Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen
Top
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Gepubliceerd in:

01-06-2014

Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21: Factor Structure and Test-Retest Invariance, and Temporal Stability and Uniqueness of Latent Factors in Older Adults

Auteurs: Rapson Gomez, Mathew Summers, Avril Summers, Anna Wolf, Jeffery J. Summers

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 2/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

This study examined the factor structure and test-retest invariance, and temporal stability and uniqueness of the latent factors (depression, anxiety, and stress) of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21; Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995) in group a of 269 older adults (age ranging from 60 to 85 years) from the general community. Participants completed the DASS-21 twice, 3 months apart. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of their ratings at Time 1 indicated support for the original 3-factor oblique model (factors for depression, anxiety, and stress). Additional analyses showed support for test-retest invariance for both the measurement (configural, metric and thresholds) and structural (variances and covariances) components of this model. Results also indicated temporal stability and uniqueness of the latent factors. The practical, theoretical, research and clinical implications of the findings are discussed.
vorige artikel Factor Validity of the Beck Hopelessness Scale in Italian Medical Patients
volgende artikel The Validity and Specificity of the Short-Form of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire (OBQ)
Literatuur
Antony, M. M., Bieling, P. J., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Swinson, R. P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 10, 176–181.CrossRef
Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus mean and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimate in CFA. Structural Equation Modelling, 13, 186–203.CrossRef
Beekman, A. T., Bremmer, M. A., Deeg, D. J. H., van Baldom, A. J. L. M., Smit, J. H., de Beurs, E., van Dyck, R., & van Tilburg, W. V. (1998). Anxiety disorders in later life: A report from the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 13, 717–726.PubMedCrossRef
Beekman, A. T., Copeland, J. R., & Prince, M. J. (1999). Review of community prevalence of depression in later life. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 307–311.PubMedCrossRef
Bilgel, N., & Bayram, N. (2010). Turkish version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-42) psychometric properties. Archives of Neuropsychiatry, 47, 118–126.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
Brown, T. A., Chorpita, B. F., Korotitsch, W., & Barlow, D. H. (1997). Psychometric properties of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) in clinical samples. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 79–89.PubMedCrossRef
Cheung, G. W. (2008). Testing equivalency in the structure, means, and variances of higher-order constructs with structural equation modelling. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 593–613.CrossRef
Clara, I. P., Cox, B. J., & Enns, M. W. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the depression anxiety stress scales in depressed and anxious patients. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 23, 61–67.CrossRef
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316–336.PubMedCrossRef
Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2003). The depression anxiety stress scales (DASS): Normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 111–131.PubMedCrossRef
Daza, P., Novy, D. M., Stanley, M. A., & Averill, P. (2002). The depression anxiety stress scale-21: Spanish translation and validation with a Hispanic sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 24, 195–205.CrossRef
Feliciano, L., Yochim, B., Steers, M. E., Jay, A. A., & Segal, L. (2011). Research with older adults. In J. C. Thomas & M. Hersen (Eds.), Understanding research in clinical and counselling psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Ferrer, E., Balluerka, N., & Widaman, K. F. (2008). Factorial invariance and the specification of second-order latent growth models. Methodology, 4, 22–36.PubMedCentralPubMed
Elder, S., Wolf, A., Tyler, M., Limbrick, K., & Summers, J. (2008). The ACE program manual. Hobart: Alzheimer’s Australia Tasmania.
Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal categorical data in structural equation modelling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course. Greenwich: Connecticut, Information Age Publishing.
Gloster, A. T., Rhoades, H. M., Novy, D., Klotsche, J., Senior, A., Kunik, W. N., & Stanley, M. A. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 in older primary care patients. Journal of Affective Disorders, 110, 248–259.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Gomez, R. (2013). Depression anxiety stress scales: Factor structure and differential item functioning across women and men. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 687–691.CrossRef
Gregorich, S. E. (2006). Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Medical Care, 44, 78–94.CrossRef
Hemphill, J. F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58, 78–79.PubMedCrossRef
Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2005). The short-form version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 227–239.PubMedCrossRef
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.CrossRef
Jorm, A. F. (2000). Does old age reduce the risk of anxiety and depression? A review of epidemiological studies across the adult life span. Psychological Medicine, 30, 11–22.PubMedCrossRef
Jorm, A. F., Windsor, T. D., Dear, K. B. G., Anstey, K. J., Christensen, H., & Rodgers, B. (2005). Age group differences in psychological distress: The role of psychosocial risk factors that vary with age. Psychological Medicine, 35, 1253–1268.PubMedCrossRef
Kessler, R. C., Birnbaum, H. G., Shahly, V., Bromet, E., et al. (2010). Age differences in the prevalence and co-morbidity of DSM-IV major depressive episodes: Results from the WHO World Health Survey Initiative. Depression and Anxiety, 27, 351–364.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Kessler, R. C., Foster, C., Webster, P. S., & House, J. S. (1992). The relationship between age and depressive symptoms in two national surveys. Psychology and Aging, 7, 119–126.PubMedCrossRef
Lovibond, P. F. (1998). Long-term stability of depression, anxiety, and stress syndromes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 520–526.PubMedCrossRef
Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation.
Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.
Norton, P. J. (2007). Depression anxiety and stress scales (DASS-21): Psychometric analysis across four racial groups. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 20, 253–265.CrossRef
Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12, 102–111.PubMedCrossRef
Teresi, J. A., Ocepek-Welikson, K., Kleinman, M., Eimicke, J. P., Crane, P. K., Richard, N., Jones, R. N., & Cella, D. (2009). Analysis of differential item functioning in the depression item bank from the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS): An item response theory approach. Psychological Science Quarterly, 5, 148–180.
Tolin, D. F., Robison, J. T., Gaztambide, S., & Blank, K. (2005). Anxiety disorders in older Puerto Rican primary care patients. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 13, 150–156.PubMedCrossRef
Wechsler, D. (2001). Wechsler test of adult reading. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
Wittchen, H. U., Schuster, P., & Lieb, R. (2001). Comorbidity and mixed anxiety-depressive disorder: Clinical curiosity or pathophysiological need? Human Psychopharmacology, 16, S21–S30.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21: Factor Structure and Test-Retest Invariance, and Temporal Stability and Uniqueness of Latent Factors in Older Adults
Auteurs
Rapson Gomez
Mathew Summers
Avril Summers
Anna Wolf
Jeffery J. Summers
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9391-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2014

Prevalence of Personality Disorders at Midlife in a Community Sample: Disorders and Symptoms Reflected in Interview, Self, and Informant Reports

Strategies for the Control of Unwanted Thoughts in Adolescents: The Adolescent Thought Control Questionnaire (TCQ-A)

Advancing an Understanding of the Anxiety Control Questionnaire for Children (ACQ-C) in Clinically Anxious and Non-Anxious Youth: Psychometric Properties, Incremental Prediction and Developmental Differences

The Association between Callous-Unemotional Traits and Behavioral and Academic Adjustment in Children: Further Validation of the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits

How Other-Oriented Perfectionism Differs from Self-Oriented and Socially Prescribed Perfectionism

A Study of the Psychometric Properties of the Social Support Scale for Children