Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 4/2014

01-05-2014

Development and evaluation of the PI-G: a three-scale measure based on the German translation of the PROMIS® pain interference item bank

Auteurs: Erik Farin, Michaela Nagl, Lukas Gramm, Katja Heyduck, Manuela Glattacker

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 4/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Objective

Study aim was to translate the PROMIS® pain interference (PI) item bank (41 items) into German, test its psychometric properties in patients with chronic low back pain and develop static subforms.

Methods

We surveyed N = 262 patients undergoing rehabilitation who were asked to fill out questionnaires at the beginning and 2 weeks after the end of rehabilitation, applying the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Pain Disability Index (PDI) in addition to the PROMIS® PI items. For psychometric testing, a 1-parameter item response theory (IRT) model was used. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses as well as reliability and construct validity analyses were conducted.

Results

The assumptions regarding IRT scaling of the translated PROMIS® PI item bank as a whole were not confirmed. However, we succeeded in devising three static subforms (PI-G scales: PI mental 13 items, PI functional 11 items, PI physical 4 items), revealing good psychometric properties.

Conclusion

The PI-G scales in their static form can be recommended for use in German-speaking countries. Their strengths versus the ODI and PDI are that pain interference is assessed in a differentiated manner and that several psychometric values are somewhat better than those associated with the ODI and PDI (distribution properties, IRT model fit, reliability). To develop an IRT-scaled item bank of the German translations of the PROMIS® PI items, it would be useful to have additional studies (e.g., with larger sample sizes and using a 2-parameter IRT model).

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., et al. (2010). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., et al. (2010). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), 3–11. CrossRef Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), 3–11. CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Choi, S., et al. (2011). How item banks and their application can influence measurement practice in rehabilitation medicine: A PROMIS fatigue item bank example. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(10 Suppl), S20–S27. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Choi, S., et al. (2011). How item banks and their application can influence measurement practice in rehabilitation medicine: A PROMIS fatigue item bank example. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(10 Suppl), S20–S27. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fries, J., Rose, M., & Krishnan, E. (2011). The PROMIS of better outcome assessment: Responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and Internet administration. Journal of Rheumatology, 38(8), 1759–1764. PubMedCrossRef Fries, J., Rose, M., & Krishnan, E. (2011). The PROMIS of better outcome assessment: Responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and Internet administration. Journal of Rheumatology, 38(8), 1759–1764. PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Paz, S., Spritzer, K., Morales, L., & Hays, R. (2013). Evaluation of the patient-reported outcomes information system (PROMIS ®) Spanish-language physical functioning items. Quality of Life Research, 22(7), 1819–1830. PubMedCrossRef Paz, S., Spritzer, K., Morales, L., & Hays, R. (2013). Evaluation of the patient-reported outcomes information system (PROMIS ®) Spanish-language physical functioning items. Quality of Life Research, 22(7), 1819–1830. PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Turk, D. C., & Melzack, R. (2011). Handbook of pain assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. Turk, D. C., & Melzack, R. (2011). Handbook of pain assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
7.
go back to reference Riley, W. T., Rothrock, N., Bruce, B., et al. (2010). Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) domain names and definitions revisions: Further evaluation of content validity in IRT-derived item banks. Quality of Life Research, 19(9), 1311–1321. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Riley, W. T., Rothrock, N., Bruce, B., et al. (2010). Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) domain names and definitions revisions: Further evaluation of content validity in IRT-derived item banks. Quality of Life Research, 19(9), 1311–1321. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fayers, P. M., Hjermstad, M. J., Klepstad, P., et al. (2011). The dimensionality of pain: Palliative care and chronic pain patients differ in their reports of pain intensity and pain interference. Pain, 152(7), 1608–1620. PubMedCrossRef Fayers, P. M., Hjermstad, M. J., Klepstad, P., et al. (2011). The dimensionality of pain: Palliative care and chronic pain patients differ in their reports of pain intensity and pain interference. Pain, 152(7), 1608–1620. PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jensen, M. P., Gould, E. M., Victor, T. W., Gammaitoni, A. R., White, R. E., & Galer, B. S. (2010). The relationship of changes in pain quality to pain interference and sleep quality. Journal of Pain, 11(8), 782–788. PubMedCrossRef Jensen, M. P., Gould, E. M., Victor, T. W., Gammaitoni, A. R., White, R. E., & Galer, B. S. (2010). The relationship of changes in pain quality to pain interference and sleep quality. Journal of Pain, 11(8), 782–788. PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (2000). SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Inc. Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (2000). SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Inc.
11.
go back to reference Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., et al. (1993). The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376. PubMedCrossRef Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., et al. (1993). The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376. PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Eremenco, S. L., Cella, D., & Arnold, B. J. (2005). A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 28(2), 212–232. PubMedCrossRef Eremenco, S. L., Cella, D., & Arnold, B. J. (2005). A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 28(2), 212–232. PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fairbank, J. C., & Pynsent, P. B. (2000). The Oswestry disability index. Spine, 25(22), 2940–2952. PubMedCrossRef Fairbank, J. C., & Pynsent, P. B. (2000). The Oswestry disability index. Spine, 25(22), 2940–2952. PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mannion, A. F., Junge, A., Fairbank, C. T., Dvorak, J., & Grob, D. (2006). Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. European Spine Journal, 15(1), 55–65. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mannion, A. F., Junge, A., Fairbank, C. T., Dvorak, J., & Grob, D. (2006). Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. European Spine Journal, 15(1), 55–65. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tait, R. C., Chibnall, J. T., & Krause, S. (1990). The pain disability index: Psychometric properties. Pain, 40(2), 171–182. PubMedCrossRef Tait, R. C., Chibnall, J. T., & Krause, S. (1990). The pain disability index: Psychometric properties. Pain, 40(2), 171–182. PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dillmann, U., Nilges, P., Saile, H., & Gerbershagen, H. (1994). Behinderungseinschätzung bei chronischen Schmerzpatienten [Assessing disability in chronic pain patients]. Der Schmerz, 8(2), 100–110. PubMedCrossRef Dillmann, U., Nilges, P., Saile, H., & Gerbershagen, H. (1994). Behinderungseinschätzung bei chronischen Schmerzpatienten [Assessing disability in chronic pain patients]. Der Schmerz, 8(2), 100–110. PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scand., 67, 361–370. CrossRef Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scand., 67, 361–370. CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Herrmann-Lingen, C., Buss, U., & Snaith, R. P. (2005). HADS-D: Hospital anxiety and depression scale–deutsche version: Deutsche Adaptation der Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Bern: Huber. Herrmann-Lingen, C., Buss, U., & Snaith, R. P. (2005). HADS-D: Hospital anxiety and depression scale–deutsche version: Deutsche Adaptation der Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Bern: Huber.
19.
go back to reference Ware JE (1993) SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center. Ware JE (1993) SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
20.
go back to reference Bullinger, M., & Kirchberger, I. (1998). SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Göttingen: Hogrefe. Bullinger, M., & Kirchberger, I. (1998). SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
21.
22.
go back to reference Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equal Mode, 6, 1–55. CrossRef Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equal Mode, 6, 1–55. CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Tucker, L., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10. CrossRef Tucker, L., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10. CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Farin, E., Ullrich, A., & Hauer, J. (2013). Participation and social functioning in patients with fibromyalgia: Development and testing of a new questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 11(1), 135. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Farin, E., Ullrich, A., & Hauer, J. (2013). Participation and social functioning in patients with fibromyalgia: Development and testing of a new questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 11(1), 135. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life banks. Plans for the patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22–S31. PubMedCrossRef Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life banks. Plans for the patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22–S31. PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Cook, K., Teal, C., Bjorner, J., et al. (2007). IRT health outcomes data analysis project: An overview and summary. Quality of Life Research, 16, 121–132. PubMedCrossRef Cook, K., Teal, C., Bjorner, J., et al. (2007). IRT health outcomes data analysis project: An overview and summary. Quality of Life Research, 16, 121–132. PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kaiser, H. F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111–117. CrossRef Kaiser, H. F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111–117. CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Coster, W. J., Haley, S. M., Andres, P. L., Ludlow, L. H., Bond, T. L. Y., & Peng-sheng, N. (2004). Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement. Personal care and instrumental activities domain. Medical Care, 42, I62–I72. PubMedCrossRef Coster, W. J., Haley, S. M., Andres, P. L., Ludlow, L. H., Bond, T. L. Y., & Peng-sheng, N. (2004). Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement. Personal care and instrumental activities domain. Medical Care, 42, I62–I72. PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Conrad, K. J., & Smith, E. V. (2004). International conference on objective measurement. Applications of Rasch analysis in health care. Medical Care, 41(1), I1–I6. Conrad, K. J., & Smith, E. V. (2004). International conference on objective measurement. Applications of Rasch analysis in health care. Medical Care, 41(1), I1–I6.
30.
go back to reference Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E. (2005). Computerized adaptive testing and item banking. In P. Fayers & R. Hays (Eds.), Assessing quality of life in clinical trials (pp. 95–112). Los Angeles: Oxford University Press. Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E. (2005). Computerized adaptive testing and item banking. In P. Fayers & R. Hays (Eds.), Assessing quality of life in clinical trials (pp. 95–112). Los Angeles: Oxford University Press.
31.
go back to reference Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32.
go back to reference Prieto, L., Alonso, J., & Lamarca, R. (2003). Classical test theory versus Rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 1, 27. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Prieto, L., Alonso, J., & Lamarca, R. (2003). Classical test theory versus Rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 1, 27. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Mokkink, L., Terwee, C., Patrick, D., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mokkink, L., Terwee, C., Patrick, D., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Mokkink, L., Terwee, C., Knol, D., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10(1), 22. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mokkink, L., Terwee, C., Knol, D., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10(1), 22. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
36.
go back to reference Miller, T. B., & Kane, M. (2001). The precision of change scores under absolute and relative interpretations. Appl Meas Educ, 14(4), 307–327. CrossRef Miller, T. B., & Kane, M. (2001). The precision of change scores under absolute and relative interpretations. Appl Meas Educ, 14(4), 307–327. CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research. A correlational approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research. A correlational approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
go back to reference Huijnen, I. P. J., Kindermans, H. P. J., Seelen, H. A. M., et al. (2011). Effects of self-discrepancies on activity-related behaviour: Explaining disability and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain. Pain, 152(9), 2165–2172. PubMedCrossRef Huijnen, I. P. J., Kindermans, H. P. J., Seelen, H. A. M., et al. (2011). Effects of self-discrepancies on activity-related behaviour: Explaining disability and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain. Pain, 152(9), 2165–2172. PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Blyth, F. M., Macfarlane, G. J., & Nicholas, M. K. (2007). The contribution of psychosocial factors to the development of chronic pain: The key to better outcomes for patients? Pain, 129(1–2), 8–11. PubMedCrossRef Blyth, F. M., Macfarlane, G. J., & Nicholas, M. K. (2007). The contribution of psychosocial factors to the development of chronic pain: The key to better outcomes for patients? Pain, 129(1–2), 8–11. PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Farin, E., Gramm, L., & Schmidt, E. (2013). The patient-physician relationship in patients with chronic low back pain as a predictor of outcomes after rehabilitation. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 36(3), 246–258. PubMedCrossRef Farin, E., Gramm, L., & Schmidt, E. (2013). The patient-physician relationship in patients with chronic low back pain as a predictor of outcomes after rehabilitation. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 36(3), 246–258. PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Wang, P., Zhang, J., Liao, W., et al. (2012). Content comparison of questionnaires and scales used in low back pain based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(14), 1167–1177. PubMedCrossRef Wang, P., Zhang, J., Liao, W., et al. (2012). Content comparison of questionnaires and scales used in low back pain based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(14), 1167–1177. PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Cook, K., Kallen, M., & Amtmann, D. (2009). Having a fit: Impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT‘s unidimensionality assumption. Quality of Life Research, 18(4), 447–460. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Cook, K., Kallen, M., & Amtmann, D. (2009). Having a fit: Impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT‘s unidimensionality assumption. Quality of Life Research, 18(4), 447–460. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educ Psychol Meas, 73(1), 5–26. CrossRef Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educ Psychol Meas, 73(1), 5–26. CrossRef
44.
go back to reference DeWalt, D. A. M., Rothrock, N. P., & Yount, S. P. (2007). Stone AAP, on behalf of the PROMIS Cooperative Group. Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45(5), S12–S21. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef DeWalt, D. A. M., Rothrock, N. P., & Yount, S. P. (2007). Stone AAP, on behalf of the PROMIS Cooperative Group. Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45(5), S12–S21. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Yamashiro, K., Arimura, T., Iwaki, R., Jensen, M. P., Kubo, C., & Hosoi, M. (2011). A multidimensional measure of pain interference: reliability and validity of the pain disability assessment scale. Clinical Journal of Pain, 27(4), 338–343. PubMedCrossRef Yamashiro, K., Arimura, T., Iwaki, R., Jensen, M. P., Kubo, C., & Hosoi, M. (2011). A multidimensional measure of pain interference: reliability and validity of the pain disability assessment scale. Clinical Journal of Pain, 27(4), 338–343. PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Holroyd, K. A., Malinoski, P., Davis, M. K., & Lipchik, G. L. (1999). The three dimensions of headache impact: Pain, disability and affective distress. Pain, 83(3), 571–578. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Holroyd, K. A., Malinoski, P., Davis, M. K., & Lipchik, G. L. (1999). The three dimensions of headache impact: Pain, disability and affective distress. Pain, 83(3), 571–578. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Cleeland, C. S., Nakamura, Y., Mendoza, T. R., Edwards, K. R., Douglas, J., & Serlin, R. C. (1996). Dimensions of the impact of cancer pain in a four country sample: New information from multidimensional scaling. Pain, 67(2–3), 267–273. PubMedCrossRef Cleeland, C. S., Nakamura, Y., Mendoza, T. R., Edwards, K. R., Douglas, J., & Serlin, R. C. (1996). Dimensions of the impact of cancer pain in a four country sample: New information from multidimensional scaling. Pain, 67(2–3), 267–273. PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Klepstad, P., Loge, J. H., Borchgrevink, P. C., Mendoza, T. R., Cleeland, C. S., & Kaasa, S. (2002). The Norwegian brief pain inventory questionnaire: Translation and validation in cancer pain patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 24(5), 517–525. PubMedCrossRef Klepstad, P., Loge, J. H., Borchgrevink, P. C., Mendoza, T. R., Cleeland, C. S., & Kaasa, S. (2002). The Norwegian brief pain inventory questionnaire: Translation and validation in cancer pain patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 24(5), 517–525. PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Saxena, A., Mendoza, T., & Cleeland, C. S. (1999). The assessment of cancer pain in North India: The validation of the Hindi brief pain inventory–BPI-H. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 17(1), 27–41. PubMedCrossRef Saxena, A., Mendoza, T., & Cleeland, C. S. (1999). The assessment of cancer pain in North India: The validation of the Hindi brief pain inventory–BPI-H. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 17(1), 27–41. PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Jensen, M. P., Smith, D. G., Ehde, D. M., & Robinsin, L. R. (2001). Pain site and the effects of amputation pain: Further clarification of the meaning of mild, moderate, and severe pain. Pain, 91(3), 317–322. PubMedCrossRef Jensen, M. P., Smith, D. G., Ehde, D. M., & Robinsin, L. R. (2001). Pain site and the effects of amputation pain: Further clarification of the meaning of mild, moderate, and severe pain. Pain, 91(3), 317–322. PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference McHorney, C. A., & Tarlov, A. R. (1995). Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are available health status surveys adequate? Quality of Life Research, 4(4), 293–307. PubMedCrossRef McHorney, C. A., & Tarlov, A. R. (1995). Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are available health status surveys adequate? Quality of Life Research, 4(4), 293–307. PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Osborne, T. L., Raichle, K. A., Jensen, M. P., Ehde, D. M., & Kraft, G. (2006). The reliability and validity of pain interference measures in persons with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 32(3), 217–229. PubMedCrossRef Osborne, T. L., Raichle, K. A., Jensen, M. P., Ehde, D. M., & Kraft, G. (2006). The reliability and validity of pain interference measures in persons with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 32(3), 217–229. PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Development and evaluation of the PI-G: a three-scale measure based on the German translation of the PROMIS® pain interference item bank
Auteurs
Erik Farin
Michaela Nagl
Lukas Gramm
Katja Heyduck
Manuela Glattacker
Publicatiedatum
01-05-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0575-6