Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

31-10-2022

Development and calibration data for the Healthcare Access Item Bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Auteurs: Noelle E. Carlozzi, Michael A. Kallen, Jonathan P. Troost, Alexa Bragg, Jessica Martin-Howard, Barbara De La Cruz, Jennifer A. Miner, Ioana Moldovan, Brian W. Jack, Suzanne Mitchell

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2023

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to develop a new measure to evaluate the ability to receive medical services when needed among persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

The Healthcare Access measure was developed using data from 225 persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus who completed an item pool comprised of 54 questions pertaining to their experience accessing healthcare services.

Results

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported the retention of 45 items. In addition, a constrained graded response model (GRM), as well as analyses that examined item misfit and differential item functioning (investigated for age, sex, education, race, and socioeconomic status), supported the retention of 44 items in the final item bank. Expert review and GRM item calibration products were used to inform the selection of a 6-item static short form and to program the Healthcare Access computer adaptive test (CAT). Preliminary data supported the reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test–retest reliability) and validity (i.e., convergent, discriminant, and known-groups) of the new measure.

Conclusions

The new Healthcare Access item bank can be used to examine the experiences that persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus have with healthcare access, to better target treatment improvements and mitigate disparities; it will be available as a part of the Neuro-Qol measurement system through healthmeasures.net and the PROMIS Application Programmable Interface (API) in early 2023.
vorige artikel Heterogeneity of quality of life in the later stages of first-episode psychosis recovery
volgende artikel Development and calibration data for the Illness Burden item bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2016). Statistical Brief #72 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). AHRQ.
2.
U.S Department of Health and Human Services, & Prevention, C. f. D. C. a. (2020). National diabetes statistics report 2020: Estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States. cdc.gov.
3.
Elixhauser, A., & Steiner, C. (2006). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.
4.
5.
Ong, S. E., Koh, J. J. K., Toh, S. E. S., Chia, K. S., Balabanova, D., McKee, M., Perel, P., & Legido-Quigley, H. (2018). Assessing the influence of health systems on type 2 diabetes mellitus awareness, treatment, adherence, and control: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 13(3), e0195086.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
Mansyur, C. L., Rustveld, L. O., Nash, S. G., & Jibaja-Weiss, M. L. (2015). Social factors and barriers to self-care adherence in Hispanic men and women with diabetes. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(6), 805–810.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Titus, S. K., & Kataoka-Yahiro, M. (2021). Barriers to access to care in Hispanics With type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. Hisp Health Care Int, 19(2), 118–130.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Titus, S. K., & Kataoka-Yahiro, M. (2019). A Systematic review of barriers to access-to-care in Hispanics with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 30(3), 280–290.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Harris, M. I. (2001). Racial and ethnic differences in health care access and health outcomes for adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 24(3), 454–459.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Canedo, J. R., Miller, S. T., Schlundt, D., Fadden, M. K., & Sanderson, M. (2018). Racial/Ethnic disparities in diabetes quality of care: The role of healthcare access and socioeconomic status. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 5(1), 7–14.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Campbell, J. A., & Egede, L. E. (2020). Individual-, community-, and health system-level barriers to optimal type 2 diabetes care for inner-city African Americans: An integrative review and model development. The Diabetes Educator, 46(1), 11–27.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Suresh, N., & Thankappan, K. R. (2019). Gender differences and barriers women face in relation to accessing type 2 diabetes care: A systematic review. Indian Journal of Public Health, 63(1), 65–72.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Tan, X., Lee, L. K., Huynh, S., Pawaskar, M., & Rajpathak, S. (2020). Sociodemographic disparities in the management of type 2 diabetes in the United States. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 36(6), 967–976.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Bijlsma-Rutte, A., Rutters, F., Elders, P. J. M., Bot, S. D. M., & Nijpels, G. (2018). Socio-economic status and HbA1c in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 34(6), e3008.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Institute of Medicine Board of Health Care Services. (2010). Future directions for the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports. National Academic Press.
16.
17.
Gulliford, M., Figueroa-Munoz, J., Morgan, M., Hughes, D., Gibson, B., Beech, R., & Hudson, M. (2002). What does ‘access to health care’ mean? Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 7(3), 186–188.CrossRef
18.
Berk, M. L., & Schur, C. L. (1998). Measuring access to care: Improving information for policymakers. Health Affairs (Millwood), 17(1), 180–186.CrossRef
19.
Quinn, M., Robinson, C., Forman, J., Krein, S. L., & Rosland, A. M. (2017). Survey instruments to assess patient experiences with access and coordination across health care settings: available and needed measures. Medical Care, 55(1), S84–S91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
21.
22.
Hoseini-Esfidarjani, S. S., Negarandeh, R., Delavar, F., & Janani, L. (2021). Psychometric evaluation of the perceived access to health care questionnaire. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), 638.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
Scatena, L. M., Wysocki, A. D., Beraldo, A. A., Magnabosco, G. T., Brunello, M. E., Netto Ruffino, A., Nogueira Jde, A., Silva Sobrinho, R. A., Brito, E. W., Alexandre, P. B., Monroe, A. A., & Villa, T. C. (2015). Validity and reliability of a health care service evaluation instrument for tuberculosis. Revista de Saude Publica, 49, 7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Evensen, C. T., Yost, K. J., Keller, S., Arora, N. K., Frentzel, E., Cowans, T., & Garfinkel, S. A. (2019). Development and testing of the CAHPS cancer care survey. Journal of Oncology Practice/ American Society of Clinical Oncology, 15(11), e969–e978.CrossRef
25.
Fortney, J. C., Pyne, J. M., Hawrilenko, M., Bechtel, J. M., Moore, D., Nolan, J. P., Pfeiffer, P., Shushan, S., Shore, J. H., & Bowen, D. (2021). Psychometric properties of the assessment of perceived access to care (APAC) instrument. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 44(1), 31–45.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Clement, S., Brohan, E., Jeffery, D., Henderson, C., Hatch, S. L., & Thornicroft, G. (2012). Development and psychometric properties the barriers to access to care evaluation scale (BACE) related to people with mental ill health. BMC Psychiatry, 12, 36.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
Pyne, J. M., Kelly, P. A., Fischer, E. P., Miller, C. J., Wright, P., Zamora, K., Koenig, C. J., Stanley, R., Seal, K., Burgess, J. F., & Fortney, J. C. (2020). Development of the perceived access inventory: A patient-centered measure of access to mental health care. Psychological Services, 17(1), 13–24.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Drum, C. E., Horner-Johnson, W., & Walsh, E. S. (2012). Construction and validation of the outpatient health care usability profile (OHCUP). Disability and Health Journal, 5(4), 292–297.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Haggerty, J. L., & Levesque, J. F. (2017). Validation of a new measure of availability and accommodation of health care that is valid for rural and urban contexts. Health Expectations, 20(2), 321–334.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Carlozzi, N., Lange, R., French, L., Kallen, M., Boileau, N., Hanks, R., Nakase-Richardson, R., Massengale, J., Sander, A., Hahn, E., Miner, J., & Brickell, T. (2020). TBI-CareQOL military health care frustration in caregivers of service members/veterans with traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 65(4), 360–376.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Kaitelidou, D., Economou, C., Galanis, P., Konstantakopoulou, O., Siskou, O., Domente, S., de Boer, D., Boerma, W. G., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2019). Development and validation of measurement tools for user experience evaluation surveys in the public primary healthcare facilities in Greece: A mixed methods study. BMC Family Practice, 20(1), 49.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
Desborough, J., Banfield, M., & Parker, R. (2014). A tool to evaluate patients’ experiences of nursing care in Australian general practice: Development of the patient enablement and satisfaction survey. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 20(2), 209–215.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., Amtmann, D., Bode, R., Buysse, D., Choi, S., Cook, K., DeVellis, R., DeWalt, D., Fries, J., Gershon, R., Hahn, E., Lai, J.-S., Pilkonis, P., Revicki, D., … Hays, R. (2010). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested in its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 1179–1194.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. L. Erlbaum Associates.
35.
Wu, M., Jen, T.-H., & Tam, H. P. (2016). Educational Measurement for Applied Researchers: Theory into Practice (1st ed., pp. 1 online resource (XIV, 306 pages 114 illustrations, 374 illustrations in color). Imprint: Springer, Singapore
36.
Bjorner, J. B., Chang, C. H., Thissen, D., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 95–108.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Cella, D., Gershon, R., Lai, J. S., & Choi, S. (2007). The future of outcomes measurement: Item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 133–141.PubMedCrossRef
38.
van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing : theory and practice. Kluwer Academic.CrossRef
39.
Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., Fischer, F., Anatchkova, M., Gandek, B., Klapp, B. F., & Ware, J. E. (2012). Computerized adaptive testing–ready for ambulatory monitoring? Psychosomatic Medicine, 74(4), 338–348.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Smits, N., Paap, M. C. S., & Bohnke, J. R. (2018). Some recommendations for developing multidimensional computerized adaptive tests for patient-reported outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 27(4), 1055–1063.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Thissen, D., Reeve, B. B., Bjorner, J. B., & Chang, C. H. (2007). Methodological issues for building item banks and computerized adaptive scales. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 109–119.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Wainer, H., & Dorans, N. J. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing : A primer (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRef
43.
Cella, D., Choi, S. W., Condon, D. M., Schalet, B., Hays, R. D., Rothrock, N. E., Yount, S., Cook, K. F., Gershon, R. C., Amtmann, D., DeWalt, D. A., Pilkonis, P. A., Stone, A. A., Weinfurt, K., & Reeve, B. B. (2019). PROMIS((R)) adult health profiles: efficient short-form measures of seven health domains. Value Health, 22(5), 537–544.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Choi, S., Junghaenel, D. U., Christoudolou, C., Gershon, R., & Stone, A. (2011). How item banks and its applications can influence measurement practice in rehabilitation medicine: A PROMIS fatigue item bank example. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 92(Supp 1), S20–S27.CrossRef
45.
Cappelleri, J. C., Jason Lundy, J., & Hays, R. D. (2014). Overview of classical test theory and item response theory for the quantitative assessment of items in developing patient-reported outcomes measures. Clinical Therapeutics, 36(5), 648–662.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
Mitchell, S., Kallen, M. A., Troost, J. P., Bragg, A., Marin-Howard, J., Moldovan, I., Miner, J. A., Jack, B. W., & Carlozzi, N. E. (Under Review). Development and calibration data for the Illness Burden Item Bank: A new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Quality of Life Research.
47.
Carlozzi, N. E., Kallen, M., Troost, J., Bragg, A., Marin-Howard, J., Moldovan, I., Miner, J. A., Jack, B. W., & Mitchell, S. (In Press). Development and calibration data for the Medication Adherence Item Bank: A new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Quality of Life Research.
48.
Hahn, E. A., & Cella, D. (2003). Health outcomes assessment in vulnerable populations: Measurement challenges and recommendations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(4 Suppl 2), S35-42.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). WRAT 4: Wide range achievement test professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.
50.
51.
Choi, S. W. (2009). Firestar: Computerized adaptive testing simulation program for polytomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(8), 644–645.CrossRef
52.
Cella, D., Nowinski, C., Peterman, A., Victorson, D., Miller, D., Lai, J.-S., & Moy, C. (2011). The neurology quality of life measurement (Neuro-QOL) Initiative. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Supplement, 92(Suppl 1), S28–S36.CrossRef
53.
Cella, D., Lai, J. S., Nowinski, C., Victorson, D., Peterman, A., Miller, D., Bethoux, F., Heinemann, A., Rubin, S., Cavasos, J., Reder, A., Sufit, R., Simuni, T., Holmes, G., Siderowf, A., Wojna, V., Bode, R., McKinney, N., Podrabsky, T., … Moy, C. (2012). Neuro-QOL: Brief measures of health-related quality of life for clinical research in neurology. Neurology, 78, 1860–1867.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
54.
Gershon, R., Lai, J.-S., Bode, R., Choi, S., Moy, C., Bleck, T., Miller, D., Peterman, A., & Cella, D. (2012). Neuro-QOL: Quality of life item banks for adults with neurological disorders: Item development and calibrations based upon clinical and general population testing. Quality of Life Research, 21(3), 475–486.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Carlozzi, N. E., Boileau, N. R., Roche, M. W., Ready, R. E., Perlmutter, J. S., Chou, K. L., Barton, S. K., McCormack, M. K., Stout, J. C., Cella, D., Miner, J. A., & Paulsen, J. S. (2020). Responsiveness to change over time and test-retest reliability of the PROMIS and Neuro-QoL mental health measures in persons with Huntington disease (HD). Quality of Life Research, 29(12), 3419–3439.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
Carlozzi, N. E., Goodnight, S., Kratz, A. L., Stout, J. C., McCormack, M. K., Paulsen, J. S., Boileau, N. R., Cella, D., & Ready, R. E. (2019). Validation of neuro-QoL and PROMIS mental health patient reported outcome measures in persons with huntington disease. J Huntingtons Dis, 8(4), 467–482.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
57.
58.
Nowinski, C. J., Siderowf, A., Simuni, T., Wortman, C., Moy, C., & Cella, D. (2016). Neuro-QoL health-related quality of life measurement system: Validation in parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 31(5), 725–733.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Victorson, D., Cavazos, J. E., Holmes, G. L., Reder, A. T., Wojna, V., Nowinski, C., Miller, D., Buono, S., Mueller, A., Moy, C., & Cella, D. (2014). Validity of the neurology quality-of-life (Neuro-QoL) measurement system in adult epilepsy. Epilepsy Behavior, 31, 77–84.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Healy, B. C., Zurawski, J., Gonzalez, C. T., Chitnis, T., Weiner, H. L., & Glanz, B. I. (2019). Assessment of computer adaptive testing version of the Neuro-QOL for people with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 25(13), 1791–1799.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Pilkonis, P. A., Yu, L., Dodds, N. E., Johnston, K. L., Lawrence, S. M., & Daley, D. C. (2016). Validation of the alcohol use item banks from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS((R)). Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 161, 316–322.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
62.
Pilkonis, P. A., Yu, L., Dodds, N. E., Johnston, K. L., Lawrence, S. M., Hilton, T. F., Daley, D. C., Patkar, A. A., & McCarty, D. (2015). Item banks for substance use from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS((R))): Severity of use and positive appeal of use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 156, 184–192.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
63.
Pilkonis, P. A., Yu, L., Dodds, N. E., Johnston, K. L., Lawrence, S. M., & Daley, D. C. (2016). Validation of the alcohol use item banks from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 161, 316–322.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
Pilkonis, P. A., Yu, L., Colditz, J., Dodds, N., Johnston, K. L., Maihoefer, C., Stover, A. M., Daley, D. C., & McCarty, D. (2013). Item banks for alcohol use from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Use, consequences, and expectancies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 130(1–3), 167–177.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Greco, C. M., Yu, L., Johnston, K. L., Dodds, N. E., Morone, N. E., Glick, R. M., Schneider, M. J., Klem, M. L., McFarland, C. E., Lawrence, S., Colditz, J., Maihoefer, C. C., Jonas, W. B., Ryan, N. D., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2015). Measuring nonspecific factors in treatment: item banks that assess the healthcare experience and attitudes from the patient’s perspective. Quality of Life Research. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-015-1178-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
66.
Tulsky, D. S., Kisala, P. A., Lai, J. S., Carlozzi, N., Hammel, J., & Heinemann, A. W. (2015). Developing an item bank to measure economic quality of life for individuals with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(4), 604–613.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Heinemann, A. W., Magasi, S., Hammel, J., Carlozzi, N. E., Garcia, S. F., Hahn, E. A., Lai, J. S., Tulsky, D., Gray, D. B., Hollingsworth, H., & Jerousek, S. (2015). Environmental factors item development for persons with stroke, traumatic brain injury, and spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 589–595.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Tulsky, D. S., Kisala, P. A., Lai, J. S., Carlozzi, N., Hammel, J., & Heinemann, A. W. (2015). Developing an item bank to measure economic quality of life for individuals with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 604–613.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Sherer, M., Nick, T. G., Sander, A. M., Melguizo, M., Hanks, R., Novack, T. A., Tulsky, D., Kisala, P., Luo, C., & Tang, X. (2017). Groupings of persons with traumatic brain injury: A new approach to classifying traumatic brain injury in the post-acute period. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 32(2), 125–133.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Carlozzi, N. E., Graves, C., Troost, J., Kallen, M. A., Tulsky, D. S., Hanks, R. A., Ianni, P. A., Miner, J. A., & Sander, A. M. (In Press). Initial evidence for reliable and valid use of scores on the 8-item Econ-QOL short form to measure economic quality of life in caregivers of persons with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.
71.
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377–381.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Minor, B. L., Elliott, V., Fernandez, M., O’Neal, L., McLeod, L., Delacqua, G., Delacqua, F., Kirby, J., Duda, S. N., Consortium R. E. (2019). The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 95, 103208.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
73.
74.
Strunin, L., Stone, M., & Jack, B. (2007). Understanding rehospitalization risk: Can hospital discharge be modified to reduce recurrent hospitalization? Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2(5), 297–304.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Jack, B., Greenwald, J., Forsythe, S., O’Donnell, J., Johnson, A., Schipelliti, L., Goodwin, M., Burniske, G. M., Hesko, C., Paasche-Orlow, M., Manasseh, C., Anthony, D., Martin, S., Hollister, L., Jack, M., Jhaveri, V., Casey, K., & Chetty, V. K. (2008). Developing the tools to administer a comprehensive hospital discharge program: The reengineered discharge (RED) program. In B. J. Henriksen, M. A. Keyes, & M. L. Grady (Eds.), Advances in patient safety: New directions and alternative approaches (Vol. 3). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
76.
Anthony, D., Chetty, V. K., Kartha, A., McKenna, K., DePaoli, M. R., & Jack, B. (2005). Re-engineering the hospital discharge: An example of a multifaceted process evaluation. In K. Henriksen, J. B. Battles, E. S. Marks, & D. I. Lewin (Eds.), Advances in patient safety: From research to implementation (Volume 2: Concepts and Methodology). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
77.
Mitchell, S. E., Laurens, V., Weigel, G. M., Hirschman, K. B., Scott, A. M., Nguyen, H. Q., Howard, J. M., Laird, L., Levine, C., Davis, T. C., Gass, B., Shaid, E., Li, J., Williams, M. V., & Jack, B. W. (2018). Care transitions from patient and caregiver perspectives. Annals of Family Medicine, 16(3), 225–231.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
78.
Li, J., Brock, J., Jack, B., Mittman, B., Naylor, M., Sorra, J., Mays, G., Williams, M. V., Project A. T. (2016). Project ACHIEVE—using implementation research to guide the evaluation of transitional care effectiveness. BMC Health Services Research, 16, 70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
79.
Naylor, M. D., Shaid, E. C., Carpenter, D., Gass, B., Levine, C., Li, J., Malley, A., McCauley, K., Nguyen, H. Q., Watson, H., Brock, J., Mittman, B., Jack, B., Mitchell, S., Callicoatte, B., Schall, J., & Williams, M. V. (2017). Components of comprehensive and effective transitional care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 65(6), 1119–1125.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
80.
Cancino, R., Esang, M., Martin, J., Morton, S., Kazis, L., & Jack, B. (2014). Development of a patient-centered instrument to evaluate 30-day hospital readmission. Academy Health.
81.
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
82.
Cook, K. F., Kallen, M. A., & Amtmann, D. (2009). Having a fit: Impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT’s unidimensionality assumption. Quality of Life Research, 18(4), 447–460.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
83.
Reise, S. P., Morizot, J., & Hays, R. D. (2007). The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 19–31.PubMedCrossRef
84.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2011). Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén.
85.
Ramsay, J. (2000). TestGraf a program for the graphical analysis of multiple choice test and questionnaire data. McGill University.
86.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
87.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.PubMedCrossRef
88.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling-a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRef
89.
Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute Inc.
90.
Lai, J.-S., Zelko, F., Krull, K., Cella, D., Nowinski, C., Manley, P., & Goldman, S. (2014). Parent-reported cognition of children with cancer and its potential clinical usefulness. Quality of Life Research, 23(4), 1049–1058.PubMedCrossRef
91.
Whittaker, T. A. (2012). Using the modification index and standardized expected parameter change for model modification. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(1), 26–44.CrossRef
92.
Kaplan, D. (1989). Model modification in covariance structure analysis: application of the expected parameter change statistic. Multivariate Behav Res, 24(3), 285–305.PubMedCrossRef
93.
Luijben, T. C., & Boomsma, A. (1988). Statistical guidance for model modification in covariance structure analysis. Compstat, 1988, 335–340.CrossRef
94.
Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & van der Veld, W. M. (2009). Testing structural equation models for detection of misspecifications. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 561–582.CrossRef
95.
Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & Sorbom, D. (1987). The detection and correction of specification errors in structural equation models. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 105–129). Jossey-Bass.
96.
Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, R. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 552–566.PubMedCrossRef
97.
Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 5–26.CrossRef
98.
Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223–237.PubMedCrossRef
99.
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores (Psychometric Monograph No. 17). Psychometric Society.
100.
Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., Drasgow, F., & Williams, B. A. (2006). Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: Should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 25–39.PubMedCrossRef
101.
Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., Tsien, S., Williams, B., & Mead, A. D. (1995). Fitting polytomous item response theory models to multiple-choice tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(2), 143–165.CrossRef
102.
Crisan, D. R., Tendeiro, J. N., & Meijer, R. R. (2017). Investigating the practical consequences of model misfit in unidimensional IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41, 439–455.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
103.
Zhao, Y. (2017). Impact of IRT item misfit on score estimates and severity classifications: An examination of PROMIS depression and pain interference item banks. Quality of Life Research, 26(3), 555–564.PubMedCrossRef
104.
Edelen, M. O., Stucky, B. D., & Chandra, A. (2015). Quantifying ‘problematic’ DIF within an IRT framework: Application to a cancer stigma index. Quality of Life Research, 24(1), 95–103.PubMedCrossRef
105.
Clauser, B. E., & Hambleton, R. K. (1994). Review of differential item functioning. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(1), 88–92.
106.
Cai, L., Thissen, D., & du Toit, S. H. C. (2015). IRTPRO for Windows [Computer software]. Scientific Software International.
107.
Woods, C. M., Cai, L., & Wang, M. (2013). The langer-improved wald test for DIF testing with multiple groups: evaluation and comparison to two-group IRT. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(3), 532–547.CrossRef
108.
Wang, M., & Woods, C. M. (2017). Anchor selection using the wald test anchor-all-test-all procedure. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(1), 17–29.PubMedCrossRef
109.
Choi, S. W., Podrabsky, T., & McKinney, N. (2012). Firestar-D: Computerized adaptive testing simulation program for dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36(1), 67–68.CrossRef
110.
Pilkonis, P. A., Yu, L., Dodds, N. E., Johnston, K. L., Maihoefer, C. C., & Lawrence, S. M. (2014). Validation of the depression item bank from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) in a three-month observational study. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 56, 112–119.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
111.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.PubMedCrossRef
112.
Andresen, E. M. (2000). Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 81(12 Suppl 2), S15-20.CrossRef
113.
Cramer, D., & Howitt, D. L. (2004). The Sage disctionary of statistics. Sage.CrossRef
114.
Taylor, R. (1990). Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: A basic review. Journal of Diagnostic and Medical Sonography, 1, 35–39.CrossRef
115.
Heaton, R. K., Miller, S. W., Taylor, J. T., & Grant, I. (2004). Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery: Demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Caucasian adults. Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.
116.
Muraki, E. (1990). Fitting a polytomous item response model to Likert-type data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 59–71.CrossRef
117.
Clauser, B. E., & Hambleton, R. K. (1994). Review of differential item functioning. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(1), 88–92.
118.
Call, K. T., McAlpine, D. D., Garcia, C. M., Shippee, N., Beebe, T., Adeniyi, T. C., & Shippee, T. (2014). Barriers to care in an ethnically diverse publicly insured population: Is health care reform enough? Medical Care, 52(8), 720–727.PubMedCrossRef
119.
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.PubMedCrossRef
120.
McMaughan, D. J., Oloruntoba, O., & Smith, M. L. (2020). Socioeconomic status and access to healthcare: Interrelated drivers for healthy aging. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 231.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
121.
Craig, L., Cruz, S. M., & Alper, H. (2019). In J. Alper, S. M. Cruz & L. Graig (Eds.), Improving Access to and Equity of Care for People with Serious Illness: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington (DC)
122.
Lewis, J. M., DiGiacomo, M., Currow, D. C., & Davidson, P. M. (2011). Dying in the margins: Understanding palliative care and socioeconomic deprivation in the developed world. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 42(1), 105–118.PubMedCrossRef
123.
Ruo, B., Choi, S. W., Baker, D. W., Grady, K. L., & Cella, D. (2010). Development and validation of a computer adaptive test for measuring dyspnea in heart failure. Journal of Cardiac Failure, 16(8), 659–668.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Development and calibration data for the Healthcare Access Item Bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Auteurs
Noelle E. Carlozzi
Michael A. Kallen
Jonathan P. Troost
Alexa Bragg
Jessica Martin-Howard
Barbara De La Cruz
Jennifer A. Miner
Ioana Moldovan
Brian W. Jack
Suzanne Mitchell
Publicatiedatum
31-10-2022
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2023
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03278-w

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2023

An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design to establish thresholds of within-individual meaningful change on a sleep disturbance numerical rating scale score in atopic dermatitis

  • Open Access

Resilience process in individuals with colorectal cancer: a qualitative study

Understanding the experiences of lung cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study

  • Open Access

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric investigation of Chinese version of the Orbach & Mikulincer Mental Pain Scale in patients with depressive disorder

Using Rasch measurement theory to explore the fitness for purpose of the genetic counseling outcome scale: a tale of two scales

Simulation study comparing analytical methods for single-item longitudinal patient-reported outcomes data

  • Open Access