Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 2/2014

01-03-2014

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index into Spanish

Auteurs: Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron, Mwidimi Ndosi, Alejandro Luque-Suarez, Begonya Alcacer-Pitarch, Pedro Vicente Munuera, Adam Garrow, Anthony C. Redmond

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 2/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

The Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index (MFPDI) is a self-assessment 19-item questionnaire developed in the UK to measure foot pain and disability. This study aimed at conducting cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the MFPDI for use in Spain.

Methods

Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes measures were followed in the MFPDI adaptation into Spanish. The cross-cultural validation involved Rasch analysis of pooled data sets from Spain and the UK.

Results

Spanish data set comprised 338 patients, five used in the adaptation phase and 333 in the cross-cultural validation phase, mean age (SD) = 55.2 (16.7) and 248 (74.5 %) were female. A UK data set (n = 682) added in the cross-cultural validation phase; mean age (SD) = 51.6 (15.2 %) and 416 (61.0 %) were female. A preliminary analysis of the 17-item MFPDI revealed significant local dependency of items causing significant deviation from the Rasch model. Grouping all items into testlets and re-analysing the MFPDI as a 3-testlet scale resulted in an adequate fit to the Rasch model, χ 2 (df) = 15.945 (12), p = 0.194, excellent reliability and unidimensionality. Lack of cross-cultural invariance was evident on the functional and personal appearance testlets. Splitting the affected testlets discounted the cross-cultural bias and satisfied requirements of the Rasch model. Subsequently, the MFPDI was calibrated into interval-level scales, fully adjusted to allow parametric analyses and cross-cultural data comparisons when required.

Conclusions

Rasch analysis has confirmed that the MFPDI is a robust 3-subscale measure of foot pain, function and appearance in both its English and Spanish versions.
vorige artikel Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the hepatitis C virus-patient-reported outcomes (HCV-PRO) instrument
volgende artikel Mokken scaling of the Chinese version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey
Literatuur
1.
Spahn, G., Schiele, R., Hell, A., Klinger, H., Jung, R., & Langlotz, A. (2004). The prevalence of pain and deformities in the feet of adolescents. Results of a cross-sectional study. Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Ihre Grenzgebiete, 142(4), 389–396.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Benvenuti, F., Ferrucci, L., Guralnik, J., Gangemi, S., & Baroni, A. (1995). Foot pain and disability in older persons: An epidemiological study. Am Geriatrics Society, 43, 479–484.
3.
Badlissi, F., Dunn, J., Link, C., Keysor, J., McKinlay, J., & Felson, D. (2005). Foot musculoskeletal disorders, pain, and foot-related functional limitation in older persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(6), 1029.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Menz, H., Barr, E., & Brown, W. (2011). Predictors and persistence of foot problems in women aged 70 years and over: A prospective study. Maturitas, 68(1), 83.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Parsons, S., Breen, A., Foster, N., Letley, L., Pincus, T., Vogel, S., et al. (2007). Prevalence and comparative troublesomeness by age of musculoskeletal pain in different body locations. Family Practice, 24(4), 308.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Menz, H. B., Gill, T. K., Taylor, A. W., & Hill, C. L. (2011). Age and gender differences in disabling foot pain using different definitions of the manchester foot pain and disability index. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 12, 243.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
7.
Tanamas, S., Wluka, A., Berry, P., Menz, H., Strauss, B., Davies-Tuck, M., et al. (2012). Relationship between obesity and foot pain and its association with fat mass, fat distribution, and muscle mass. Arthritis Care and Research, 64(2), 262.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Menz, H., & Lord, S. (2001). Foot pain impairs balance and functional ability in community-dwelling older people. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 91(5), 222.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Menz, H., Morris, M., & Lord, S. (2006). Foot and ankle risk factors for falls in older people: A prospective study. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 61(8), 866.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Mickle, K., Munro, B., Lord, S., Menz, H., & Steele, J. (2009). ISB clinical biomechanics award 2009: Toe weakness and deformity increase the risk of falls in older people. Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 24(10), 787.
11.
Mickle, K., Munro, B., Lord, S., Menz, H., & Steele, J. (2011). Cross-sectional analysis of foot function, functional ability, and health-related quality of life in older people with disabling foot pain. Arthritis Care and Research, 63(11), 1592.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Kaoulla, P., Frescos, N., & Menz, H. B. (2011). A survey of foot problems in community-dwelling older Greek Australians. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 4, 23.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
13.
Kitaoka, H., Alexander, I., Adelaar, R., Nunley, J., Myerson, M., & Sanders, M. (1994). Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot and ankle international/American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society [and] Swiss Foot and Ankle Society, 15(7), 349.
14.
Budiman-Mak, E., Conrad, K., & Roach, K. (1991). The Foot Function Index: A measure of foot pain and disability. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44(6), 561.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Bennett, P., Patterson, C., Wearing, S., & Baglioni, T. (1998). Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot-health status. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 88(9), 419.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Niki, H., Tatsunami, S., Haraguchi, N., Aoki, T., Okuda, R., Suda, Y., et al. (2013). Validity and reliability of a self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q). Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 18(2), 298–320.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
17.
Garrow, A. P., Papageorgiou, A. C., Silman, A. J., Thomas, E., Jayson, M, I. V., & Macfarlane, G. J. (2000). Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess disabling foot pain. Pain, 85(1), 107–113.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Menz, H., Tiedemann, A., Kwan, M., Plumb, K., & Lord, S. R. (2006). Foot pain in community-dwelling older people: An evaluation of the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index. Rheumatology, 45(7), 863–867.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Roddy, E., Muller, S., & Thomas, E. (2011). Onset and persistence of disabling foot pain in community-dwelling older adults over a 3-year period: A prospective cohort study. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 66(4), 474.CrossRef
20.
Cook, C. E., Cleland, J., Pietrobon, R., Garrow, A., & Macfarlane, G. (2007). Calibration of an item pool for assessing the disability associated with foot pain: An application of item response theory to the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index. Physiotherapy, 93(2), 89–95.CrossRef
21.
22.
Spink, M. J., Menz, H. B., & Lord, S. R. (2008). Efficacy of a multifaceted podiatry intervention to improve balance and prevent falls in older people: Study protocol for a randomised trial. BMC Geriatrics, 8(1), 30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
23.
Alcacer-Pitarch, B., Buch, M. H., Gray, J., Denton, C. P., Herrick, A., Navarro-Coy, N., et al. (2012). Pressure and pain in systemic sclerosis/Scleroderma-an evaluation of a simple intervention (PISCES): Randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 13(1), 11.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
24.
Berglund, B., Nordström, G., Hagberg, C., & Mattiasson, A. C. (2005). Foot pain and disability in individuals with Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (EDS): Impact on daily life activities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(4), 164–169.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Bowen, C. J., Edwards, C. J., Hooper, L., Dewbury, K., Sampson, M., Sawyer, S., et al. (2010). Improvement in symptoms and signs in the forefoot of patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with anti-TNF therapy. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 3, 10.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
26.
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Ware, J. J., Gandek, B., Keller, S., & IQOLA Group. (1996). Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. In: B. Spilker (ed), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (2nd ed., pp. 681–692). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.
28.
Petersen, M., Groenvold, M., Bjorner, J., Aaronson, N., Conroy, T., Cull, A., et al. (2003). Use of differential item functioning analysis to assess the equivalence of translations of a questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 12(4), 373–385.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Tennant, A., Penta, M., Tesio, L., Grimby, G., Thonnard, J.-L., Slade, A., Lawton, G., Simone, A., Carter, J., Lundgren-Nilsson, Ã. s., Tripolski, M., Ring, H., Biering-Sørensen, F., Marincek, C., Burger, H., & Phillips, S. (2004). Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through differential item functioning within the framework of the Rasch model: The PRO-ESOR Project. Medical Care, 42(1), 1–37.
30.
Scott, N., Fayers, P., Aaronson, N., Bottomley, A., de Graeff, A., Groenvold, M., et al. (2007). The use of differential item functioning analyses to identify cultural differences in responses to the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research, 16(1), 115–129.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Kaoulla, P., Frescos, N., & Menz, H. B. (2008). Development and validation of a Greek language version of the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 6, 39.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
32.
Ferrari, S. C., Santos, F. C., Guarnieri, A. P., Salvador, N., Correa, A., Hala, A. Z. A., et al. (2008). Indice Manchester de incapacidade associada ao pé doloroso no idoso: Traducao, adaptacao cultural e validasao para a lingua portuguesa. Brazilian Journal of Rheumatology, 48(6), 335–341.
33.
Marinozzi, A., Martinelli, N., Panasc√¨, M., Cancilleri, F., Franceschetti, E., Vincenzi, B., et al. (2009). Italian translation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, with re-assessment of reliability and validity. Quality of Life Research, 18(7), 923–927.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., et al. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health: The Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 8(2), 94.CrossRef
35.
Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 57(8), 1358–1362.PubMedCrossRef
36.
IBM. (2010). IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0.1: SPSS Inc.
37.
Laboratory, R. U. M. M. (1998). Rasch unidimensional measurement models. Perth: RUMM Laboratory Pty Ltd.
38.
Rasch, G. (1967). An informal report on a theory of objectivity in comparisons. Leyden: University of Leyden.
39.
Anderen, E. (1977). Sufficient statistics and latent trait models. Psychometrika, 42, 69–81.CrossRef
40.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. London: Lawrence Arlbaum Associates.
41.
Rosenbaum, P. R. (1989). Criterion-related construct validity. Psychometrika, 54(4), 625–633.CrossRef
42.
Masters, G. A. (1982). Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–174.CrossRef
43.
Wright, B. (1996). Local dependency, correlations and principal components. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 10(3), 509–511.
44.
Guemin, L., Robert, L. B., & David, A. F. (2000). Incorporating the testlet concept in test score analyses. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 19(4), 9–15.
45.
Smith, E, Jr. (2002). Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(2), 205.PubMed
46.
Brodersen, J., Meads, D., Kreiner, S., Thorsen, H., Doward, L., & McKenna, S. (2007). Methodological aspects of differential item functioning in the Rasch model. Journal of Medical Economics, 10(3), 309–324.CrossRef
47.
48.
Johnson, T. (1998). Approaches to equivalence in cross-cultural and cross-national survey research. ZUMA Nachrichten Spezial, 3, 1–40.
49.
Wright, B., & Linacre, J. (1989). Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 70(12), 857.PubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index into Spanish
Auteurs
Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron
Mwidimi Ndosi
Alejandro Luque-Suarez
Begonya Alcacer-Pitarch
Pedro Vicente Munuera
Adam Garrow
Anthony C. Redmond
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0507-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2014

Quality of Life Research 2/2014 Naar de uitgave

Brief Communication

Validation of the Polish version of the EORTC QLQ-BM22 module for the assessment of health-related quality of life in patients with bone metastases

Brief Communication

Use of factor analysis models to evaluate measurement invariance property of the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)

OriginalPaper

Swedish experience-based value sets for EQ-5D health states

OriginalPaper

How good is “very good”? Translation effect in the racial/ethnic variation in self-rated health status

Brief Communication

EQ-5D Portuguese population norms

OriginalPaper

Assessment of health-related quality of life 6 years after childhood cochlear implantation