Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

01-12-2014 | Research | Uitgave 1/2014 Open Access

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2014

Consensus-based recommendations of Australian podiatrists for the prescription of foot orthoses for symptomatic flexible pes planus in adults

Tijdschrift:
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research > Uitgave 1/2014
Auteurs:
Helen A Banwell, Shylie Mackintosh, Dominic Thewlis, Karl B Landorf
Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​s13047-014-0049-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interests

KBL is Deputy Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Foot and Ankle Research – it is journal policy that editors are removed from the peer review and editorial decision making process for papers they have co-authored.

Authors’ contributions

Initial development of the survey was undertaken by HB with all authors contributing to the final survey. Analyses and management of the data were undertaken by HB and DT/SM/KL with all four authors being in agreement with the final presented findings. All authors contributed to and approved the final manuscript.

Abstract

Background

Foot orthoses are commonly used for symptomatic flexible pes planus in adults. However, there are no clinical guidelines for the prescription of customised foot orthoses that are specific to this population. The aim of this study was to investigate prescription habits of Australian podiatrists for customised foot orthoses for symptomatic flexible pes planus in adults and to develop consensus-based practice recommendations for the prescription of these foot orthoses.

Methods

A four round Delphi survey was undertaken with 24 podiatric experts to establish current use and rationale for individual prescription variables of customised foot orthoses for symptomatic flexible pes planus in adults. Round one determined prescription use (consensus) and rounds two, three and four determined the rationale for use (agreement) of prescription variables across the rearfoot, midfoot, forefoot, as well as accommodation and materials used. For consensus and agreement to be accepted, 70% of the respondents were required to use or agree on the rationale for use of individual prescription variables.

Results

Consensus was reached in round one for two variables, choice of shell material (polyolefin) and when to prescribe a forefoot post balanced to perpendicular. In rounds two, three and four, agreement was reached for 52 statements related to the rationale for use of individual prescription variables, including when to prescribe: an inverted cast pour [heel in an inverted position], an inverted rearfoot post, a medial heel (Kirby) skive, minimal/maximum arch fill, a medial flange, a forefoot post and common orthotic accommodations.

Conclusion

This study found consensus or agreement for the use of several prescription variables for customised foot orthoses for symptomatic flexible pes planus in adults. The findings were used to develop the Foot orthosis Prescription Recommendations for symptOmatic flexible Pes planus in adults (FootPROP) proforma, to guide clinicians and researchers in the prescription of customised foot orthoses for this population.

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Extra materiaal
Additional file 1: Population based calculations for the Delphi survey panel formation. (DOCX 17 KB)
13047_2014_49_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Additional file 2: Round one for the Delphi survey on the prescription of customised FOs for symptomatic flexible pes planus in adults. (DOCX 21 KB)
13047_2014_49_MOESM2_ESM.docx
Additional file 3: Current employment classification of participants. (DOCX 16 KB)
13047_2014_49_MOESM3_ESM.docx
Additional file 4: Results for the Delphi survey on the use of FOs for symptomatic flexible pes planus in the adult; excluded statements (bolded statements reached agreement but were outside of the scope of the study). (DOCX 28 KB)
13047_2014_49_MOESM4_ESM.docx
Authors’ original file for figure 1
13047_2014_49_MOESM5_ESM.gif
Authors’ original file for figure 2
13047_2014_49_MOESM6_ESM.gif
Authors’ original file for figure 3
13047_2014_49_MOESM7_ESM.gif
Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2014

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2014 Naar de uitgave