Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 1/2009

01-03-2009

Debiasing of Pessimistic Judgments Associated with Anxiety: A Test of the Availability Heuristic

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 1/2009

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

This investigation directly tested the Consider-An-Alternative debiasing procedure and the reduction of pessimistic threat-related judgments associated with anxiety. Two separate generation interventions were included to test the availability heuristic as a possible explanation of the debiasing effect. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three interventions and probability estimates of future threat-related events were completed in a repeated measures experimental design. Level of trait anxiety was measured to assign participants to “normal” and highly anxious groups. The data were analyzed in a 3 × 2 × 2 mixed factorial repeated measures ANOVA. The results found that only the short debiasing intervention showed a significant reduction of pessimistic judgments in comparison to the control group. The results were interpreted as supporting the availability heuristic as an explanation of the debiasing effect. Further analysis also suggested that the content of recall may be as important to the debiasing effect as ease of recall.
Literatuur
go back to reference Bentz, B. G., & Williamson, D. A. (1998). Worry and the prediction of future threatening events: association with sex and trait anxiety. Journal of Gender, Culture, and Health, 3, 29–40.CrossRef Bentz, B. G., & Williamson, D. A. (1998). Worry and the prediction of future threatening events: association with sex and trait anxiety. Journal of Gender, Culture, and Health, 3, 29–40.CrossRef
go back to reference Bentz, B. G., Williamson, D. A., & Franks, S. F. (2004). Debiasing of pessimistic judgments associated with anxiety. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 173–180.CrossRef Bentz, B. G., Williamson, D. A., & Franks, S. F. (2004). Debiasing of pessimistic judgments associated with anxiety. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 173–180.CrossRef
go back to reference Bentz, B. G., Williamson, D. A., & Smith, C. F. (1999). The prediction of negative events associated with anxiety and dietary restraint: a test of the content specificity hypothesis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 21, 97–108.CrossRef Bentz, B. G., Williamson, D. A., & Smith, C. F. (1999). The prediction of negative events associated with anxiety and dietary restraint: a test of the content specificity hypothesis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 21, 97–108.CrossRef
go back to reference Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive processes in anxiety. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 5, 51–62.CrossRef Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive processes in anxiety. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 5, 51–62.CrossRef
go back to reference Hirt, E. R., & Markman, K. D. (1995). Multiple explanation: a consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1069–1086.CrossRef Hirt, E. R., & Markman, K. D. (1995). Multiple explanation: a consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1069–1086.CrossRef
go back to reference Lim, L., & Benbasat, I. (1997). The debiasing role of group support systems: an experimental investigation of the representativeness bias. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47, 453–471.CrossRef Lim, L., & Benbasat, I. (1997). The debiasing role of group support systems: an experimental investigation of the representativeness bias. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47, 453–471.CrossRef
go back to reference MacLeod, A. K., & Byrne, A. (1996). Anxiety, depression, and the anticipation of future positive and negative experiences. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 286–289.PubMedCrossRef MacLeod, A. K., & Byrne, A. (1996). Anxiety, depression, and the anticipation of future positive and negative experiences. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 286–289.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Martuza, V. R., & Kallstrom, D. W. (1974). Validity of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in an academic setting. Psychological Reports, 35, 363–366. Martuza, V. R., & Kallstrom, D. W. (1974). Validity of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in an academic setting. Psychological Reports, 35, 363–366.
go back to reference McKenna, F. P., & Albery, I. P. (2001). Does unrealistic optimism change following a negative experience? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1146–1157.CrossRef McKenna, F. P., & Albery, I. P. (2001). Does unrealistic optimism change following a negative experience? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1146–1157.CrossRef
go back to reference Mineka, S., & Sutton, S. K. (1992). Cognitive biases and the emotional disorders. Psychological Science, 3, 65–69.CrossRef Mineka, S., & Sutton, S. K. (1992). Cognitive biases and the emotional disorders. Psychological Science, 3, 65–69.CrossRef
go back to reference Mumma, G. H., & Wilson, S. B. (1995). Procedural debiasing of primacy/anchoring effects in clinical-like judgments. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 841–853.PubMedCrossRef Mumma, G. H., & Wilson, S. B. (1995). Procedural debiasing of primacy/anchoring effects in clinical-like judgments. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 841–853.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
go back to reference Swartz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202.CrossRef Swartz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202.CrossRef
go back to reference Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.CrossRef Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.CrossRef
go back to reference Vaughn, L. A., & Weary, G. (2002). Roles of availability of explanations, feelings of ease, and dysphoria in judgments about the future. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21, 686–704.CrossRef Vaughn, L. A., & Weary, G. (2002). Roles of availability of explanations, feelings of ease, and dysphoria in judgments about the future. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21, 686–704.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Debiasing of Pessimistic Judgments Associated with Anxiety: A Test of the Availability Heuristic
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2009
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-008-9090-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2009

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 1/2009 Naar de uitgave