Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 7/2020

03-03-2020

Core patient-reported outcome domains for routine clinical care in chronic pain management: patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspective

Auteurs: Diana Zidarov, Alexia Zidarova-Carrié, Regina Visca, J. Marc Miller, Krista Brecht, Natacha Viens, Sara Ahmed

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

To identify a core patient-reported outcome (PRO) domain set to be used in routine clinical care in settings offering specialized and supra-specialized multidisciplinary care to individuals with chronic pain (CP).

Methods

Two online cross-sectional surveys were administered: one with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and one with individuals with CP. Both surveys included domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) framework. The patients’ survey also included the Patient Generated Index (PGI). Areas affected by CP identified in the PGI were mapped to The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

Results

According to HCPs, the five most relevant HRQoL domains to be assessed in routine clinical care were pain interference, pain intensity, physical function, anxiety and depression. The five areas that were the most valued by individuals with CP were recreation and leisure; global mental function; work and employment; household tasks and walking and moving. In total, these represented 74% of all nominated areas. When triangulating both frameworks (ICF/PROMIS) and perspectives (HCPs/patients), 10 core PRO domains were identified: pain interference, pain intensity, physical function, sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression, ability to participate in social roles and activities, fatigue, sleep-related impairments and self-efficacy.

Conclusions

This study identified 10 core PRO domains covering the physical, psychological and social consequences of CP on an individual’s life from the perspective of individuals with CP and HCPs. The results can help identify appropriate PRO measures to assess the outcomes of multidisciplinary interventions.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Ho, A., & Nair, S. (2018). Chapter nine—Global chronic pain: Public and population health responses. In D. Z. Buchman & K. D. Davis (Eds.), Developments in neuroethics and bioethics (pp. 171–189). New York: Academic Press. CrossRef Ho, A., & Nair, S. (2018). Chapter nine—Global chronic pain: Public and population health responses. In D. Z. Buchman & K. D. Davis (Eds.), Developments in neuroethics and bioethics (pp. 171–189). New York: Academic Press. CrossRef
2.
go back to reference McCarberg, B. H., et al. (2008). The impact of pain on quality of life and the unmet needs of pain management: Results from pain sufferers and physicians participating in an Internet survey. American Journal of Therapeutics, 15(4), 312–320. PubMedCrossRef McCarberg, B. H., et al. (2008). The impact of pain on quality of life and the unmet needs of pain management: Results from pain sufferers and physicians participating in an Internet survey. American Journal of Therapeutics, 15(4), 312–320. PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dobkin, P. L., & Boothroyd, L. J. (2008). Organizing health services for patients with chronic pain: When there is a will there is a way. Pain Medication, 9(7), 881–889. CrossRef Dobkin, P. L., & Boothroyd, L. J. (2008). Organizing health services for patients with chronic pain: When there is a will there is a way. Pain Medication, 9(7), 881–889. CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. (2011). Relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Institute of Medicine. (2011). Relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
5.
go back to reference Ospina, M., & Harstall, C. (2003). Multidisciplinary pain programs for chronic pain: Evidence from systematic reviews . In HTA 30: Series a health technology assessment (p. 48). Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. Ospina, M., & Harstall, C. (2003). Multidisciplinary pain programs for chronic pain: Evidence from systematic reviews . In HTA 30: Series a health technology assessment (p. 48). Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.
6.
go back to reference Stanos, S., et al. (2016). Rethinking chronic pain in a primary care setting. Postgraduate Medicine, 128(5), 502–515. PubMedCrossRef Stanos, S., et al. (2016). Rethinking chronic pain in a primary care setting. Postgraduate Medicine, 128(5), 502–515. PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Noonan, V. K., et al. (2017). Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series e Paper 3: Patient-reported outcomes can facilitate shared decision-making and guide self-management. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 89, 125–135. PubMedCrossRef Noonan, V. K., et al. (2017). Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series e Paper 3: Patient-reported outcomes can facilitate shared decision-making and guide self-management. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 89, 125–135. PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Calvert, M., et al. (2019). Maximising the impact of patient reported outcome assessment for patients and society. BMJ, 364(k5267), 1–8. Calvert, M., et al. (2019). Maximising the impact of patient reported outcome assessment for patients and society. BMJ, 364(k5267), 1–8.
9.
go back to reference Chapman, J. R., et al. (2011). Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine, 36(21 Suppl), S54–68. PubMedCrossRef Chapman, J. R., et al. (2011). Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine, 36(21 Suppl), S54–68. PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chiarotto, A., Terwee, C. B., & Ostelo, R. W. (2016). Choosing the right outcome measurement instruments for patients with low back pain. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 30(6), 1003–1020. PubMedCrossRef Chiarotto, A., Terwee, C. B., & Ostelo, R. W. (2016). Choosing the right outcome measurement instruments for patients with low back pain. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 30(6), 1003–1020. PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dansie, E. J., & Turk, D. C. (2013). Assessment of patients with chronic pain. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 111(1), 19e25. CrossRef Dansie, E. J., & Turk, D. C. (2013). Assessment of patients with chronic pain. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 111(1), 19e25. CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Holmes, M. M., et al. (2017). The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 26, 245–257. PubMedCrossRef Holmes, M. M., et al. (2017). The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 26, 245–257. PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Greenhalgh, J. (2009). The applications of PROs in clinical practice: What are they, do they work, and why? Quality of Life Research, 18(1), 115–123. PubMedCrossRef Greenhalgh, J. (2009). The applications of PROs in clinical practice: What are they, do they work, and why? Quality of Life Research, 18(1), 115–123. PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Santana, M. J., & Feeny, D. (2014). Framework to assess the effects of using patient-reported outcome measures in chronic care management. Quality of Life Research, 23(5), 1505–1513. PubMedCrossRef Santana, M. J., & Feeny, D. (2014). Framework to assess the effects of using patient-reported outcome measures in chronic care management. Quality of Life Research, 23(5), 1505–1513. PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dworkin, R. H., et al. (2005). Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain, 113(1–2), 9–19. PubMedCrossRef Dworkin, R. H., et al. (2005). Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain, 113(1–2), 9–19. PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kaiser, U., et al. (2018). Developing a core outcome domain set to assessing effectiveness of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy: The VAPAIN consensus statement on core outcome domains. Pain, 159(4), 673–683. PubMedCrossRef Kaiser, U., et al. (2018). Developing a core outcome domain set to assessing effectiveness of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy: The VAPAIN consensus statement on core outcome domains. Pain, 159(4), 673–683. PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Turk, D. C., et al. (2008). Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: An IMMPACT survey of people with pain. Pain, 137(2), 276–285. PubMedCrossRef Turk, D. C., et al. (2008). Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: An IMMPACT survey of people with pain. Pain, 137(2), 276–285. PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Deyo, R. A., et al. (1998). Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine, 23(18), 2003–2013. PubMedCrossRef Deyo, R. A., et al. (1998). Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine, 23(18), 2003–2013. PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tardif, H., et al. (2017). Establishment of the Australasian electronic persistent pain outcomes collaboration. Pain Medicine, 18(6), 1007–1018. PubMed Tardif, H., et al. (2017). Establishment of the Australasian electronic persistent pain outcomes collaboration. Pain Medicine, 18(6), 1007–1018. PubMed
20.
go back to reference Zidarov, D., Visca, R., & Ahmed, S. (2019). Type of clinical outcomes used by healthcare professionals to evaluate health-related quality of life domains to inform clinical decision making for chronic pain management. Quality of Life Research, 28, 2761–2771. PubMedCrossRef Zidarov, D., Visca, R., & Ahmed, S. (2019). Type of clinical outcomes used by healthcare professionals to evaluate health-related quality of life domains to inform clinical decision making for chronic pain management. Quality of Life Research, 28, 2761–2771. PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cella, D., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–s11. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cella, D., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–s11. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Botella, M., et al. (2007). French adaptation of the Patient Generated Index: Metric characteristics and practical limitations. Psycho-Oncologie, 2, 131–140. CrossRef Botella, M., et al. (2007). French adaptation of the Patient Generated Index: Metric characteristics and practical limitations. Psycho-Oncologie, 2, 131–140. CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Callaghan, B. G., & Condie, M. E. (2003). A post-discharge quality of life outcome measure for lower limb amputees: Test-retest reliability and construct validity. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17, 858–864. PubMedCrossRef Callaghan, B. G., & Condie, M. E. (2003). A post-discharge quality of life outcome measure for lower limb amputees: Test-retest reliability and construct validity. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17, 858–864. PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tavernier, S. S., et al. (2011). Validity of the patient generated index as a quality-of-life measure in radiation oncology. Oncology Nursing Forum, 38(3), 19–29. CrossRef Tavernier, S. S., et al. (2011). Validity of the patient generated index as a quality-of-life measure in radiation oncology. Oncology Nursing Forum, 38(3), 19–29. CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ternent, L., et al. (2009). Measuring outcomes of importance to women with stress urinary incontinence. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 116(7), 719–725. Ternent, L., et al. (2009). Measuring outcomes of importance to women with stress urinary incontinence. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 116(7), 719–725.
26.
go back to reference Ruta, D. A., et al. (1994). A new approach to the measurement of qualityof life. The Patient-Generated Index. Medical Care, 32(11), 1109–1126. PubMedCrossRef Ruta, D. A., et al. (1994). A new approach to the measurement of qualityof life. The Patient-Generated Index. Medical Care, 32(11), 1109–1126. PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ruta, D. A., Garratt, A. M., & Russell, I. T. (1999). Patient centred assessment of quality of life for patients with four common conditions. Quality in Health Care, 8, 22–29. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Ruta, D. A., Garratt, A. M., & Russell, I. T. (1999). Patient centred assessment of quality of life for patients with four common conditions. Quality in Health Care, 8, 22–29. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. PubMedCrossRef Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: WHO. World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: WHO.
30.
go back to reference Tucker, C. A., et al. (2014). Concept analysis of the patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) and the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Quality of Life Research, 23, 1677–1686. PubMedCrossRef Tucker, C. A., et al. (2014). Concept analysis of the patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) and the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Quality of Life Research, 23, 1677–1686. PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Tucker, C. A., et al. (2014). Mapping the content of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) using the international classification of functioning, health and disability. Quality of Life Research, 23, 2431–2438. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tucker, C. A., et al. (2014). Mapping the content of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) using the international classification of functioning, health and disability. Quality of Life Research, 23, 2431–2438. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Boers, M., et al. (2014). Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0*. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67, 745e–753e. CrossRef Boers, M., et al. (2014). Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0*. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67, 745e–753e. CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Terwee, C. B., et al. (2018). COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patientreported outcome measures: A Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1159–1170. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Terwee, C. B., et al. (2018). COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patientreported outcome measures: A Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1159–1170. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Idzerda, L., et al. (2014). Can we decide which outcomes should be measured in every clinical trial? A scoping review of the existing conceptual frameworks and processes to develop core outcome sets. Journal of Rheumatology, 41, 986–993. PubMedCrossRef Idzerda, L., et al. (2014). Can we decide which outcomes should be measured in every clinical trial? A scoping review of the existing conceptual frameworks and processes to develop core outcome sets. Journal of Rheumatology, 41, 986–993. PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Schmitt, J., et al. (2015). The Harmonizing Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) roadmap: A methodological framework to develop core sets of outcome measurements in dermatology. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 135(1), 24–30. PubMedCrossRef Schmitt, J., et al. (2015). The Harmonizing Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) roadmap: A methodological framework to develop core sets of outcome measurements in dermatology. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 135(1), 24–30. PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Ahmed, S., et al. (2017). Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series e Paper 8: Patient-reported outcomes in electronic health records can inform clinical and policy decisions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 89, 160–167. PubMedCrossRef Ahmed, S., et al. (2017). Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series e Paper 8: Patient-reported outcomes in electronic health records can inform clinical and policy decisions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 89, 160–167. PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Boyce, M. B., Browne, J. P., & Greenhalgh, J. (2014). The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: A systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23, 508–518. CrossRef Boyce, M. B., Browne, J. P., & Greenhalgh, J. (2014). The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: A systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23, 508–518. CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Chiarotto, A., et al. (2015). Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain. European Spine Journal, 24(6), 1127–1142. PubMedCrossRef Chiarotto, A., et al. (2015). Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain. European Spine Journal, 24(6), 1127–1142. PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Turk, C. D., et al. (2003). Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain, 106(3), 337–345. PubMedCrossRef Turk, C. D., et al. (2003). Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain, 106(3), 337–345. PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Jackson, T., et al. (2014). Self-efficacy and chronic pain outcomes: A meta-analytic review. The Journal of Pain, 15(8), 800–814. PubMedCrossRef Jackson, T., et al. (2014). Self-efficacy and chronic pain outcomes: A meta-analytic review. The Journal of Pain, 15(8), 800–814. PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Kaiser, U., et al. (2016). Core outcome sets and multidimensional assessment tools for harmonizing outcome measure in chronic pain and back pain. Healthcare, 4(3), 63. PubMedCentralCrossRef Kaiser, U., et al. (2016). Core outcome sets and multidimensional assessment tools for harmonizing outcome measure in chronic pain and back pain. Healthcare, 4(3), 63. PubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Van Der Wees, P. J., et al. (2014). Integrating the use of patient-reported outcomes for both clinical practice and performance measurement: Views of experts from 3 countries. Milbank Quarterly, 92(4), 754–775. CrossRef Van Der Wees, P. J., et al. (2014). Integrating the use of patient-reported outcomes for both clinical practice and performance measurement: Views of experts from 3 countries. Milbank Quarterly, 92(4), 754–775. CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Roland, M. O., & Morris, R. W. (1983). A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine, 8, 141–144. PubMedCrossRef Roland, M. O., & Morris, R. W. (1983). A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine, 8, 141–144. PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Roland, M., & Fairbank, J. (2000). The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine, 25, 3115–3124. PubMedCrossRef Roland, M., & Fairbank, J. (2000). The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine, 25, 3115–3124. PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Kopec, J. A., et al. (1996). The Quebec back pain disability scale: Conceptualization and development. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49, 151–161. PubMedCrossRef Kopec, J. A., et al. (1996). The Quebec back pain disability scale: Conceptualization and development. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49, 151–161. PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Duncan, E. A. S., & Murray, J. (2012). The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 12(1), 96. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Duncan, E. A. S., & Murray, J. (2012). The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 12(1), 96. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Baumhauer, J. F. (2017). Patient-reported outcomes—Are they living up to their potential? New England Journal of Medicine, 377(1), 6–9. PubMedCrossRef Baumhauer, J. F. (2017). Patient-reported outcomes—Are they living up to their potential? New England Journal of Medicine, 377(1), 6–9. PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Broderick, J. E., et al. (2013). Validity and reliability of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system instruments in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care & Research, 65(10), 1625–1633. Broderick, J. E., et al. (2013). Validity and reliability of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system instruments in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care & Research, 65(10), 1625–1633.
49.
go back to reference Deyo, R. A., et al. (2016). Performance of a patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) short form in older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain Medicine, 17(2), 314–324. PubMed Deyo, R. A., et al. (2016). Performance of a patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) short form in older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain Medicine, 17(2), 314–324. PubMed
50.
go back to reference Hayes, R. D., et al. (2015). Responsiveness and minimally important difference for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 20-item physical functioning short form in a prospective observational study of rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 74, 104–107. CrossRef Hayes, R. D., et al. (2015). Responsiveness and minimally important difference for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 20-item physical functioning short form in a prospective observational study of rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 74, 104–107. CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Kroenke, K., et al. (2014). Operating characteristics of PROMIS four item depression and anxiety scales in primary care patients with chronic pain. Pain Medication, 15, 1892–1901. CrossRef Kroenke, K., et al. (2014). Operating characteristics of PROMIS four item depression and anxiety scales in primary care patients with chronic pain. Pain Medication, 15, 1892–1901. CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Oude Voshaar, M. A., et al. (2015). Validity and measurement precision of the PROMIS physical function item bank and a content validity–driven 20-item short form in rheumatoid arthritis compared with traditional measures. Rheumatology, 54(12), 2221–2229. PubMed Oude Voshaar, M. A., et al. (2015). Validity and measurement precision of the PROMIS physical function item bank and a content validity–driven 20-item short form in rheumatoid arthritis compared with traditional measures. Rheumatology, 54(12), 2221–2229. PubMed
53.
go back to reference Deckert, S., et al. (2016). A systematic review of the outcomes reported in multimodal pain therapy for chronic pain. European Journal of Pain, 20(1), 51–63. PubMedCrossRef Deckert, S., et al. (2016). A systematic review of the outcomes reported in multimodal pain therapy for chronic pain. European Journal of Pain, 20(1), 51–63. PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Core patient-reported outcome domains for routine clinical care in chronic pain management: patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspective
Auteurs
Diana Zidarov
Alexia Zidarova-Carrié
Regina Visca
J. Marc Miller
Krista Brecht
Natacha Viens
Sara Ahmed
Publicatiedatum
03-03-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02459-9