Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 10/2019

12-09-2019 | Responses to "Advancing quality‑of‑life research by deepening our understanding of response shift" by Bruce D. Rapkin & Carolyn E. Schwartz

Conceptual and methodological considerations regarding appraisal and response shift

Auteurs: M. G. E. Verdam, F. J. Oort

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 10/2019

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Excerpt

When evaluating the impact of disease and treatment on patients’ perceived health trajectories, it is important to also consider possible changes in the meaning of patients’ self-evaluations, i.e., response shift. Response shift has been introduced in health-related quality of life (HRQL) research as an explanation for paradoxical and counter-intuitive findings, such as stable HRQL in spite of life-threatening disease or comparable HRQL in healthy (general) and disease populations [5]. In the current issue, Rapkin and Schwartz (2019) argue that the theory of cognitive appraisal is the “only and best way forward” (p. 3) to elucidate response shift phenomena. However, we have some conceptual and methodological issues regarding the interpretation and operationalization of appraisal and response shift as proposed by Rapkin and Schwartz. Conceptually: What is the relationship between appraisal and response shift? Methodologically: How to investigate appraisal and response shift? …
vorige artikel Appraisal as a unifying theory of response shift: continuing the conversation
volgende artikel A systematic review of quality of life research in medicine and health sciences
Literatuur
1.
Jobe, J. B. (2003). Cognitive psychology and self-reports: Models and methods. Quality of Life Research, 12, 219–227.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Oort, F. J. (2005). Using structural equation modeling to detect response shift and true change. Quality of Life Research, 14, 587–598.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Oort, F. J., Visser, M. R. M., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2009). Formal definitions of measurement bias and explanation bias clarify measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1126–1137.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Padilla, J.-L., & Benítez, I. (2014). Validity evidence based on response processes. Psicothema, 26(1), 136–144.PubMed
5.
Sprangers, M. A. G., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1507–1515.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Taminiau-Bloem, E. F., van Zuuren, F. J., Koeneman, M. A., Rapkin, B. D., Visser, M. R. M., … Sprangers, M. A. G. (2010). A ‘short walk’ is longer before therapy than afterwards: A qualitative study questioning the baseline and follow-up design. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. A. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Conceptual and methodological considerations regarding appraisal and response shift
Auteurs
M. G. E. Verdam
F. J. Oort
Publicatiedatum
12-09-2019
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02282-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2019

Quality of Life Research 10/2019 Naar de uitgave

Responses to “Advancing quality‑of‑life research by deepening our understanding of response shift” by Bruce D. Rapkin & Carolyn E. Schwartz

Appraisal as a unifying theory of response shift: continuing the conversation

OriginalPaper

Type of clinical outcomes used by healthcare professionals to evaluate health-related quality of life domains to inform clinical decision making for chronic pain management

Responses to "Advancing quality‑of‑life research by deepening our understanding of response shift" by Bruce D. Rapkin & Carolyn E. Schwartz

Measurement of appraisal is a valuable adjunct to the current spine outcome tools: a clinician’s perspective on the Rapkin and Schwartz commentary

Review

Appraising the quality of tools used to record patient-reported outcomes in users of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): a systematic review

OriginalPaper

Longitudinal measurement invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale in adolescence

OriginalPaper

Measurement properties of PROMIS short forms for pain and function in orthopedic foot and ankle surgery patients