Ga naar de hoofdinhoud
Top

Cost-effectiveness of long term left ventricular assist devices

  • Open Access
  • 06-11-2024
  • Letter to the Editor
Gepubliceerd in:
This letter is on behalf of the working group for mechanical circulatory support of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery (NVVC and NVT).
Dear Editor,
With great interest we read the systematic review by Wiethoff et al. regarding the cost-effectiveness of therapies for inherited cardiomyopathies [1].
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have demonstrated a significant survival benefit in patients with end stage heart failure (HF). To our surprise, the infographic (Fig. 1) in their review suggests that LVADs are not cost-effective in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Although these assertions are nuanced in the accompanying text, we believe the information in this central figure is not correct.
Wiethoff et al. based their conclusions on two papers. These papers either investigate the usage of (Bi)VADs in children or analyse the cost-effectiveness of mechanical support with earlier-generation LVADs in Japan, which have never been available on the European market [2].
In our opinion, these key differences render their analysis non-contributory and non-extrapolatable for assessing the cost-effectiveness of LVAD therapy in adult HF patients in Europe. Thorough research on this subject has been performed in a similar health care system showing cost-effectiveness with the newest generation LVADs for end-stage HF [3].

Conflict of interest

G.P.J. van Hout, P.A. Doevendans and L.W. van Laake declare that they have no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Titel
Cost-effectiveness of long term left ventricular assist devices
Auteurs
Gerardus P. J. van Hout
Pieter A. Doevendans
Linda W. van Laake
Publicatiedatum
06-11-2024
Uitgeverij
BSL Media & Learning
Gepubliceerd in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Uitgave 12/2024
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-024-01909-0
1.
go back to reference Wiethoff I, Goversen B, Michels M, et al. A systematic literature review of economic evaluations and cost-of-illness studies of inherited cardiomyopathies. Neth Heart J. 2023;31:226–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Avancena ALV, Hutton DW, Lee J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of implantable ventricular assist devices in older children with stable, inotrope-dependent dilated cardiomyopathy. Pediatr Transplant. 2021;25:e13975.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lim HS, Shaw S, Carter AW, et al. A clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device for transplant-ineligible patients: A United Kingdom perspective. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022;41:174–86.CrossRefPubMed