Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 6/2021

07-09-2020 | Original Article

Control over task conflict in the stroop and affordances tasks: an individual differences study

Auteurs: Ran Littman, Eyal Kalanthroff

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Task conflict is a type of conflict that emerges when a stimulus triggers two or more competing tasks. In the Stroop task, task conflict occurs between the relevant color-naming task and irrelevant word reading task and can be observed mainly on congruent trials, which only involve task conflict and are devoid of additional conflict types. We hypothesized that task conflict also manifests in the affordances task between the relevant task (e.g., classifying manipulatable objects), and the automatic task afforded by the object (e.g., grasping the object), and is mostly evident on congruent trials. Using an individual differences design we assessed the relationship between control mechanisms operating on Stroop congruent and affordances congruent trials under conditions of high and low cognitive control requirements. We hypothesized that task control is employed in both tasks. One-hundred and twenty-three participants performed an affordances task and two blocks of a Stroop task, each requiring a different level of task control (high vs. low). In a hierarchical regression model, we found a significant and specific correlation between affordances congruent and Stroop congruent conditions only in the high-control block, designed to greatly engage participants’ task control, thus linking the task control mechanism in both tasks. These results indicate that task control underlies diverse modalities of response (visuomotor and linguistic), independently of other conflict types. We suggest that the affordances task may serve as a supplementary tool for the assessment of task control in the lab.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
go back to reference Aarts, E., Roelofs, A., & van Turennout, M. (2009). Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: brain activity and reaction time distributions. Neuropsychologia, 47(10), 2089–2099. PubMedCrossRef Aarts, E., Roelofs, A., & van Turennout, M. (2009). Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: brain activity and reaction time distributions. Neuropsychologia, 47(10), 2089–2099. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Allport, A., & Wylie, G. (2000). Task switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. In Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII, pp. 35–70. Allport, A., & Wylie, G. (2000). Task switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. In Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII, pp. 35–70.
go back to reference Azaad, S., & Laham, S. M. (2019). Sidestepping spatial confounds in object-based correspondence effects: The Bimanual Affordance Task (BMAT). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(11), 2605–2613. CrossRef Azaad, S., & Laham, S. M. (2019). Sidestepping spatial confounds in object-based correspondence effects: The Bimanual Affordance Task (BMAT). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(11), 2605–2613. CrossRef
go back to reference Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624–652. PubMedCrossRef Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624–652. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bub, D. N., Masson, M. E. J., & Kumar, R. (2018). Time course of motor affordances evoked by pictured objects and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(1), 53–68. PubMed Bub, D. N., Masson, M. E. J., & Kumar, R. (2018). Time course of motor affordances evoked by pictured objects and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(1), 53–68. PubMed
go back to reference Buccino, G., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Rodà, F., & Riggio, L. (2009). Broken affordances, broken objects: A TMS study. Neuropsychologia, 47(14), 3074–3078. PubMedCrossRef Buccino, G., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Rodà, F., & Riggio, L. (2009). Broken affordances, broken objects: A TMS study. Neuropsychologia, 47(14), 3074–3078. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Carter, C. S., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). The contribution of the anterior cingulate cortex to executive processes in cognition. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 10(1), 49–58. PubMedCrossRef Carter, C. S., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). The contribution of the anterior cingulate cortex to executive processes in cognition. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 10(1), 49–58. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Carter, C. S., Mintun, M., & Cohen, J. D. (1995). Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: An H215O PET study of Stroop task performance. Neuroimage, 2(4), 264–272. PubMedCrossRef Carter, C. S., Mintun, M., & Cohen, J. D. (1995). Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: An H215O PET study of Stroop task performance. Neuroimage, 2(4), 264–272. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12(4), 478–484. PubMedCrossRef Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12(4), 478–484. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Cho, D. T., & Proctor, R. W. (2010). The object-based Simon effect: Grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 853–861. PubMed Cho, D. T., & Proctor, R. W. (2010). The object-based Simon effect: Grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 853–861. PubMed
go back to reference Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Neural representations of graspable objects: Are tools special? Cognitive Brain Research, 22(3), 457–469. PubMedCrossRef Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Neural representations of graspable objects: Are tools special? Cognitive Brain Research, 22(3), 457–469. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference De Houwer, J. (2003). On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect. Memory & Cognition, 31(3), 353–359. CrossRef De Houwer, J. (2003). On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect. Memory & Cognition, 31(3), 353–359. CrossRef
go back to reference Dudschig, C., Lachmair, M., de la Vega, I., De Filippis, M., & Kaup, B. (2012). Do task-irrelevant direction-associated motion verbs affect action planning? Evidence from a Stroop paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 40(7), 1081–1094. CrossRef Dudschig, C., Lachmair, M., de la Vega, I., De Filippis, M., & Kaup, B. (2012). Do task-irrelevant direction-associated motion verbs affect action planning? Evidence from a Stroop paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 40(7), 1081–1094. CrossRef
go back to reference Entel, O., & Tzelgov, J. (2018). Focusing on task conflict in the Stroop effect. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 82(2), 284–295. PubMedCrossRef Entel, O., & Tzelgov, J. (2018). Focusing on task conflict in the Stroop effect. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 82(2), 284–295. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. CrossRef Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. CrossRef
go back to reference Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2008). Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 201–225. CrossRef Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2008). Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 201–225. CrossRef
go back to reference Geusebroek, J.-M., Burghouts, G. J., & Smeulders, A. W. M. (2005). The Amsterdam library of object images. International Journal of Computer Vision, 61(1), 103–112. CrossRef Geusebroek, J.-M., Burghouts, G. J., & Smeulders, A. W. M. (2005). The Amsterdam library of object images. International Journal of Computer Vision, 61(1), 103–112. CrossRef
go back to reference Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecology approach to visual perception (Classic ed.). Routledge: Psychology Press. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecology approach to visual perception (Classic ed.). Routledge: Psychology Press.
go back to reference Goldfarb, L., & Henik, A. (2007). Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(5), 1170–1176. PubMed Goldfarb, L., & Henik, A. (2007). Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(5), 1170–1176. PubMed
go back to reference Kalanthroff, E., Anholt, G. E., & Henik, A. (2014). Always on guard: Test of high vs. low control conditions in obsessive-compulsive disorder patients. Psychiatry Research, 219(2), 322–328. PubMedCrossRef Kalanthroff, E., Anholt, G. E., & Henik, A. (2014). Always on guard: Test of high vs. low control conditions in obsessive-compulsive disorder patients. Psychiatry Research, 219(2), 322–328. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kalanthroff, E., Avnit, A., Henik, A., Davelaar, E. J., & Usher, M. (2015). Stroop proactive control and task conflict are modulated by concurrent working memory load. PsychonomicBulletin & Review, 22(3), 869–875. CrossRef Kalanthroff, E., Avnit, A., Henik, A., Davelaar, E. J., & Usher, M. (2015). Stroop proactive control and task conflict are modulated by concurrent working memory load. PsychonomicBulletin & Review, 22(3), 869–875. CrossRef
go back to reference Kalanthroff, E., Davelaar, E. J., Henik, A., Goldfarb, L., & Usher, M. (2018). Task conflict and proactive control: A computational theory of the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 125(1), 59–82. PubMedCrossRef Kalanthroff, E., Davelaar, E. J., Henik, A., Goldfarb, L., & Usher, M. (2018). Task conflict and proactive control: A computational theory of the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 125(1), 59–82. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kalanthroff, E., Goldfarb, L., Usher, M., & Henik, A. (2013). Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(7), 1356–1367. PubMedCrossRef Kalanthroff, E., Goldfarb, L., Usher, M., & Henik, A. (2013). Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(7), 1356–1367. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kalanthroff, E., & Henik, A. (2014). Preparation time modulates pro-active control and enhances task conflict in task switching. Psychological Research, 78(2), 276–288. PubMedCrossRef Kalanthroff, E., & Henik, A. (2014). Preparation time modulates pro-active control and enhances task conflict in task switching. Psychological Research, 78(2), 276–288. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kerns, J. G. (2006). Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activity in an FMRI study of trial-to-trial adjustments on the Simon task. Neuroimage, 33(1), 399–405. PubMedCrossRef Kerns, J. G. (2006). Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activity in an FMRI study of trial-to-trial adjustments on the Simon task. Neuroimage, 33(1), 399–405. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303(5660), 1023–1026. PubMedCrossRef Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303(5660), 1023–1026. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Levin, Y., & Tzelgov, J. (2016). Contingency learning is not affected by conflict experience: Evidence from a task conflict-free, item-specific Stroop paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 164, 39–45. PubMedCrossRef Levin, Y., & Tzelgov, J. (2016). Contingency learning is not affected by conflict experience: Evidence from a task conflict-free, item-specific Stroop paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 164, 39–45. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lu, J., & Cheng, L. (2013). Perceiving and interacting affordances: A new model of human–affordance interactions. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47(1), 142–155. PubMedCrossRef Lu, J., & Cheng, L. (2013). Perceiving and interacting affordances: A new model of human–affordance interactions. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47(1), 142–155. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163–203. PubMedCrossRef MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163–203. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference MacLeod, C. M., & MacDonald, P. A. (2000). Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(10), 383–391. PubMedCrossRef MacLeod, C. M., & MacDonald, P. A. (2000). Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(10), 383–391. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Makris, S., Grant, S., Hadar, A. A., & Yarrow, K. (2013). Binocular vision enhances a rapidly evolving affordance priming effect: Behavioural and TMS evidence. Brain and Cognition, 83(3), 279–287. PubMedCrossRef Makris, S., Grant, S., Hadar, A. A., & Yarrow, K. (2013). Binocular vision enhances a rapidly evolving affordance priming effect: Behavioural and TMS evidence. Brain and Cognition, 83(3), 279–287. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Martin, A., Wiggs, C. L., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1996). Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature, 379(6566), 649–652. PubMedCrossRef Martin, A., Wiggs, C. L., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1996). Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature, 379(6566), 649–652. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Milham, M. P., Erickson, K. I., Banich, M. T., Kramer, A. F., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., et al. (2002). Attentional control in the aging brain: Insights from an fMRI study of the stroop task. Brain and Cognition, 49(3), 277–296. PubMedCrossRef Milham, M. P., Erickson, K. I., Banich, M. T., Kramer, A. F., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., et al. (2002). Attentional control in the aging brain: Insights from an fMRI study of the stroop task. Brain and Cognition, 49(3), 277–296. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2013). Mental chronometry and individual differences: Modeling reliabilities and correlations of reaction time means and effect sizes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(5), 819–858. CrossRef Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2013). Mental chronometry and individual differences: Modeling reliabilities and correlations of reaction time means and effect sizes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(5), 819–858. CrossRef
go back to reference Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. PubMedCrossRef Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Moutsopoulou, K., & Waszak, F. (2012). Across-task priming revisited: Response and task conflicts disentangled using ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(2), 367–374. PubMed Moutsopoulou, K., & Waszak, F. (2012). Across-task priming revisited: Response and task conflicts disentangled using ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(2), 367–374. PubMed
go back to reference Netelenbos, N., & Gonzalez, C. L. R. (2015). Is that graspable? Let your right hand be the judge. Brain and Cognition, 93, 18–25. PubMedCrossRef Netelenbos, N., & Gonzalez, C. L. R. (2015). Is that graspable? Let your right hand be the judge. Brain and Cognition, 93, 18–25. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Proctor, R. W., Lien, M.-C., & Thompson, L. (2017). Do silhouettes and photographs produce fundamentally different object-based correspondence effects? Cognition, 169, 91–101. PubMedCrossRef Proctor, R. W., Lien, M.-C., & Thompson, L. (2017). Do silhouettes and photographs produce fundamentally different object-based correspondence effects? Cognition, 169, 91–101. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Proctor, R. W., & Miles, J. D. (2014). Does the concept of affordance add anything to explanations of stimulus–response compatibility effects? In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 60, pp. 227–266). New York: Academic Press. Proctor, R. W., & Miles, J. D. (2014). Does the concept of affordance add anything to explanations of stimulus–response compatibility effects? In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 60, pp. 227–266). New York: Academic Press.
go back to reference Proverbio, A. M., Adorni, R., & D’aniello, G. E. (2011). 250 ms to code for action affordance during observation of manipulable objects. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2711–2717. PubMedCrossRef Proverbio, A. M., Adorni, R., & D’aniello, G. E. (2011). 250 ms to code for action affordance during observation of manipulable objects. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2711–2717. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rice, N. J., Valyear, K. F., Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., & Culham, J. C. (2007). Orientation sensitivity to graspable objects: An fMRI adaptation study. Neuroimage, 36, T87–T93. PubMedCrossRef Rice, N. J., Valyear, K. F., Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., & Culham, J. C. (2007). Orientation sensitivity to graspable objects: An fMRI adaptation study. Neuroimage, 36, T87–T93. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2), 207–231. CrossRef Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2), 207–231. CrossRef
go back to reference Schmidt, J. R., & Besner, D. (2008). The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(3), 514–523. PubMed Schmidt, J. R., & Besner, D. (2008). The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(3), 514–523. PubMed
go back to reference Schmidt, J. R., & Cheesman, J. (2005). Dissociating stimulus-stimulus and response-response effects in the Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 59(2), 132–138. PubMedCrossRef Schmidt, J. R., & Cheesman, J. (2005). Dissociating stimulus-stimulus and response-response effects in the Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 59(2), 132–138. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime: User’s guide. Psychology Software Incorporated. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime: User’s guide. Psychology Software Incorporated.
go back to reference Shichel, I., & Tzelgov, J. (2018). Modulation of conflicts in the Stroop effect. Acta Psychologica, 189, 93–102. PubMedCrossRef Shichel, I., & Tzelgov, J. (2018). Modulation of conflicts in the Stroop effect. Acta Psychologica, 189, 93–102. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Steinhauser, M., & Hübner, R. (2009). Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: Evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1398–1412. PubMed Steinhauser, M., & Hübner, R. (2009). Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: Evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1398–1412. PubMed
go back to reference Symes, E., Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2005). Dissociating object-based and space-based affordances. Visual Cognition, 12(7), 1337–1361. CrossRef Symes, E., Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2005). Dissociating object-based and space-based affordances. Visual Cognition, 12(7), 1337–1361. CrossRef
go back to reference Tipper, S. P., Paul, M. A., & Hayes, A. E. (2006). Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 493–498. CrossRef Tipper, S. P., Paul, M. A., & Hayes, A. E. (2006). Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 493–498. CrossRef
go back to reference Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 830–846. PubMed Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 830–846. PubMed
go back to reference Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica, 116(2), 185–203. PubMedCrossRef Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica, 116(2), 185–203. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., & Berger, J. (1992). Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory & Cognition, 20(6), 727–735. CrossRef Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., & Berger, J. (1992). Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory & Cognition, 20(6), 727–735. CrossRef
go back to reference Vainio, L., Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2007). The role of visual attention in action priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(2), 241–261. CrossRef Vainio, L., Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2007). The role of visual attention in action priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(2), 241–261. CrossRef
go back to reference Vainio, L., Symes, E., Ellis, R., Tucker, M., & Ottoboni, G. (2008). On the relations between action planning, object identification, and motor representations of observed actions and objects. Cognition, 108(2), 444–465. PubMedCrossRef Vainio, L., Symes, E., Ellis, R., Tucker, M., & Ottoboni, G. (2008). On the relations between action planning, object identification, and motor representations of observed actions and objects. Cognition, 108(2), 444–465. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wilf, M., Holmes, N. P., Schwartz, I., & Makin, T. R. (2013). Dissociating between object affordances and spatial compatibility effects using early response components. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 591. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wilf, M., Holmes, N. P., Schwartz, I., & Makin, T. R. (2013). Dissociating between object affordances and spatial compatibility effects using early response components. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 591. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Xiong, A., Proctor, R. W., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2019). Visual salience, not the graspable part of a pictured eating utensil, grabs attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81, 1–10. CrossRef Xiong, A., Proctor, R. W., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2019). Visual salience, not the graspable part of a pictured eating utensil, grabs attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81, 1–10. CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Control over task conflict in the stroop and affordances tasks: an individual differences study
Auteurs
Ran Littman
Eyal Kalanthroff
Publicatiedatum
07-09-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01411-3