Top

Gepubliceerd in:

13-11-2019

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and construct validity of the Thai version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 in individuals with chronic low back pain

Auteurs: Polake Rawang, Prawit Janwantanakul, Helena Correia, Mark P. Jensen, Rotsalai Kanlayanaphotporn

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2020

Abstract

Purpose

To culturally adapt the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 into Thai (T-PROMIS-29) and evaluate the reliability and validity of the culturally adapted questionnaire.

Methods

The translation was performed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) translation guidelines. Unidimensionality, internal consistency, and test–retest reliability at a 1-week interval for the translated measure were computed. Construct validity was evaluated by computing correlations between the T-PROMIS-29 scores and selected SF-36 scale scores.

Results

The study sample comprised of 241 participants with chronic low back pain. Internal consistencies were good to excellent, with Cronbach’s alphas ranging from 0.84 to 0.94. The test–retest stability of all T-PROMIS-29 domains were moderate to good, with ICCs_(2,1) ranging from 0.57 to 0.74. Unidimensionality, convergent validity, and divergent construct validity were satisfactory.

Conclusions

The findings support the reliability and validity of the T-PROMIS-29 scale scores. The measure can be used to assess key quality of life domains in individuals from Thailand with chronic low back pain.

vorige artikel Assessing measurement invariance of MSQOL-54 across Italian and English versions

volgende artikel Cross-cultural adaptation and validation for the Brazilian population of the instrument Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis-Specific Quality of Life–Short Form (ALSSQOL-SF)

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Breivik, H., Collett, B., Ventafridda, V., Cohen, R., & Gallacher, D. (2006). Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. European Journal of Pain,10(4), 287–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009.CrossRefPubMed

Kawai, K., Kawai, A. T., Wollan, P., & Yawn, B. P. (2017). Adverse impacts of chronic pain on health-related quality of life, work productivity, depression and anxiety in a community-based study. Family Practice,34(6), 656–661. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmx034.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bjornsdottir, S. V., Jonsson, S. H., & Valdimarsdottir, U. A. (2014). Mental health indicators and quality of life among individuals with musculoskeletal chronic pain: A nationwide study in Iceland. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology,43(5), 419–423. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009742.2014.881549.CrossRefPubMed

Hirase, T., Kataoka, H., Inokuchi, S., Nakano, J., Sakamoto, J., & Okita, M. (2017). Factors associated with chronic musculoskeletal pain in Japanese community-dwelling older adults: A cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore),96(23), e7069. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007069.CrossRef

Husky, M. M., Ferdous Farin, F., Compagnone, P., Fermanian, C., & Kovess-Masfety, V. (2018). Chronic back pain and its association with quality of life in a large French population survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes,16(1), 195. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-1018-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gore, M., Sadosky, A., Stacey, B. R., Tai, K. S., & Leslie, D. (2012). The burden of chronic low back pain: Clinical comorbidities, treatment patterns, and health care costs in usual care settings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),37(11), E668–E677. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318241e5de.CrossRef

Choi, Y. S., Kim, D. J., Lee, K. Y., Park, Y. S., Cho, K. J., Lee, J. H., et al. (2014). How does chronic back pain influence quality of life in koreans: A cross-sectional study. Asian Spine Journal,8(3), 346–352. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2014.8.3.346.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wettstein, M., Eich, W., Bieber, C., & Tesarz, J. (2019). Pain intensity, disability, and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain: Does age matter? Pain Medicine,20(3), 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pny062.CrossRefPubMed

Roland, M., & Morris, R. (1983). A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),8(2), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004.CrossRef

10.

Fairbank, J. C., Couper, J., Davies, J. B., & O’Brien, J. P. (1980). The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy,66(8), 271–273.PubMed

11.

Kopec, J. A., Esdaile, J. M., Abrahamowicz, M., Abenhaim, L., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Lamping, D. L., et al. (1996). The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: Conceptualization and development. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,49(2), 151–161.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Jirarattanaphochai, K., Jung, S., Sumananont, C., & Saengnipanthkul, S. (2005). Reliability of the Roland- Morris Disability Questionnaire (Thai version) for the evaluation of low back pain patients. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand,88(3), 407–411.PubMed

13.

Sanjaroensuttikul, N. (2007). The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire (version 1.0) Thai version. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand,90(7), 1417–1422.PubMed

14.

Felce, D., & Perry, J. (1995). Quality of life: Its definition and measurement. Research in Developmental Disabilities,16(1), 51–74.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care,45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Deyo, R. A., Dworkin, S. F., Amtmann, D., Andersson, G., Borenstein, D., Carragee, E., et al. (2014). Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain. The Journal of Pain,15(6), 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2014.03.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Deyo, R. A., Katrina, R., Buckley, D. I., Michaels, L., Kobus, A., Eckstrom, E., et al. (2016). Performance of a patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) short form in older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain Medicine,17(2), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnv046.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Kroenke, K., Yu, Z., Wu, J., Kean, J., & Monahan, P. O. (2014). Operating characteristics of PROMIS four-item depression and anxiety scales in primary care patients with chronic pain. Pain Medicine,15(11), 1892–1901. https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12537.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Askew, R. L., Cook, K. F., Revicki, D. A., Cella, D., & Amtmann, D. (2016). Evidence from diverse clinical populations supported clinical validity of PROMIS pain interference and pain behavior. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,73, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.035.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Cook, K. F., Jensen, S. E., Schalet, B. D., Beaumont, J. L., Amtmann, D., Czajkowski, S., et al. (2016). PROMIS measures of pain, fatigue, negative affect, physical function, and social function demonstrated clinical validity across a range of chronic conditions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,73, 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.038.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Purvis, T. E., Andreou, E., Neuman, B. J., Riley, L. H., 3rd, & Skolasky, R. L. (2017). Concurrent validity and responsiveness of PROMIS health domains among patients presenting for anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),42(23), E1357–E1365. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002347.CrossRef

22.

Terwee, C. B., Roorda, L. D., de Vet, H. C., Dekker, J., Westhovens, R., van Leeuwen, J., et al. (2014). Dutch-Flemish translation of 17 item banks from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Quality of Life Research,23(6), 1733–1741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0611-6.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Eremenco, S. L., Cella, D., & Arnold, B. J. (2005). A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Evaluation and the Health Professions,28(2), 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278705275342.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Brazier, J. E., Harper, R., Jones, N. M., O’Cathain, A., Thomas, K. J., Usherwood, T., et al. (1992). Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: New outcome measure for primary care. BMJ,305(6846), 160–164.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Lim, L. L., Seubsman, S. A., & Sleigh, A. (2008). Thai SF-36 health survey: Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and validity in healthy men and women. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes,6, 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Laosanguanek, N., Wiroteurairuang, T., Siritho, S., & Prayoonwiwat, N. (2011). Reliability of the Thai version of SF-36 questionnaire for an evaluation of quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients in multiple sclerosis clinic at Siriraj Hospital. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand,94(Suppl 1), S84–S88.PubMed

27.

Kamper, S. J., Ostelo, R. W., Knol, D. L., Maher, C. G., de Vet, H. C., & Hancock, M. J. (2010). Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,63(7), 760–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.009.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education,2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Weir, J. P. (2005). Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,19(1), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1519/15184.1.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine,15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

de Vet, H. C. W., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., & Bouter, L. M. (2006). When to use agreement versus reliability measures. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,59(10), 1033–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015.CrossRefPubMed

32.

de Vet, H. C., Terwee, C. B., Ostelo, R. W., Beckerman, H., Knol, D. L., & Bouter, L. M. (2006). Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: Distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes,4, 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling,6(1), 1–55.CrossRef

34.

MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods,1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130.CrossRef

35.

Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,60(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,63(11), 1179–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Hung, M., Bounsanga, J., Voss, M. W., & Saltzman, C. L. (2018). Establishing minimum clinically important difference values for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function, hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction in orthopaedics. World Journal of Orthopedics,9(3), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v9.i3.41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Hung, M., Saltzman, C. L., Kendall, R., Bounsanga, J., Voss, M. W., Lawrence, B., et al. (2018). What are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI instruments among patients with spinal conditions? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,476(10), 2037–2039. https://doi.org/10.1097/Corr.0000000000000465.CrossRef

39.

Miles, J., & Shevlin, M. (2007). A time and a place for incremental fit indices. Personality and Individual Differences,42(5), 869–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.022.CrossRef

40.

Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research,99(6), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.3200/Joer.99.6.323-338.CrossRef

41.

Kenney, R. J., Houck, J., Giordano, B. D., Baumhauer, J. F., Herbert, M., & Maloney, M. D. (2019). Do patient reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) scales demonstrate responsiveness as well as disease-specific scales in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy? American Journal of Sports Medicine,47(6), 1396–1403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546519832546.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Hung, M., Baumhauer, J. F., Brodsky, J. W., Cheng, C., Ellis, S. J., Franklin, J. D., et al. (2014). Psychometric comparison of the PROMIS physical function CAT with the FAAM and FFI for measuring patient-reported outcomes. Foot and Ankle International,35(6), 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100714528492.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Hung, M., Saltzman, C. L., Greene, T., Voss, M. W., Bounsanga, J., Gu, Y., et al. (2018). Evaluating instrument responsiveness in joint function: The HOOS JR, the KOOS JR, and the PROMIS PF CAT. Journal of Orthopaedic Research,36(4), 1178–1184. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23739.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Brodke, D. S., Goz, V., Voss, M. W., Lawrence, B. D., Spiker, W. R., & Hung, M. (2017). PROMIS PF CAT outperforms the ODI and SF-36 physical function domain in spine patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),42(12), 921–929. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001965.CrossRef

Titel: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and construct validity of the Thai version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 in individuals with chronic low back pain
Auteurs: Polake Rawang
Prawit Janwantanakul
Helena Correia
Mark P. Jensen
Rotsalai Kanlayanaphotporn
Publicatiedatum: 13-11-2019
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02363-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2020

Psychometric evaluation of the Participation and Activity Inventory for Children and Youth (PAI-CY) 0–2 years with visual impairment

Open Access
Brief Communication

Optimizing measurement of vision-related quality of life: a computerized adaptive test for the impact of vision impairment questionnaire (IVI-CAT)

A conceptual map of health-related quality of life dimensions: key lessons for a new instrument

Open Access

Correlation between disease severity factors and EQ-5D utilities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, AQL-5D and a bespoke TTO in acute asthmatics

Open Access

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and construct validity of the Thai version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 in individuals with chronic low back pain

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2020

Psychometric evaluation of the Participation and Activity Inventory for Children and Youth (PAI-CY) 0–2 years with visual impairment

Optimizing measurement of vision-related quality of life: a computerized adaptive test for the impact of vision impairment questionnaire (IVI-CAT)

A conceptual map of health-related quality of life dimensions: key lessons for a new instrument

Correlation between disease severity factors and EQ-5D utilities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, AQL-5D and a bespoke TTO in acute asthmatics

Consistency matters: measurement invariance of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire in patients with hematologic malignancies

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Psychometric evaluation of the Participation and Activity Inventory for Children and Youth (PAI-CY) 0–2 years with visual impairment

Optimizing measurement of vision-related quality of life: a computerized adaptive test for the impact of vision impairment questionnaire (IVI-CAT)

A conceptual map of health-related quality of life dimensions: key lessons for a new instrument

Correlation between disease severity factors and EQ-5D utilities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, AQL-5D and a bespoke TTO in acute asthmatics

Consistency matters: measurement invariance of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire in patients with hematologic malignancies