Skip to main content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 9/2016

01-09-2016

Considerations for conducting qualitative research with pediatric patients for the purpose of PRO development

Auteurs: Zabin S. Patel, Sally E. Jensen, Jin-Shei Lai

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 9/2016

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

To provide an overview of methodological considerations when conducting qualitative research with pediatric patients for the purpose of patient-reported outcome measure development

Methods

A literature review of qualitative methods in pediatric measure development was completed. Eight clinicians providing care to pediatric patients were interviewed for their expert input. Thematic analysis of the literature and clinician interviews was used to identify themes for consideration.

Results

Findings from the literature and expert interviews emphasized the way in which cognitive, linguistic, and social developmental factors affect pediatric patients’ understanding of their condition and ability to communicate about their experiences in an interview. There was consensus among the experts that traditional semi-structured interviews with children younger than eight lack characteristics necessary to yield meaningful information about condition and symptom report because they may fail to capture children’s understanding and awareness of their condition and may limit their ability to express themselves comfortably. Our findings include recommended strategies to optimize data collected in qualitative interviews with pediatric patients, including modifications to the interview process to establish rapport, construction of interview questions to ensure they are developmentally appropriate, and the use of supplementary techniques to facilitate communication.

Conclusion

When employing qualitative methods in pediatric measure development, interview guides, methods, and length require careful tailoring to ensure the child’s perspectives are captured. This may be best achieved through research performed with narrow age bands that employs flexibility in methods to allow children a comfortable way in which to communicate about their experiences.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Faux, S. A., Walsh, M., & Deatrick, J. A. (1988). Intensive interviewing with children and adolescents. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 10(2), 180–194. CrossRefPubMed Faux, S. A., Walsh, M., & Deatrick, J. A. (1988). Intensive interviewing with children and adolescents. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 10(2), 180–194. CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Docherty, S., & Sandelowski, M. (1999). Interviewing children. Research in Nursing & Health, 22(2), 177–185. CrossRef Docherty, S., & Sandelowski, M. (1999). Interviewing children. Research in Nursing & Health, 22(2), 177–185. CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Curtin, C. (2001). Eliciting children’s voices in qualitative research. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(3), 295–302. CrossRefPubMed Curtin, C. (2001). Eliciting children’s voices in qualitative research. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(3), 295–302. CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Arbuckle, R., & Abetz-Webb, L. (2013). “Not just little adults”: Qualitative methods to support the development of pediatric patient-reported outcomes. The Patient, 6(3), 143–159. CrossRefPubMed Arbuckle, R., & Abetz-Webb, L. (2013). “Not just little adults”: Qualitative methods to support the development of pediatric patient-reported outcomes. The Patient, 6(3), 143–159. CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kortesluoma, R. L., Hentinen, M., & Nikkonen, M. (2003). Conducting a qualitative child interview: Methodological considerations. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 42(5), 434–441. CrossRefPubMed Kortesluoma, R. L., Hentinen, M., & Nikkonen, M. (2003). Conducting a qualitative child interview: Methodological considerations. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 42(5), 434–441. CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Fivush, R. (1993). Developmental perspectives on autobiographical recall. In G. S. Goodman & B. L. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving testimony (pp. 1–24). New York: Guilford Press. Fivush, R. (1993). Developmental perspectives on autobiographical recall. In G. S. Goodman & B. L. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving testimony (pp. 1–24). New York: Guilford Press.
8.
go back to reference Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Conducting qualitative interviews with school children in dental research. British Dental Journal, 204(7), 371–374. CrossRefPubMed Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Conducting qualitative interviews with school children in dental research. British Dental Journal, 204(7), 371–374. CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Steward, M. S., & Steward, D. S. (1996). Interviewing young children about body touch and handling. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61(4–5), 1–214. PubMed Steward, M. S., & Steward, D. S. (1996). Interviewing young children about body touch and handling. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61(4–5), 1–214. PubMed
10.
go back to reference Zwiers, M. L., & Morrissette, P. J. (1999). Effective interviewing of children: A comprehensive guide for counselors and human service workers. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis. Zwiers, M. L., & Morrissette, P. J. (1999). Effective interviewing of children: A comprehensive guide for counselors and human service workers. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.
11.
go back to reference Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. CrossRef Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Woolley, M. E., Bowen, G. L., & Bowen, N. K. (2004). Cognitive pretesting and the developmental validity of child self-report instruments: Theory and applications. Research on Social Work Practice, 14(3), 191–200. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Woolley, M. E., Bowen, G. L., & Bowen, N. K. (2004). Cognitive pretesting and the developmental validity of child self-report instruments: Theory and applications. Research on Social Work Practice, 14(3), 191–200. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Irwin, D. E., Varni, J. W., Yeatts, K., & DeWalt, D. A. (2009). Cognitive interviewing methodology in the development of a pediatric item bank: A patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 3. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Irwin, D. E., Varni, J. W., Yeatts, K., & DeWalt, D. A. (2009). Cognitive interviewing methodology in the development of a pediatric item bank: A patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 3. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Matza, L. S., Swensen, A. R., Flood, E. M., Secnik, K., & Leidy, N. K. (2004). Assessment of health-related quality of life in children: A review of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues. Value in Health, 7(1), 79–92. CrossRefPubMed Matza, L. S., Swensen, A. R., Flood, E. M., Secnik, K., & Leidy, N. K. (2004). Assessment of health-related quality of life in children: A review of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues. Value in Health, 7(1), 79–92. CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Considerations for conducting qualitative research with pediatric patients for the purpose of PRO development
Auteurs
Zabin S. Patel
Sally E. Jensen
Jin-Shei Lai
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1256-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 9/2016

Quality of Life Research 9/2016 Naar de uitgave