Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 2/2013

01-03-2013 | Original Article

Detecting perturbations in polyrhythms: effects of complexity and attentional strategies

Auteurs: Brian C. Fidali, Ève Poudrier, Bruno H. Repp

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 2/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Jones et al. in Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 21:293–307, 1995, showed that a temporal perturbation is easier to detect in a 3:2 polyrhythm than in a single-stream isochronous baseline condition if the two isochronous pulse streams forming the polyrhythm are perceptually integrated: integration creates shorter inter-onset interval (IOI) durations that facilitate perturbation detection. The present study examined whether this benefit of integration outweighs the potential costs imposed by the greater IOI heterogeneity and memory demands of more complex polyrhythms. In "Experiment 1", musically trained participants tried to detect perturbations in 3:5, 4:5, 6:5, and 7:5 polyrhythms having one of two different pitch separations between pulse streams, as well as in an isochronous baseline condition. "Experiment 2" included an additional 2:5 polyrhythm, additional pitch separations, and instructions to integrate or segregate the two pulse streams. In both experiments, perturbation detection scores for polyrhythms were below baseline, decreased as polyrhythm complexity increased, and tended to be lower at a smaller pitch separation, with little effect of instructions. Clearly, polyrhythm complexity was the main determinant of detection performance, which is attributed to the interval heterogeneity and/or memory demands of the pattern formed by the integrated pulse streams. In this task, perceptual integration was disadvantageous, but apparently could not be avoided.
Voetnoten
1
As it is generally believed that attentional strategies affect the subjective perception of multi-stream stimuli between the fission and temporal coherence boundaries (Bregman, 1990; Van Noorden, 1975), it is likely that the participants would have judged the stimuli to be more integrated (segregated) when they had been instructed to integrate (segregate) them. Therefore, the results suggest that detection performance depended more on objective stimulus properties than on subjective impressions of integration/segregation (which were not assessed).
 
2
It might seem that this statement should be qualified by adding “unless the first tone in the polyrhythm cycle is perturbed” because that tone is surrounded by 450-ms IOIs, like the tones in the four-pulse stream. In fact, however, perturbation of the first tone in either stream should be easy to detect because it changes the synchrony of the two cycle-initial tones into an asynchrony. Thus, this perturbation would not be detected on the basis of a change in the adjacent IOIs, but on the basis of asynchrony.
 
3
Occasionally, a true false alarm may have been scored as a hit, or a very slow response to a perturbation may have been considered a false alarm. The wide window was justified by the fact that participants were likely to respond to the change in the shorter of the two consecutive IOIs that were affected by a shifted tone. If the shorter IOI was the second one, the response was actually triggered by the next tone, resulting in a longer RT.
 
4
The response window for hits was 1200 − 150 = 1,050-ms long. The response windows of the eight perturbations thus occupied 8 × 1,050 = 8,400 ms in 17 cycles of 2504 ms duration each, or 19.7% of the total time of 17 × 2,504 = 42,568 ms. (Participants did not know that perturbations occurred only in even-numbered cycles, only that they could not occur in the first three cycles.)
 
5
Individual differences were very large, with average hit percentages ranging from 14.2% (the omitted participant) to 87.9%. BHR achieved 55.3%.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Beauvillain, C. (1983). Auditory perception of dissonant polyrhythms. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 34(6), 585–592.CrossRef Beauvillain, C. (1983). Auditory perception of dissonant polyrhythms. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 34(6), 585–592.CrossRef
go back to reference Bogacz, S. (2005). Understanding how speed affects performance of polyrhythms: transferring control as speed increases. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 21–34.PubMedCrossRef Bogacz, S. (2005). Understanding how speed affects performance of polyrhythms: transferring control as speed increases. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 21–34.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: the perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge: MIT Press. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: the perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Bregman, A. S., & Campbell, J. (1971). Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequence of tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 24–244.CrossRef Bregman, A. S., & Campbell, J. (1971). Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequence of tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 24–244.CrossRef
go back to reference Deutsch, D. (1983). The generation of two isochronous sequences in parallel. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 331–337.CrossRef Deutsch, D. (1983). The generation of two isochronous sequences in parallel. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 331–337.CrossRef
go back to reference Friberg, A., & Sundberg, J. (1995). Time discrimination in a monotonic, isochronous sequence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 2524–2531.CrossRef Friberg, A., & Sundberg, J. (1995). Time discrimination in a monotonic, isochronous sequence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 2524–2531.CrossRef
go back to reference Grondin, S. (2001). From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 22–44.PubMedCrossRef Grondin, S. (2001). From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 22–44.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Handel, S. (1984). Using polyrhythms to study rhythm. Music Perception, 1, 465–484.CrossRef Handel, S. (1984). Using polyrhythms to study rhythm. Music Perception, 1, 465–484.CrossRef
go back to reference Handel, S. (1989). Listening: an introduction to the perception of auditory events. Cambridge: MIT Press. Handel, S. (1989). Listening: an introduction to the perception of auditory events. Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Handel, S., & Oshinsky, J. (1981). The meter of syncopated auditory polyrhythms. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 1–9.CrossRef Handel, S., & Oshinsky, J. (1981). The meter of syncopated auditory polyrhythms. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 1–9.CrossRef
go back to reference Hirsh, I. J., Monahan, C. B., Grant, K. W., & Singh, P. G. (1990). Studies in auditory timing: 1. Simple patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 215–226.CrossRef Hirsh, I. J., Monahan, C. B., Grant, K. W., & Singh, P. G. (1990). Studies in auditory timing: 1. Simple patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 215–226.CrossRef
go back to reference Jagacinsky, R. J., Marshburn, E., Klapp, S. T., & Jones, M. R. (1988). Tests of parallel versus integrated structure in polyrhythmic tapping. Journal of Motor Behavior, 20, 416–442. Jagacinsky, R. J., Marshburn, E., Klapp, S. T., & Jones, M. R. (1988). Tests of parallel versus integrated structure in polyrhythmic tapping. Journal of Motor Behavior, 20, 416–442.
go back to reference Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Review, 83, 323–355.PubMedCrossRef Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Review, 83, 323–355.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Jones, M. R., Jagacinski, R. J., Yee, W., Floyd, R. L., & Klapp, S. T. (1995). Tests of attentional flexibility in listening to polyrhythmic patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 21, 293–307.PubMedCrossRef Jones, M. R., Jagacinski, R. J., Yee, W., Floyd, R. L., & Klapp, S. T. (1995). Tests of attentional flexibility in listening to polyrhythmic patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 21, 293–307.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Klapp, S. T. (1979). Doing two things at once: the role of temporal compatibility. Memory & Cognition, 7, 375–381.CrossRef Klapp, S. T. (1979). Doing two things at once: the role of temporal compatibility. Memory & Cognition, 7, 375–381.CrossRef
go back to reference Klapp, S. T., & Jagacinsky, R. J. (2011). Gestalt principles in the control of motor action. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 443–462.PubMedCrossRef Klapp, S. T., & Jagacinsky, R. J. (2011). Gestalt principles in the control of motor action. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 443–462.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Klapp, S. T., Hill, M. D., Tyler, J. G., Martin, Z. E., Jagacinsky, R. J., & Jones, M. R. (1985). On marching to two different drummers: perceptual aspects of the difficulties. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 11, 814–827.PubMedCrossRef Klapp, S. T., Hill, M. D., Tyler, J. G., Martin, Z. E., Jagacinsky, R. J., & Jones, M. R. (1985). On marching to two different drummers: perceptual aspects of the difficulties. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 11, 814–827.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Klapp, S. T., Nelson, J. M., & Jagacinsky, R. J. (1998). Can people tap concurrent bimanual rhythms independently? Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 301–322.PubMedCrossRef Klapp, S. T., Nelson, J. M., & Jagacinsky, R. J. (1998). Can people tap concurrent bimanual rhythms independently? Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 301–322.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Krampe, R. T., Kliegl, R., Mayr, U., Engbert, R., & Vorberg, D. (2000). The fast and slow of skilled bimanual rhythm production: parallel versus integrated timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 26, 206–233.PubMedCrossRef Krampe, R. T., Kliegl, R., Mayr, U., Engbert, R., & Vorberg, D. (2000). The fast and slow of skilled bimanual rhythm production: parallel versus integrated timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 26, 206–233.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kurtz, S., & Lee, T. D. (2003). Part and whole perceptual-motor practice of a polyrhythm. Neuroscience Letters, 338, 205–208.PubMedCrossRef Kurtz, S., & Lee, T. D. (2003). Part and whole perceptual-motor practice of a polyrhythm. Neuroscience Letters, 338, 205–208.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Micheyl, C., & Oxenham, A. J. (2010). Objective and subjective psychophysical measures of auditory stream integration and segregation. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 11, 709–724.PubMedCrossRef Micheyl, C., & Oxenham, A. J. (2010). Objective and subjective psychophysical measures of auditory stream integration and segregation. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 11, 709–724.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Moelants, D., & Van Noorden, L. (2005). The influence of pitch interval on the perception of polyrhythms. Music Perception, 22, 425–440.CrossRef Moelants, D., & Van Noorden, L. (2005). The influence of pitch interval on the perception of polyrhythms. Music Perception, 22, 425–440.CrossRef
go back to reference Monahan, C. B., & Hirsh, I. J. (1990). Studies in auditory timing: 2. Rhythmic patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 227–242.CrossRef Monahan, C. B., & Hirsh, I. J. (1990). Studies in auditory timing: 2. Rhythmic patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 227–242.CrossRef
go back to reference Oshinsky, J., & Handel, S. (1978). Syncopated auditory polyrhythms: discontinuous reversals in meter interpretation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 936–939.CrossRef Oshinsky, J., & Handel, S. (1978). Syncopated auditory polyrhythms: discontinuous reversals in meter interpretation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 936–939.CrossRef
go back to reference Peper, C. E., Beek, P. J., & van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1995). Frequency-induced phase transitions in bimanual tapping. Biological Cybernetics, 73, 301–309.PubMedCrossRef Peper, C. E., Beek, P. J., & van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1995). Frequency-induced phase transitions in bimanual tapping. Biological Cybernetics, 73, 301–309.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pressing, J., Summers, J., & Magill, J. (1996). Cognitive multiplicity in polyrhythmic pattern performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1127–1148.CrossRef Pressing, J., Summers, J., & Magill, J. (1996). Cognitive multiplicity in polyrhythmic pattern performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1127–1148.CrossRef
go back to reference Pressnitzer, D., Sayles, M., Micheyl, C., & Winter, I. M. (2008). Perceptual organization of sound begins in the auditory periphery. Current Biology, 18, 1124–1128.PubMedCrossRef Pressnitzer, D., Sayles, M., Micheyl, C., & Winter, I. M. (2008). Perceptual organization of sound begins in the auditory periphery. Current Biology, 18, 1124–1128.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Repp, B. H. (2002). Perception of timing is more context sensitive than sensorimotor synchronization. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 703–716.CrossRef Repp, B. H. (2002). Perception of timing is more context sensitive than sensorimotor synchronization. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 703–716.CrossRef
go back to reference Repp, B. H. (2009a). Segregated in perception, integrated for action: immunity of rhythmic sensorimotor coordination to auditory stream segregation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 426–434.CrossRef Repp, B. H. (2009a). Segregated in perception, integrated for action: immunity of rhythmic sensorimotor coordination to auditory stream segregation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 426–434.CrossRef
go back to reference Repp, B. H. (2009b). Rhythmic sensorimotor coordination is resistant but not immune to auditory stream segregation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2306–2312.CrossRef Repp, B. H. (2009b). Rhythmic sensorimotor coordination is resistant but not immune to auditory stream segregation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2306–2312.CrossRef
go back to reference Shaffer, L. H. (1981). Performances of Chopin, Bach, and Bartók: studies in motor programming. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 326–376.CrossRef Shaffer, L. H. (1981). Performances of Chopin, Bach, and Bartók: studies in motor programming. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 326–376.CrossRef
go back to reference Summers, J. J. (2002). Practice and training in bimanual coordination tasks: strategies and constraints. Brain and Cognition, 48, 166–178.PubMedCrossRef Summers, J. J. (2002). Practice and training in bimanual coordination tasks: strategies and constraints. Brain and Cognition, 48, 166–178.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Summers, J. J., & Kennedy, T. M. (1992). Strategies in the production of a 5:3 polyrhythm. Human Movement Science, 11, 101–112.CrossRef Summers, J. J., & Kennedy, T. M. (1992). Strategies in the production of a 5:3 polyrhythm. Human Movement Science, 11, 101–112.CrossRef
go back to reference Summers, J. J., Ford, S. K., & Todd, J. A. (1993a). Practice effects on the coordination of the two hands in a bimanual tapping task. Human Movement Science, 12, 111–133.CrossRef Summers, J. J., Ford, S. K., & Todd, J. A. (1993a). Practice effects on the coordination of the two hands in a bimanual tapping task. Human Movement Science, 12, 111–133.CrossRef
go back to reference Summers, J. J., Rosenbaum, D. A., Burns, B. D., & Ford, S. K. (1993b). Production of polyrhythms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 19, 416–428.PubMedCrossRef Summers, J. J., Rosenbaum, D. A., Burns, B. D., & Ford, S. K. (1993b). Production of polyrhythms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 19, 416–428.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Summers, J. J., Todd, J. A., & Kim, Y. H. (1993c). The influence of perceptual and motor factors on bimanual coordination in a polyrhythmic tapping task. Psychological Research, 55, 107–115.PubMedCrossRef Summers, J. J., Todd, J. A., & Kim, Y. H. (1993c). The influence of perceptual and motor factors on bimanual coordination in a polyrhythmic tapping task. Psychological Research, 55, 107–115.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference van Noorden, L.P.A.S. (1975). Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. van Noorden, L.P.A.S. (1975). Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
go back to reference Vliegen, J., Moore, B. C. J., & Oxenham, A. J. (1999). The role of spectral and periodicity cues in auditory stream segregation, measured using a temporal discrimination task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 938–945.PubMedCrossRef Vliegen, J., Moore, B. C. J., & Oxenham, A. J. (1999). The role of spectral and periodicity cues in auditory stream segregation, measured using a temporal discrimination task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 938–945.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Winkler, I., Takegata, R., & Sussman, E. (2005). Event-related brain potentials reveal multiple stages in the perceptual organization of sound. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 291–299.PubMedCrossRef Winkler, I., Takegata, R., & Sussman, E. (2005). Event-related brain potentials reveal multiple stages in the perceptual organization of sound. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 291–299.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Yee, W., Holleran, S., & Jones, M. R. (1994). Sensitivity to event timing in regular and irregular sequences: Influences of musical skill. Perception and Psychophysics, 56, 461–471.PubMedCrossRef Yee, W., Holleran, S., & Jones, M. R. (1994). Sensitivity to event timing in regular and irregular sequences: Influences of musical skill. Perception and Psychophysics, 56, 461–471.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Detecting perturbations in polyrhythms: effects of complexity and attentional strategies
Auteurs
Brian C. Fidali
Ève Poudrier
Bruno H. Repp
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0406-8

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2013

Psychological Research 2/2013 Naar de uitgave