Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

25-10-2017

Demographic, clinical, dispositional, and social-environmental characteristics associated with psychological response to a false positive ovarian cancer screening test: a longitudinal study

Auteurs: Amanda T. Wiggins, Edward J. Pavlik, Michael A. Andrykowski

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Uitgave 3/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Cancer screening can facilitate early detection that improves survival, but also can identify an abnormal finding that is not malignant and deemed benign. While such false positive (FP) results can impact a variety of psychological outcomes, little is known about demographic, clinical, dispositional, and social-environmental characteristics associated with psychological outcomes after a FP result. Women participating in an ovarian cancer (OC) screening program and experiencing a FP screening test result (n = 375) completed assessments at baseline and 4-months. Results indicated greater social constraint and less education were linked to greater OC-specific distress at both assessments. Short-term predictors included less optimism and no previous abnormal test, while longer-term predictors were fewer previous screens and the interaction between OC family history and monitoring coping style. Younger age, less education, less optimism, greater social constraint, and family history of OC were associated with greater perceptions of OC risk. Brief interventions prior to screening may minimize the negative impact of a false positive result and not interfere with compliant participation in screening programs.
Literatuur
go back to reference Adams, R. N., Winger, J. G., & Mosher, C. E. (2015). A meta-analysis of the relationship between social constraints and distress in cancer patients. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38, 294–305.CrossRefPubMed Adams, R. N., Winger, J. G., & Mosher, C. E. (2015). A meta-analysis of the relationship between social constraints and distress in cancer patients. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38, 294–305.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference American Cancer Society. (2016). Cancer facts and figures. Atlanta: American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society. (2016). Cancer facts and figures. Atlanta: American Cancer Society.
go back to reference Andersen, M. R., Drescher, C. W., Zheng, Y., Bowen, D. J., Wilson, S., Young, A., et al. (2007). Changes in cancer worry associated with participation in ovarian cancer screening. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 814–820.CrossRefPubMed Andersen, M. R., Drescher, C. W., Zheng, Y., Bowen, D. J., Wilson, S., Young, A., et al. (2007). Changes in cancer worry associated with participation in ovarian cancer screening. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 814–820.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Andrykowski, M. A. (2017). Psychological and behavioral impact of participation in ovarian cancer screening. Diagnostics (Basel), 7(1), 15.CrossRef Andrykowski, M. A. (2017). Psychological and behavioral impact of participation in ovarian cancer screening. Diagnostics (Basel), 7(1), 15.CrossRef
go back to reference Andrykowski, M. A., Boerner, L. M., Salsman, J. M., & Pavlik, E. (2004). Psychological response to test results in an ovarian cancer screening program: a prospective, longitudinal study. Health Psychology, 23, 622–630.CrossRefPubMed Andrykowski, M. A., Boerner, L. M., Salsman, J. M., & Pavlik, E. (2004). Psychological response to test results in an ovarian cancer screening program: a prospective, longitudinal study. Health Psychology, 23, 622–630.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Andrykowski, M. A., & Pavlik, E. J. (2011). Response to an abnormal ovarian cancer-screening test result: test of the social cognitive processing and cognitive social health information processing models. Psychology and Health, 26, 383–397.CrossRefPubMed Andrykowski, M. A., & Pavlik, E. J. (2011). Response to an abnormal ovarian cancer-screening test result: test of the social cognitive processing and cognitive social health information processing models. Psychology and Health, 26, 383–397.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Barrett, J., Jenkins, V., Farewell, V., Menon, U., Jacobs, I., Kilkerr, J., et al. (2014). Psychological morbidity associated with ovarian cancer screening: Results from more than 23,000 women in the randomised trial of ovarian cancer screening (UKCTOCS). British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 121, 1071–1079.CrossRef Barrett, J., Jenkins, V., Farewell, V., Menon, U., Jacobs, I., Kilkerr, J., et al. (2014). Psychological morbidity associated with ovarian cancer screening: Results from more than 23,000 women in the randomised trial of ovarian cancer screening (UKCTOCS). British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 121, 1071–1079.CrossRef
go back to reference Bond, M., Pavey, T., Welch, K., Cooper, C., Garside, R., Edan, S., et al. (2013). Psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms in the UK. Evidence-Based Medicine, 18, 54–61.CrossRefPubMed Bond, M., Pavey, T., Welch, K., Cooper, C., Garside, R., Edan, S., et al. (2013). Psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms in the UK. Evidence-Based Medicine, 18, 54–61.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Brain, K. E., Lifford, K. J., Fraser, L., Rosenthal, A. N., Rogers, M. T., Lancastle, D., et al. (2012). Psychological outcomes of familial ovarian cancer screening: No evidence of long-term harm. Gynecologic Oncology, 127, 556–563.CrossRefPubMed Brain, K. E., Lifford, K. J., Fraser, L., Rosenthal, A. N., Rogers, M. T., Lancastle, D., et al. (2012). Psychological outcomes of familial ovarian cancer screening: No evidence of long-term harm. Gynecologic Oncology, 127, 556–563.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Brett, J., Bankhead, C., Henderson, B., Watson, E., & Austoker, J. (2005). The psychological impact of mammographic screening: A systematic review. Psycho-Oncology, 14, 917–938.CrossRefPubMed Brett, J., Bankhead, C., Henderson, B., Watson, E., & Austoker, J. (2005). The psychological impact of mammographic screening: A systematic review. Psycho-Oncology, 14, 917–938.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Brewer, N. T., Salz, T., & Lillie, S. E. (2007). Systematic review: The long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Annals of Internal Medicine, 146, 502–510.CrossRefPubMed Brewer, N. T., Salz, T., & Lillie, S. E. (2007). Systematic review: The long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Annals of Internal Medicine, 146, 502–510.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Broadhead, W. E., Gehlbach, S. H., de Gruy, F. V., & Kaplan, B. H. (1988). The Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire. Measurement of social support in family medicine patients. Medical Care, 26, 709–723.CrossRefPubMed Broadhead, W. E., Gehlbach, S. H., de Gruy, F. V., & Kaplan, B. H. (1988). The Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire. Measurement of social support in family medicine patients. Medical Care, 26, 709–723.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., Miller, C. J., & Fulford, D. (2009). Optimism. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 303–311). New York: Oxford Univ. Press. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., Miller, C. J., & Fulford, D. (2009). Optimism. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 303–311). New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
go back to reference Cockburn, J., De Luise, T., Hurley, S., & Clover, K. (1992). Development and validation of the PCQ: A questionnaire to measure the psychological consequences of screening mammography. Social Science and Medicine, 34, 1129–1134.CrossRefPubMed Cockburn, J., De Luise, T., Hurley, S., & Clover, K. (1992). Development and validation of the PCQ: A questionnaire to measure the psychological consequences of screening mammography. Social Science and Medicine, 34, 1129–1134.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.CrossRefPubMed Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Creamer, M., Burgess, P., & Pattison, P. (1992). Reaction to trauma: A cognitive processing model. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 452–459.CrossRefPubMed Creamer, M., Burgess, P., & Pattison, P. (1992). Reaction to trauma: A cognitive processing model. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 452–459.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference DePriest, P. D., & DeSimone, C. P. (2003). Ultrasound screening for early detection of ovarian cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21, 194s–199s.CrossRefPubMed DePriest, P. D., & DeSimone, C. P. (2003). Ultrasound screening for early detection of ovarian cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21, 194s–199s.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Floyd, A., Steffens, R. F., Pavlik, E., & Andrykowski, M. A. (2011). Receipt of a false positive test result during routine screening for ovarian cancer: a teachable moment? Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 18, 70–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Floyd, A., Steffens, R. F., Pavlik, E., & Andrykowski, M. A. (2011). Receipt of a false positive test result during routine screening for ovarian cancer: a teachable moment? Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 18, 70–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Helgeson, V. S., & Cohen, S. (1996). Social support and adjustment to cancer: Reconciling descriptive, correlational, and intervention research. Health Psychology, 15, 135–148.CrossRefPubMed Helgeson, V. S., & Cohen, S. (1996). Social support and adjustment to cancer: Reconciling descriptive, correlational, and intervention research. Health Psychology, 15, 135–148.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Horowitz, M., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979). Impact of Event Scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209–218.CrossRefPubMed Horowitz, M., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979). Impact of Event Scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209–218.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hunn, J., & Rodriguez, G. C. (2012). Ovarian cancer: Etiology, risk factors, and epidemiology. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 55, 3–23.CrossRefPubMed Hunn, J., & Rodriguez, G. C. (2012). Ovarian cancer: Etiology, risk factors, and epidemiology. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 55, 3–23.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jenkins, V., Fallowfield, L., Langridge, C., Barrett, J., Ryan, A., Jacobs, I., et al. (2015). Psychosocial factors associated with withdrawal from the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening after 1 episode of repeat screening. International Journal of Gyncegological Cancer, 25, 1519–1525.CrossRef Jenkins, V., Fallowfield, L., Langridge, C., Barrett, J., Ryan, A., Jacobs, I., et al. (2015). Psychosocial factors associated with withdrawal from the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening after 1 episode of repeat screening. International Journal of Gyncegological Cancer, 25, 1519–1525.CrossRef
go back to reference Kauff, N. D., Hurley, K. E., Hensley, M. L., Robson, M. E., Lev, G., Goldfrank, D., et al. (2005). Ovarian carcinoma screening in women at intermediate risk: Impact on quality of life and need for invasive follow-up. Cancer, 104, 314–320.CrossRefPubMed Kauff, N. D., Hurley, K. E., Hensley, M. L., Robson, M. E., Lev, G., Goldfrank, D., et al. (2005). Ovarian carcinoma screening in women at intermediate risk: Impact on quality of life and need for invasive follow-up. Cancer, 104, 314–320.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lepore, S. J. (2001). A social-cognitive processing model of emotional adjustment to cancer. In A. Baum & B. L. Andersen (Eds.), Psychosocial interventions for cancer (pp. 99–116). Washington, DC: American Pychological Association.CrossRef Lepore, S. J. (2001). A social-cognitive processing model of emotional adjustment to cancer. In A. Baum & B. L. Andersen (Eds.), Psychosocial interventions for cancer (pp. 99–116). Washington, DC: American Pychological Association.CrossRef
go back to reference Lepore, S., & Ituarte, P. H. (1999). Optimism about cancer enhances mood by reducing negative social interactions. Cancer Research, Therapy, and Control, 8, 165–174. Lepore, S., & Ituarte, P. H. (1999). Optimism about cancer enhances mood by reducing negative social interactions. Cancer Research, Therapy, and Control, 8, 165–174.
go back to reference Lifford, K. J., Fraser, L., Rosenthal, A. N., Rogers, M. T., Lancastle, D., Phelps, C., et al. (2012). Withdrawal from familial ovarian screening for surgery: Findings from a psychological evaluation study (Psy FOCS). Gynecologic Oncology, 124, 158–163.CrossRefPubMed Lifford, K. J., Fraser, L., Rosenthal, A. N., Rogers, M. T., Lancastle, D., Phelps, C., et al. (2012). Withdrawal from familial ovarian screening for surgery: Findings from a psychological evaluation study (Psy FOCS). Gynecologic Oncology, 124, 158–163.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lin, K., Lipsitz, R., Miller, T., & Janakiraman, S. (2008). Benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: An evidence update for the U.S. Preventive services task force. Annals of Internal Medicine, 149, 192–199.CrossRefPubMed Lin, K., Lipsitz, R., Miller, T., & Janakiraman, S. (2008). Benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: An evidence update for the U.S. Preventive services task force. Annals of Internal Medicine, 149, 192–199.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference McGovern, P. M., Gross, C. R., Krueger, R. A., Engelhard, D. A., Cordes, J. E., & Church, T. R. (2004). False-positive cancer screens and health-related quality of life. Cancer Nursing, 27, 347–352.CrossRefPubMed McGovern, P. M., Gross, C. R., Krueger, R. A., Engelhard, D. A., Cordes, J. E., & Church, T. R. (2004). False-positive cancer screens and health-related quality of life. Cancer Nursing, 27, 347–352.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Menon, U., Griffin, M., & Gentry-Maharaj, A. (2014). Ovarian cancer screening—current status, future directions. Gynecologic Oncology, 132, 490–495.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Menon, U., Griffin, M., & Gentry-Maharaj, A. (2014). Ovarian cancer screening—current status, future directions. Gynecologic Oncology, 132, 490–495.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Miller, S. M. (1995). Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease: Implications for cancer screening and management. Cancer, 76, 167–177.CrossRefPubMed Miller, S. M. (1995). Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease: Implications for cancer screening and management. Cancer, 76, 167–177.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Miller, S. M., Rodoletz, M., Schroeder, C. M., Mangan, C. E., & Sedlacek, T. V. (1996). Applications of the monitoring process model to coping with severe long-term medical threats. Health Psychology, 15, 216–225.CrossRefPubMed Miller, S. M., Rodoletz, M., Schroeder, C. M., Mangan, C. E., & Sedlacek, T. V. (1996). Applications of the monitoring process model to coping with severe long-term medical threats. Health Psychology, 15, 216–225.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Moyer, V. A., & U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2012). Screening for ovarian cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 156, 900–904.CrossRef Moyer, V. A., & U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2012). Screening for ovarian cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 156, 900–904.CrossRef
go back to reference Pavlik, E. J., Ueland, F. R., Miller, R. V. V., Ubellacker, J. M., DeSimone, C. P., Hoff, J., et al. (2013). Frequency and disposition of ovarian abnormalities followed with serial transvaginal sonography. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 122, 210–217.CrossRefPubMed Pavlik, E. J., Ueland, F. R., Miller, R. V. V., Ubellacker, J. M., DeSimone, C. P., Hoff, J., et al. (2013). Frequency and disposition of ovarian abnormalities followed with serial transvaginal sonography. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 122, 210–217.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Permuth-Wey, J., & Sellers, T. A. (2009). Epidemiology of ovarian cancer. Methods in Molecular Biology, 472, 413–437.CrossRefPubMed Permuth-Wey, J., & Sellers, T. A. (2009). Epidemiology of ovarian cancer. Methods in Molecular Biology, 472, 413–437.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Reade, C. J., Riva, J. J., Busse, J. W., Goldsmith, C. H., & Elit, L. (2013). Risks and benefits of screening asymptomatic women for ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecologic Oncology, 130, 674–681.CrossRefPubMed Reade, C. J., Riva, J. J., Busse, J. W., Goldsmith, C. H., & Elit, L. (2013). Risks and benefits of screening asymptomatic women for ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecologic Oncology, 130, 674–681.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Salz, T., Richman, A. R., & Brewer, N. T. (2010). Meta-analyses of the effect of false-positive mammograms on generic and specific psychosocial outcomes. Psycho-Oncology, 19, 1026–1034.CrossRefPubMed Salz, T., Richman, A. R., & Brewer, N. T. (2010). Meta-analyses of the effect of false-positive mammograms on generic and specific psychosocial outcomes. Psycho-Oncology, 19, 1026–1034.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1992). Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: theoretical overview and empirical update. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 201–228.CrossRef Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1992). Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: theoretical overview and empirical update. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 201–228.CrossRef
go back to reference Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078.CrossRefPubMed Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schorge, J. O., Modesitt, S. C., Coleman, R. L., Cohn, D. E., Kauff, N. D., Duska, L. R., et al. (2010). SGO white paper on ovarian cancer: Etiology, screening and surveillance. Gynecologic Oncology, 119, 7–17.CrossRefPubMed Schorge, J. O., Modesitt, S. C., Coleman, R. L., Cohn, D. E., Kauff, N. D., Duska, L. R., et al. (2010). SGO white paper on ovarian cancer: Etiology, screening and surveillance. Gynecologic Oncology, 119, 7–17.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S., Fowler, F. J., Jr., & Welch, H. G. (2004). Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 71–78.CrossRefPubMed Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S., Fowler, F. J., Jr., & Welch, H. G. (2004). Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 71–78.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Slatore, C. G., Sullivan, D. R., Pappas, M., & Humphrey, L. L. (2014). Patient-centered outcomes among lung cancer screening recipients with computed tomography: A systematic review. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 9, 927–934.CrossRefPubMed Slatore, C. G., Sullivan, D. R., Pappas, M., & Humphrey, L. L. (2014). Patient-centered outcomes among lung cancer screening recipients with computed tomography: A systematic review. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 9, 927–934.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Steptoe, A. (1989). An abbreviated version of the Miller Behavioral Style Scale. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 183–184.CrossRefPubMed Steptoe, A. (1989). An abbreviated version of the Miller Behavioral Style Scale. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 183–184.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Stratton, J. E., Pharoah, P., Smith, S. K., Easton, D., & Ponder, B. A. (1998). A systematic review and meta-analysis of family history and risk of ovarian cancer. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 105, 493–499.CrossRefPubMed Stratton, J. E., Pharoah, P., Smith, S. K., Easton, D., & Ponder, B. A. (1998). A systematic review and meta-analysis of family history and risk of ovarian cancer. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 105, 493–499.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Taylor, K. L., Shelby, R., Gelmann, E., & McGuire, C. (2004). Quality of life and trial adherence among participants in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 96, 1083–1094.CrossRefPubMed Taylor, K. L., Shelby, R., Gelmann, E., & McGuire, C. (2004). Quality of life and trial adherence among participants in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 96, 1083–1094.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1995). Trauma and transformation: Growing in the aftermath of significant suffering. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRef Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1995). Trauma and transformation: Growing in the aftermath of significant suffering. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRef
go back to reference Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Concepual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 1–8.CrossRef Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Concepual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 1–8.CrossRef
go back to reference van Nagell, J. R., Jr., Miller, R. V. V., DeSimone, C. P., Ueland, F. R., Podzielinski, I., Goodrich, S. T., et al. (2011). Long-term survival of women with epithelial ovarian cancer detected by ultrasonagraphic screening. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 118, 1212–1221.CrossRefPubMed van Nagell, J. R., Jr., Miller, R. V. V., DeSimone, C. P., Ueland, F. R., Podzielinski, I., Goodrich, S. T., et al. (2011). Long-term survival of women with epithelial ovarian cancer detected by ultrasonagraphic screening. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 118, 1212–1221.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference van Nagell, J. R., Jr., & Pavlik, E. J. (2012). Ovarian cancer screening. Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 55, 43–51.CrossRef van Nagell, J. R., Jr., & Pavlik, E. J. (2012). Ovarian cancer screening. Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 55, 43–51.CrossRef
go back to reference Wardle, F. J., Collins, W., Pernet, A. L., Whitehead, M. I., Bourne, T. H., & Campbell, S. (1993). Psychological impact of screening for familial ovarian cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85, 653–657.CrossRefPubMed Wardle, F. J., Collins, W., Pernet, A. L., Whitehead, M. I., Bourne, T. H., & Campbell, S. (1993). Psychological impact of screening for familial ovarian cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85, 653–657.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wardle, J., Pernet, A., Collins, W., & Bourne, T. (1994). False positive results in ovarian cancer screening: One year follow-up of psychological status. Psychology and Health, 10, 33–40.CrossRef Wardle, J., Pernet, A., Collins, W., & Bourne, T. (1994). False positive results in ovarian cancer screening: One year follow-up of psychological status. Psychology and Health, 10, 33–40.CrossRef
go back to reference Wardle, J., & Pope, R. (1992). The psychological costs of screening for cancer. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 36, 609–624.CrossRefPubMed Wardle, J., & Pope, R. (1992). The psychological costs of screening for cancer. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 36, 609–624.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wardle, J., Robb, K., Verson, S., & Waller, J. (2015). Screening for prevention and early diagnosis of cancer. American Psychologist, 70, 119–133.CrossRefPubMed Wardle, J., Robb, K., Verson, S., & Waller, J. (2015). Screening for prevention and early diagnosis of cancer. American Psychologist, 70, 119–133.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Watson, E. K., Henderson, B. J., Brett, J., Bankhead, C., & Austoker, J. (2005). The psychological impact of mammographic screening on women with a family history of breast cancer—a systematic review. Psycho-Oncology, 14, 939–948.CrossRefPubMed Watson, E. K., Henderson, B. J., Brett, J., Bankhead, C., & Austoker, J. (2005). The psychological impact of mammographic screening on women with a family history of breast cancer—a systematic review. Psycho-Oncology, 14, 939–948.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wiggins, A. T., Pavlik, E. J., & Andrykowski, M. A. (2017). Affective, cognitive, and behavioral outcomes associated with a false positive ovarian cancer screening test result. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 40, 803–813.CrossRefPubMed Wiggins, A. T., Pavlik, E. J., & Andrykowski, M. A. (2017). Affective, cognitive, and behavioral outcomes associated with a false positive ovarian cancer screening test result. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 40, 803–813.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Demographic, clinical, dispositional, and social-environmental characteristics associated with psychological response to a false positive ovarian cancer screening test: a longitudinal study
Auteurs
Amanda T. Wiggins
Edward J. Pavlik
Michael A. Andrykowski
Publicatiedatum
25-10-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Uitgave 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-017-9897-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2018

Journal of Behavioral Medicine 3/2018 Naar de uitgave