Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

28-10-2022

Development and calibration data for the Medication Adherence Item Bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Auteurs: Noelle E. Carlozzi, Michael A. Kallen, Jonathan Troost, Alexa Bragg, Jessica Martin-Howard, Ioana Moldovan, Jennifer A. Miner, Brian W. Jack, Suzanne Mitchell

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2023

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

To develop a new computer adaptive test that evaluates important aspects of medication adherence for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

Two hundred and twenty-five people with type 2 diabetes mellitus completed 41 items related to medication adherence.

Results

Exploratory analysis supported the essential unidimensionality of the initial item pool. Five items were deleted due to low item-adjusted total score correlations (resulting in 36 items). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the retention of 27 items. A graded response model identified no items for exclusion, based on misfit. No items were flagged for meaningful differential item functioning (DIF). The final item bank is comprised of 27 items; an associated 6-item short form was constructed that balanced both psychometric factors (e.g., item information values) and clinical input. Initial analysis of the simulated CAT and static short form supported both the reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test–retest reliability) and validity (i.e., convergent, discriminant, and known groups) of both administration formats.

Conclusions

The new medication adherence item bank provides a reliable and valid assessment of the ability to take medications accurately among people with T2DM; it will be available in early 2023 through healthmeasures.net.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Sapkota, S., Brien, J. A., Greenfield, J. R., & Aslani, P. (2015). A systematic review of interventions addressing adherence to anti-diabetic medications in Patients with type 2 diabetes-components of interventions. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0128581.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sapkota, S., Brien, J. A., Greenfield, J. R., & Aslani, P. (2015). A systematic review of interventions addressing adherence to anti-diabetic medications in Patients with type 2 diabetes-components of interventions. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0128581.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rubin, R. R. (2005). Adherence to pharmacologic therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. American Journal of Medicine, 118(Suppl 5A), 27S-34S.PubMedCrossRef Rubin, R. R. (2005). Adherence to pharmacologic therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. American Journal of Medicine, 118(Suppl 5A), 27S-34S.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Krass, I., Schieback, P., & Dhippayom, T. (2015). Adherence to diabetes medication: A systematic review. Diabetic Medicine, 32(6), 725–737.PubMedCrossRef Krass, I., Schieback, P., & Dhippayom, T. (2015). Adherence to diabetes medication: A systematic review. Diabetic Medicine, 32(6), 725–737.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Roblin, D. W., Platt, R., Goodman, M. J., Hsu, J., Nelson, W. W., Smith, D. H., et al. (2005). Effect of increased cost-sharing on oral hypoglycemic use in five managed care organizations: How much is too much? Medical Care, 43(10), 951–959.PubMedCrossRef Roblin, D. W., Platt, R., Goodman, M. J., Hsu, J., Nelson, W. W., Smith, D. H., et al. (2005). Effect of increased cost-sharing on oral hypoglycemic use in five managed care organizations: How much is too much? Medical Care, 43(10), 951–959.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gonzalez, J. S., Tanenbaum, M. L., & Commissariat, P. V. (2016). Psychosocial factors in medication adherence and diabetes self-management: Implications for research and practice. American Psychologist, 71(7), 539–551.PubMedCrossRef Gonzalez, J. S., Tanenbaum, M. L., & Commissariat, P. V. (2016). Psychosocial factors in medication adherence and diabetes self-management: Implications for research and practice. American Psychologist, 71(7), 539–551.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Clifford, S., Perez-Nieves, M., Skalicky, M., Reaney, M., & Coyne, K. S. (2014). A systematic literature review of methodologies used to assess medication adherence in patients with diabetes. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 30(6), 1071–1085.PubMedCrossRef Clifford, S., Perez-Nieves, M., Skalicky, M., Reaney, M., & Coyne, K. S. (2014). A systematic literature review of methodologies used to assess medication adherence in patients with diabetes. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 30(6), 1071–1085.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Peterson, A. M., Nau, D. P., Cramer, J. A., Benner, J., Gwadry-Sridhar, F., & Nichol, M. (2007). A checklist for medication compliance and persistence studies using retrospective databases. Value Health, 10(1), 3–12.PubMedCrossRef Peterson, A. M., Nau, D. P., Cramer, J. A., Benner, J., Gwadry-Sridhar, F., & Nichol, M. (2007). A checklist for medication compliance and persistence studies using retrospective databases. Value Health, 10(1), 3–12.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Moon, S. J., Lee, W. Y., Hwang, J. S., Hong, Y. P., & Moriskey, D. E. (2017). Accuracy of a screening tool for medication adherence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the morisky medication adherence scale-8. PLoS ONE, 12(11), e0187139.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Moon, S. J., Lee, W. Y., Hwang, J. S., Hong, Y. P., & Moriskey, D. E. (2017). Accuracy of a screening tool for medication adherence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the morisky medication adherence scale-8. PLoS ONE, 12(11), e0187139.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Morisky, D. E., Ang, A., Krousel-Wood, M., & Ward, H. J. (2008). Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting. Journal of Clinical Hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 10(5), 348–354.PubMedCrossRef Morisky, D. E., Ang, A., Krousel-Wood, M., & Ward, H. J. (2008). Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting. Journal of Clinical Hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 10(5), 348–354.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Morisky, D. E., Green, L. W., & Levine, D. M. (1986). Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence. Medical Care, 24(1), 67–74.PubMedCrossRef Morisky, D. E., Green, L. W., & Levine, D. M. (1986). Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence. Medical Care, 24(1), 67–74.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Multivariate applications book series (pp. xi–371). Erlbaum Associates. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Multivariate applications book series (pp. xi–371). Erlbaum Associates.
12.
go back to reference Wu, M., Jen, T.-H., & Tam, H.P. (2016). Educational Measurement for Applied Researchers: Theory into Practice. Imprint: p. 1 online resource (XIV, 306 pages 114 illustrations, 74 illustrations in color. Springer Wu, M., Jen, T.-H., & Tam, H.P. (2016). Educational Measurement for Applied Researchers: Theory into Practice. Imprint: p. 1 online resource (XIV, 306 pages 114 illustrations, 74 illustrations in color. Springer
14.
go back to reference Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, N., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested in its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 1179–1194.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, N., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested in its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 1179–1194.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cella, D., Lai, J. S., Nowinski, C., Victorson, D., Peterman, A., Miller, D., et al. (2012). Neuro-QOL: Brief measures of health-related quality of life for clinical research in neurology. Neurology, 78, 1860–1867.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cella, D., Lai, J. S., Nowinski, C., Victorson, D., Peterman, A., Miller, D., et al. (2012). Neuro-QOL: Brief measures of health-related quality of life for clinical research in neurology. Neurology, 78, 1860–1867.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cella, D., Nowinski, C., Peterman, A., Vistorson, D., Miller, D., Lai, J.-S., et al. (2011). The neurology quality of life measurement (Neuro-QOL) initiative. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Supplement, 92(Suppl 1), S28–S36.CrossRef Cella, D., Nowinski, C., Peterman, A., Vistorson, D., Miller, D., Lai, J.-S., et al. (2011). The neurology quality of life measurement (Neuro-QOL) initiative. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Supplement, 92(Suppl 1), S28–S36.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). WRAT 4: Wide range achievement test professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources Inc. Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). WRAT 4: Wide range achievement test professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.
19.
go back to reference Cancino, R., Esang, M., Martin, J., Morton, S., Kazis, L., & Jack, B. (2014). Development of a Patient-Centered Instrument to Evaluate 30-Day Hospital Readmission, in Academy Health. San Diego Cancino, R., Esang, M., Martin, J., Morton, S., Kazis, L., & Jack, B. (2014). Development of a Patient-Centered Instrument to Evaluate 30-Day Hospital Readmission, in Academy Health. San Diego
20.
go back to reference Carlozzi, N.E., Kallen, M.A., Troost, J.P., Bragg, A., Marin-Howard, J., DE La Cruz, B., et al. (In Press). Development and calibration data for the Healthcare Access Item Bank: A new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Quality of Life Research. Carlozzi, N.E., Kallen, M.A., Troost, J.P., Bragg, A., Marin-Howard, J., DE La Cruz, B., et al. (In Press). Development and calibration data for the Healthcare Access Item Bank: A new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Quality of Life Research.
21.
go back to reference Choi, S. W. (2009). Firestar: Computerized adaptive testing simulation program for polytomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(8), 644–645.CrossRef Choi, S. W. (2009). Firestar: Computerized adaptive testing simulation program for polytomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(8), 644–645.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, N., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, N., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Carlozzi, N. E., Boileau, N. R., Roche, M. W., Ready, R. E., Perlmutter, J. S., Chou, K. L., et al. (2020). Responsiveness to change over time and test-retest reliability of the PROMIS and Neuro-QoL mental health measures in persons with Huntington disease (HD). Quality of Life Research, 29(12), 3419–3439.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Carlozzi, N. E., Boileau, N. R., Roche, M. W., Ready, R. E., Perlmutter, J. S., Chou, K. L., et al. (2020). Responsiveness to change over time and test-retest reliability of the PROMIS and Neuro-QoL mental health measures in persons with Huntington disease (HD). Quality of Life Research, 29(12), 3419–3439.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Carlozzi, N. E., Goodnight, S., Kratz, A. L., Stout, J. C., McCormack, M. K., Paulsen, J. S., et al. (2019). Validation of neuro-QoL and PROMIS mental health patient reported outcome measures in persons with huntington disease. J Huntingtons Dis, 8(4), 467–482.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Carlozzi, N. E., Goodnight, S., Kratz, A. L., Stout, J. C., McCormack, M. K., Paulsen, J. S., et al. (2019). Validation of neuro-QoL and PROMIS mental health patient reported outcome measures in persons with huntington disease. J Huntingtons Dis, 8(4), 467–482.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gershon, R. C., Lai, J.-S., Bode, R., Choi, S., Moy, C., Bleck, T., et al. (2012). Neuro-QOL: Quality of life item banks for adults with neurological disorders: Item development and calibrations based upon clinical and general population testing. Quality of Life Research, 21(3), 475–486.PubMedCrossRef Gershon, R. C., Lai, J.-S., Bode, R., Choi, S., Moy, C., Bleck, T., et al. (2012). Neuro-QOL: Quality of life item banks for adults with neurological disorders: Item development and calibrations based upon clinical and general population testing. Quality of Life Research, 21(3), 475–486.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Miller, D. M., Bethoux, F., Victorson, D., Nowinski, C. J., Buono, S., Lai, J.-S., et al. (2015). Validating Neuro-QoL short forms and targeted scales with people who have multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 22(6), 830–841.PubMedCrossRef Miller, D. M., Bethoux, F., Victorson, D., Nowinski, C. J., Buono, S., Lai, J.-S., et al. (2015). Validating Neuro-QoL short forms and targeted scales with people who have multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 22(6), 830–841.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Nowinski, C. J., Siderowf, A., Simuni, T., Wortman, C., Moy, C., & Cella, D. (2016). Neuro-QoL health-related quality of life measurement system: Validation in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 31(5), 725–733.PubMedCrossRef Nowinski, C. J., Siderowf, A., Simuni, T., Wortman, C., Moy, C., & Cella, D. (2016). Neuro-QoL health-related quality of life measurement system: Validation in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 31(5), 725–733.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Victorson, D., Cavazos, J. E., Holmes, G. L., Reder, A. T., Wojna, V., Nowinski, C., et al. (2014). Validity of the neurology quality-of-life (Neuro-QoL) measurement system in adult epilepsy. Epilepsy Behavior, 31, 77–84.PubMedCrossRef Victorson, D., Cavazos, J. E., Holmes, G. L., Reder, A. T., Wojna, V., Nowinski, C., et al. (2014). Validity of the neurology quality-of-life (Neuro-QoL) measurement system in adult epilepsy. Epilepsy Behavior, 31, 77–84.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Healy, B. C., Zurawski, J., Gonzalez, C. T., Chitnis, T., Weiner, H. L., & Glanz, B. I. (2019). Assessment of computer adaptive testing version of the Neuro-QOL for people with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 25(13), 1791–1799.PubMedCrossRef Healy, B. C., Zurawski, J., Gonzalez, C. T., Chitnis, T., Weiner, H. L., & Glanz, B. I. (2019). Assessment of computer adaptive testing version of the Neuro-QOL for people with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 25(13), 1791–1799.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Tran, T. A., Williams, L. M., Bui, D., Anthonisen, C., Poltavskiy, E., & Szabo, R. M. (2018). Prospective Pilot Study Comparing pre- and postsurgical CTSAQ and Neuro-QoL questionnaire with median nerve high-resolution ultrasound cross-sectional areas. J Hand Surg Am, 43(2), 1841–1849.CrossRef Tran, T. A., Williams, L. M., Bui, D., Anthonisen, C., Poltavskiy, E., & Szabo, R. M. (2018). Prospective Pilot Study Comparing pre- and postsurgical CTSAQ and Neuro-QoL questionnaire with median nerve high-resolution ultrasound cross-sectional areas. J Hand Surg Am, 43(2), 1841–1849.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Greco, C. M., Yu, L., Johnston, K. L., Dodds, N. E., Morone, N. E., Glick, R. M., et al. (2015). Measuring nonspecific factors in treatment: Item banks that assess the healthcare experience and attitudes from the patient’s perspective. Quality of Life Research, 25(7), 1625–1634.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Greco, C. M., Yu, L., Johnston, K. L., Dodds, N. E., Morone, N. E., Glick, R. M., et al. (2015). Measuring nonspecific factors in treatment: Item banks that assess the healthcare experience and attitudes from the patient’s perspective. Quality of Life Research, 25(7), 1625–1634.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Tulsky, D. S., Kisala, P. A., Lai, J.-S., Carlozzi, N. E., Hammel, J., & Heinemann, A. W. (2015). Developing an item bank to measure economic quality of life for individuals with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(4), 604–613.PubMedCrossRef Tulsky, D. S., Kisala, P. A., Lai, J.-S., Carlozzi, N. E., Hammel, J., & Heinemann, A. W. (2015). Developing an item bank to measure economic quality of life for individuals with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(4), 604–613.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Heinemann, A. W., Magasi, S., Hammel, J., Carlozzi, N. E., Garcia, S. F., Hahn, E. A., et al. (2015). Environmental factors item development for persons with stroke, traumatic brain injury, and spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 589–595.PubMedCrossRef Heinemann, A. W., Magasi, S., Hammel, J., Carlozzi, N. E., Garcia, S. F., Hahn, E. A., et al. (2015). Environmental factors item development for persons with stroke, traumatic brain injury, and spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 589–595.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Tulsky, D. S., Kisala, P. A., Lai, J.-S., Carlozzi, N. E., Hammel, J., & Heinemann, A. W. (2015). Developing an item bank to measure economic quality of life for individuals with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 604–613.PubMedCrossRef Tulsky, D. S., Kisala, P. A., Lai, J.-S., Carlozzi, N. E., Hammel, J., & Heinemann, A. W. (2015). Developing an item bank to measure economic quality of life for individuals with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 604–613.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Sherer, M., Nick, T. G., Sander, A. M., Melguizo, M., Hanks, R., Novack, T., et al. (2017). Groupings of persons with traumatic brain injury: A new approach to classifying traumatic brain injury in the post-acute period. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 32(2), 125–133.PubMedCrossRef Sherer, M., Nick, T. G., Sander, A. M., Melguizo, M., Hanks, R., Novack, T., et al. (2017). Groupings of persons with traumatic brain injury: A new approach to classifying traumatic brain injury in the post-acute period. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 32(2), 125–133.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Carlozzi, N.E., Graves, C., Troost, J.P., Kallen, M.A., Tulsky, D.S., Hanks, R., et al. (In Press). Initial evidence for reliable and valid use of scores on the 8-item Econ-QOL short form to measure economic quality of life in caregivers of persons with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Psychology. Carlozzi, N.E., Graves, C., Troost, J.P., Kallen, M.A., Tulsky, D.S., Hanks, R., et al. (In Press). Initial evidence for reliable and valid use of scores on the 8-item Econ-QOL short form to measure economic quality of life in caregivers of persons with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Psychology.
37.
go back to reference McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
38.
go back to reference Cook, K. F., Kallen, M. A., & Amtmann, D. (2009). Having a fit: Impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT’s unidimensionality assumption. Quality of Life Research, 18(4), 447–460.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cook, K. F., Kallen, M. A., & Amtmann, D. (2009). Having a fit: Impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT’s unidimensionality assumption. Quality of Life Research, 18(4), 447–460.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Reise, S. P., Morizot, J., & Hays, R. D. (2007). The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 19–31.PubMedCrossRef Reise, S. P., Morizot, J., & Hays, R. D. (2007). The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 19–31.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Ramsay, J. (2000). TestGraf a program for the graphical analysis of multiple choice test and questionnaire data. McGill University. Ramsay, J. (2000). TestGraf a program for the graphical analysis of multiple choice test and questionnaire data. McGill University.
41.
go back to reference Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
42.
go back to reference Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.PubMedCrossRef Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling-a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRef Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling-a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute Inc. Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute Inc.
45.
go back to reference Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Choi, S., Junghaenel, D. U., Christoudolou, C., Gershon, R., et al. (2011). How item banks and its applications can influence measurement practice in rehabilitation medicine: A PROMIS fatigue item bank example. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 92(Supp 1), S20–S27.CrossRef Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Choi, S., Junghaenel, D. U., Christoudolou, C., Gershon, R., et al. (2011). How item banks and its applications can influence measurement practice in rehabilitation medicine: A PROMIS fatigue item bank example. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 92(Supp 1), S20–S27.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Lai, J.-S., Zelko, F., Krull, K., Cella, D., Nowinski, C., Manley, P., et al. (2014). Parent-reported cognition of children with cancer and its potential clinical usefulness. Quality of Life Research, 23(4), 1049–1058.PubMedCrossRef Lai, J.-S., Zelko, F., Krull, K., Cella, D., Nowinski, C., Manley, P., et al. (2014). Parent-reported cognition of children with cancer and its potential clinical usefulness. Quality of Life Research, 23(4), 1049–1058.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Whittaker, T. A. (2012). Using the modification index and standardized expected parameter change for model modification. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(1), 26–44.CrossRef Whittaker, T. A. (2012). Using the modification index and standardized expected parameter change for model modification. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(1), 26–44.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Kaplan, D. (1989). Model modification in covariance structure analysis: Application of the expected parameter change statistic. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24(3), 285–305.PubMedCrossRef Kaplan, D. (1989). Model modification in covariance structure analysis: Application of the expected parameter change statistic. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24(3), 285–305.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Luijben, T.C. & Boomsma, A. (1988). Statistical guidance for model modification in covariance structure analysis. Compstat (pp. 335–340) Luijben, T.C. & Boomsma, A. (1988). Statistical guidance for model modification in covariance structure analysis. Compstat (pp. 335–340)
50.
go back to reference Saris, W.E., Satorra, A., & Sorbom, D. (1987). The detection and correction of specification errors in structural equation models, in Sociological methodology In: C.C. Clogg, (Eds) Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, (pp. 105–129) Saris, W.E., Satorra, A., & Sorbom, D. (1987). The detection and correction of specification errors in structural equation models, in Sociological methodology In: C.C. Clogg, (Eds) Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, (pp. 105–129)
51.
go back to reference Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & van der Veld, W. M. (2009). Testing structural equation models for detection of misspecifications. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 561–582.CrossRef Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & van der Veld, W. M. (2009). Testing structural equation models for detection of misspecifications. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 561–582.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2011). Mplus User’s Guide. Muthén & Muthén. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2011). Mplus User’s Guide. Muthén & Muthén.
53.
go back to reference Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, R. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 552–566.PubMedCrossRef Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, R. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 552–566.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 5–26.CrossRef Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 5–26.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223–237.PubMedCrossRef Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223–237.PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores. Psychometrika, 34(4p2):p. 1-& Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores. Psychometrika, 34(4p2):p. 1-&
57.
go back to reference Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., Drasgow, F., & Williams, B. A. (2006). Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: Should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 25–39.PubMedCrossRef Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., Drasgow, F., & Williams, B. A. (2006). Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: Should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 25–39.PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Crisan, D. R., Tendeiro, J. N., & Meijer, R. R. (2017). Investigating the practical consequences of model misfit in unidimensional IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41, 439–455.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Crisan, D. R., Tendeiro, J. N., & Meijer, R. R. (2017). Investigating the practical consequences of model misfit in unidimensional IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41, 439–455.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., Tsein, S., Williams, B., & Mead, A. D. (1995). Fitting polytomous item response theory models to multiple-choice tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(2), 143–165.CrossRef Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., Tsein, S., Williams, B., & Mead, A. D. (1995). Fitting polytomous item response theory models to multiple-choice tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(2), 143–165.CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Zhao, Y. (2017). Impact of IRT item misfit on score estimates and severity classifications: An examination of PROMIS depression and pain interference item banks. Quality of Life Research, 26(3), 555–564.PubMedCrossRef Zhao, Y. (2017). Impact of IRT item misfit on score estimates and severity classifications: An examination of PROMIS depression and pain interference item banks. Quality of Life Research, 26(3), 555–564.PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 5–18.PubMedCrossRef Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 5–18.PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Cai, L., Thissen, D., & du Toit, S. H. C. (2015). IRTPRO for Windows [Computer software]. Scientific Software International. Cai, L., Thissen, D., & du Toit, S. H. C. (2015). IRTPRO for Windows [Computer software]. Scientific Software International.
63.
go back to reference Woods, C. M., Cai, L., & Wang, M. (2013). The langer-improved wald test for DIF testing with multiple groups: evaluation and comparison to two-group IRT. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(3), 532–547.CrossRef Woods, C. M., Cai, L., & Wang, M. (2013). The langer-improved wald test for DIF testing with multiple groups: evaluation and comparison to two-group IRT. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(3), 532–547.CrossRef
64.
go back to reference Wang, M., & Woods, C. M. (2017). Anchor selection using the wald test anchor-all-test-all procedure. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(1), 17–29.PubMedCrossRef Wang, M., & Woods, C. M. (2017). Anchor selection using the wald test anchor-all-test-all procedure. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(1), 17–29.PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Bjorner, J. B., Chang, C. H., Thissen, D., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 95–108.PubMedCrossRef Bjorner, J. B., Chang, C. H., Thissen, D., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 95–108.PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Cella, D., Gershon, R., Lai, J.-S., & Choi, S. (2007). The future of outcomes measurement: Item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 133–141.PubMedCrossRef Cella, D., Gershon, R., Lai, J.-S., & Choi, S. (2007). The future of outcomes measurement: Item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 133–141.PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: theory and practice (pp. 12–323). Kluwer Academic.CrossRef van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: theory and practice (pp. 12–323). Kluwer Academic.CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., Fischer, F., Anatchkova, M., Gandel, B., Klapp, B. F., et al. (2012). Computerized adaptive testing–ready for ambulatory monitoring? Psychosomatic Medicine, 74(4), 338–348.PubMedCrossRef Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., Fischer, F., Anatchkova, M., Gandel, B., Klapp, B. F., et al. (2012). Computerized adaptive testing–ready for ambulatory monitoring? Psychosomatic Medicine, 74(4), 338–348.PubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Smits, N., Paap, M. C. S., & Bohnke, J. R. (2018). Some recommendations for developing multidimensional computerized adaptive tests for patient-reported outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 27(4), 1055–1063.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Smits, N., Paap, M. C. S., & Bohnke, J. R. (2018). Some recommendations for developing multidimensional computerized adaptive tests for patient-reported outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 27(4), 1055–1063.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Thissen, D., Reeve, B. B., Bjorner, J. B., & Chang, C. H. (2007). Methodological issues for building item banks and computerized adaptive scales. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 109–119.PubMedCrossRef Thissen, D., Reeve, B. B., Bjorner, J. B., & Chang, C. H. (2007). Methodological issues for building item banks and computerized adaptive scales. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 109–119.PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Wainer, H., & Dorans, N. J. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: a primer (2nd ed., pp. xxiii–335). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRef Wainer, H., & Dorans, N. J. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: a primer (2nd ed., pp. xxiii–335). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRef
72.
go back to reference Choi, S. W., Podrabsky, T., & McKinney, N. (2012). Firestar-D: Computerized adaptive testing simulation program for dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36(1), 67–68.CrossRef Choi, S. W., Podrabsky, T., & McKinney, N. (2012). Firestar-D: Computerized adaptive testing simulation program for dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36(1), 67–68.CrossRef
73.
go back to reference Pilkonis, P. A., Yu, L., Dodds, N. E., Johnston, K. L., Maihoefer, C. C., & Lawrence, S. M. (2014). Validation of the depression item bank from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) in a three-month observational study. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 56, 112–119.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pilkonis, P. A., Yu, L., Dodds, N. E., Johnston, K. L., Maihoefer, C. C., & Lawrence, S. M. (2014). Validation of the depression item bank from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) in a three-month observational study. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 56, 112–119.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.PubMedCrossRef Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Andresen, E. M. (2000). Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 81(12 Suppl 2), S15-20.CrossRef Andresen, E. M. (2000). Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 81(12 Suppl 2), S15-20.CrossRef
76.
go back to reference Cramer, D., & Howitt, D. L. (2004). The Sage disctionary of statistics. Sage.CrossRef Cramer, D., & Howitt, D. L. (2004). The Sage disctionary of statistics. Sage.CrossRef
77.
go back to reference Heaton, R. K., Miller, S. W., Taylor, J. T., & Grant, I. (2004). Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-reitan battery: Demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Caucasian adults. Psychological Assessment Resources Inc. Heaton, R. K., Miller, S. W., Taylor, J. T., & Grant, I. (2004). Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-reitan battery: Demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Caucasian adults. Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.
78.
go back to reference Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores (Psychometric Monograph No. 17). Psychometric Society. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores (Psychometric Monograph No. 17). Psychometric Society.
79.
go back to reference Muraki, E. (1990). Fitting a polytomous item response model to Likert-type data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 59–71.CrossRef Muraki, E. (1990). Fitting a polytomous item response model to Likert-type data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 59–71.CrossRef
80.
go back to reference Clauser, B. E., & Hambleton, R. K. (1994). Review of differential item functioning. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(1), 88–92. Clauser, B. E., & Hambleton, R. K. (1994). Review of differential item functioning. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(1), 88–92.
81.
go back to reference Mitchell, S., Kallen, M.A., Troost, J.P., Bragg, A., Marin-Howard, J., Moldovan, I., et al. (In Press). Development and calibration data for the Illness Burden Item Bank: A new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Quality of Life Research. Mitchell, S., Kallen, M.A., Troost, J.P., Bragg, A., Marin-Howard, J., Moldovan, I., et al. (In Press). Development and calibration data for the Illness Burden Item Bank: A new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Quality of Life Research.
82.
go back to reference Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.PubMedCrossRef Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.PubMedCrossRef
83.
go back to reference Carlozzi, N. E., Lange, R. T., French, L., Kallen, M. A., Boileau, N. R., Hanks, R., et al. (2020). TBI-CareQOL military health care frustration in caregivers of service members/veterans with traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 65(4), 360–376.PubMedCrossRef Carlozzi, N. E., Lange, R. T., French, L., Kallen, M. A., Boileau, N. R., Hanks, R., et al. (2020). TBI-CareQOL military health care frustration in caregivers of service members/veterans with traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 65(4), 360–376.PubMedCrossRef
84.
go back to reference Ruo, B., Choi, S. W., Baker, D. W., Grady, K. L., & Cella, D. (2010). Development and validation of a computer adaptive test for measuring dyspnea in heart failure. Journal of Cardiac Failure, 16(8), 659–668.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ruo, B., Choi, S. W., Baker, D. W., Grady, K. L., & Cella, D. (2010). Development and validation of a computer adaptive test for measuring dyspnea in heart failure. Journal of Cardiac Failure, 16(8), 659–668.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Development and calibration data for the Medication Adherence Item Bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Auteurs
Noelle E. Carlozzi
Michael A. Kallen
Jonathan Troost
Alexa Bragg
Jessica Martin-Howard
Ioana Moldovan
Jennifer A. Miner
Brian W. Jack
Suzanne Mitchell
Publicatiedatum
28-10-2022
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2023
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03275-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2023

Quality of Life Research 3/2023 Naar de uitgave