Skip to main content

Mijn bibliotheek

Shop

Nieuws
Boeken
Tijdschriften
E-learning
Web-tv
Video
Audio

Tips voor Mijn BSL

UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 10/2018

27-06-2018 | Brief Communication

Cross-cultural validation of the German version of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) in multimorbid elderly people

Auteurs: Anna Exner, Maria Kleinstäuber, Wolfgang Maier, Angela Fuchs, Juliana J. Petersen, Ingmar Schäfer, Jochen Gensichen, Steffi G. Riedel-Heller, Siegfried Weyerer, Horst Bickel, Hans-Helmut König, Birgitt Wiese, Gerhard Schön, Martin Scherer, Hendrik van den Bussche, Berend Terluin

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 10/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

Psychosomatic symptoms and mental health problems are highly prevalent in multimorbid elderly people challenging general practitioners to differentiate between normal stress and psychopathological conditions. The 4DSQ is a Dutch questionnaire developed to detect anxiety, depression, somatization, and distress in primary care. This study aims to analyze measurement equivalence between a German version and the original Dutch instrument.

Methods

A Dutch and a German sample of multimorbid elderly people, matched by gender and age, were analyzed. Equivalence of scale structures was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). To evaluate measurement equivalence across languages, differential item functioning (DIF) was analyzed using Mantel–Haenszel method and hybrid ordinal logistic regression analysis. Differential test functioning (DTF) was assessed using Rasch analysis.

Results

A total of 185 German and 185 Dutch participants completed the questionnaire. The CFA confirmed one-factor models for all scales of both 4DSQ versions. Nine items in three scales were flagged with DIF. The anxiety scale showed to be free of DIF. DTF analysis revealed negligible scale impact of DIF.

Conclusions

The German 4DSQ demonstrated measurement equivalence to the original Dutch instrument. Hence, it can be considered a valid questionnaire for the screening for mental health problems in primary care.
vorige artikel Fatigue in the general population: German normative values of the EORTC QLQ-FA12
volgende artikel Negligible impact of differential item functioning between Black and White dialysis patients on the Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-item short form survey (KDQOLTM-36)
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Marengoni, A., Angleman, S., Melis, R., Mangialasche, F., Karp, A., Garmen, A., et al. (2011). Aging with multimorbidity: A systematic review of the literature. Ageing Research Reviews, 10(4), 430–439. CrossRefPubMed
2.
Swartz, J. A., & Jantz, I. (2014). Association between nonspecific severe psychological distress as an indicator of serious mental illness and increasing levels of medical multimorbidity. American Journal of Public Health, 104(12), 2350–2358. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Rattay, P., Butschalowsky, H., Rommel, A., Prütz, F., Jordan, S., Nowossadeck, E., et al. (2013). Utilization of outpatient and inpatient health services in Germany. Results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1) [Inanspruchnahme der ambulanten und stationären medizinischen Versorgung in Deutschland: Ergebnisse der Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland (DEGS1)]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 56, 832–844.
4.
Olario, E., Forero, C. G., Castro-Rodriguez, J. I., Rodrigo-Calvo, M. T., Álvarez, P., Martín-López, L. M., et al. (2015). Detection of anxiety disorders in primary care: A meta-analysis of assisted and unassisted diagnosis. Depression and Anxiety, 32(7), 471–484. CrossRef
5.
Terluin, B. (1996). De Vierdimensionale Klachtenlijst (4DKL). Een vragenlijst voor het meten van distress, depressie, angst en somatisatie. Huisarts Wet, 39(12), 538–547.
6.
Terluin, B., van Marwijk, H. W. J., Ader, H. J., de Vet, H. C. W., Penninx, B. W. J. H., Hermens, M. L. M., et al. (2006). The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ): A validation study of a multidimensional self-report questionnaire to assess distress, depression, anxiety and somatization. BMC Psychiatry, 6, 34. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Terluin, B., Unalan, P. C., Turfaner, N., Özkul, S. A., & Marwijk, H. W. J. V. (2016). Cross-cultural validation of the Turkish Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) using differential item and test functioning (DIF and DTF) analysis. BMC Family Practice, 17(1), 53. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Schäfer, I., Hansen, H., Schön, G., Maier, W., Höfels, S., Altiner, A., et al. (2009). The German MultiCare-study: Patterns of multimorbidity in primary health care - protocol of a prospective cohort study. BMC Health Services Research, 9, 145. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Scherpenzeel, A. (2011). Data collection in a probability-based Internet panel: How the LISS panel was built and how it can be used. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 109(1), 56–61. CrossRef
10.
Terluin, B., Marchand, M. A. G., De Vet, H. C. W., & Brouwers, E. P. M. (2015). Impact of verb tense on response to the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31(3), 202–210. CrossRef
11.
Terluin, B., Brouwers, E. P. M., Van Marwijk, H. W. J., Verhaak, P. F. M., & Van Der Horst, H. E. (2009). Detecting depressive and anxiety disorders in distressed patients in primary care; comparative diagnostic accuracy of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). BMC Family Practice, 10, 58. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
De Vroege, L., Emons, W. H. M., Sijtsma, K., Hoedeman, R., & Van Der Feltz-Cornelis, C. M. (2015). Validation of the 4DSQ somatization subscale in the occupational health care setting as a screener. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 25(1), 105–115. CrossRefPubMed
13.
Terluin, B., Oosterbaan, D. B., Brouwers, E. P. M., Van Straten, A., Van De Ven, P. M., Langerak, W., et al. (2014). To what extent does the anxiety scale of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) detect specific types of anxiety disorder in primary care? A psychometric study. BMC Psychiatry, 14, 121. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Van Ginkel, J. R., & Van Der Ark, L. A. (2005). SPSS syntax for missing value imputation in test and questionnaire data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(2), 152–153. CrossRef
15.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. CrossRef
16.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. CrossRef
17.
Hambleton, R. K. (2006). Good practices for identifying differential item functioning. Medical Care, 44(11), 182–188. CrossRef
18.
Teresi, J. A. (2006). Different approaches to differential item functioning in health applications: Advantages, disadvantages and some neglected topics. Medical Care, 44(11 Suppl 3), 152–170. CrossRef
19.
20.
Choi, S. W., Gibbons, L. E., & Crane, P. K. (2011). lordif: An R package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory and Monte Carlo simulations. Journal of Statistical Software, 39(8), 1–30. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Terluin, B., Smits, N., Brouwers, E. P., & de Vet, H. C. (2016). The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) in the general population: Scale structure, reliability, measurement invariance and normative data: A cross-sectional survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14(1), 130. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Terluin, B., Smits, N., & Miedema, B. (2014). The English version of the four-dimensional symptom questionnaire (4DSQ) measures the same as the original Dutch questionnaire: A validation study. European Journal of General Practice, 20(4), 320–326. CrossRefPubMed
23.
Smith, J. J., Berman, M. D., Hiratsuka, V. Y., & Frazier, R. R. (2015). The effect of regular primary care utilization on long-term glycemic and blood pressure control in adults with diabetes. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 28(1), 28–37. CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Cross-cultural validation of the German version of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) in multimorbid elderly people
Auteurs
Anna Exner
Maria Kleinstäuber
Wolfgang Maier
Angela Fuchs
Juliana J. Petersen
Ingmar Schäfer
Jochen Gensichen
Steffi G. Riedel-Heller
Siegfried Weyerer
Horst Bickel
Hans-Helmut König
Birgitt Wiese
Gerhard Schön
Martin Scherer
Hendrik van den Bussche
Berend Terluin
Publicatiedatum
27-06-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1924-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2018

Quality of Life Research 10/2018 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Understanding patient-reported outcome measures in Huntington disease: at what point is cognitive impairment related to poor measurement reliability?

OriginalPaper

Relationship between cyberbullying and health-related quality of life in a sample of children and adolescents

OriginalPaper

A population-based analysis of life satisfaction and social support among children of diverse backgrounds in British Columbia, Canada

Correction

Correction to: Health-related quality of life in coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis mapped against the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

Letter to the Editor

Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with breast cancer: a reply to Ribi et al.

OriginalPaper

Trials with patient-reported outcomes registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR)