Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Prior research has found that sex differences in pain are partially due to individual variations in gender roles. In a laboratory study, we tested the hypothesis that the presence of covert gender role cues can also moderate the extent to which women and men experience pain. Specifically, we varied gender role cues by asking male and female participants to write about instances in which they behaved in a stereotypically feminine, masculine, or neutral manner. Pain and cardiovascular reactivity to the cold pressor task were then assessed. Results revealed that, when primed with femininity, men reported less pain and anxiety from the cold pressor task than women. However, no differences existed between the sexes in the masculine or neutral prime conditions. The results indicate that covert gender cues can alter pain reports. Further, at least in some situations, feminine role cues may be more influential on pain reports than masculine role cues.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bem, S. L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 624–643. CrossRef
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex-typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364. CrossRef
Bem, S. L. (1984). Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Psychology and gender: Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 179–226). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Bendelow, G. A. (2000). Pain and gender. London, UK: Prentice Hall.
Berkley, K., Hoffman, G., Holdcroft, A., & Murphy, A. (2002). Pain: Sex/gender differences. In D. Pfaff, A. Arnold, A. Etgen, S. Fahrbach, & R. Rubin (Eds.), Hormones, brain, and behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 409–442). London: Academic Press. CrossRef
Bernardes, S. F., Keogh, E., & Lima, M. L. (2008). Bridging the gap between pain and gender research: A selective literature review. European Journal of Pain, 12, 427–440. PubMed
Deaux, K. (1985). Sex and gender. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 49–81. CrossRef
Fagot, B. I. (1977). Consequences of moderate cross-gender behavior in preschool children. Child Development, 48, 902–907. CrossRef
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Fillingim, R. B. (2000). Sex, gender, and pain: Women and men really are different. Current Review of Pain, 4, 24–30. PubMed
Fillingim, R. B., Browning, A. D., Powell, T., & Wright, R. (2002). Sex differences in perceptual and cardiovascular responses to pain: The influence of a perceived ability manipulation. The Journal of Pain, 6, 439–445. CrossRef
Fillingim, R. B., & Maixner, W. (1995). Gender differences in the responses to noxious stimuli. Pain Forum, 4, 209–221.
Geers, A. L., Wellman, J. A., Helfer, S. G., Fowler, S. L., & France, C. R. (2008). Dispositional optimism and thoughts of well-being determine sensitivity to an experimental pain task. Annuals of Behavioral Medicine, 36, 304–313. CrossRef
Holdcroft, A. I., & Berkley, K. J. (2005). Sex and gender differences in pain and its relief. In S. B. McMahon, M. Koltzenburg, P. D. Wall, & R. Melzack (Eds.), Wall and Melzack’s textbook of pain (3rd ed., pp. 1181–1197). Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone.
Maixner, W., & Humphrey, C. (1993). Gender differences in pain and cardiovascular responses to forearm ischemia. Clinical Journal of Pain, 8, 16–25. CrossRef
Mechanic, D. (1964). The influence of mothers on their children’s health attitudes and behavior. Pediatric, 33, 444–453.
Meier-Pesti, K., & Penz, E. (2008). Sex or gender? Expanding the sex-based view by introducing masculinity and femininity as predictors of financial risk taking. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 180–196. CrossRef
Myers, C. D., Riley, J. L., III, Robinson, M. E., & Sheffield, D. (2001). Cardiovascular reactivity and gender-role: Contributions to experimental pain report. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63, 545–550. PubMed
Ni, H., Wu, C., Prineas, R., Shea, S., Lui, K., Kronmal, R., et al. (2006). Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study. American Journal of Hypertenion, 19, 353–360. CrossRef
Ortner, T. M., & Sieverding, M. (2008). Where are the gender differences? Male priming boosts spatial skills in women. Sex Roles, 59, 274–281. CrossRef
Otto, M. W., & Dougher, M. J. (1985). Sex differences and personality factors in responsivity to pain. Perceptual Motor Skills, 61, 383–39032.
Pennebaker, J. W., & Francis, M. E. (1999). Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC): A computerized text analysis software program. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). The personal attributes questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. Journal Supplement Abstract Service Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43–44.
Trudeau, K., Danoff-Burg, S., Revenson, T., & Paget, S. (2003). Agency and communication in people with rheumatoid arthritis. Sex Roles, 49, 303–311. CrossRef
Unger, R. K. (1979). Toward a redefinition of sex and gender. American Psychology, 34, 1085–1094. CrossRef
- Concept priming and pain: an experimental approach to understanding gender roles in sex-related pain differences
Stephanie L. Fowler
Heather M. Rasinski
Andrew L. Geers
Suzanne G. Helfer
Christopher R. France
- Springer US