Top

Quality of Life Research

Gepubliceerd in:

01-06-2011

Comparison of 7-day and repeated 24-h recall of type 2 diabetes

Auteurs: A. V. Bennett, D. L. Patrick, D. M. Bushnell, C. F. Chiou, P. Diehr

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 5/2011

Abstract

Purpose

Patient reporting of type 2 diabetes symptoms in a questionnaire with a 7-day recall period was expected to be different from symptom reports using a 7-day diary with repeated 24-h recall based on cognitive theory of memory processes and prior literature. This study compared these two types of recall in patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods

One hundred and forty adults with T2D completed a daily diary for 7 days containing 9 T2D-related symptom and impact items. On day 7, patients completed the same items with a 7-day recall period. We examined the concordance of 7-day recall with summary descriptors of the daily reports and compared the scores and the discriminant ability of 7-day recall and mean of daily reports.

Results

Seven-day recall was most concordant with the mean of daily reports. The average difference in scores was small (range 0.22–0.77 on 11-point scale) and less than 0.5 standard deviations. For some items, the difference was positively associated with the variation in daily reports. The discriminant ability was comparable.

Conclusions

In this study population, a questionnaire with 7-day recall provided information consistent with a daily diary measure of the average week-long experience of T2D symptoms and impacts.

vorige artikel Psychometric validation of the S-QoL Chinese (Taiwan) version for patients with schizophrenia

volgende artikel Health-related quality of life in preschool children in five health conditions

Revicki, D. A., Osoba, D., Fairclough, D., Barofsky, I., Berzon, R., Leidy, N. K., et al. (2000). Recommendations on health-related quality of life research to support labeling and promotional claims in the United States. Quality of Life Research, 9(8), 887–900.PubMedCrossRef

FDA. (2009). Patient reported outcome (PRO) measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Federal Register, 74(235), 65132–65133.

Stull, D. E., Leidy, N. K., Parasuraman, B., & Chassany, O. (2009). Optimal recall periods for patient-reported outcomes: Challenges and potential solutions. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 25(4), 929–942.PubMedCrossRef

Hufford, M. R., & Shiffman, S. (2003). Assessment methods for patient-reported outcomes. Disease Management and Health Outcomes, 11(2), 77–86.CrossRef

Homma, Y., Ando, T., Yoshida, M., Kageyama, S., Takei, M., Kimoto, K., et al. (2002). Voiding and incontinence frequencies: Variability of diary data and required diary length. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 21(3), 204–209.PubMedCrossRef

Kenton, K., Fitzgerald, M. P., & Brubaker, L. (2006). What is a clinician to do-believe the patient or her urinary diary? Journal of Urology, 176(2), 633–635. (discussion 5).PubMedCrossRef

Elser, D. M., Fantl, J. A., & McClish, D. K. (1995). Comparison of “subjective” and “objective” measures of severity of urinary incontinence in women. Program for Women Research Group. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 14(4), 311–316.PubMedCrossRef

Richardson, M. T., Ainsworth, B. E., Jacobs, D. R., & Leon, A. S. (2001). Validation of the Stanford 7-day recall to assess habitual physical activity. Annals of Epidemiology, 11(2), 145–153.PubMedCrossRef

Stel, V. S., Smit, J. H., Pluijm, S. M., Visser, M., Deeg, D. J., & Lips, P. (2004). Comparison of the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire with a 7-day diary and pedometer. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57(3), 252–258.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Gmel, G., & Daeppen, J. B. (2007). Recall bias for seven-day recall measurement of alcohol consumption among emergency department patients: Implications for case-crossover designs. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 68(2), 303–310.PubMed

11.

Hilton, M. E. (1989). A comparison of a prospective diary and two summary recall techniques for recording alcohol consumption. British Journal of Addiction, 84(9), 1085–1092.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Stone, A. A., Broderick, J. E., Kaell, A. T., DelesPaul, P. A., & Porter, L. E. (2000). Does the peak-end phenomenon observed in laboratory pain studies apply to real-world pain in rheumatoid arthritics? The Journal of Pain, 1(3), 212–217.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Stone, A. A., Broderick, J. E., Shiffman, S. S., & Schwartz, J. E. (2004). Understanding recall of weekly pain from a momentary assessment perspective: Absolute agreement, between- and within-person consistency, and judged change in weekly pain. Pain, 107(1–2), 61–69.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Shiffman, S. S. (2005). Variability of momentary pain predicts recall of weekly pain: A consequence of the peak (or salience) memory heuristic. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1340–1346.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Grootenhuis, P. A., Snoek, F. J., Heine, R. J., & Bouter, L. M. (1994). Development of a type 2 diabetes symptom checklist: A measure of symptom severity. Diabetic Medicine, 11(3), 253–261.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Ware, J. E., Jr., Kosinski, M., & Dewey, J. E. (2000). How to score version 2 of the SF-36 health survey. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric, Incorporated.

17.

Ware, J. E, Jr., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36 Health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute.

18.

American Diabetes Association. (2009). Standards of medical care in diabetes–2009. Diabetes Care, 32(Suppl 1), S13–S61.CrossRef

19.

Lin, L. I. (1989). A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics, 45(1), 255–268.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Deyo, R. A., Diehr, P., & Patrick, D. L. (1991). Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Controlled Clinical Trials, 12(4 Suppl), 142S–158S.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Bennett, A. V., Patrick, D. L., Lymp, J. F., Edwards, T. C., & Goss, C. H. (2010). Comparison of 7-day and repeated 24-hour recall of symptoms of cystic fibrosis (in press). doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2010.08.008.

Titel: Comparison of 7-day and repeated 24-h recall of type 2 diabetes
Auteurs: A. V. Bennett
D. L. Patrick
D. M. Bushnell
C. F. Chiou
P. Diehr
Publicatiedatum: 01-06-2011
Uitgeverij: Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9791-5

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2011

The extent to which common health-related quality of life indices capture constructs beyond symptoms and function

The relationship between eating disorder psychopathology and health-related quality of life within a community sample

Measurement properties of the Community Wellbeing Index in older adults

Changes in SWB following injury to different brain lobes

Self-reported health-related quality of life of children and adolescent survivors of extracranial childhood malignancies: a Finnish nationwide survey

Anhedonia is associated with poor health status and more somatic and cognitive symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease