Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, the Department of Defense, or other federal agencies.
Studies have shown that a physician’s clinical reasoning performance can be influenced by contextual factors. We explored how the clinical reasoning performance of medical students was impacted by contextual factors in order to expand upon previous findings in resident and board certified physicians. Using situated cognition as the theoretical framework, our aim was to evaluate the verbalized clinical reasoning processes of medical students in order to describe what impact the presence of contextual factors has on their reasoning performance.
Seventeen medical student participants viewed three video recordings of clinical encounters portraying straightforward diagnostic cases in internal medicine with explicit contextual factors inserted. Participants completed a computerized post-encounter form as well as a think-aloud protocol. Three authors analyzed verbatim transcripts from the think-aloud protocols using a constant comparative approach. After iterative coding, utterances were analyzed and grouped into categories and themes.
Six categories and ten associated themes emerged, which demonstrated overlap with findings from previous studies in resident and attending physicians. Four overlapping categories included emotional disturbances, behavioural inferences about the patient, doctor-patient relationship, and difficulty with closure. Two new categories emerged to include anchoring and misinterpretation of data.
The presence of contextual factors appeared to impact clinical reasoning performance in medical students. The data suggest that a contextual factor can be innate to the clinical scenario, consistent with situated cognition theory. These findings build upon our understanding of clinical reasoning performance from both a theoretical and practical perspective.
Higgs J, Jones M. Clinical decision making and multiple problem spaces. In: Higgs J, Jones M, Loftus S, Christensen N, editors. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008.
Durning S, Artino AR Jr., Pangaro L, van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth L. Context and clinical reasoning: understanding the perspective of the expert’s voice. Med Educ. 2011;45:927–38. CrossRef
Norman GR, Tugwell P, Feightner JW, Muzzin LJ, Jacoby LL. Knowledge and clinical problem-solving. Med Educ. 1985;19:344–56. CrossRef
Elstein AS, Shulman LS, Sprafka SA. Medical problem: solving a ten-year retrospective. Eval Health Prof. 1990;13:5–36. CrossRef
Eva K, Neville A, Norman G. Exploring the etiology of content specificity: factors influencing analogic transfer and problem solving. Acad Med. 1998;73(10 Supplement):S1–S5. CrossRef
McBee E, Ratcliffe T, Picho K, et al. Consequences of contextual factors on clinical reasoning in resident physicians. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2015;20:1225–36. CrossRef
Durning SJ, Artino AR. Situativity theory: a perspective on how participants and the environment can interact: AMEE Guide no. 52. Med Teach. 2011;33:188–99. CrossRef
Schunk D. Learning theories: an educational perspective. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education; 2008.
Durning SJ, Artino A, Boulet J, et al. The feasibility, reliability, and validity of a post-encounter form for evaluating clinical reasoning. Med Teach. 2012;34:30–7. CrossRef
Durning S, Artino A, Van der Vleuten C, La Rochelle J, Arze B, Schuwirth L. Making use of contrasting participant views of the same encounter. Med Educ. 2010;44:953–61. CrossRef
Ericsson K, Simon H. Verbal reports as data. Psychol Rev. 1980;87:215–51. CrossRef
Kennedy T, Lingard L. Making sense of grounded theory in medical education. Med Educ. 2006;40:101–18. CrossRef
Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci. 1988;12:257–85. CrossRef
Feltovich PJ, Barrows HS. Isssues of generality in medical problem solving. In: Schmidt HG, de Volder ML, editors. Tutorials in problem-based learning: new directions in training for the health professions. Assen: Van Gorcum; 1984. pp. 128–42.
Context and clinical reasoning
Understanding the medical student perspective
Shelby J. Madden
Steven J. Durning
- Bohn Stafleu van Loghum