Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Gepubliceerd in:
Maatschappelijke en organisatorische aspecten van de verloskunde hoofdstuk lezen eerste hoofdstuk lezen

2019 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

11. Complicaties bij de baring

Auteurs : Drs. Marianne Prins, Prof. dr. Jos van Roosmalen, Drs. Yvonne Smit, Prof. dr. Sicco Scherjon, Dr. Jeroen van Dillen

Gepubliceerd in: Praktische verloskunde

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Samenvatting

Een ongecompliceerde baring, zoals beschreven is in H. 6, wordt over het algemeen niet van het ene op het andere moment een gecompliceerde baring. Geleidelijk doen zich één of meerdere symptomen voor die extra monitoring, diagnostiek of interventie vereisen. Nog elk jaar neemt het aantal verwijzingen durante partu toe. Dat komt gedeeltelijk door nieuwe medische inzichten, maar ook door ongeduld bij de barende vrouw en de verloskundig professional. Met enige medicamenteuze ondersteuning, zoals bijstimulatie of pijnbehandeling, maken de meeste vrouwen een verder ongecompliceerde baring door. Nederland behoort tot een van de weinige hogelonenlanden met een sectiopercentage < 20 %. In dit hoofdstuk komen de stoornissen aan de orde die het verloop van het eerste, tweede, derde en vierde tijdperk van de baring kunnen compliceren, alsook de acute verloskundige situaties.
vorige hoofdstuk Ziekten en afwijkingen die de zwangerschap compliceren
volgende hoofdstuk Complicaties in de kraamperiode
Literatuur
1.
Van Runnard Heimel RJ, Van Pampus MG, Coumans ABC, Reuwer PJHM. Spontane vaginale baring. NVOG-richtlijn 2013. Utrecht: NVOG; 2013.
2.
ACOG/SMFM obstetric care concensus. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:693–711.CrossRef
3.
Bedwell C, Levin K, Pett C, Lavender DT. A realist review of the partograph: when and how does it work for labour monitoring? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:31.CrossRef
4.
Offerhaus P, De Boer J, Daemers D. Niet-vorderende ontsluiting. KNOV-richtlijn 2006. Utrecht: KNOV; 2006.
5.
WHO. WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirthexperience. Genève: World Health Organization; 2018. Licence:CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
6.
7.
Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5:CD000331.
8.
Lawrence A, Lewis L, Hofmeyr GJ, Styles C. Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;10:CD003934.
9.
Tuuli MG, Frey HA, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Immediate compared with delayed pushing in the second stage of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:660–8.CrossRef
10.
Cahill AG, et al. Effect of immediate vs delayed pushing on rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery among nulliparous women receiving neuraxial analgesia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320:1444–54.CrossRef
11.
Dorr PJ, Khouw VM, Jacquemyn Y, Nijhuis JG. Obstetrische interventies. 2e druk. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014.
12.
Mahmood TA, Campbell DM, Wilson AW. Maternal height, shoe size, and outcome of labour in white primigravidas: a prospective anthropometric study. BMJ. 1988;297:515–7.CrossRef
13.
Louwen F, Daviss BA, Johnson KC, Reitter A. Does breech delivery in an upright position instead of on the back improve outcomes and avoid cesareans? Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017;136:151–61.CrossRef
14.
Walker S, Parker P, Scamell M. Expertise in physiological breech birth: a mixed-methods study. Birth. 2018;45:202–9.CrossRef
15.
Walker S, Breslin E, Scamell M, Parker P. Effectiveness of vaginal breech birth training strategies: an integrative review of the literature. Birth. 2017;44:101–9.CrossRef
16.
Wildschut HI, Van Belzen-Slappendel H, Jans S. The art of vaginal breech birth at term on all fours. Clin Case Rep. 2017;5:182–6.CrossRef
17.
Rozenberg P. Is there a role for X-ray pelvimetry in the twenty-first century? Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2007;35:6–12.CrossRef
18.
Hoffmann J, Thomassen K, Stumpp P, Grothoff M, Engel C, Kahn T, Stepan H. New MRI criteria for successful vaginal breech delivery in primiparae. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0161028.CrossRef
19.
Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2000;356:1375–83.CrossRef
20.
Jonsdottir F, Henriksen L, Secher NJ, Maaløe N. Does internal podalic version of the non-vertex second twin still have a place in obstetrics? A Danish national retrospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94:59–64.CrossRef
21.
Cornette JMJ, Erkamp JS. Internal podalic version and breech extraction: enhancing realistic sensations in a simulation model. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;130:360–3.CrossRef
22.
Logtenberg SLM, Vink ML, Godfried MB, Beenakkers ICM, Schellevis FG, Mol BW, Verhoeven CJ. Serious adverse events attributed to remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia during labour in The Netherlands. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2018: S0959-289X(18)30216-4.
23.
Freeman LM, Bloemenkamp KW, Franssen MT, et al. Patient controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus epidural analgesia in labour: randomised multicentre equivalence trial. BMJ 2015;350:h846.CrossRef
24.
Federatie Medisch Specialisten. Medicamenteuze pijnbehandelingen tijdens de bevalling. Multidisciplinaire richtlijn. Utrecht: Federatie Medisch Specialisten; 2008.
25.
26.
Logtenberg SLM, Vink ML, Godfried M, Beenakkers ICM, Freeman LM, Schellevis FG, Mol BW, Verhoeven CJ. Practice variation in the application of remifentanil during labour; an overview of its application in Dutch hospitals. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2018;162:D2816.
27.
Chooi C, Cox JJ, Lumb RS, Middleton P, Chemali M, Emmett RS, Simmons SW, Cyna AM. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;8:CD002251.
28.
Langesaeter E, Dyer RA. Maternal haemodynamic changes during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24:242–8.CrossRef
29.
Anderson D. Pudendal nerve block for vaginal birth. Midwifery Womens Health. 2014;59:651–9.CrossRef
30.
Edqvist M, Hildingsson I, Mollberg M, Lundgren I, Lindgren H. Midwives’ management during the second stage of labor in relation to second-degree tears: an experimental study. Birth. 2017;44:86–94.CrossRef
31.
Kwee A, Franx A. Zwangerschap en bevalling na voorgaande sectio. NVOG-richtlijn 2010. Utrecht: NVOG; 2010.
32.
Vankan E, Schoorel EN, Van Kuijk SM, et al. Practice variation of vaginal birth after cesarean and the influence of risk factors at patient level: a retrospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96:158–165.CrossRef
33.
Lydon Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Firts-birth cesarean and placental abruption or previa at second birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:765–9.CrossRef
34.
Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Ory F, De Vries JIP, Bloemenkamp KWM, Van Roosmalen J. Uterine rupture in the Netherlands: a nationwide population based cohort study. BJOG. 2009;116:1069–78.CrossRef
35.
Schoorel EN, Vankan E, Scheepers HC, et al. Involving women in personalised decision-making on mode of delivery after caesarean section: the development and pilot testing of a patient decision aid. BJOG. 2014;121:202–9.CrossRef
36.
Schoorel EN, Melman S, Van Kuijk SM, et al. Predicting successful intended vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section: external validation of two predictive models in a Dutch nationwide registration-based cohort with a high intended vaginal delivery rate. BJOG. 2014;121:840–7.CrossRef
37.
Paterson-Brown S, Howell C. Managing obstetric emergencies and trauma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.
38.
Woollard M, Hinshaw K, Simpson H, Wieteska S. Pre-hospital obstetric emergency training. Manchester: Advanced Life Support Group; 2010.
39.
Fransen AF, Van de Ven J, Schuit E, Van Tetering A, Mol BW, Oei SG. Simulation-based team training for multi-professional obstetric care teams to improve patient outcome: a multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2017;124:641–50.CrossRef
40.
Van de Ven J, Fransen AF, Schuit E, Van Runnard Heimel PJ, Mol BW, Oei SG. The effect of one-day simulation team training in obstetric emergencies decline within one year? A post-hoc analysis of a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;216:79–84.CrossRef
41.
Expertgroep Zorgstandaard Integrale Geboortezorg. Aanpassingen tijdelijke expertcommissie Adviescommissie Kwaliteit Zorginstituut Nederland. Zorgstandaard Integrale Geboortezorg. Utrecht: College Perinatale Zorg; 2016.
42.
Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2581–9.CrossRef
43.
Zeeman GG, Wolf H. Schouderdystocie. NVOG-richtlijn 2008. Utrecht: NVOG; 2008.
44.
Gherman RB, Tramont J, Muffley P, Goodwin TM. Analysis of McRoberts’ maneuver by x-ray pelvimetry. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:43–7.PubMed
45.
Boulvain M, Irion O, Dowswell T, Thornton JG. Induction of labour at or near term for suspected fetal macrosomia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(5):CD000938.
46.
Zondag L. Positieve discongruentie. KNOV-factsheet 2017. Utrecht: KNOV; 2017.
47.
Chauhan SP, Rose CH, Gherman RB, Magann EF, Holland MW, Morrison JC. Brachial plexus injury: a 23-year experience from a tertiary center. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1795–802.CrossRef
48.
Gibbons C, O’Herlihy C, Murphy JF. Umbilical cord prolapse–changing patterns and improved outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG. 2014;121:1705–8.CrossRef
49.
Smit M, Zwanenburg F, Van der Wolk S, et al. Umbilical cord prolapse in primary midwifery care in the Netherlands; a case series. Part 2. Pract Midwife. 2014;17:34–8.
50.
Smit M, Zwanenburg F, Van der Wolk S, et al. Umbilical cord prolapse in primary midwifery care in the Netherlands; a case series. Pract Midwife. 2014;17:24–7.PubMed
51.
Shamshirsaz AA, Clark SL. Amniotic fluid embolism. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016;43:779–90.CrossRef
52.
Stolk KH, Zwart JJ, Schutte J, Van Roosmalen J. Severe maternal morbidity and mortality from amniotic fluid embolism in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:991–5.CrossRef
53.
Vain NE, Batton DG. Meconium ‘aspiration’ (or respiratory distress associated with meconium-stained amniotic fluid?). Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;22:214–9.CrossRef
54.
Committee on Obstetric Practice A, American Academy of P, Committee on F, et al. ACOG committee opinion. Number 333, May 2006 (replaces No. 174, July 1996): the Apgar score. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1209–12.
55.
Nederlandse Reanimatieraad. Reanimatie en ondersteuning van de transitie van het kind bij de geboorte. Voorschoten: Nederlandse Reanimatieraad; 2015.
56.
Jacobs SE, Berg M, Hunt R, Tarnow-Mordi WO, Inder TE, Davis PG. Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(1):CD003311.
57.
Van Handel M, Swaab H, De Vries LS, Jongmans MJ. Long-term cognitive and behavioral consequences of neonatal encephalopathy following perinatal asphyxia: a review. Eur J Pediatr. 2007;166:645–54.CrossRef
58.
Von Schmidt auf Altenstadt JF, Hukkelhoven CWPM, Van Roosmalen J, Bloemenkamp KWM. Pre-eclampsia increases the risk of postpartum haemorrhage: a nationwide cohort study in The Netherlands. PLoS ONE. 2013;12:e81959.
59.
Nyfløt LT, Sandven I, Stray-Pedersen B. Risk factors for severe postpartum hemorrhage: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:17.CrossRef
60.
Deneux-Tharaux C, Sentilhes L, Maillard F, Closset E, Vardon D, Lepercq J, et al. Effect of routine controlled cord traction as part of the active management of the third stage of labour on postpartum haemorrhage: multicentre randomised controlled trial (TRACOR). BMJ. 2013;346:f1541.CrossRef
61.
Scheepers HCJ. Hemorrhagia Postpartum. NVOG-richtlijn, 2013–2015. Utrecht: NVOG; 2015.
62.
63.
WOMAN Trial Collaborators. Effect of early tranexamic acid administration on mortality, hysterectomy, and other morbidities in women with post-partum haemorrhage (WOMAN): an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2105–16.
64.
Prick BW, Jansen AJ, Steegers EA, et al. Transfusion policy after severe postpartum haemorrhage: a randomised non-inferiority trial. BJOG. 2014;121:1005–14.CrossRef
65.
Matsuzaki S, Endo M, Ueda Y. A case of acute Sheehan’s syndrome and literature review: a rare but life-threatening complication of postpartum hemorrhage. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:188.CrossRef
66.
Klar M, Laub M, Schulte-Moenting J, Proempeler H, Kunze M. Clinical risk factors for complete and partial placental retention: a case-control study. J Perinat Med. 2013;41:529–34.
67.
Witteveen T, Van Stralen G, Zwart J, Van Roosmalen J. Puerperal uterine inversion in the Netherlands: a nationwide cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92:334–7.CrossRef
68.
Van Dorp W, Maissan IM, Hapa LRR, Creemers JW, Van Muyden-Martens JE. Reanimatie van een zwangere patient. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A2370.PubMed
69.
Beckett VA, Knight M, Sharpe P. The CAPS study: incidence, manageent and outcomes of cardiac arrest in pregnancy in the UK: a prospective, descriptive study. BJOG. 2017;124:1374–81.CrossRef
70.
Dijkman A, Huisman CM, Smit M, Schutte JM, Zwart JJ, Van Roosmalen JJ, et al. Cardiac arrest in pregnancy: increasing use of perimortem caesarean section due to emergency skills training? BJOG. 2010;117:282–7.CrossRef
71.
Bonsack CF, Lathrop A, Blackburn M. Induction of labor: update and review. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014;59:606–15.CrossRef
72.
Budden A, Chen LJ, Henry A. High-dose versus low-dose oxytocin infusion regimens for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(10):CD009701.
73.
Saccone G, Ciardulli A, Baxter JK, Quiñones JN, Diven LC, Pinar B, Maruotti GM, Martinelli P, Berghella V. Discontinuing oxytocin infusion in the active phase of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:1090–6.CrossRef
74.
Harper LM, Caughey AB, Odibo AO, Roehl KA, Zhao Q, Cahill AG. Normal progress of induced labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:1113–8.CrossRef
75.
Alfirevic Z, Aflaifel N, Weeks A. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(6):CD001338.
76.
Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ, Mol BW, Irion O, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(3):CD001233.
77.
Navve D, Orenstein N, Ribak R, Daykan Y, Shechter-Maor G, Biron-Shental T. Is the Bishop-score significant in predicting the success of labor induction in multiparous women? J Perinatol. 2017;37:480–3.CrossRef
78.
Sotiriadis A, Petousis S, Thilaganathan B, Figueras F, Martins WP, Odibo AO, Dinas K, Hyett J. Maternal and perinatal outcomes after elective induction of labor at 39 weeks in uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53:26–35.CrossRef
79.
Middleton P, Shepherd E, Crowther CA. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 9;5:CD004945.
80.
Wood S, Cooper S, Ross S. Does induction of labour increase the risk of caesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in women with intact membranes. BJOG. 2014;121:674–85.CrossRef
81.
Bernardes TP, Broekhuijsen K, Koopmans CM, et al. Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials. BJOG. 2016;123:1501–8.CrossRef
82.
Grobman WA, Rice MM. Reddy UM, et al. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:513–23.
83.
Coates R, Cupples G, Scamell A, McCourt C. Women’s experiences of induction of labour: qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis. Midwifery. 2018;69:17–28.CrossRef
84.
Kenkel WM, Yee JR, Carter CS. Is oxytocin a maternal-foetal signalling molecule at birth? Implications for development. J Neuroendocrinol. 2014;26:739–49.CrossRef
85.
Bell AF, Erickson EN, Carter CS. Beyond labor: the role of natural and synthetic oxytocin in the transition to motherhood. J Midwifery women’s Health. 2014;59:35–42.CrossRef
86.
Kroll-Desrosiers AR, Nephew BC, Babb JA, Guilarte-Walker Y, Moore Simas TA, Deligiannidis KM. Association of peripartum synthetic oxytocin administration and depressive and anxiety disorders within the first postpartum year. Depress Anxiety. 2017;34:137–46.CrossRef
87.
Vogel JP, Osoti AO, Kelly AJ, Livio S, Norman JE, Alfirevic Z. Medications and mechanical interventions for induction of labour in outpatient settings. Cochrane Syst Rev. 2017;9:CD007701.
88.
O’Mahony F, Hofmeyr GJ, Menon V. Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(11):CD005455.
89.
Euro-Peristat Project. European perinatal health report. Core indicators of the health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2015. November 2018. www.​europeristat.​com.
90.
Franx A, Kwee A. Indicatiestelling sectio caesarea. NVOG-richtlijn 2011. Utrecht: NVOG; 2011.
91.
Stegwee SI, Jordans IPM, van der Voet LF, et al. Single- versus double-layer closure of the caesarean (uterine) scar in the prevention of gynaecological symptoms in relation to niche development - the 2 Close study: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019;19:85.
92.
Smith J, Plaat F, Fisk NM. The natural caesarean: a woman-centred technique. BJOG. 2008;115:1037–42.CrossRef
93.
Korteweg FJ, De Boer HD, Van der Ploeg JM, Buiter HD, Van der Ham DP. Huid-op-huidsectio: hype of betere patiëntenzorg? Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2017;161:D582.
94.
Smaill FM, Grivell RM. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(10):CD007482.
95.
Haas DM, Morgan S, Contreras K, Enders S. Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7:CD007892.
96.
Kallianidis AF, Schutte JM, Van Roosmalen J, Van den Akker T. Maternal mortality after cesarean section in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;229:148–52.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Complicaties bij de baring
Auteurs
Drs. Marianne Prins
Prof. dr. Jos van Roosmalen
Drs. Yvonne Smit
Prof. dr. Sicco Scherjon
Dr. Jeroen van Dillen
Copyright
2019
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek
Praktische verloskunde

Print ISBN: 978-90-368-2278-7

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-2279-4

Copyright: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2279-4_11