Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 3/2023

25-10-2022

Development and calibration data for the Illness Burden item bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Auteurs: Suzanne Mitchell, Michael A. Kallen, Jonathan P. Troost, Alexa Bragg, Jessica Martin-Howard, Ioana Moldovan, Jennifer A. Miner, Brian W. Jack, Noelle E. Carlozzi

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2023

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to develop a new measure, the Re-Engineered Discharge for Diabetes Computer Adaptive Test (REDD-CAT) Illness Burden item bank, to evaluate the impact that a chronic condition has on independent living, the ability to work (including working at home), social activities, and relationships.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were used to inform the development of an item pool (47 items) that captured patients’ beliefs about how a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes interferes with different aspects of their lives. The Illness Burden item bank was developed and tested in 225 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Results

No items had sparse response option cells or problems with monotonicity; two items were deleted due to low item-rest correlations. Factor analyses supported the retention of 29 items. With those 29 remaining items, a constrained (common slope) graded response model fit assessment indicated that two items had misfit; they were excluded. No items displayed differential item functioning by age, sex, education, or socio-economic status. The final item bank is comprised of 27 items. Preliminary data supported the reliability (internal consistency and test–retest reliability) and validity (convergent, discriminant, and known-groups) of the new bank.

Conclusion

The Illness Burden item bank can be administered as a computer adaptive test or a 6-item short form. This new measure captures patients’ perceptions of the impact that having type 2 diabetes has on their daily lives; it can be used in conjunction with the REDD-CAT measurement system to evaluate important social determinants of health in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
vorige artikel Development and calibration data for the Healthcare Access Item Bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus
volgende artikel Development and calibration data for the Medication Adherence Item Bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Alva, M., Gray, A., Mihaylova, B., & Clarke, P. (2014). The effect of diabetes complications on health-related quality of life: The importance of longitudinal data to address patient heterogeneity. Health Economics, 23(4), 487–500.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Peyrot, M., Rubin, R. R., Lauritzen, T., Snoek, F. J., Matthews, D. R., & Skovlund, S. E. (2005). Psychosocial problems and barriers to improved diabetes management: Results of the Cross-National Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) Study. Diabetic Medicine, 22(10), 1379–1385.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Noor-Mahomed, S. B., Schlebusch, L., & Bosch, B. A. (2003). Suicidal behavior in patients diagnosed with cancer of the cervix. Crisis, 24(4), 168–172.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Wilson, K. G., Curran, D., & McPherson, C. J. (2005). A burden to others: A common source of distress for the terminally ill. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 34(2), 115–123.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Filiberti, A., Ripamonti, C., Totis, A., Ventafridda, V., De Conno, F., Contiero, P., & Tamburini, M. (2001). Characteristics of terminal cancer patients who committed suicide during a home palliative care program. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 22(1), 544–553.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Iskandarsyah, A., de Klerk, C., Suardi, D. R., Soemitro, M. P., Sadarjoen, S. S., & Passchier, J. (2014). Psychosocial and cultural reasons for delay in seeking help and nonadherence to treatment in Indonesian women with breast cancer: A qualitative study. Health Psychology, 33(3), 214–221.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Lutz, J., Katz, E., Gallegos, J., Spalding, R., & Edelstein, B. (2020). The geriatric feelings of burdensomeness scale (GFBS). Clinical Gerontologist, 45, 1–12.
8.
McGuire, T., Wells, K. B., Bruce, M. L., Miranda, J., Scheffler, R., Durham, M., Ford, D. E., Lewis, L., & Workgroup, N. A. D. (2002). Burden of illness. Mental Health Services Research, 4(4), 179–185.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Hessel, F. (2008). Burden of disease. In W. Kirch (Ed.), Encyclopedia of public health. Springer.
10.
11.
Widdifield, J., Ivers, N. M., Young, J., Green, D., Jaakkimainen, L., Butt, D. A., O’Connor, P., Hollands, S., & Tu, K. (2015). Development and validation of an administrative data algorithm to estimate the disease burden and epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in Ontario, Canada. Multiple Sclerosis, 21(8), 1045–1054.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Devins, G. M., Armstrong, S. J., Mandin, H., Paul, L. C., Hons, R. B., Burgess, E. D., Taub, K., Schorr, S., Letourneau, P. K., & Buckle, S. (1990). Recurrent pain, illness intrusiveness, and quality of life in end-stage renal disease. Pain, 42(3), 279–285.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Devins, G. M., Mandin, H., Hons, R. B., Burgess, E. D., Klassen, J., Taub, K., Schorr, S., Letourneau, P. K., & Buckle, S. (1990). Illness intrusiveness and quality of life in end-stage renal disease: Comparison and stability across treatment modalities. Health Psychology, 9(2), 117–142.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Ortiz, A., Bradler, K., Moorti, P., MacLean, S., Husain, M. I., Sanches, M., Goldstein, B. I., Alda, M., & Mulsant, B. H. (2021). Reduced heart rate variability is associated with higher illness burden in bipolar disorder. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 145, 110478.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Devins, G. M. (2010). Using the illness intrusiveness ratings scale to understand health-related quality of life in chronic disease. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 68(6), 591–602.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Cina, C. S., & Clase, C. M. (1999). The Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale: A measure of severity in individuals with hyperhidrosis. Quality of Life Research, 8(8), 693–698.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Portenoy, R. K., Thaler, H. T., Kornblith, A. B., Lepore, J. M., Friedlander-Klar, H., Kiyasu, E., Sobel, K., Coyle, N., Kemeny, N., Norton, L., & Scher, H. (1994). The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale: An instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress. European Journal of Cancer, 30A(9), 1326–1336.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Armand, M. L., Taieb, C., Bourgeois, A., Bourlier, M., Bennani, M., Bodemer, C., Wolkenstein, P., along with the French national network on rare skin, d. (2019). Burden of adult neurofibromatosis 1: Development and validation of a burden assessment tool. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 14(1), 94.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Heiberg, T., Nordby, T., Kvien, T. K., & Buanes, T. (2013). Development and preliminary validation of the pancreatic cancer disease impact score. Supportive Care in Cancer, 21(6), 1677–1684.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
Ishak, W. W., Greenberg, J. M., Saah, T., Mobaraki, S., Fakhry, H., Wu, Q. V., Ngor, E., Yu, F., & Cohen, R. M. (2013). Development and validation of the Individual Burden of Illness Index for Major Depressive Disorder (IBI-D). Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 40(2), 76–86.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Herekar, A. D., Herekar, A. A., Ahmad, A., Uqaili, U. L., Ahmed, B., Effendi, J., Alvi, S. Z., & Steiner, T. J. (2013). The burden of headache disorders in Pakistan: Methodology of a population-based nationwide study, and questionnaire validation. The Journal of Headache and Pain, 14, 73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
23.
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. L. Erlbaum Associates.
24.
Wu, M., Jen, T.-H., & Tam, H. P. (2016). Educational measurement for applied researchers: Theory into practice (1st ed., pp. 1 online resource (XIV, 306 pages 114 illustrations, 374 illustrations in color). Springer.
25.
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., Amtmann, D., Bode, R., Buysse, D., Choi, S., Cook, K., DeVellis, R., DeWalt, D., Fries, J., Gershon, R., Hahn, E., Lai, J.-S., Pilkonis, P., Revicki, D., … Hays, R. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested in its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 1179–1194.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., Ader, D., Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Rose, M. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first 2 years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
Cella, D., Lai, J. S., Nowinski, C., Victorson, D., Peterman, A., Miller, D., Bethoux, F., Heinemann, A., Rubin, S., Cavasos, J., Reder, A., Sufit, R., Simuni, T., Holmes, G., Siderowf, A., Wojna, V., Bode, R., McKinney, N., Podrabsky, T., … Moy, C. (2012). Neuro-QOL: Brief measures of health-related quality of life for Clinical Research in Neurology. Neurology, 78, 1860–1867.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Cella, D., Nowinski, C., Peterman, A., Victorson, D., Miller, D., Lai, J.-S., & Moy, C. (2011). The Neurology Quality of Life Measurement (Neuro-QOL) Initiative. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Supplement, 92(Suppl 1), S28–S36.CrossRef
29.
Bjorner, J. B., Chang, C. H., Thissen, D., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 95–108.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Cella, D., Gershon, R., Lai, J. S., & Choi, S. (2007). The future of outcomes measurement: Item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 133–141.PubMedCrossRef
31.
van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Kluwer Academic.CrossRef
32.
Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., Fischer, F., Anatchkova, M., Gandek, B., Klapp, B. F., & Ware, J. E. (2012). Computerized adaptive testing—Ready for ambulatory monitoring? Psychosomatic Medicine, 74(4), 338–348.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Smits, N., Paap, M. C. S., & Bohnke, J. R. (2018). Some recommendations for developing multidimensional computerized adaptive tests for patient-reported outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 27(4), 1055–1063.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Thissen, D., Reeve, B. B., Bjorner, J. B., & Chang, C. H. (2007). Methodological issues for building item banks and computerized adaptive scales. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 109–119.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Wainer, H., & Dorans, N. J. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRef
36.
Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Choi, S., Junghaenel, D. U., Christoudolou, C., Gershon, R., & Stone, A. (2011). How item banks and its applications can influence measurement practice in rehabilitation medicine: A PROMIS fatigue item bank example. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 92(Supp 1), S20–S27.CrossRef
37.
Cappelleri, J. C., Jason Lundy, J., & Hays, R. D. (2014). Overview of classical test theory and item response theory for the quantitative assessment of items in developing patient-reported outcomes measures. Clinical Therapeutics, 36(5), 648–662.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Carlozzi, N. E., Kallen, M. A., Troost, J. P., Bragg, A., Marin-Howard, J., De la Cruz, B., Miner, J. A., Moldovan, I., Jack, B. W., & Mitchell, S. (In Press). Development and calibration data for the Healthcare Access Item Bank: A new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Quality of Life Research.
39.
Carlozzi, N. E., Kallen, M., Troost, J., Bragg, A., Marin-Howard, J., Moldovan, I., Miner, J. A., Jack, B. W., & Mitchell, S. (In Press). Development and calibration data for the Medication Adherence Item Bank: A new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Quality of Life Research.
40.
Hahn, E. A., & Cella, D. (2003). Health outcomes assessment in vulnerable populations: Measurement challenges and recommendations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(4 Suppl 2), S35-42.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). WRAT 4: Wide range achievement test professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
42.
Cancino, R., Esang, M., Martin, J., Morton, S., Kazis, L., & Jack, B. (2014). Development of a patient-centered instrument to evaluate 30-day hospital readmission, academy health. San Diego.
43.
Strunin, L., Stone, M., & Jack, B. (2007). Understanding rehospitalization risk: Can hospital discharge be modified to reduce recurrent hospitalization? Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2(5), 297–304.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Jack, B., Greenwald, J., Forsythe, S., O’Donnell, J., Johnson, A., Schipelliti, L., Goodwin, M., Burniske, G. M., Hesko, C., Paasche-Orlow, M., Manasseh, C., Anthony, D., Martin, S., Hollister, L., Jack, M., Jhaveri, V., Casey, K., & Chetty, V. K. (2008). Developing the Tools to Administer a Comprehensive Hospital Discharge Program: The ReEngineered Discharge (RED) Program. In B. J. K. Henriksen, M. A. Keyes, & M. L. Grady (Eds.), Advances in patient safety: New directions and alternative approaches. (Vol. 3). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
45.
Anthony, D., Chetty, V. K., Kartha, A., McKenna, K., DePaoli, M. R., & Jack, B. (2005). Re-engineering the hospital discharge: An example of a multifaceted process evaluation. In K. Henriksen, J. B. Battles, E. S. Marks, & D. I. Lewin (Eds.), Advances in patient safety: From research to implementation (volume 2: Concepts and methodology). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US).
46.
Mitchell, S. E., Laurens, V., Weigel, G. M., Hirschman, K. B., Scott, A. M., Nguyen, H. Q., Howard, J. M., Laird, L., Levine, C., Davis, T. C., Gass, B., Shaid, E., Li, J., Williams, M. V., & Jack, B. W. (2018). Care transitions from patient and caregiver perspectives. Annals of Family Medicine, 16(3), 225–231.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
Li, J., Brock, J., Jack, B., Mittman, B., Naylor, M., Sorra, J., Mays, G., Williams, M. V., & Project, A. T. (2016). Project ACHIEVE—Using implementation research to guide the evaluation of transitional care effectiveness. BMC Health Services Research, 16, 70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
Naylor, M. D., Shaid, E. C., Carpenter, D., Gass, B., Levine, C., Li, J., Malley, A., McCauley, K., Nguyen, H. Q., Watson, H., Brock, J., Mittman, B., Jack, B., Mitchell, S., Callicoatte, B., Schall, J., & Williams, M. V. (2017). Components of comprehensive and effective transitional care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 65(6), 1119–1125.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
50.
Cook, K. F., Kallen, M. A., & Amtmann, D. (2009). Having a fit: Impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT’s unidimensionality assumption. Quality of Life Research, 18(4), 447–460.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
51.
Reise, S. P., Morizot, J., & Hays, R. D. (2007). The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 19–31.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika, 34(4p2), 1–97.CrossRef
53.
Choi, S. W., Podrabsky, T., & McKinney, N. (2012). Firestar-D: Computerized adaptive testing simulation program for dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36(1), 67–68.CrossRef
54.
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., Amtmann, D., Bode, R., Buysse, D., Choi, S., Cook, K., DeVellis, R., DeWalt, D., Fries, J. F., Gershon, R., Hahn, E. A., Lai, J.-S., Pilkonis, P., Revicki, D., … Hays, R. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
55.
Carlozzi, N. E., Boileau, N. R., Roche, M. W., Ready, R. E., Perlmutter, J. S., Chou, K. L., Barton, S. K., McCormack, M. K., Stout, J. C., Cella, D., Miner, J. A., & Paulsen, J. S. (2020). Responsiveness to change over time and test–retest reliability of the PROMIS and Neuro-QoL mental health measures in persons with Huntington disease (HD). Quality of Life Research, 29(12), 3419–3439.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
Carlozzi, N. E., Goodnight, S., Kratz, A. L., Stout, J. C., McCormack, M. K., Paulsen, J. S., Boileau, N. R., Cella, D., & Ready, R. E. (2019). Validation of Neuro-QoL and PROMIS mental health patient reported outcome measures in persons with Huntington disease. Journal of Huntington’s Disease, 8(4), 467–482.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
57.
Gershon, R. C., Lai, J. S., Bode, R., Choi, S., Moy, C., Bleck, T., Miller, D., Peterman, A., & Cella, D. (2012). Neuro-QOL: Quality of life item banks for adults with neurological disorders: Item development and calibrations based upon clinical and general population testing. Quality of Life Research, 21(3), 475–486.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Miller, D. M., Bethoux, F., Victorson, D., Nowinski, C. J., Buono, S., Lai, J. S., Wortman, K., Burns, J. L., Moy, C., & Cella, D. (2015). Validating Neuro-QoL short forms and targeted scales with people who have multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 22, 830–841.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Nowinski, C. J., Siderowf, A., Simuni, T., Wortman, C., Moy, C., & Cella, D. (2016). Neuro-QoL health-related quality of life measurement system: Validation in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 31(5), 725–733.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Victorson, D., Cavazos, J. E., Holmes, G. L., Reder, A. T., Wojna, V., Nowinski, C., Miller, D., Buono, S., Mueller, A., Moy, C., & Cella, D. (2014). Validity of the Neurology Quality-of-Life (Neuro-QoL) measurement system in adult epilepsy. Epilepsy Behavior, 31, 77–84.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Healy, B. C., Zurawski, J., Gonzalez, C. T., Chitnis, T., Weiner, H. L., & Glanz, B. I. (2019). Assessment of computer adaptive testing version of the Neuro-QOL for people with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 25(13), 1791–1799.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Hahn, E. A., Dewalt, D. A., Bode, R. K., Garcia, S. F., Devellis, R. F., Correia, H., & Cella, D. (2014). New English and Spanish social health measures will facilitate evaluating health determinants. Health Psychology, 33(5), 490–499.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
63.
Greco, C. M., Yu, L., Johnston, K. L., Dodds, N. E., Morone, N. E., Glick, R. M., Schneider, M. J., Klem, M. L., McFarland, C. E., Lawrence, S., Colditz, J., Maihoefer, C. C., Jonas, W. B., Ryan, N. D., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2015). Measuring nonspecific factors in treatment: Item banks that assess the healthcare experience and attitudes from the patient’s perspective. Quality of Life Research, 25, 1625–1634.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
Tulsky, D. S., Kisala, P. A., Lai, J. S., Carlozzi, N., Hammel, J., & Heinemann, A. W. (2015). Developing an item bank to measure economic quality of life for individuals with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(4), 604–613.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Heinemann, A. W., Magasi, S., Hammel, J., Carlozzi, N. E., Garcia, S. F., Hahn, E. A., Lai, J. S., Tulsky, D., Gray, D. B., Hollingsworth, H., & Jerousek, S. (2015). Environmental factors item development for persons with stroke, traumatic brain injury, and spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 589–595.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Tulsky, D. S., Kisala, P. A., Lai, J. S., Carlozzi, N., Hammel, J., & Heinemann, A. W. (2015). Developing an item bank to measure economic quality of life for individuals with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 604–613.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Sherer, M., Nick, T. G., Sander, A. M., Melguizo, M., Hanks, R., Novack, T. A., Tulsky, D., Kisala, P., Luo, C., & Tang, X. (2017). Groupings of persons with traumatic brain injury: A new approach to classifying traumatic brain injury in the post-acute period. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 32(2), 125–133.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Carlozzi, N. E., Graves, C., Troost, J., Kallen, M. A., Tulsky, D. S., Hanks, R. A., Ianni, P. A., Miner, J. A., & Sander, A. M. (In Press). Initial evidence for reliable and valid use of scores on the 8-item Econ-QOL short form to measure economic quality of life in caregivers of persons with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, S0003-9993(22)00573-1. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​apmr.​2022.​07.​015.
69.
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Minor, B. L., Elliott, V., Fernandez, M., O’Neal, L., McLeod, L., Delacqua, G., Delacqua, F., Kirby, J., Duda, S. N., & Consortium, R. E. (2019). The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 95, 103208.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377–381.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Ramsay, J. (2000). TestGraf a program for the graphical analysis of multiple choice test and questionnaire data. McGill University.
72.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
73.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.PubMedCrossRef
74.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling—A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRef
75.
Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute, Inc.
76.
Lai, J.-S., Zelko, F., Krull, K., Cella, D., Nowinski, C., Manley, P., & Goldman, S. (2014). Parent-reported cognition of children with cancer and its potential clinical usefulness. Quality of Life Research, 23(4), 1049–1058.PubMedCrossRef
77.
Whittaker, T. A. (2012). Using the modification index and standardized expected parameter change for model modification. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(1), 26–44.CrossRef
78.
Kaplan, D. (1989). Model modification in covariance structure analysis: Application of the expected parameter change statistic. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24(3), 285–305.PubMedCrossRef
79.
Luijben, T. C., & Boomsma, A. (1988). Statistical guidance for model modification in covariance structure analysis. Compstat, 1988, 335–340.CrossRef
80.
Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & Sorbom, D. (1987). The detection and correction of specification errors in structural equation models. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 105–129). Jossey-Bass.
81.
Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & van der Veld, W. M. (2009). Testing structural equation models for detection of misspecifications. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 561–582.CrossRef
82.
Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, R. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 552–566.PubMedCrossRef
83.
Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 5–26.CrossRef
84.
Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223–237.PubMedCrossRef
85.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2011). Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén.
86.
Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., Drasgow, F., & Williams, B. A. (2006). Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: Should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 25–39.PubMedCrossRef
87.
Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., Tsien, S., Williams, B., & Mead, A. D. (1995). Fitting polytomous item response theory models to multiple-choice tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(2), 143–165.CrossRef
88.
Crisan, D. R., Tendeiro, J. N., & Meijer, R. R. (2017). Investigating the practical consequences of model misfit in unidimensional IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41, 439–455.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
89.
Zhao, Y. (2017). Impact of IRT item misfit on score estimates and severity classifications: An examination of PROMIS depression and pain interference item banks. Quality of Life Research, 26(3), 555–564.PubMedCrossRef
90.
Edelen, M. O., Stucky, B. D., & Chandra, A. (2015). Quantifying “problematic” DIF within an IRT framework: Application to a cancer stigma index. Quality of Life Research, 24(1), 95–103.PubMedCrossRef
91.
Clauser, B. E., & Hambleton, R. K. (1994). Review of differential item functioning. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(1), 88–92.
92.
Cai, L., Thissen, D., & du Toit, S. H. C. (2015). IRTPRO for Windows [Computer software]. Scientific Software International.
93.
Woods, C. M., Cai, L., & Wang, M. (2013). The Langer-improved Wald test for DIF testing with multiple groups: Evaluation and comparison to two-group IRT. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(3), 532–547.CrossRef
94.
Wang, M., & Woods, C. M. (2017). Anchor selection using the Wald test anchor-all-test-all procedure. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(1), 17–29.PubMedCrossRef
95.
Pilkonis, P. A., Yu, L., Dodds, N. E., Johnston, K. L., Maihoefer, C. C., & Lawrence, S. M. (2014). Validation of the depression item bank from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in a 3-month observational study. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 56, 112–119.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
96.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.PubMedCrossRef
97.
Andresen, E. M. (2000). Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 81(12 Suppl 2), S15-20.CrossRef
98.
Cramer, D., & Howitt, D. L. (2004). The Sage dictionary of statistics. Sage.CrossRef
99.
Taylor, R. (1990). Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: A basic review. Journal of Diagnostic and Medical Sonography, 1, 35–39.CrossRef
100.
Heaton, R. K., Miller, S. W., Taylor, J. T., & Grant, I. (2004). Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead–Reitan Battery: Demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Caucasian adults. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
101.
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores (psychometric monograph No. 17). Psychometric Society.
102.
Muraki, E. (1990). Fitting a polytomous item response model to Likert-type data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 59–71.CrossRef
103.
Clauser, B. E., & Hambleton, R. K. (1994). Review of differential item functioning, P. W. Holland, H. Wainer. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(1), 88–92.
104.
105.
Tan, X., Lee, L. K., Huynh, S., Pawaskar, M., & Rajpathak, S. (2020). Sociodemographic disparities in the management of type 2 diabetes in the United States. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 36(6), 967–976.PubMedCrossRef
106.
Bijlsma-Rutte, A., Rutters, F., Elders, P. J. M., Bot, S. D. M., & Nijpels, G. (2018). Socio-economic status and HbA1c in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 34(6), e3008.PubMedCrossRef
107.
Canedo, J. R., Miller, S. T., Schlundt, D., Fadden, M. K., & Sanderson, M. (2018). Racial/ethnic disparities in diabetes quality of care: The role of healthcare access and socioeconomic status. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 5(1), 7–14.PubMedCrossRef
108.
Carlozzi, N., Lange, R., French, L., Kallen, M., Boileau, N., Hanks, R., Nakase-Richardson, R., Massengale, J., Sander, A., Hahn, E., Miner, J., & Brickell, T. (2020). TBI-CareQOL military health care frustration in caregivers of service members/veterans with traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 65(4), 360–376.PubMedCrossRef
109.
Ruo, B., Choi, S. W., Baker, D. W., Grady, K. L., & Cella, D. (2010). Development and validation of a computer adaptive test for measuring dyspnea in heart failure. Journal of Cardiac Failure, 16(8), 659–668.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Development and calibration data for the Illness Burden item bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Auteurs
Suzanne Mitchell
Michael A. Kallen
Jonathan P. Troost
Alexa Bragg
Jessica Martin-Howard
Ioana Moldovan
Jennifer A. Miner
Brian W. Jack
Noelle E. Carlozzi
Publicatiedatum
25-10-2022
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2023
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03282-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2023

Quality of Life Research 3/2023 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Development and calibration data for the Healthcare Access Item Bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus

OriginalPaper

Heterogeneity of quality of life in the later stages of first-episode psychosis recovery

OriginalPaper

Investigating gender-based differential item functioning on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) using qualitative content analysis

OriginalPaper

The impact of restrictions on psychological outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease on biological treatment during the coronavirus pandemic in Norway

OriginalPaper

Flexible modeling of longitudinal health-related quality of life data accounting for informative dropout in a cancer clinical trial

OriginalPaper

Development of the functional assessment of migraine scale using a patient guided approach