.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Forrest, C. B., Tucker, C. A., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Pratiwadi, R., Moon, J., Teneralli, R. E., et al. (2016). Concurrent validity of the PROMIS® pediatric global health measure. Quality of Life Research, 25(3), 739–751.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Huebner, E. S. (1991). Initial development of the student’s life satisfaction scale. School Psychology International, 12, 231–240.CrossRef
19.
Huebner, E. S. (1995). The Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale: An assessment of psychometric properties with black and white elementary school students. Social Indicators Research, 34(3), 315–323.CrossRef
20.
Gadermann, A. M., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2009). Investigating validity evidence of the satisfaction with life scale adapted for children. Social Indicators Research, 96(2), 229–247.CrossRef
21.
Levin, K. A., & Currie, C. (2013). Reliability and validity of an adapted version of the cantril ladder for use with adolescent samples. Social Indicators Research, 119(2), 1047–1063.CrossRef
22.
Seligson, J. L., Huebner, E. S., & Valois, R. F. (2003). Preliminary validation of the brief multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale (BMSLSS). Social Indicators Research, 61(2), 121–145.CrossRef
23.
Funk, I., Benjamin, A., Huebner, E. S., & Valois, R. F. (2006). Reliability and validity of a brief life satisfaction scale with a high school sample. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(1), 41–54.CrossRef
24.
Huebner, E. (1994). Preliminary development and validation of a multidimensional life satisfaction scale for children. Psychological Assessment, 6, 149–158.CrossRef
25.
Bradley, K. D., Cunningham, J. D., & Gilman, R. (2013). Measuring adolescent life satisfaction: A psychometric investigation of the multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale (MSLSS). Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(6), 1333–1345.CrossRef
26.
Proctor, C., Alex Linley, P., & Maltby, J. (2009). Youth life satisfaction measures: A review. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(2), 128–144.CrossRef
27.
Forrest, C. B., Bevans, K. B., Tucker, C., Riley, A. W., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Gardner, W., et al. (2012). Commentary: the patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS(R)) for children and youth: Application to pediatric psychology. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 37(6), 614–621.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Ravens-Sieberer, U., Devine, J., Bevans, K., Riley, A. W., Moon, J., Salsman, J. M., et al. (2014). Subjective well-being measures for children were developed within the PROMIS project: Presentation of first results. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(2), 207–218.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Forrest, C. B., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Devine, J., Becker, B. D., Teneralli, R. E., Moon, J., et al. (2017). Development and evaluation of the PROMIS® pediatric positive affect item bank, child-report and parent-proxy editions. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi:10.​1007/​s10902-016-9843-9.
30.
Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
DiSogra, C., Dennis, J. M., & Fahimi, M. (2010). On the quality of ancillary data available for address-based sampling. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods, 4174–4183.
32.
33.
Lohr, S. (2009). Sampling: Design and analysis: Nelson Education.
34.
Bethell, C. D., Read, D., Neff, J., Blumberg, S. J., Stein, R. E. K., Sharp, V., et al. (2002). Comparison of the children with special health care needs screener to the questionnaire for identifying children with chronic conditions–Revised. Academic Pediatrics, 2(1), 49–57.
35.
Bethell, C. D., Read, D., Stein, R. E. K., Blumberg, S. J., Wells, N., & Newacheck, P. W. (2002). Identifying children with special health care needs: Development and evaluation of a short screening instrument. Academic Pediatrics, 2(1), 38–48.
36.
Green, B. F., Bock, D., Humphres, R. L., & Linn, M. D. (1984). Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21(4), 347–360.CrossRef
37.
Proctor, C. L., Linley, P. A., & Maltby, J. (2008). Youth life satisfaction: A review of the literature. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(5), 583–630.CrossRef
38.
Dewalt, D. A., Thissen, D., Stucky, B. D., Langer, M. M., Morgan Dewitt, E., Irwin, D. E., et al. (2013). PROMIS Pediatric Peer Relationships Scale: Development of a peer relationships item bank as part of social health measurement. Health Psychology, 32(10), 1093–1103.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Cook, K. F., Jensen, S. E., Schalet, B. D., Beaumont, J. L., Amtmann, D., Czajkowski, S., et al. (2016). PROMIS measures of pain, fatigue, negative affect, physical function, and social function demonstrated clinical validity across a range of chronic conditions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 73, 89–102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Irwin, D. E., Stucky, B. D., Langer, M. M., Thissen, D., Dewitt, E. M., Lai, J. S., et al. (2012). PROMIS Pediatric Anger Scale: An item response theory analysis. Quality of Life Research, 21(4), 697–706.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Irwin, D. E., Stucky, B., Langer, M. M., Thissen, D., Dewitt, E. M., Lai, J. S., et al. (2010). An item response analysis of the pediatric PROMIS anxiety and depressive symptoms scales. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 595–607.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Bevans, K. B., Gardner, W., Pajer, K., Riley, A. W., & Forrest, C. B. (2013). Qualitative development of the PROMIS(R) pediatric stress response item banks. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 38(2), 173–191.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Cantril, H. (1966). Pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
44.
Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 5–18.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRef
47.
Carle, A. C. (2010). Mitigating systematic measurement error in comparative effectiveness research in heterogeneous populations. Medical Care, 48(6 Suppl), S68–74.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Samejima, F. (1997). Graded response model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85–100). New York: Springer.CrossRef
49.
Takane, Y., & de Leeuw, J. (1987). On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables. Psychometrika, 52(3), 393–408.CrossRef
50.
Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L. E., Narasimhalu, K., Lai, J. S., & Cella, D. (2007). Rapid detection of differential item functioning in assessments of health-related quality of life: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy. Quality of Life Research, 16(1), 101–114.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Millsap, R. E., & Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(3), 479–513.CrossRef
52.
Choi, S. W. (2009). Firestar: Computerized adaptive testing simulation program for polytomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(8), 644–645.CrossRef
53.
Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443–459.CrossRef
54.
55.
Hankin, B. L., & Abramson, L. Y. (2001). Development of gender differences in depression: An elaborated cognitive vulnerability-transactional stress theory. Psychological Bulletin, 127(6), 773–796.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Hays, R. D., Liu, H., & Kapteyn, A. (2015). Use of Internet panels to conduct surveys. Behavioral Research, 47(3), 685–690.CrossRef
57.
Craig, B. M., Hays, R. D., Pickard, A. S., Cella, D., Revicki, D. A., & Reeve, B. B. (2013). Comparison of US panel vendors for online surveys. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15, e260.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metagegevens
Titel
Development and psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS Pediatric Life Satisfaction item banks, child-report, and parent-proxy editions
Auteurs
Christopher B. Forrest
Janine Devine
Katherine B. Bevans
Brandon D. Becker
Adam C. Carle
Rachel E. Teneralli
JeanHee Moon
Carole A. Tucker
Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer
Publicatiedatum
21-08-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1681-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2018

Quality of Life Research 1/2018 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Health-related quality of life, developmental milestones, and self-esteem in young adults with bleeding disorders

Commentary

Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with breast cancer: a reply to Maratia et al

OriginalPaper

Self-rated health as a predictor of mid-term and long-term mortality in older Afro-Caribbeans hospitalised via the emergency department

OriginalPaper

How is weight stigma related to children’s health-related quality of life? A model comparison approach

Special Section: Measuring What Matters (by invitation only)

Prioritizing research topics: a comparison of crowdsourcing and patient registry

Special Section: Measuring What Matters (by invitation only)

Moving from significance to real-world meaning: methods for interpreting change in clinical outcome assessment scores