Top

Quality of Life Research

Gepubliceerd in:

07-01-2022

Creation and validation of the pictorial ecological momentary well-being instrument (EMOWI) for adolescents

Auteurs: Marie Buzzi, Laetitia Minary, Yan Kestens, Nelly Agrinier, Laetitia Ricci, Jonathan Epstein

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 6/2022

Abstract

Purpose

Adolescence is characterized by the ongoing maturation of emotion-regulation skills and increased emotional reactivity. There is a need for a measurement tool suitable to the Ecological Momentary Assessment methodology, to better capture within-day variations in well-being, and provide fine-grained data that can help understand how environments, behaviors, and health intersect. This paper presents the development and evaluation of the Ecological MOmentary Well-Being Instrument for adolescents, designed for use in EMA.

Methods

A mixed-methods study was conducted, using both qualitative and quantitative approaches, to develop and assess the EMOWI. A literature review, pictorial production by graphic designers, and qualitative interviews with French and Canadian professionals and adolescents helped design and evaluate the scale face validity. Quantitative evaluation of dimensionality, reliability, and validity was conducted in two samples of French 8th graders.

Results

The resulting 8-item EMOWI showed excellent face validity. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a single factor hypothesis (RMSEA = 0.072). Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.85) and intraday test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.83) were high. Correlations with existing scales were consistent with preset hypotheses. Ceiling effects were evidenced for all items, yet not on the global score. Quantitative estimations were similar for the verbal and pictorial versions, but qualitative findings argued in favor of the pictorial version.

Conclusion

The 8-item pictorial EMOWI is a short and innovative instrument to measure momentary well-being in adolescents aged 12 to 17 years. Its strong psychometric properties and its acceptability among adolescents make it an excellent candidate instrument for the Ecological Momentary Assessment of well-being in this population.

vorige artikel Psychometric validation and interpretation of the Nocturia Impact Diary in a clinical trial setting

volgende artikel Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

World Health Organization. Mental health: strengthening our response. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response (accessed June 22, 2021).

Arbour-Nicitopoulos, K. P., Faulkner, G. E., & Irving, H. M. (2012). Multiple health-risk behaviour and psychological distress in adolescence. Journal of Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 21, 171–178.

Griffin, K. W., Scheier, L. M., Botvin, G. J., & Diaz, T. (2001). Protective role of personal competence skills in adolescent substance use: Psychological well-being as a mediating factor. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15, 194–203.CrossRefPubMed

Shedler, J., & Block, J. (1990). Adolescent drug use and psychological health. A longitudinal inquiry. American Psychology, 45, 612–630. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.45.5.612CrossRef

Clarke, A., Friede, T., Putz, R., Ashdown, J., Martin, S., Blake, A., et al. (2011). Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): Validated for teenage school students in England and Scotland. A mixed methods assessment. BMC Public Health, 11, 487. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-487CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Tomyn, A. J., Stokes, M. A., Cummins, R. A., & Dias, P. C. (2020). A Rasch analysis of the personal well-being index in school children. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 43, 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278718819219CrossRefPubMed

Ravens-Sieberer, U., Erhart, M., Rajmil, L., Herdman, M., Auquier, P., Bruil, J., et al. (2010). Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: A short measure for children and adolescents’ well-being and health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 19, 1487–1500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9706-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Viejo, C., Gómez-López, M., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2018). Adolescents’ psychological well-being: A multidimensional measure. IJERPH, 15, 2325. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102325CrossRefPubMedCentral

Kern, M. L., Benson, L., Steinberg, E. A., & Steinberg, L. (2016). The EPOCH measure of adolescent well-being. Psychological Assessment, 28, 586–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000201CrossRefPubMed

10.

Ahmed, S. P., Bittencourt-Hewitt, A., & Sebastian, C. L. (2015). Neurocognitive bases of emotion regulation development in adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.07.006CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Young, K. S., Sandman, C. F., & Craske, M. G. (2019). Positive and negative emotion regulation in adolescence: Links to anxiety and depression. Brain Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9040076CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415CrossRefPubMed

13.

van Genugten, C. R., Schuurmans, J., Lamers, F., Riese, H., Penninx, B. W., Schoevers, R. A., et al. (2020). Experienced burden of and adherence to smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment in persons with affective disorders. J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020322CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Beute, F., & de Kort, Y. A. W. (2018). The natural context of wellbeing: Ecological momentary assessment of the influence of nature and daylight on affect and stress for individuals with depression levels varying from none to clinical. Health & Place, 49, 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.11.005CrossRef

15.

Maher, J. P., Doerksen, S. E., Elavsky, S., & Conroy, D. E. (2014). Daily satisfaction with life is regulated by both physical activity and sedentary behavior. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 36, 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2013-0185CrossRef

16.

de Vries, L. P., Baselmans, B. M. L., & Bartels, M. (2021). Smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment of well-being: A systematic review and recommendations for future studies. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22, 2361–2408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00324-7CrossRefPubMed

17.

Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., et al. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-63CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Ross, D. A., Hinton, R., Melles-Brewer, M., Engel, D., Zeck, W., Fagan, L., et al. (2020). Adolescent well-being: A definition and conceptual framework. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67, 472–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.06.042CrossRef

19.

Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. C. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 110, 837–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7CrossRefPubMed

20.

Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207–222.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Remschmidt, H. (1994). Psychosocial milestones in normal puberty and adolescence. Hormone Research, 41(Suppl 2), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1159/000183955CrossRefPubMed

22.

Betella, A., & Verschure, P. F. M. J. (2016). The affective slider: A digital self-assessment scale for the measurement of human emotions. PLoS One, 11, e0148037. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148037CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Sauer, J., Baumgartner, J., Frei, N., & Sonderegger, A. (2021). Pictorial scales in research and practice: A review. European Psychologist, 26, 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000405CrossRef

24.

Kunin, T. (1955). The construction of a new type of attitude measure. Personnel Psychology, 8, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1955.tb01189.xCrossRef

25.

Bennett, K. B., & Walters, B. (2001). Configural display design techniques considered at multiple levels of evaluation. Human Factors, 43, 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872001775898304CrossRefPubMed

26.

Baumgartner, J., Sonderegger, A., & Sauer, J. (2019). No need to read: Developing a pictorial single-item scale for measuring perceived usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 122, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.08.008CrossRef

27.

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

van Roekel, E., Keijsers, L., & Chung, J. M. (2019). A review of current ambulatory assessment studies in adolescent samples and practical recommendations. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 29, 560–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12471CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R., & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276CrossRef

30.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141CrossRefPubMed

31.

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., et al. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-yCrossRef

32.

Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.719CrossRefPubMed

33.

Courtwright, S. E., Makic, M. B. F., & Jones, J. (2020). Emotional wellbeing in youth: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum, 55, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12404CrossRefPubMed

34.

Keyes, C. L. M. (2006). The subjective well-being of america’s youth: toward a comprehensive assessment. Adolescent & Family Health, 4, 3–11.

35.

Rebar L. (n.d). LibGuides: Nursing - Literature reviews & systematic reviews: backward & forward reference searching. https://libguides.fau.edu/c.php?g=966176&p=7013756. Accessed 23 July 2021.

36.

National Research Council. (1984). Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building a bridge between disciplines. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/930.

37.

Willis, G. (2021). Cognitive interviewing. Thousand Oaks.

38.

Murphy, M., Hollinghurst, S., & Salisbury, C. (2018). Qualitative assessment of the primary care outcomes questionnaire: A cognitive interview study. BMC Health Services Research, 18, 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2867-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb), 22, 276–282.CrossRef

40.

Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., et al. (2011). Content Validity—Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 2—Assessing Respondent Understanding. Value in Health, 14, 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013CrossRefPubMed

41.

2.4.1 Lemmatisation — IRaMuTeQ. (n.d). http://www.iramuteq.org/documentation/html/copy4_of_1-2-principe-de-fonctionnement-du-logiciel. Accessed 23 July 2021.

42.

Willis, G. B., & Artino, A. R. (2013). What do our respondents think we’re asking? Using cognitive interviewing to improve medical education surveys. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5, 353–356. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-13-00154.1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC, et al. (n.d). COSMIN Study Design checklist for Patient-reported outcome measurement instruments, 32.

44.

Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012CrossRefPubMed

45.

Trousselard, M., Steiler, D., Dutheil, F., Claverie, D., Canini, F., Fenouillet, F., et al. (2016). Validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) in French psychiatric and general populations. Psychiatry Research, 245, 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.08.050CrossRefPubMed

46.

White, D., Leach, C., Sims, R., Atkinson, M., & Cottrell, D. (1999). Validation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale for use with adolescents. British Journal of Psychiatry, 175, 452–454. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.175.5.452CrossRef

47.

Revah-Levy, A., Birmaher, B., Gasquet, I., & Falissard, B. (2007). The Adolescent Depression Rating Scale (ADRS): A validation study. BMC Psychiatry, 7, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-7-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Ryan, R., Huta, V., & Deci, E. (2013). Living well: a self-determination theory perspective on Eudaimonia. The Exploration of Happiness, Happiness Studies Book Series, pp. 117–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5702-8_7.

49.

Schueller, S. M., Aguilera, A., & Mohr, D. C. (2017). Ecological momentary interventions for depression and anxiety. Depression and Anxiety, 34, 540–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22649CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Creation and validation of the pictorial ecological momentary well-being instrument (EMOWI) for adolescents
Auteurs: Marie Buzzi
Laetitia Minary
Yan Kestens
Nelly Agrinier
Laetitia Ricci
Jonathan Epstein
Publicatiedatum: 07-01-2022
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03077-9

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2022

Greater mastery is associated with lower depression risk in a large international cohort of people with multiple sclerosis over 2.5 years

Single item self-rated general health: SF-36 based observations from 16,910 spine surgery procedures

Evaluation of a multidisciplinary care model to improve quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised controlled trial

A philosophical perspective on the development and application of patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs)

Possible substantive improvements in the structure of the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) scale? A study based on its Spanish version

Happiness and depression in psoriasis: a cross-sectional study in Germany