The risk of injury to a LIMA graft is reported to be as high as 4 % [
3], and this risk seems to be directly related to the surgical technique of the primary operation. Several techniques have been described to prevent the LIMA from becoming adherent to the sternum [
4‐
6]. We prefer to route the LIMA into the pericardial cavity through a pericardial incision, anterior and parallel to the phrenic nerve and lateral to the pulmonary artery. For reoperative cardiac surgery after prior aortocoronary bypass grafting, full understanding of the anatomic location of patent grafts is obligatory. Standard work-up including coronary angiography and chest X-ray often fails to provide the cardiac surgeon with adequate anatomical information. Currently, invasive coronary angiography remains the golden standard for assessment of stenosis of both native coronary vessels, and of coronary bypass grafts. On-going research is providing increasing evidence for the complementary value of CT imaging [
7]; recent studies suggest that also the haemodynamic significance of a stenosis may be assessed on CT angiography [
8]. Further, evidence on the diagnostic value of CT angiography in detecting significant lesions in coronary bypass grafts is mounting [
9]. However, in the present case CT angiography was performed to understand the anatomical relationship of the LIMA graft and the sternum rather than to assess graft patency. In conclusion, this case report illustrates that preoperative CT angiography may provide the surgeon with a ‘road map’, facilitating safe sternal re-entry, dissection, and sternal closure at the time of reoperation after prior aortocoronary bypass surgery.