Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are essential for assessing subjective patient experiences. Interactive voice response (IVR) data collection provides advantages for clinical trial design by standardizing and centralizing the assessment. Prior to adoption of IVR as a mode of PRO administration in the Testosterone Trials (TTrials), we compared IVR to paper versions of the instruments to be used.
IVR versions of the FACIT-Fatigue scale and Psychosexual Daily Questionnaire, Question 4, were developed. In one pilot study, IVR versions of these scales were compared to paper versions in 25 men ≥ 65 years at each of two clinical sites. In another study, IVR versions of the SF-36 Vitality Scale (SF-36), Positive and Negative Affect Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire were evaluated in comparison with previously validated paper versions in 25 men at two clinical sites. Both paper and IVR versions of each instrument were administered in counterbalanced order, and test–retest reliability was evaluated by repeated administration of the test. Bland–Altman plots were used to assess the degree of agreement. Test–retest correlations for each measure were also determined.
Satisfactory agreement was observed between IVR and paper versions of each study measure. Specifically, linear and highly positive associations were observed consistently across the study for IVR and paper versions of all study measures. These ranged from r = 0.91–0.99. Test–retest reliability for all measures was acceptable or better (r = 0.70–0.90).
The IVR versions of TTrials endpoints in these two studies performed consistently well in comparison with paper versions.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Piette, J. D. (2000). Interactive voice response systems in the diagnosis and management of chronic disease. American Journal of Managed Care,6(7), 817–827. PubMed
Corkrey, R., & Parkinson, L. (2002). Interactive voice response: Review of studies 1989–2000. Behave Research Methods Instruments & Computers,34(3), 342–353. CrossRef
Mundt, J. C., Kobak, K. A., Taylor, L. V., Mantle, J. M., Jefferson, J. W., Katzelnick, D. J., et al. (1998). Administration of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale using interactive voice response technology. MD Computing,15(1), 31–39. PubMed
Wang-Weigand, S., Watissee, M., & Roth, T. (2011). Use of a post-sleep questionnaire-interactive voice response system (PSQ-IVRS) to evaluate the subjective sleep effects of Ramelteon in adults with chronic insomnia. Sleep Medicine,12(9), 920–923. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2011.06.008. CrossRefPubMed
DeRogatis, L. R., Allgood, A., Auerbach, P., Eubank, D., Greist, J., Bharmal, M., et al. (2010). Validation of a Women’s Sexual Interest Diagnostic Interview-Short Form (WSID-SF) and a Daily Log of Sexual Activities (DLSA) in postmenopausal women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. The Journal of Sexual Medicine,7(2 Pt 2), 917–927. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01528.x. CrossRefPubMed
Tucker, J. A., Simpson, C. A., Huang, J., Roth, D. L., & Stewart, K. E. (2013). Utility of an interactive voice response system to assess antiretroviral pharmacotherapy adherence among substance users living with HIV/AIDS in the rural South. AIDS Patient Care STDS,27(5), 280–286. doi: 10.1089/apc.2012.0322. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Simpson, C. A., Xie, L., Blum, E. R., & Tucker, J. A. (2011). Agreement between prospective interactive voice response telephone reporting and structured recall reports of risk behaviors in rural substance users living with HIV/AIDS. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,25(1), 185–190. doi: 10.1037/a0022725. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Dalal, A. A., Nelson, L., Gilligan, T., McLeod, L., Lewis, S., & DeMuro-Mercon, C. (2011). Evaluating patient-reported outcome measurement comparability between paper and alternate versions, using the lung function questionnaire as an example. Value Health,14(5), 712–720. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.12.007. CrossRefPubMed
Skolarus, T. A., Holmes-Rovner, M., Hawley, S. T., Dunn, R. L., Barr, K. L., Willard, N. R., et al. (2012). Monitoring quality of life among prostate cancer survivors: The feasibility of automated telephone assessment. Urology,80(5), 1021–1026. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.07.038. CrossRefPubMed
Snyder, P. J., Ellenberg, S. S., Cunningham, G. R., Matsumoto, A. M., Bhasin, S., Barrett-Connor, E., et al. (2014). The Testosterone Trials: Seven coordinated trials of testosterone treatment in elderly men. Clinical Trials,11(3), 362–375. doi: 10.1177/1740774514524032. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Cella, D., Yount, S., Sorensen, M., Chartash, E., Sengupta, N., & Grober, J. (2005). Validation of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale relative to other instrumentation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology,32, 811–819. PubMed
Ware, J., & Kosinski, M. (2005). SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A manual for users of version 1 (2nd ed.). Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Inc.
Ware, J., Snow, K., & Kosinski, M. (1993, 2000). SF- 36 Health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Inc.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika,16(3), 297–334. CrossRef
- Comparison of interactive voice response (IVR) with paper administration of instruments to assess functional status, sexual function, and quality of life in elderly men
Raymond C. Rosen
Alisa J. Stephens-Shields
Glenn R. Cunningham
John T. Farrar
Cora E. Lewis
Peter J. Snyder
- Springer International Publishing