Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 4/2013

01-07-2013 | Original Article

Correlation and response relevance in sequence learning

Auteurs: Josephine Cock, Beat Meier

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

We tested the effects of introducing a secondary sequence into the serial reaction time task. Specifically, we examined the role of correlated streams of information and response relevance. In the first experiment, the order of stimulus locations was correlated with the order of key press responses in the conventional way. A symbol-identity sequence, of a different length, was also present but no manual responses were made to it, and it was not correlated with any other stream of information. In the second experiment, two concurrent streams of location-based stimuli were presented. Both were sequenced but only one sequence required responses. Importantly, the sequences were either correlated with one another or not (same vs. different lengths). In the third experiment, the same design was used but with one sequence visual and the other auditory. In all three experiments, participants became sensitive to the sequence that required responses, and resultant knowledge was largely explicit. They were also sensitive to the sequence that did not require responses but only when it was correlated with the sequence that did, and here resultant knowledge was implicit. The findings suggest that the presence of a secondary sequence can affect learning, but only when stimuli in that sequence are integrated, through correlation, with responses made to the primary sequence.
Literatuur
go back to reference Abrahamse, E. L., Jiménez, L., Verwey, W. B., & Clegg, B. (2010). Representing serial action and perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 603–623.CrossRef Abrahamse, E. L., Jiménez, L., Verwey, W. B., & Clegg, B. (2010). Representing serial action and perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 603–623.CrossRef
go back to reference Cock, J. J., Berry, D. C., & Buchner, A. (2002). Negative priming and sequence learning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 27–48.CrossRef Cock, J. J., Berry, D. C., & Buchner, A. (2002). Negative priming and sequence learning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 27–48.CrossRef
go back to reference Cock, J., & Meier, B. (2007). Incidental task sequence learning: perceptual rather than conceptual? Psychological Research, 71, 140–151.PubMedCrossRef Cock, J., & Meier, B. (2007). Incidental task sequence learning: perceptual rather than conceptual? Psychological Research, 71, 140–151.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Deroost, N., & Soetens, E. (2006). Spatial processing and perceptual sequence learning in SRT tasks. Experimental Psychology, 53, 16–30.PubMedCrossRef Deroost, N., & Soetens, E. (2006). Spatial processing and perceptual sequence learning in SRT tasks. Experimental Psychology, 53, 16–30.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hoffmann, J., & Koch, I. (1998). Implicit learning of loosely defined structures. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of Implicit Learning (pp. 161–199). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Hoffmann, J., & Koch, I. (1998). Implicit learning of loosely defined structures. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of Implicit Learning (pp. 161–199). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Hoffmann, J., Sebald, A., & Stoecker, C. (2001). Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in serial reaction time tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 27, 470–482.CrossRef Hoffmann, J., Sebald, A., & Stoecker, C. (2001). Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in serial reaction time tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 27, 470–482.CrossRef
go back to reference Hsiao, A. T., & Reber, A. S. (2001). The dual-task SRT procedure: fine-tuning the timing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 336–342.CrossRef Hsiao, A. T., & Reber, A. S. (2001). The dual-task SRT procedure: fine-tuning the timing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 336–342.CrossRef
go back to reference Jiménez, L., & Mendez, C. (1999). Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 25, 236–259.CrossRef Jiménez, L., & Mendez, C. (1999). Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 25, 236–259.CrossRef
go back to reference Keele, S. W., Ivry, R., Mayr, U., Hazeltine, E., & Heuer, H. (2003). The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychological Review, 110, 316–339.PubMedCrossRef Keele, S. W., Ivry, R., Mayr, U., Hazeltine, E., & Heuer, H. (2003). The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychological Review, 110, 316–339.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000). The role of stimulus-based and response-based spatial information in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 26, 863–882.CrossRef Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000). The role of stimulus-based and response-based spatial information in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 26, 863–882.CrossRef
go back to reference Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 22, 350–364.CrossRef Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 22, 350–364.CrossRef
go back to reference Meier, B., & Cock, J. (2010). Are correlated streams of information necessary for implicit sequence learning? Acta Psychologica, 133, 17–27.PubMedCrossRef Meier, B., & Cock, J. (2010). Are correlated streams of information necessary for implicit sequence learning? Acta Psychologica, 133, 17–27.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Meier, B., & Cock, J. (2012). The role of cues and stimulus valency in implicit task sequence learning: a task sequence is not enough. In A. L. Magnusson & D. J. Lindberg (Eds.). Psychology of Performance and Defeat (pp. 155–166). Hauppauge: Nova Science Publisher. Meier, B., & Cock, J. (2012). The role of cues and stimulus valency in implicit task sequence learning: a task sequence is not enough. In A. L. Magnusson & D. J. Lindberg (Eds.). Psychology of Performance and Defeat (pp. 155–166). Hauppauge: Nova Science Publisher.
go back to reference Nemeth, D., Hallgato, E., Janacsek, K., Sandor, T., & Londe, Z. (2009). Perceptual and motor factors of implicit skill learning. Neuro Report, 20, 1654–1658. Nemeth, D., Hallgato, E., Janacsek, K., Sandor, T., & Londe, Z. (2009). Perceptual and motor factors of implicit skill learning. Neuro Report, 20, 1654–1658.
go back to reference Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.CrossRef Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.CrossRef
go back to reference Rah, S. K.-Y., Reber, A. S., & Hsiao, A. T. (2000). Anotherwrinkle on the dual-task SRT experiment: it’s probably not dual task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 309–313.CrossRef Rah, S. K.-Y., Reber, A. S., & Hsiao, A. T. (2000). Anotherwrinkle on the dual-task SRT experiment: it’s probably not dual task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 309–313.CrossRef
go back to reference Riedel, B., & Burton, A. M. (2006). Auditory sequence learning: differential sensitivity to task relevant and task irrelevant sequences. Psychological Research, 70, 337–344.PubMedCrossRef Riedel, B., & Burton, A. M. (2006). Auditory sequence learning: differential sensitivity to task relevant and task irrelevant sequences. Psychological Research, 70, 337–344.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Robertson, E. M., Tormos, J. M., Maeda, F., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2001). The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during sequence learning is specific for spatial information. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 628–635.PubMedCrossRef Robertson, E. M., Tormos, J. M., Maeda, F., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2001). The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during sequence learning is specific for spatial information. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 628–635.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rowland, L. A., & Shanks, D. R. (2006). Attention modulates the learning of multiple contingencies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 643–648.CrossRef Rowland, L. A., & Shanks, D. R. (2006). Attention modulates the learning of multiple contingencies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 643–648.CrossRef
go back to reference Schmidtke, V., & Heuer, H. (1997). Task integration as a factor in secondary-task effects on sequence learning. Psychological Research, 60, 53–71.CrossRef Schmidtke, V., & Heuer, H. (1997). Task integration as a factor in secondary-task effects on sequence learning. Psychological Research, 60, 53–71.CrossRef
go back to reference Schwarb, H., & Schumacher, E. H. (2010). Implicit sequence learning is represented by stimulus-response rules. Memory and Cognition, 38, 677–688.CrossRef Schwarb, H., & Schumacher, E. H. (2010). Implicit sequence learning is represented by stimulus-response rules. Memory and Cognition, 38, 677–688.CrossRef
go back to reference Shin, J. C., & Ivry, R. B. (2002). Concurrent learning of temporal and spatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 28, 445–457.CrossRef Shin, J. C., & Ivry, R. B. (2002). Concurrent learning of temporal and spatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 28, 445–457.CrossRef
go back to reference Stoecker, C., Sebald, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2003). The influence of response-effect compatibility in a serial reaction time task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 685–703. Stoecker, C., Sebald, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2003). The influence of response-effect compatibility in a serial reaction time task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 685–703.
go back to reference Weiermann, B., Cock, J., & Meier, B. (2010). What matters in implicit task sequence learning: perceptual stimulus features, task-sets, or correlated streams of information? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 36, 1492–1509.CrossRef Weiermann, B., Cock, J., & Meier, B. (2010). What matters in implicit task sequence learning: perceptual stimulus features, task-sets, or correlated streams of information? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 36, 1492–1509.CrossRef
go back to reference Weiermann, B., & Meier, B. (2012). Implicit task sequence learning with auditory stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 468–475.CrossRef Weiermann, B., & Meier, B. (2012). Implicit task sequence learning with auditory stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 468–475.CrossRef
go back to reference Ziessler, M., & Nattkemper, D. (2001). Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 27, 595–613.CrossRef Ziessler, M., & Nattkemper, D. (2001). Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 27, 595–613.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Correlation and response relevance in sequence learning
Auteurs
Josephine Cock
Beat Meier
Publicatiedatum
01-07-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0444-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2013

Psychological Research 4/2013 Naar de uitgave