Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 6/2014

01-08-2014

Conceptualizing and prioritizing clinical trial outcomes from the perspectives of people with Parkinson’s disease versus health care professionals: a concept mapping study

Auteurs: Catharina Sjödahl Hammarlund, Maria H. Nilsson, Markus Idvall, Scott R. Rosas, Peter Hagell

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 6/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Background

Focusing clinical investigations on outcomes that are meaningful from an end-user perspective is central in clinical research, particularly in chronic disorders such as Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, little is known about how end-users such as people with PD (PwPD) and health care professionals (HCPs) view and prioritize therapeutic outcomes.

Purpose

To compare the perspectives of PwPD and HCPs regarding prioritized areas for outcome measurement in clinical PD trials.

Methods

Concept mapping was used to identify prioritized outcomes (statements) through focus groups (n = 27; 12 PwPD, 12 HCPs, three researchers), statement sorting and importance rating (n = 38; 19 PwPD, 19 HCPs), followed by quantitative (multidimensional scaling, cluster analysis, procrustes analysis) and qualitative analysis.

Results

Sorting of 99 statements by PwPD and HCPs yielded 2D maps (PwPD/HCPs stress values, 0.31/0.21) with eight clusters per group. The correlation between raw sorting data of PwPD and HCPs was 0.80, and there was a significant concordance (m 12 = 0.53; P < 0.001; i.e., r = 0.68) between the spatial arrangements in their respective maps. Qualitatively, the maps from the two groups represented partially different perspectives. There were no significant differences between PwPD and HCP item importance ratings.

Conclusion

Although similarities dominated, there were differences in how the relationships between items were perceived by the two groups, emanating from different perspectives, i.e., the clinical biomedical (“disease”) versus the lived experience (“illness”). This study illustrates the clinical importance of attention to the perspective of PwPD; taking this into account is likely to provide evidence from clinical investigations that are meaningful and interpretable for end-users.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Jankovic, J. (2008). Parkinson’s disease: Clinical features and diagnosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 79(4), 368–376.PubMedCrossRef Jankovic, J. (2008). Parkinson’s disease: Clinical features and diagnosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 79(4), 368–376.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chaudhuri, K. R., & Odin, P. (2010). The challenge of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Progress in Brain Research, 184, 325–341.PubMedCrossRef Chaudhuri, K. R., & Odin, P. (2010). The challenge of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Progress in Brain Research, 184, 325–341.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference World Health Organization, and World Bank. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization. World Health Organization, and World Bank. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization.
9.
go back to reference Nisenzon, A. N., Robinson, M. E., Bowers, D., Banou, E., Malaty, I., & Okun, M. S. (2011). Measurement of patient-centered outcomes in Parkinson’s disease: What do patients really want from their treatment? Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 17(2), 89–94.CrossRef Nisenzon, A. N., Robinson, M. E., Bowers, D., Banou, E., Malaty, I., & Okun, M. S. (2011). Measurement of patient-centered outcomes in Parkinson’s disease: What do patients really want from their treatment? Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 17(2), 89–94.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kane, M., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Kane, M., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
13.
go back to reference Trochim, W. M. K. (1989). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 1–16.CrossRef Trochim, W. M. K. (1989). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 1–16.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hoehn, M. M., & Yahr, M. D. (1967). Parkinsonism: Onset, progression and mortality. Neurology, 17(5), 427–442.PubMedCrossRef Hoehn, M. M., & Yahr, M. D. (1967). Parkinsonism: Onset, progression and mortality. Neurology, 17(5), 427–442.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sturrock, K., & Rocha, J. (2000). A multidimensional scaling stress evaluation table. Field Methods, 12(1), 49–60.CrossRef Sturrock, K., & Rocha, J. (2000). A multidimensional scaling stress evaluation table. Field Methods, 12(1), 49–60.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rosas, S. R., & Kane, M. (2012). Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: A pooled study analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(2), 236–245.PubMedCrossRef Rosas, S. R., & Kane, M. (2012). Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: A pooled study analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(2), 236–245.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Trochim, W. M. K. (1993). The reliability of concept mapping. In Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Evaluation Association, Dallas, TX, November 6, 1993. Trochim, W. M. K. (1993). The reliability of concept mapping. In Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Evaluation Association, Dallas, TX, November 6, 1993.
18.
go back to reference Stillman, F. A., Schmitt, C. L., & Rosas, S. R. (2012). Opportunity for collaboration: A conceptual model of success in tobacco control and cancer prevention. Preventing Chronic Disease, 9, E02.PubMedCentralPubMed Stillman, F. A., Schmitt, C. L., & Rosas, S. R. (2012). Opportunity for collaboration: A conceptual model of success in tobacco control and cancer prevention. Preventing Chronic Disease, 9, E02.PubMedCentralPubMed
19.
go back to reference Jackson, D. A. (1995). PROTEST: A PROcrustean randomization TEST of community environment concordance. Ecoscience, 2(3), 297–303. Jackson, D. A. (1995). PROTEST: A PROcrustean randomization TEST of community environment concordance. Ecoscience, 2(3), 297–303.
20.
go back to reference Peres-Neto, P. R., & Jackson, D. A. (2001). How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test. Oecologia, 129, 169–178.CrossRef Peres-Neto, P. R., & Jackson, D. A. (2001). How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test. Oecologia, 129, 169–178.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schneider, J. W., & Borlund, P. (2007). Matrix comparison, part 2: Measuring the resemblance between proximity measures or ordination results by use of the Mantel and Procrustes statistics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(11), 1596–1609.CrossRef Schneider, J. W., & Borlund, P. (2007). Matrix comparison, part 2: Measuring the resemblance between proximity measures or ordination results by use of the Mantel and Procrustes statistics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(11), 1596–1609.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Eisenberg, L. (1977). Disease and illness. Distinctions between professional and popular ideas of sickness. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 1(1), 9–23.PubMedCrossRef Eisenberg, L. (1977). Disease and illness. Distinctions between professional and popular ideas of sickness. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 1(1), 9–23.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Helman, C. G. (1981). Disease versus illness in general practice. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 31(230), 548–552.PubMedCentralPubMed Helman, C. G. (1981). Disease versus illness in general practice. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 31(230), 548–552.PubMedCentralPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hobart, J., & Cano, S. (2009). Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: The role of new psychometric methods. Health Technology Assessment, 13(12), iii, ix–x, 1–177. Hobart, J., & Cano, S. (2009). Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: The role of new psychometric methods. Health Technology Assessment, 13(12), iii, ix–x, 1–177.
25.
go back to reference Hobart, J., Cano, S., Baron, R., Thompson, A., Schwid, S., Zajicek, J., et al. (2013). Achieving valid patient-reported outcomes measurement: A lesson from fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 19(13), 1773–1783. doi:10.1177/1352458513483378. Hobart, J., Cano, S., Baron, R., Thompson, A., Schwid, S., Zajicek, J., et al. (2013). Achieving valid patient-reported outcomes measurement: A lesson from fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 19(13), 1773–1783. doi:10.​1177/​1352458513483378​.
26.
go back to reference Antonini, A., Martinez-Martin, P., Chaudhuri, R. K., Merello, M., Hauser, R., Katzenschlager, R., et al. (2011). Wearing-off scales in Parkinson’s disease: Critique and recommendations. Movement Disorders, 26(12), 2169–2175.PubMedCrossRef Antonini, A., Martinez-Martin, P., Chaudhuri, R. K., Merello, M., Hauser, R., Katzenschlager, R., et al. (2011). Wearing-off scales in Parkinson’s disease: Critique and recommendations. Movement Disorders, 26(12), 2169–2175.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Den Oudsten, B. L., Van Heck, G. L., & De Vries, J. (2007). The suitability of patient-based measures in the field of Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review. Movement Disorders, 22(10), 1390–1401.CrossRef Den Oudsten, B. L., Van Heck, G. L., & De Vries, J. (2007). The suitability of patient-based measures in the field of Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review. Movement Disorders, 22(10), 1390–1401.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hogl, B., Arnulf, I., Comella, C., Ferreira, J., Iranzo, A., Tilley, B., et al. (2010). Scales to assess sleep impairment in Parkinson’s disease: Critique and recommendations. Movement Disorders, 25(16), 2704–2716.PubMedCrossRef Hogl, B., Arnulf, I., Comella, C., Ferreira, J., Iranzo, A., Tilley, B., et al. (2010). Scales to assess sleep impairment in Parkinson’s disease: Critique and recommendations. Movement Disorders, 25(16), 2704–2716.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Schrag, A., Barone, P., Brown, R. G., Leentjens, A. F., McDonald, W. M., Starkstein, S., et al. (2007). Depression rating scales in Parkinson’s disease: Critique and recommendations. Movement Disorders, 22(8), 1077–1092.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schrag, A., Barone, P., Brown, R. G., Leentjens, A. F., McDonald, W. M., Starkstein, S., et al. (2007). Depression rating scales in Parkinson’s disease: Critique and recommendations. Movement Disorders, 22(8), 1077–1092.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Tomlinson, C. L., Patel, S., Meek, C., Herd, C. P., Clarke, C. E., Stowe, R., et al. (2012). Physiotherapy intervention in Parkinson’s disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 345, e5004.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Tomlinson, C. L., Patel, S., Meek, C., Herd, C. P., Clarke, C. E., Stowe, R., et al. (2012). Physiotherapy intervention in Parkinson’s disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 345, e5004.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Tyson, S., & Connell, L. (2009). The psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures of walking and mobility in neurological conditions: A systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation, 23(11), 1018–1033.PubMedCrossRef Tyson, S., & Connell, L. (2009). The psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures of walking and mobility in neurological conditions: A systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation, 23(11), 1018–1033.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Brown, C. A., Cheng, E. M., Hays, R. D., Vassar, S. D., & Vickrey, B. G. (2009). SF-36 includes less Parkinson’s disease (PD)-targeted content but is more responsive to change than two PD-targeted health-related quality of life measures. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1219–1237.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Brown, C. A., Cheng, E. M., Hays, R. D., Vassar, S. D., & Vickrey, B. G. (2009). SF-36 includes less Parkinson’s disease (PD)-targeted content but is more responsive to change than two PD-targeted health-related quality of life measures. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1219–1237.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Hagell, P., & Nygren, C. (2007). The 39 item Parkinson’s disease questionnaire (PDQ-39) revisited: Implications for evidence based medicine. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 78(11), 1191–1198.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hagell, P., & Nygren, C. (2007). The 39 item Parkinson’s disease questionnaire (PDQ-39) revisited: Implications for evidence based medicine. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 78(11), 1191–1198.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Lee, M. A., Walker, R. W., Hildreth, A. J., & Prentice, W. M. (2006). Individualized assessment of quality of life in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 21(11), 1929–1934.PubMedCrossRef Lee, M. A., Walker, R. W., Hildreth, A. J., & Prentice, W. M. (2006). Individualized assessment of quality of life in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 21(11), 1929–1934.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Hobart, J. C., Cano, S. J., Zajicek, J. P., & Thompson, A. J. (2007). Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: Problems, solutions, and recommendations. Lancet Neurology, 6(12), 1094–1105.PubMedCrossRef Hobart, J. C., Cano, S. J., Zajicek, J. P., & Thompson, A. J. (2007). Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: Problems, solutions, and recommendations. Lancet Neurology, 6(12), 1094–1105.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modelling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modelling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Metagegevens
Titel
Conceptualizing and prioritizing clinical trial outcomes from the perspectives of people with Parkinson’s disease versus health care professionals: a concept mapping study
Auteurs
Catharina Sjödahl Hammarlund
Maria H. Nilsson
Markus Idvall
Scott R. Rosas
Peter Hagell
Publicatiedatum
01-08-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0614-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2014

Quality of Life Research 6/2014 Naar de uitgave