Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 1/2007

01-08-2007 | Original Paper

Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment

Auteurs: Jakob Bue Bjorner, Chih-Hung Chang, David Thissen, Bryce B. Reeve

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | bijlage 1/2007

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Item banks and Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) have the potential to greatly improve the assessment of health outcomes. This review describes the unique features of item banks and CAT and discusses how to develop item banks. In CAT, a computer selects the items from an item bank that are most relevant for and informative about the particular respondent; thus optimizing test relevance and precision. Item response theory (IRT) provides the foundation for selecting the items that are most informative for the particular respondent and for scoring responses on a common metric. The development of an item bank is a multi-stage process that requires a clear definition of the construct to be measured, good items, a careful psychometric analysis of the items, and a clear specification of the final CAT. The psychometric analysis needs to evaluate the assumptions of the IRT model such as unidimensionality and local independence; that the items function the same way in different subgroups of the population; and that there is an adequate fit between the data and the chosen item response models. Also, interpretation guidelines need to be established to help the clinical application of the assessment. Although medical research can draw upon expertise from educational testing in the development of item banks and CAT, the medical field also encounters unique opportunities and challenges.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Wainer, H., Dorans, N. J., & Eignor, D., et al. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Wainer, H., Dorans, N. J., & Eignor, D., et al. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2.
go back to reference Fischer, G. H., & Molenaar, I. W. (1995). Rasch models—foundations, recent developments, and applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Fischer, G. H., & Molenaar, I. W. (1995). Rasch models—foundations, recent developments, and applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
3.
go back to reference Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. London: Sage Publications. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. London: Sage Publications.
4.
go back to reference van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. Berlin: Springer. van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. Berlin: Springer.
5.
go back to reference Ware, J. E., Jr., Bjorner, J. B., & Kosinski, M. (2000). Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: A brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales. Medical Care, 38, II73–II82PubMedCrossRef Ware, J. E., Jr., Bjorner, J. B., & Kosinski, M. (2000). Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: A brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales. Medical Care, 38, II73–II82PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Veit, C. L., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (1983). The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 730–742.PubMedCrossRef Veit, C. L., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (1983). The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 730–742.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bock, R. D. (1997). The nominal categories model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 3–50). Berlin: Springer. Bock, R. D. (1997). The nominal categories model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 3–50). Berlin: Springer.
8.
go back to reference Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 159–176. Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 159–176.
9.
go back to reference Muraki, E. (1997). A Generalized partial credit model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 153–164). Berlin: Springer. Muraki, E. (1997). A Generalized partial credit model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 153–164). Berlin: Springer.
10.
go back to reference Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–173.CrossRef Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–173.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Masters, G. N., & Wright, B. D. (1997). The partial credit model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 101–122). Berlin: Springer. Masters, G. N., & Wright, B. D. (1997). The partial credit model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 101–122). Berlin: Springer.
12.
go back to reference Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561–573.CrossRef Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561–573.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Samejima, F. (1997). Graded response model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85–100). Berlin: Springer. Samejima, F. (1997). Graded response model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85–100). Berlin: Springer.
14.
go back to reference Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, 34(Suppl 17), 1–97. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, 34(Suppl 17), 1–97.
15.
go back to reference Lord, F. M., & Norvick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading: Addison-Wesley. Lord, F. M., & Norvick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
16.
go back to reference Mellenbergh, G. J. (1995). Conceptual notes on models for discrete polytomous item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 91–100.CrossRef Mellenbergh, G. J. (1995). Conceptual notes on models for discrete polytomous item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 91–100.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1986). A taxonomy of item response models. Psychometrika, 51, 567–577.CrossRef Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1986). A taxonomy of item response models. Psychometrika, 51, 567–577.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Roberts, J. S., Donoghue, J. R., & Laughlin, J. E. (2000). A general item response theory model for unfolding unidimensional polytomous responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 3–32. Roberts, J. S., Donoghue, J. R., & Laughlin, J. E. (2000). A general item response theory model for unfolding unidimensional polytomous responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 3–32.
19.
go back to reference Maydeu-Olivares, A., Drasgow, F., & Mead, A. D. (1994). Distinguishing among parametric item response models for polychotomous ordered data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 245–256.CrossRef Maydeu-Olivares, A., Drasgow, F., & Mead, A. D. (1994). Distinguishing among parametric item response models for polychotomous ordered data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 245–256.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Muthen, B. O. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 29, 177–185. Muthen, B. O. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 29, 177–185.
21.
go back to reference Takane, Y., & de Leeuw, J. (1987). On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables. Psychometrika, 52, 393–408CrossRef Takane, Y., & de Leeuw, J. (1987). On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables. Psychometrika, 52, 393–408CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Muraki, E. (1993). Information functions of the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 351–363.CrossRef Muraki, E. (1993). Information functions of the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 351–363.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bock, R. D., & Mislevy, R. J. (1982). Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 431–444.CrossRef Bock, R. D., & Mislevy, R. J. (1982). Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 431–444.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Thissen, D., & Orlando, M. (2001). Item response theory for items scored in two categories. In D. Thissen & H. Wainer (Eds.), Test scoring (pp. 73–140). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. Thissen, D., & Orlando, M. (2001). Item response theory for items scored in two categories. In D. Thissen & H. Wainer (Eds.), Test scoring (pp. 73–140). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
go back to reference van der Linden, W. J. (2000). Constrained adaptive testing with shadow tests. In W. J. van der Linden & C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing, theory and practice (pp. 27–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. van der Linden, W. J. (2000). Constrained adaptive testing with shadow tests. In W. J. van der Linden & C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing, theory and practice (pp. 27–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26.
go back to reference Warm, T. A. (1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory. Psychometrika, 54, 427–450.CrossRef Warm, T. A. (1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory. Psychometrika, 54, 427–450.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Tarlov, A. R., Ware, J. E., Jr., Greenfield, S., Nelson, E. C., Perrin, E., & Zubkoff, M. (1989). The medical outcomes study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA, 262, 925–930.PubMedCrossRef Tarlov, A. R., Ware, J. E., Jr., Greenfield, S., Nelson, E. C., Perrin, E., & Zubkoff, M. (1989). The medical outcomes study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA, 262, 925–930.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ware, J. E., Jr., Bayliss, M. S., Rogers, W. H., Kosinski, M., & Tarlov, A. R. (1996). Differences in 4-year health outcomes for elderly and poor, chronically ill patients treated in HMO and fee-for-service systems. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA, 276, 1039–1047.PubMedCrossRef Ware, J. E., Jr., Bayliss, M. S., Rogers, W. H., Kosinski, M., & Tarlov, A. R. (1996). Differences in 4-year health outcomes for elderly and poor, chronically ill patients treated in HMO and fee-for-service systems. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA, 276, 1039–1047.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ware, J. E., Jr., & Kosinski, M. (2001). SF36 physical and mental health summary scales: A manual for users of version 1. Lincoln RI: QualityMetric Inc. Ware, J. E., Jr., & Kosinski, M. (2001). SF36 physical and mental health summary scales: A manual for users of version 1. Lincoln RI: QualityMetric Inc.
30.
go back to reference Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2003). Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: An application of item response theory to the headache impact test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913–933.PubMedCrossRef Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2003). Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: An application of item response theory to the headache impact test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913–933.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hill, C. D. (2004). Precisions of parameter estimates for the graded item response model. (Masters Thesis) Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina. Hill, C. D. (2004). Precisions of parameter estimates for the graded item response model. (Masters Thesis) Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
32.
go back to reference Tsutakawa, R. K., & Johnson, J. C. (1990). The effect of uncertainty of item parameter estimation on ability estimates. Psychometrika, 55, 371–390.CrossRef Tsutakawa, R. K., & Johnson, J. C. (1990). The effect of uncertainty of item parameter estimation on ability estimates. Psychometrika, 55, 371–390.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Dillman, D. (2007). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method—2007 update with new Internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. New York, NY: J. Wiley. Dillman, D. (2007). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method—2007 update with new Internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. New York, NY: J. Wiley.
34.
go back to reference Bjorner, J. B., Ware, J. E., Jr., & Kosinski, M. (2003). The potential synergy between cognitive models and modern psychometric models. Quality of Life Research, 12, 261–274.PubMedCrossRef Bjorner, J. B., Ware, J. E., Jr., & Kosinski, M. (2003). The potential synergy between cognitive models and modern psychometric models. Quality of Life Research, 12, 261–274.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference McHorney, C. A., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (1994). Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: Results from a national survey. Medical Care, 32, 551–567.PubMedCrossRef McHorney, C. A., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (1994). Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: Results from a national survey. Medical Care, 32, 551–567.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Cook, A. J., Roberts, D. A., Henderson, M. D., Van Winkle, L. C., Chastain, D. C., & Hamill-Ruth, R. J. (2004). Electronic pain questionnaires: A randomized, crossover comparison with paper questionnaires for chronic pain assessment. Pain, 110, 310–317.PubMedCrossRef Cook, A. J., Roberts, D. A., Henderson, M. D., Van Winkle, L. C., Chastain, D. C., & Hamill-Ruth, R. J. (2004). Electronic pain questionnaires: A randomized, crossover comparison with paper questionnaires for chronic pain assessment. Pain, 110, 310–317.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Ryan, J. M., Corry, J. R., Attewell, R., & Smithson, M. J. (2002). A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 general health questionnaire to the standard paper version. Quality of Life Research, 11, 19–26.PubMedCrossRef Ryan, J. M., Corry, J. R., Attewell, R., & Smithson, M. J. (2002). A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 general health questionnaire to the standard paper version. Quality of Life Research, 11, 19–26.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Velikova, G., Wright, E. P., & Smith, A. B., et al. (1999). Automated collection of quality-of-life data: A comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17, 998–1007.PubMed Velikova, G., Wright, E. P., & Smith, A. B., et al. (1999). Automated collection of quality-of-life data: A comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17, 998–1007.PubMed
39.
go back to reference Muthen, B. O., & Muthen, L. (2001). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén. Muthen, B. O., & Muthen, L. (2001). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
40.
go back to reference Chen, W.-H., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 265–289. Chen, W.-H., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 265–289.
41.
go back to reference Christensen, K. B., Bjorner, J. B., Kreiner, S., & Petersen, J. H. (2002). Tests for unidimensionality in polytomous Rasch models. Psychometrika, 67, 563–574.CrossRef Christensen, K. B., Bjorner, J. B., Kreiner, S., & Petersen, J. H. (2002). Tests for unidimensionality in polytomous Rasch models. Psychometrika, 67, 563–574.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Muraki, E., & Carlson, J. E. (1995). Full-information factor analysis for polytomous item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 73–90.CrossRef Muraki, E., & Carlson, J. E. (1995). Full-information factor analysis for polytomous item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 73–90.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Stout, W., Habing, B., Douglas, J., Kim, R. H., Roussos, L., & Zhang, J. (2001). Conditional covariance-based nonparametric multidimensionality assessment. Psychological Measurement, 20, 331–354.CrossRef Stout, W., Habing, B., Douglas, J., Kim, R. H., Roussos, L., & Zhang, J. (2001). Conditional covariance-based nonparametric multidimensionality assessment. Psychological Measurement, 20, 331–354.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Ramsay, J. O. (1995). TestGraf—a program for the graphical analysis of multiple choice test and questionnaire data. Montreal: McGill University. Ramsay, J. O. (1995). TestGraf—a program for the graphical analysis of multiple choice test and questionnaire data. Montreal: McGill University.
45.
go back to reference van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1997). Item response theory: Brief history, common models, and extensions. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 1–28). Berlin: Springer. van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1997). Item response theory: Brief history, common models, and extensions. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 1–28). Berlin: Springer.
46.
go back to reference Rasch, G. (1966). An item analysis which takes individual differences into account. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 19, 49–57.PubMed Rasch, G. (1966). An item analysis which takes individual differences into account. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 19, 49–57.PubMed
47.
go back to reference Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
go back to reference Andrich, D. (1988). Rasch models for measurement. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. Andrich, D. (1988). Rasch models for measurement. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
49.
go back to reference Andrich, D., & Luo, G.(2003). Conditional pairwise estimation in the Rasch model for ordered response categories using principal components. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4, 205–221.PubMed Andrich, D., & Luo, G.(2003). Conditional pairwise estimation in the Rasch model for ordered response categories using principal components. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4, 205–221.PubMed
50.
go back to reference Molenaar, I. W. (1995). Estimation of item parameters. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models—foundations recent developments and applications (pp. 39–52). Berlin: Springer. Molenaar, I. W. (1995). Estimation of item parameters. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models—foundations recent developments and applications (pp. 39–52). Berlin: Springer.
51.
go back to reference Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal and structural equation models. Chapman & Hall, CRC. Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal and structural equation models. Chapman & Hall, CRC.
52.
go back to reference Fischer, G. H., & Ponocny, I. (1995). Extended rating scale and partial credit models for assessing change. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models—foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 353–370). Berlin: Springer. Fischer, G. H., & Ponocny, I. (1995). Extended rating scale and partial credit models for assessing change. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models—foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 353–370). Berlin: Springer.
53.
go back to reference Glas, C. A. W., & Verhelst, N. D. (1995). Tests of fit for polytomous Rasch models. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models—foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 325–352). Berlin: Springer. Glas, C. A. W., & Verhelst, N. D. (1995). Tests of fit for polytomous Rasch models. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models—foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 325–352). Berlin: Springer.
54.
go back to reference Glas, C. A. W., & Verhelst, N. D. (1995). Testing the Rasch model. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models—foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 69–95). Berlin: Springer. Glas, C. A. W., & Verhelst, N. D. (1995). Testing the Rasch model. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models—foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 69–95). Berlin: Springer.
55.
go back to reference Muraki, E., & Bock, R. D. (1996). Parscale—IRT based test scoring and item analysis for graded open-ended exercises and performance tasks. Chicago: Scientific Software Inc. Muraki, E., & Bock, R. D. (1996). Parscale—IRT based test scoring and item analysis for graded open-ended exercises and performance tasks. Chicago: Scientific Software Inc.
56.
go back to reference Stone, C. A., & Zhang, B. (2003). Assessing goodness of fit of item response theory models: A comparison of traditional and alternative procedures. The Journal of Educational Measurement, 4, 331–352.CrossRef Stone, C. A., & Zhang, B. (2003). Assessing goodness of fit of item response theory models: A comparison of traditional and alternative procedures. The Journal of Educational Measurement, 4, 331–352.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Stone, C. A. (2000). Monte Carlo based null distribution for an alternative goodness-of-fit test statistic in IRT models. The Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 58–75.CrossRef Stone, C. A. (2000). Monte Carlo based null distribution for an alternative goodness-of-fit test statistic in IRT models. The Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 58–75.CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Stone, C. A. (2003). Empirical power and type I error rates for an IRT fit statistic that considers the precision of ability estimates. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 566–586.CrossRef Stone, C. A. (2003). Empirical power and type I error rates for an IRT fit statistic that considers the precision of ability estimates. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 566–586.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Glas, C. A. W. (1999). Modification indices for the 2-PL and the nominal response model. Psychometrika, 64, 273–294.CrossRef Glas, C. A. W. (1999). Modification indices for the 2-PL and the nominal response model. Psychometrika, 64, 273–294.CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2000). Likelihood-based item-fit indices for dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 50–64.CrossRef Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2000). Likelihood-based item-fit indices for dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 50–64.CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2003). Using item response theory to calibrate the Headache Impact Test (HIT) to the metric of traditional headache scales. Quality of Life Research, 12, 981–1002.PubMedCrossRef Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2003). Using item response theory to calibrate the Headache Impact Test (HIT) to the metric of traditional headache scales. Quality of Life Research, 12, 981–1002.PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Kosinski, M., Bayliss, M. S., & Bjorner, J. B., et al. (2003). A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: the HIT-6. Quality of Life Research, 12, 963–974.PubMedCrossRef Kosinski, M., Bayliss, M. S., & Bjorner, J. B., et al. (2003). A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: the HIT-6. Quality of Life Research, 12, 963–974.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Sands, W. A., Waters, B. K., & McBride, J. R. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association. Sands, W. A., Waters, B. K., & McBride, J. R. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association.
64.
go back to reference Berwick, D. M., Murphy, J. M., Goldman, P. A., Ware, J. E., Jr., Barsky, A. J., & Weinstein, M. C. (1991). Performance of a five-item mental health screening test. Medical Care, 29, 169–176.PubMedCrossRef Berwick, D. M., Murphy, J. M., Goldman, P. A., Ware, J. E., Jr., Barsky, A. J., & Weinstein, M. C. (1991). Performance of a five-item mental health screening test. Medical Care, 29, 169–176.PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference van der Linden, W. J., & Pashley, P. J. (2000). Item selection and ability estimation in adaptive testing. In W. J. van der Linden & C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing, theory and practice (pp. 1–25). Dordrecht: Kluwer Adacemic Publishers. van der Linden, W. J., & Pashley, P. J. (2000). Item selection and ability estimation in adaptive testing. In W. J. van der Linden & C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing, theory and practice (pp. 1–25). Dordrecht: Kluwer Adacemic Publishers.
66.
go back to reference Karabatsos, G. (2003). Comparing the aberrant response detection performance of thirty-six person-fit statistics. Applied Measurement in Education, 16, 277–298.CrossRef Karabatsos, G. (2003). Comparing the aberrant response detection performance of thirty-six person-fit statistics. Applied Measurement in Education, 16, 277–298.CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Ware, J. E., Jr., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B.(1993). SF-36 health survey. Manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health institute, New England Medical Center. Ware, J. E., Jr., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B.(1993). SF-36 health survey. Manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health institute, New England Medical Center.
68.
go back to reference Ware, J. E., Jr., Kosinski, M., & Bjorner, J. B., et al. (2003). Applications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact. Quality of Life Research, 12, 935–952.PubMedCrossRef Ware, J. E., Jr., Kosinski, M., & Bjorner, J. B., et al. (2003). Applications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact. Quality of Life Research, 12, 935–952.PubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Bayliss, M. S., Dewey, J. E., & Dunlap, I., et al. (2003). A study of the feasibility of Internet administration of a computerized health survey: The headache impact test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 953–961.PubMedCrossRef Bayliss, M. S., Dewey, J. E., & Dunlap, I., et al. (2003). A study of the feasibility of Internet administration of a computerized health survey: The headache impact test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 953–961.PubMedCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Segall, D. O. (1996). Multidimensional adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 61, 331–354.CrossRef Segall, D. O. (1996). Multidimensional adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 61, 331–354.CrossRef
71.
go back to reference Gardner, W., Kelleher, K. J., & Pajer, K. A. (2002). Multidimensional adaptive testing for mental health problems in primary care. Medical Care, 40, 812–823.PubMedCrossRef Gardner, W., Kelleher, K. J., & Pajer, K. A. (2002). Multidimensional adaptive testing for mental health problems in primary care. Medical Care, 40, 812–823.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment
Auteurs
Jakob Bue Bjorner
Chih-Hung Chang
David Thissen
Bryce B. Reeve
Publicatiedatum
01-08-2007
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave bijlage 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9168-6

Andere artikelen bijlage 1/2007

Quality of Life Research 1/2007 Naar de uitgave