Top

Gepubliceerd in:

13-07-2017

De onderlinge samenhang tussen leerkracht-leerlingrelaties, peerstatus, en gedragsmatige betrokkenheid

Auteurs: Maaike C. Engels, MSc, Prof. Hilde Colpin, Prof. Karla Van Leeuwen, Prof. Patricia Bijttebier, Prof. Wim Van Den Noortgate, Prof. Stephan Claes, Prof. Luc Goossens, Prof. Karine Verschueren

Gepubliceerd in: Kind en adolescent | Uitgave 3/2017

Samenvatting

Deze studie onderzocht hoe leerkracht-leerlingrelaties, peerstatus en gedragsmatige betrokkenheid onderling samenhangen in het secundair onderwijs. Hierbij werd onderscheid gemaakt tussen een positieve en een negatieve dimensie in de leerkracht-leerlingrelatie en tussen twee aspecten van peerstatus, namelijk acceptatie en populariteit.

De onderzoeksgroep bestond uit 1116 Vlaamse adolescenten uit het eerste, tweede en derde leerjaar van het secundair onderwijs. Tijdens jaarlijkse metingen werden peernominaties van leerkracht-leerlingrelaties en peerstatus, en zelfrapportages van gedragsmatige betrokkenheid afgenomen.

Uit cross-lagged analyses bleek dat positieve leerkracht-leerlingrelaties meer betrokkenheid en negatieve leerkracht-leerlingrelaties minder betrokkenheid voorspelden in de loop van de tijd. Daarnaast hingen zowel acceptatie als populariteit in de peergroep negatief samen met latere gedragsmatige betrokkenheid. Gedragsmatige betrokkenheid was niet voorspellend voor leerkracht-leerlingrelaties of peerstatus. Resultaten toonden aan dat relaties met leerkrachten en leeftijdsgenoten onafhankelijk van elkaar een belangrijke rol spelen in de ontwikkeling van gedragsmatige betrokkenheid van adolescenten.

vorige artikel Over het ongedaan maken van een psychiatrische diagnose

volgende artikel Een terugblik op dertig jaar kinder- en jeugdpsychiatrie

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386. doi:10.1002/pits.20303.CrossRef

Archambault, I., Pagani, L. S., & Fitzpatrick, C. (2013). Transactional associations between classroom engagement and relations with teachers from first through fourth grade. Learning and Instruction, 23, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.09.003.CrossRef

Asher, S. R., & McDonald, K. L. (2009). The behavioral basis of acceptance, rejection, and perceived popularity. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski & B. Laursen (red.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pag. 232–248). New York: Guilford.

Bergin, C., & Bergin, D. (2009). Attachment in the classroom. Educational Psychological Review, 21(2), 141–170. doi:10.1007/s10648-009-9104-0.CrossRef

Berndt, T. J., Hawkins, J. A., & Jiao, Z. (1999). Influences of friends and friendships on adjustment to junior high school. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45(1), 13–41.

Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1998). Children’s interpersonal behaviors and the teacher-child relationship. Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 934–946. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.34.5.934.CrossRefPubMed

Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: separation, anxiety and anger. band 2. New York: Basic Books.

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (red.), Theoretical models of human development 6e druk. Handbook of child psychology, (band 1, pag. 793–828). New York: John Wiley.

Buhs, E. S., & Ladd, G. W. (2001). Peer rejection as an antecedent of young children’s school adjustment: an examination of mediating processes. Developmental Psychology, 37(4), 550–560. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.550.CrossRefPubMed

Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with mplus: basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.

Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer.CrossRef

Cillessen, A. H. N. (2009). Sociometric methods. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukoski & B. Laursen (red.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pag. 82–99). New York: Guilford.

Cillessen, A. H. N., Schwartz, D., & Mayeux, L. (2011). Popularity in the peer system. New York: Guilford.

Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: a cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557–570. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.19.2.224.CrossRef

Enders, C. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford.

Engels, M. C., Colpin, H., Leeuwen, K. van, Bijttebier, P., Noortgate, W. van den, Claes, S., Goossens, L., & Verschueren, K. (2017). School engagement trajectories in adolescence: The role of peer likeability and popularity. Journal of School Psychology, 64(5), 61–75. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.006.CrossRefPubMed

Europese Commissie. Eurostat (2016). Statistical Atlas Eurostat regional yearbook 2016: urban-rural typology. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistical-atlas/gis/viewer/?mids=2,99,CNTR-OVL&o=1,1,0.7&center=50.83595,5.40014,7&ch=95,96&nutsId=BE327&. Geraadpleegd op: 13 juni 2017

Farmer, T. W., Estell, D. B., Bishop, J. L., O’Neal, K. K., & Cairns, B. D. (2003). Rejected bullies or popular leaders? The social relations of aggressive subtypes of rural african american early adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 39(6), 992–1004. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.6.992.CrossRefPubMed

Farmer, T. W., McAuliffe Lines, M., & Hamm, J. V. (2011). Revealing the invisible hand: the role of teachers in children’s peer experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 247–256. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2011.04.006.CrossRef

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059.CrossRef

Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002.CrossRef

Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148–162. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148.CrossRef

Galván, A., Spatzier, A., & Juvonen, J. (2011). Perceived norms and social values to capture school culture in elementary and middle school. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(6), 346–353. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2011.08.005.CrossRef

Gregory, A., Allen, J. P., Mikami, A. Y., Hafen, C. A., & Pianta, R. C. (2014). Effects of a professional development program on behavioral engagement of students in middle and high school. Psychology in the Schools, 51(2), 143–163. doi:10.1002/pits.21741.CrossRefPubMed

Guérin, C., Pieters, C., Roelants, M., Leeuwen, K. van, Desoete, A., Wiersema, J. R., & Hoppenbrouwers, K. (2012). Socio-demografisch profiel en gezondheid van 6 en 12-jarige jongeren (cohorte jong!) in vlaanderen (Sociodemographic profile and health of 6‑ and 12-years-old youngsters (cohorts jong!) in flanders). Leuven: Policy Research Centre of Welfare. Retrieved from www.steunpuntwvg.be

Hamm, J. V., Farmer, T. W., Robertson, D., Dadisman, K., Murray, A., Meece, J. L., & Song, S. Y. (2010). Effects of a developmentally based intervention with teachers on native american and white early adolescents’ schooling adjustment in rural settings. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78(3), 343–377. doi:10.1080/00220970903548038.CrossRef

Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625–638. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00301.CrossRefPubMed

Hughes, J. N., Luo, W., Kwok, O. M., & Loyd, L. K. (2008). Teacher-student support, effortful engagement, and achievement: a 3‑year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 1–14. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

IRRE (1998). Research assessment package for schools (raps) manual. Philidelphia: Institute for Research and Reform in Education.

Johnson, W., McGue, M., & Iacono, W. G. (2006). Genetic and environmental influences on academic achievement trajectories during adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 42(3), 514–532. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.514.CrossRefPubMed

Kindermann, T. A., & Skinner, E. A. (2009). How do naturally existing peer groups shape children’s academic development during sixth grade? European Journal of Psychological Science, 3(1), 31–43. doi:10.3233/dev-2009-3105.

Ladd, G. W., Birch, S. H., & Buhs, E. S. (1999). Children’s social and scholastic lives in kindergarten: related spheres of influence. Child Development, 70(6), 1373–1400. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00101.CrossRefPubMed

Laet, S. de, Doumen, S., Vervoort, E., Colpin, H., Leeuwen, K. van, Goossens, L., & Verschueren, K. (2014). Transactional links between teacher-child relationship quality and perceived versus sociometric popularity: a three-wave longitudinal study. Child Development, 85(4), 1647–1662. doi:10.1111/cdev.12216.CrossRefPubMed

Laet, S. de, Colpin, H., Vervoort, E., Doumen, S., Leeuwen, K. van, Goossens, L., & Verschueren, K. (2015). Developmental trajectories of student behavioral engagement in late elementary school: both teachers and peers matter. Developmental Psychology, 51(9), 1292–1306. doi:10.1037/a0039478.CrossRefPubMed

LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19(1), 130–147. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x.CrossRef

Li, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Trajectories of school engagement during adolescence: Implications for grades, depression, delinquency, and substance use. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 233–247. doi:10.1037/a0021307.CrossRefPubMed

Marks, P. E. L., Babcock, B., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Crick, N. R. (2013). The effects of participation rate on the internal reliability of peer nomination measures. Social Development, 22(3), 609–622. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2012.00661.x.CrossRef

Martin, A. J., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 327–365. doi:10.3102/0034654308325583.CrossRef

Mikami, A. Y., Gregory, A., Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., & Lun, J. (2011). Effects of a teacher professional development intervention on peer relationships in secondary classrooms. School Psychology Review, 40(3), 367–385.PubMedPubMedCentral

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

Nurmi, J.-E., & Kiuru, N. (2015). Students’ evocative impact on teacher instruction and teacher-child relationships: theoretical background and an overview of previous research. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39(5), 445–457. doi:10.1177/0165025415592514.CrossRef

Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: a meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529. doi:10.3102/0034654311421793.

Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Bowker, J. C. (2015). Children in peer groups. In R. M. Lerner, M. H. Bornstein & T. Leventhal (red.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pag. 175–222). Hoboken: Wiley.

Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J. D., & Lynch, J. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14(2), 226–249. doi:10.1177/027243169401400207.CrossRef

Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514. doi:10.1007/bf02296192.CrossRef

Schwartz, D., & Gorman, A. H. (2011). The high price of high status: popularity as a mechanism of risk. In A. H. N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz & L. Mayeux (red.), Popularity in the peer system (pag. 245–270). New York: Guilford.

Schwartz, D., Hopmeyer Gorman, A., Nakamoto, J., & McKay, T. (2006). Popularity, social acceptance, and aggression in adolescent peer groups: links with academic performance and school attendance. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1116–1127. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1116.CrossRefPubMed

Skinner, E. A. (2016). Engagement and disaffection as central to processes of motivational resilience and development. In R. W. Kathryn & D. B. Miele (red.), Handbook of motivation at school (2e druk. pag. 145–168). New York: Routledge.

Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.85.4.571.CrossRef

Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008a). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781. doi:10.1037/a0012840.CrossRef

Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2008b). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525. doi:10.1177/0013164408323233.CrossRef

Thissen, M., & Bendermacher, N. (2012). Kunst socstat: sociometric status. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.

Verschueren, K. (2015). Ontwikkeling en onderwijs: De bijdrage van bio-ecologische ontwikkelingsmodellen aan onderwijsonderzoek. Kind en Adolescent, 36(4), 209–225. doi:10.1007/s12453-015-0101-4.CrossRef

Verschueren, K., Doumen, S., & Buyse, E. (2012). Relationships with mother, teacher, and peers: unique and joint effects on young children’s self-concept. Attachment & Human Development, 14(3), 233–248. doi:10.1080/14616734.2012.672263.CrossRef

Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Social support matters: longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83(3), 877–895. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x.CrossRefPubMed

Wang, M. T., Willett, J. B., & Eccles, J. S. (2011). The assessment of school engagement: examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of School Psychology, 49(4), 465–480. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.04.001.CrossRefPubMed

Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: the role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 202–209. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.202.CrossRef

Wentzel, K. R., & Muenks, K. (2016). Peer influence on students’ motivation, academic achievement, and social behavior. In K. R. Wentzel & G. B. Ramani (red.), Handbook of social influences in school contexts (pag. 13–30). London: Routledge.

Williams, R. L. (2000). A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics, 56(2), 645–646. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00645.x.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: De onderlinge samenhang tussen leerkracht-leerlingrelaties, peerstatus, en gedragsmatige betrokkenheid
Auteurs: Maaike C. Engels, MSc
Prof. Hilde Colpin
Prof. Karla Van Leeuwen
Prof. Patricia Bijttebier
Prof. Wim Van Den Noortgate
Prof. Stephan Claes
Prof. Luc Goossens
Prof. Karine Verschueren
Publicatiedatum: 13-07-2017
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in: Kind en adolescent / Uitgave 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-2436
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-5998
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12453-017-0149-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2017

Verschueren, K., & Koomen, H. (Red.) (2016). Handboek Diagnostiek in de leerlingenbegeleiding: kind en context

Boeken

To screen or not to screen: onterechte kritiek op instrumenten voor screening van kindermishandeling

Opmerkelijk

Mis(ver)standen rondom dyslexie

Opmerkelijk

Over het ongedaan maken van een psychiatrische diagnose

IJzendoorn, M. H. van, & Rosmalen, L. van (red.) (2016). Pedagogiek in beeld. Een inleiding in de pedagogische studie van opvoeding, onderwijs en hulpverlening

Boeken

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)