Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Responses to stimuli are faster when the stimulus location spatially corresponds to the required response (standard Simon effect). Recently, a similar effect has been observed with monocular stimuli. Responses were faster when the response location and the stimulated eye corresponded (monocular Simon effect). It has been suggested that distinct mechanisms may underlie these two Simon effects. Here, we attempted to study these two mechanisms simultaneously. For mean reaction time, a finding of perfect additivity was obtained. These behavioral data coupled with surface electrophysiological measures support the view that two different mechanisms contribute independently to the monocular and standard Simon effect.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
de Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750. doi: 10.1037/0096-15184.108.40.2061. CrossRefPubMed
Eimer, M. (1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioural performance. Acta Psychologica, 101, 293–313.
Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (2002). Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 514–520.
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and post-stimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331–344. doi: 10.1037/0096-15220.127.116.111. CrossRefPubMed
Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53–112). San Diego: Academic Press.
Mishra, J., & Hillyard, S. A. (2008). Endogenous attention selection during binocular rivalry at early stages of visual processing. Vision Research. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.018.
Proctor, R. W., & Lu, C. M. (1999). Processing irrelevant location information: practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks. Memory & Cognition, 27, 63–77.
Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2004). Binocular rivalry is partly resolved at early processing stages with steady and with flickering presentation: a human event-related brain potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 31, 51–55.
Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 648–670.
Wascher, E., Verleger, R., & Wauschkuhn, B. (1996). In pursuit of the Simon effect: The effect of S-R compatibility investigated by event-related potentials. Journal of Psychophysiology, 10, 336–346.
- Compatibility between stimulated eye, target location and response location
Steven A. Hackley