Background
Foot pain and deformity are associated with falls in community-dwelling older persons [
1,
2]. One meta-analysis indicated that persons who have falls are more likely to have foot pain and hallux valgus (HV) with odds ratios of 1.95 and 1.89, respectively [
2]. Another meta-analysis reported that the prevalence of HV in persons over 65 years was 35.7%, which was higher in females than in males [
3]. Similarly, a study of 268 Japanese females aged ≥65 years living in the community, 99 (36.9%) were diagnosed with HV [
4].
HV and lesser toe deformities significantly reduce the flexor strength of the hallux and lesser toes [
5‐
7]. The relationship between HV and physical function [
8], spatiotemporal gait parameters [
9], balance [
10,
11], timed up and go test [
12], and plantar pressure have been reported [
7,
8,
13‐
15]. However, the participants of these studies were middle-aged or older people, and the studies also included persons with mobility and ADL limitations [
10,
11], with aids [
5] or assistive devices [
13], with foot pain or previous treatment [
7], with knee osteoarthritis [
8], and those with indications for surgery [
14]. Therefore, factors other than HV may have been involved, and the deterioration in physical function, balance, and plantar pressure may have been due to aging.
On the other hand, about 30% of female university students in Japan are reported to have HV [
16,
17]. It has been reported that young women need to be more aware of the characteristics and severity of HV [
16]. To reduce the risk of falls in old age, it is important to prevent the onset and deterioration of HV among young females. To this end, it is necessary to clarify the effects of HV on motor function, even in young females. Toe flexor muscles become more active in the mid stance to toe off during walking [
18,
19], and toe flexor strength was significantly correlated with the anterior limit of the functional base of support [
20]. Therefore, even in young people, if the toe flexor strength is reduced due to hallux valgus, there is concern that it may affect the forward movement of the center of gravity and the motion with propulsive force in daily life.
This study aimed to compare dynamic balance in forward reaching/stepping tasks in young females with and without HV. In addition, the relationship among functional activity, toe flexor strength, and plantar pressure was assessed.
Results
The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of the total sample was 19.6 ± 1.3 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 21.2 ± 2.0 kg/m
2. Table
1 shows the characteristics of participants. The HV group had 39 participants, whereas the no HV group had 55 participants.
Table 1
Characteristics of participants
HV angle (°) (range) | 20.3 ± 5.1 (4–15) | 11.0 ± 2.6 (16–43) | < 0.001 |
Age (years) | 19.4 ± 1.2 | 19.8 ± 1.3 | 0.186 |
Height (cm) | 157.4 ± 4.7 | 156.8 ± 5.7 | 0.628 |
Weight (kg) | 52.8 ± 4.3 | 52.1 ± 6.2 | 0.521 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 21.3 ± 1.8 | 21.2 ± 2.2 | 0.425 |
Table
2 shows FR, MSL, toe flexor strength, and plantar pressure. FR and MSL were not significantly different in the HV and no HV groups. Toe flexor strength was significantly different at 26.69 ± 9.68 and 32.19 ± 8.55 for the HV and no HV groups, respectively (
p = 0.002, β = 0.206). During walking, the plantar pressure in the HV group was significantly reduced for the second through fifth toes (
p = 0.005, β = 0.187) and the second through fourth metatarsals (
p = 0.014, β = 0.600), and was significantly increased in the lateral heel (
p = 0.044, β = 0.603). During FR, the plantar pressure was significantly increased in the first metatarsal in the HV group (
p = 0.016, β = 0.338).
Table 2
FR, MSL, toe flexor strength, and plantar pressure
FR (cm/cm*100) | 21.39 ± 3.61 | 22.15 ± 3.54 | 0.309 | 0.827 | 0.214 |
MSL (cm/cm*100) | 72.10 ± 5.78 | 73.95 ± 6.54 | 0.159 | 0.705 | 0.300 |
Toe flexor strength (kg/bw*100) | 26.69 ± 9.68 | 32.19 ± 8.55 | 0.002** | 0.206 | 0.602 |
Plantar pressure (kPa) |
Gait |
T1 | 89.07 ± 22.65 | 79.41 ± 28.35 | 0.070 | 0.572 | 0.376 |
T25 | 61.33 ± 32.50 | 81.38 ± 32.50 | 0.005** | 0.187 | 0.617 |
M1 | 104.74 ± 26.82 | 122.31 ± 52.56 | 0.055 | 0.506 | 0.421 |
M24 | 159.60 ± 11.88 | 172.92 ± 49.54 | 0.014* | 0.600 | 0.370 |
M5 | 115.29 ± 24.03 | 121.20 ± 20.66 | 0.205 | 0.762 | 0.264 |
MF | 102.91 ± 29.44 | 96.37 ± 39.01 | 0.379 | 0.854 | 0.189 |
MH | 162.05 ± 7.96 | 163.01 ± 8.35 | 0.576 | 0.914 | 0.118 |
LH | 168.63 ± 11.93 | 164.29 ± 11.69 | 0.044* | 0.603 | 0.368 |
FR |
T1 | 59.23 ± 54.25 | 56.15 ± 49.83 | 0.985 | 0.941 | 0.059 |
T25 | 53.30 ± 39.26 | 62.64 ± 46.33 | 0.343 | 0.829 | 0.218 |
M1 | 105.82 ± 42.92 | 85.09 ± 37.44 | 0.016* | 0.338 | 0.515 |
M24 | 133.13 ± 34.33 | 128.12 ± 29.50 | 0.220 | 0.888 | 0.157 |
M5 | 97.78 ± 40.45 | 105.52 ± 31.77 | 0.323 | 0.829 | 0.213 |
MF | 70.32 ± 26.10 | 58.23 ± 31.04 | 0.050 | 0.487 | 0.422 |
MH | 103.77 ± 34.39 | 110.34 ± 32.78 | 0.351 | 0.848 | 0.195 |
LH | 103.70 ± 34.35 | 112.59 ± 30.71 | 0.347 | 0.757 | 0.273 |
Table
3 shows the relationship between HV angle and toe flexor strength. HV angle was negatively correlated with toe flexor strength (
r = − 0.315,
p = 0.002, β = 0.121), plantar pressure during walking in the second through fifth toes (
r = − 0.362,
p < 0.001, β = 0.047) and the second through fourth metatarsals (
r = − 0.242,
p = 0.019, β = 0.342), and there was a positive correlation with plantar pressure during walking in the first toe (
r = 0.253,
p = 0.014, β = 0.301) and the lateral heel (
r = 0.301,
p = 0.003, β = 0.154) and during FR in the first metatarsal (
r = 0.308,
p = 0.002, β = 0.137) and midfoot (
r = 0.212,
p = 0.040, β = 0.459). Toe flexor strength was negatively correlated with plantar pressure during walking in midfoot (
r = − 0.211,
p = 0.041, β = 0.463) and during FR in the second through fourth metatarsals (
r = − 0.318,
p = 0.002, β = 0.115) and midfoot (
r = − 0.348,
p = 0.001, β = 0.064), and there was a positive correlation with MSL (
r = 0.330,
p = 0.001, β = 0.092), during walking in the second through fifth toes (
r = 0.226,
p = 0.029, β = 0.403), and during FR the first toe (
r = 0.223,
p = 0.031, β = 0.415).
Table 3
Correlations between HV angle and toe flexor strength and FR, MSL and plantar pressure
HV angle | 1.000 | | | −0.315 | 0.002** | 0.121 |
Toe flexor strength | −0.315 | 0.002** | 0.121 | 1.000 | | |
FR | −0.007 | 0.949 | 0.950 | 0.198 | 0.056 | 0.515 |
MSL | −0.129 | 0.217 | 0.764 | 0.330 | 0.001** | 0.092 |
Plantar pressure |
Gait |
T1 | 0.253 | 0.014* | 0.301 | −0.038 | 0.718 | 0.935 |
T25 | −0.362 | < 0.001** | 0.047 | 0.226 | 0.029* | 0.403 |
M1 | −0.138 | 0.186 | 0.736 | 0.013 | 0.899 | 0.948 |
M24 | −0.242 | 0.019* | 0.342 | −0.067 | 0.520 | 0.901 |
M5 | −0.091 | 0.385 | 0.860 | −0.007 | 0.944 | 0.949 |
MF | 0.163 | 0.116 | 0.650 | −0.211 | 0.041* | 0.463 |
MH | −0.168 | 0.106 | 0.632 | −0.065 | 0.532 | 0.904 |
LH | 0.301 | 0.003** | 0.154 | −0.132 | 0.205 | 0.754 |
FR |
T1 | 0.028 | 0.791 | 0.942 | 0.223 | 0.031* | 0.415 |
T25 | −0.130 | 0.213 | 0.762 | 0.199 | 0.054 | 0.509 |
M1 | 0.308 | 0.002** | 0.137 | −0.135 | 0.195 | 0.745 |
M24 | 0.124 | 0.235 | 0.779 | −0.318 | 0.002** | 0.115 |
M5 | −0.144 | 0.166 | 0.716 | −0.095 | 0.364 | 0.852 |
MF | 0.212 | 0.040* | 0.459 | −0.348 | 0.001** | 0.064 |
MH | −0.174 | 0.093 | 0.608 | −0.193 | 0.062 | 0.534 |
LH | −0.198 | 0.056 | 0.517 | −0.173 | 0.095 | 0.612 |
Discussion
There was no difference in FR and MSL between the HV and no HV groups. The anterior limit of the functional base of support was significantly correlated with toe flexor strength [
20]. On the other hand, the maximum balance test that participants leaned forward then backward as far as possible from the ankle without moving their feet is heavily involved with ankle inversion-eversion ROM, and the maximal balance range was not influenced by the presence or absence of HV [
11]. As for the reason why there is no difference between FR and MSL in HV and no HV groups, young women with HV may be adequately compensated using different balance strategies, despite toe flexor strength with HV weakness.
There was a difference in toe flexor strength between the HV and no HV groups. Also, HV angle and toe flexor strength were negatively correlated. It has often been reported that plantar flexion strength of HV decreases in older people [
5‐
7]. The valgus / pronation of the first phalanx associated with HV may relatively shorten the length of the flexor hallucis muscles, making it difficult to exert the toe flexor strength. Although it was not possible to evaluate the muscle strengths of the hallux and lesser toes separately with the equipment used, it became clear that even in young people, plantar flexion strength was lower in those with HV.
There was no significant difference in pressure on the first toe during walking between the HV and no HV groups. There are various reports on the pressure of the toes during walking in older people. The HV showed no significant difference in plantar pressure of hallux during walking and the pressures of the first and second metatarsals were significantly higher than those of no HV [
13]. Many reports suggest that the first toe pressure on HV during walking is low [
7,
8,
28,
29]. Greater HV severity was associated with great toe pain and reduced loading under the hallux when walking [
29]. Conversely, the pressure of the hallux during walking was significantly higher in women with mild HV than in those with no history of foot or lower limb problems [
30]. The participants of this study were young persons with no pain in the toes and no disability in the lower limbs. That is, the participants did not avoid pain and were not affected by other joint disorders. Even the HV may not have affected the pressure of the hallux during walking.
Furthermore, in the HV group, the pressures of the second through fifth toes and the second through fourth metatarsals during walking were significantly lower, and the pressure of the lateral heel was significantly higher than that in no HV. From this result, it is considered that the load is applied to the outside by heel contact, and the load is decreased from mid stance to toe off. In HV, the ratio of the center of pressure excursion to the foot width during walking is low, and it is pointed out that foot pronation may occur [
28]. In this study, although the center of pressure and foot posture were not measured, the tendency toward foot pronation in the hallux valgus is predicted due to the decrease in lateral pressure during walking.
In FR, when body weight was moved forward while standing on both legs, the pressure on the first metatarsal in HV was higher compared to no HV group, but not the pressure on the hallux and lesser toes. The varus of the first metatarsal bone and the valgus / pronation of the first phalanx that is associated with HV may increase the most prominent pressure on the first metatarsophalangeal joint.
Toe flexor strength and MSL were positively correlated. However, toe flexor strength and FR were not correlated. Long and short toe flexor muscles produce maximal voluntary moments around the metatarsal phalangeal joints in 0°–10° ankle dorsiflexion and in 25°–45° metatarsal phalangeal joint dorsiflexion [
31]. Flexor muscles exert their most tension when the muscle length becomes long due to the two joint movements. The movement of MST includes metatarsal phalangeal joint dorsiflexion, but the movement of FR does not include this joint movement. Also, similar to FR, previous studies have reported that maximal balance range does not depend on the presence or absence of HV [
11], with the most important independent predictor noted as ankle dorsiflexion strength [
10] and ankle inversion-eversion ROM [
11]. Therefore, in MST, more toe flexor muscles were acting, but in FR, it may not have been acting. That is, it is considered that there was a significant relationship only between toe flexor strength and MSL.
This study has some limitations. First, an HV angle of 16° or more indicated HV, as determined by the footprint. This angle would correspond to 20° on X-ray. Therefore, an X-ray image showing an angle of 15° may indicate mild HV, and it is possible that the no HV group included participants with mild HV. Second, pressure of the supporting foot in MSL could not be measured by the foot analyzer used in this study, and the pressure distribution with or without HV remains unknown. Third, FR and MSL were measured as functional activities. These movements involve whole-body movements, and although their relationship with toe function was recognized, involvement of other parts of the body other than the toes could not be ruled out. A relationship was observed between HV angle and toe flexor strength, and between toe flexor strength and MSL, but the causal relationship remains unknown.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.