Gepubliceerd in:

09-09-2022 | Correction

Correction to: Individual differences in dimensions of mind wandering: the mediating role of emotional valence and intentionality

Auteurs: Jonathan B. Banks, Matthew S. Welhaf

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2023

Excerpt

In the article, there was an error in the values reported in Table 2. A correction to Table 2 has been made to several reported values in which the decimal was improperly aligned changing the interpretation of the correlation.

Table 2

Correlations among all measures

Variable	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
1. WM	–
2. Attention Control	0.91	–
3. SYMSPAN	0.60	0.40	–
4. RSPAN	0.64	0.47	0.40	–
5. Counters	0.81	0.65	0.36	0.33	–
6. ANTI-Aro	0.73	0.89	0.25	0.31	0.46	–
7. ANTI-Let	0.74	0.89	0.28	0.34	0.50	0.68	–
8. SART-d’	0.52	0.52	0.16	0.36	0.43	0.35	0.36	–
9. SART-RTSD	− 0.49	− 0.52	− 0.21	− 0.20	− 0.39	− 0.40	− 0.34	− 0.62	–
10. TUT	− 0.30	− 0.37	− 0.06	− 0.02	− 0.26	− 0.32	− 0.28	− 0.46	0.53	–
11. Neu TUT	0.07	0.06	0.04	0.18	− 0.02	0.01	0.10	0.05	0.07	0.38	–
12. Pos TUT	− 0.29	− 0.33	− 0.16	− 0.13	− 0.17	− 0.30	− 0.27	− 0.24	0.30	0.31	− 0.13	–
13. Neg TUT	− 0.24	− 0.28	− 0.02	− 0.11	− 0.18	− 0.18	− 0.25	− 0.42	0.37	0.61	− 0.36	− 0.08	–
14. Intent TUT	− 0.25	− 0.26	− 0.02	− 0.14	− 0.22	− 0.20	− 0.17	− 0.39	0.37	0.57	0.19	0.06	0.42	–
15. UnIntent TUT	− 0.07	− 0.13	− 0.04	0.13	− 0.06	− 0.12	− 0.13	− 0.10	0.20	0.51	0.21	0.28	0.23	− 0.42	–
16. PANAS Pos	0.06	0.09	− 0.02	0.01	0.03	0.16	0.03	− 0.02	− 0.03	− 0.12	− 0.07	0.01	− 0.07	0.05	− 0.18	–
17. PANAS Neg	− 0.20	− 0.22	− 0.05	− 0.15	− 0.13	− 0.20	− 0.19	− 0.10	0.11	0.22	− 0.17	− 0.02	0.40	0.09	0.15	0.06
18. FFMQ Observe	− 0.01	0.06	0.02	0.03	− 0.12	0.06	0.08	0.05	− 0.05	0.03	− 0.04	− 0.06	0.10	0.06	− 0.02	0.21
19. FFMQ Describe	0.00	− 0.00	0.01	0.07	− 0.04	0.00	− 0.01	0.03	0.03	0.04	0.10	0.06	− 0.08	0.05	− 0.01	0.30
20. FFMQ Act	0.08	0.11	0.08	− 0.02	0.00	0.08	0.16	− 0.01	− 0.00	− 0.11	0.01	0.08	− 0.17	− 0.05	− 0.07	0.25
21. FFMQ No Judge	0.10	0.14	− 0.03	0.01	0.06	0.14	0.14	0.05	− 0.01	− 0.08	0.02	− 0.01	− 0.10	0.09	− 0.19	0.08
22. FFMQ No React	0.13	0.20	0.03	0.05	0.06	0.20	0.19	0.06	− 0.12	− 0.08	0.06	− 0.01	− 0.12	− 0.13	0.06	0.17
23. RSS	− 0.05	− 0.08	− 0.02	0.03	− 0.04	− 0.07	− 0.09	− 0.05	0.04	0.11	− 0.11	− 0.07	0.24	0.04	0.08	− 0.07
24. MWQ	− 0.09	− 0.08	− 0.14	− 0.02	− 0.02	− 0.08	− 0.09	− 0.00	− 0.09	0.04	− 0.07	0.02	0.09	− 0.01	0.06	− 0.13

Variable	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24
1. WM
2. Attention Control
3. SYMSPAN
4. RSPAN
5. Counters
6. ANTI-Aro
7. ANTI-Let
8. SART-d’
9. SART-RTSD
10. TUT
11. Neu TUT
12. Pos TUT
13. Neg TUT
14. Intent TUT
15. UnIntent TUT
16. PANAS Pos
17. PANAS Neg	–
18. FFMQ Observe	0.11	–
19. FFMQ Describe	− 0.28	0.35	–
20. FFMQ Act	− 0.30	− 0.02	0.35	–
21. FFMQ No Judge	− 0.29	− 0.10	0.22	0.49	–
22. FFMQ No React	− 0.24	0.08	0.25	0.13	0.06	–
23. RSS	0.42	0.24	− 0.21	− 0.35	− 0.45	− 0.25	–
24. MWQ	0.16	0.06	− 0.18	− 0.68	− 0.30	− 0.06	0.24	–

Correlations above |.14| are significant at p < .05

WM working memory factor score, Attention Control attention control factor score, SYMSPAN Symmetry Span score, RSPAN Reading Span score, Counters Counters working memory task score, ANTI-Aro Antisaccade Arrows, ANTI-Let Antisaccade Letters, SART-d’ Sustained Attention to Response Task d’ score, SART-RTSD Sustained Attention to Response Task reaction time standard deviation, TUT Task Unrelated Thought, Neu neutral, Pos positive, Neg negative, Intent intentional, UnIntent unintentional, PANAS Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, FFMQ Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire, RSS Ruminative Responses Scale, MWQ Mind Wandering Questionnaire

…

vorige artikel Is motor inhibition involved in the processing of sentential negation? An assessment via the Stop-Signal Task

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Excerpt

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2023

The contribution of temporal analysis of pupillometry measurements to cognitive research

Length is not all that matters: testing the role of number identity and the ratio of fillers in comparisons of multi-digits with different digit length

The experiential basis of compatibility effects in reading-by-rotating paradigms

Sequence representations after action-imagery practice of one-finger movements are effector-independent

Is motor inhibition involved in the processing of sentential negation? An assessment via the Stop-Signal Task

Response-code conflict in dual-task interference and its modulation by age