Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
To assess the comparability of five performance indicator scores for treatment delay among patients diagnosed with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in relation to the quality of the underlying data.
Secondary analyses were performed on data from 1017 patients in seven Dutch hospitals. Data were collected using standardised forms for patients discharged in 2012. Comparability was assessed as the number of occasions the indicator threshold was reached for each hospital.
Hospitals recorded different time points based on different interpretations of the definitions. This led to substantial differences in indicator scores, ranging from 57 to 100 % of the indictor threshold being reached. Some hospitals recorded all the required data elements for calculating the performance indicators but none of the data elements could be retrieved in a fully automated way. Moreover, recording accessibility and completeness of time points varied widely within and between hospitals.
Hospitals use different definitions for treatment delay and vary greatly in the extent to which the necessary data are available, accessible and complete, impeding comparability between hospitals. Indicator developers, users and hospitals providing data should be aware of these issues and aim to improve data quality in order to facilitate comparability of performance indicators.
Khan NA, McGilchrist M, Padmanabhan S, et al. Data quality tool. Deliverable of the TRANSFoRm project (Translational Research and Patient Safety in Europe). Utrecht: NIVEL; 2013.
Kringos DS, Anema HA, ten Asbroek AHA, et al. Beperkt Zicht. Onderzoek naar de betrouwbaarheid, validiteit en bruikbaarheid van prestatie-indicatoren over de kwaliteit van de Nederlandse ziekenhuiszorg. [Research on the reliability, validity and usefullness of performance indicators on the quality of Dutch hospital care]. Amsterdam: AMC; 2012.
Wollersheim H, Hermens R, Hulscher M, et al. Clinical indicators: development and applications. Neth J Med. 2007;65:15–22. PubMed
Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur heart J. 2012;33:2569–619.
O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al, American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127:362–425. CrossRef
IGZ. Basisset kwaliteitsindicatoren ziekenhuizen [Dutch Health Inspection. Quality indicators for hospitals]. 2012. http://www.igz.nl/Images/Basisset%20kwaliteitsindicatoren%20ziekenhuizen%202012–2_tcm294–305782.pdf. pp. 86–9. Accessed 26 february 2015
Stroetmann VN (Ed.), Kalra D, Lewalle P, et al. Semantic Interoperability for Better Health and Safer Healthcare. Deployment and Research Roadmap for Europe. European Communities, European Commission, Information Society and Media Directorate-General, Belgium 2009.
NFU. Kwaliteitsevaluatie door verbeterde zorg documentatie. [Netherlands Federation of University medical centers. Quality evaluation by improved care registration]. Utrecht: NFU; 2013.
Dentler K, Cornet R, ten Teije A, et al. Influence of data quality on computed Dutch hospital quality indicators: a case study in colorectal cancer surgery. BMC Med Inform DecMak. 2014;14:32–3. CrossRef
Cimino JJ. Collect once, many: enabling the reuse of clinical data through controlled terminologies. J AHIMA. 2007;78:24–9. PubMed
- Data quality issues impede comparability of hospital treatment delay performance indicators
M.C. de Bruijne
- Bohn Stafleu van Loghum