Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Reducing HIV incidence among adolescents represents an urgent global priority. Structural change approaches to HIV prevention may reduce youth risk by addressing the economic, social, cultural, and political factors that elevate it. We assessed whether achievement of structural changes made by eight Connect-to-Protect (C2P) coalitions were associated with improvements in youth’s views of their community over the first 4 years of coalitions’ mobilization. We recruited annual cross-sectional samples of targeted youth from each C2P community. We sampled youth in neighborhood venues. We interviewed a total of 2461 youth over 4 years. Males (66 %) and youth of color comprised the majority (52 % Hispanic/Latinos; 41 % African Americans) of those interviewed. By year 4, youth reported greater satisfaction with their community as a youth-supportive setting. They reported their needs were better met by available community resources compared with year 1. However, these findings were moderated by risk population such that those from communities where C2P focused on young men who have sex with men (YMSM) reported no changes over time whereas those from communities focused on other at-risk youth reported significant improvements over time in satisfaction and resource needs being met. Internalized HIV stigma increased over time among those from communities serving other at-risk youth and was unchanged among those from YMSM communities. The very different results we observe over time between communities focused on YMSM versus other at-risk youth may suggest it is unreasonable to assume identical chains of structural causality across youth populations who have such different historical relationships to HIV and who encounter very different kinds of entrenched discrimination within their communities.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Arnold, E. A., Rebchook, G. M., & Kegeles, S. M. (2014). ‘Triply cursed’: Racism, homophobia and HIV-rleated stigma are barriers to regular HIV testing, treatment adherence and disclosure among young Black gay men. Culture, Health, & Sexuality, 6, 710–722. CrossRef
Bamburger, M., Rugh, J., & Mabry, L. (2012). Realworld evaluation: Working under budget, time, data, and political constraints (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.
Barker, D. H., Swenson, R. R., Brown, L. K., Stanton, B. F., Vanable, P. A., Carey, M. P., et al. (2012). Blocking the benefit of group-based HIV–prevention efforts in at-risk African-American adolescents: The problem of HIV-related stigma. AIDS and Behavior, 16, 571–577. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Bonnell, C., Hargreaves, J., Strange, V., Pronyk, P., & Porter, J. (2006). Should structural interventions be evaluated using RCTs? The case of HIV prevention. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 1135–1142. CrossRef
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). HIV among youth. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/age/youth/index.html.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). HIV surveillance report, 2013, Vol. 25. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/surveillance/
Cheadle, A., Hsu, C., Schwartz, P. M., Pearson, D., Greenwald, H. P., Beery, W. L., et al. (2008). Involving local health departments in community health partnerships: Evaluation results for the Partnership for the Public’s Health Initiative. Journal of Urban Health, 85, 162–177. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Cheadle, A., Schwartz, P. M., Rauzon, S., Bourcier, E., Senter, S., Spring, R., & Beery, W. L. (2013). Using the concept of “population-dose” in planning and evaluating community-level obesity prevention initiatives. American Journal of Evaluation, 34, 71–84. CrossRef
Chen, H. T. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury Park: Sage.
Chutuape, K. S., Willard, N., Sanchez, K., Straub, D. M., Ochoa, T. N., Howell, L., et al. (2010). Mobilizing communities around HIV prevention for youth: How three coalitions applied key strategies to bring about structural changes. AIDS Education and Prevention, 22, 15–27. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Earl, S., Carden, F., & Smutylo, T. (2001). Outcome mapping: Building learning and reflection into development programs. Ottawa, ON: International Development Research Centre.
Funnell, S. C., & Rogers, P. J. (2011). Purposeful program theory. Effective use of theories of change and logic models. San Francisco: Wiley.
Harper, G. W., Lemos, D., Hosek, S. G., & the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV, AIDS Interventions. (2014). Stigma reduction in adolescents and young adults newly diagnosed with HIV: Findings from the Project ACCEPT Intervention. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 28, 543–554. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Hollister, R. G., & Hill, J. (1995). Problems in the evaluation of community-wide initiatives. In J. P. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, L. B. Schorr, & C. H. Weiss (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts (pp. 127–172). New York: Aspen Institute.
Reed, S. J., & Miller, R. L. (2014). The benefits of youth engagement in HIV-preventive structural change interventions. Youth and Society, 46, 528–545. CrossRef
Salazar, L. F., Emshoff, J. G., Baker, C. K., & Crowley, T. (2007). Examining the behavior of a system: An outcome evaluation of a coordinated community response to domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 631–641. CrossRef
Schriner, K. F., & Fawcett, S. B. (1988). Development and validation of a community concerns report method. Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 306–316. CrossRef
Stall, R., Friedman, M., & Catania, J. (2008). Interacting epidemics and gay Men’s health: A theory of syndemic production among urban gay men. In R. J. Wolitski, R. Stall & R. O. Valdiserri (Eds.), Unequal opportunity: Health disparities affecting gay and bisexual men in the United States (pp. 251–274). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Bradford, B., & Fawcett, S. B. (1988). Common concerns of disabled Americans: Issues and options. Social Policy, 19, 29–35.
Weick, K. E. (1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39, 40–49. CrossRef
Weiss, C. H. (1995). Nothing as practical as a good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In J. P. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, L. B. Schorr, & C. H. Weiss (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts (pp. 65–92). New York: Aspen Institute.
Yin, R. K., & Kaftarian, S. J. (1997). Introduction: Challenges of community-based program outcome evaluations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 20, 293–297. CrossRef
Ziff, M., Harper, G., Chutuape, K., Deeds, B. G., Futterman, D., Francisco, V. T., et al. (2006). Laying the foundation for Connect to Protect ®: A multi-site community mobilization intervention to reduce HIV/AIDS incidence and prevalence among urban youth. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 506–522. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
- Creating Youth-Supportive Communities: Outcomes from the Connect-to-Protect® (C2P) Structural Change Approach to Youth HIV Prevention
Robin Lin Miller
Patrick F. Janulis
Sarah J. Reed
Gary W. Harper
Cherrie B. Boyer
the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions
- Springer US