Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-06-2011

Comparison of 7-day and repeated 24-h recall of type 2 diabetes

Auteurs: A. V. Bennett, D. L. Patrick, D. M. Bushnell, C. F. Chiou, P. Diehr

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 5/2011

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

Patient reporting of type 2 diabetes symptoms in a questionnaire with a 7-day recall period was expected to be different from symptom reports using a 7-day diary with repeated 24-h recall based on cognitive theory of memory processes and prior literature. This study compared these two types of recall in patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods

One hundred and forty adults with T2D completed a daily diary for 7 days containing 9 T2D-related symptom and impact items. On day 7, patients completed the same items with a 7-day recall period. We examined the concordance of 7-day recall with summary descriptors of the daily reports and compared the scores and the discriminant ability of 7-day recall and mean of daily reports.

Results

Seven-day recall was most concordant with the mean of daily reports. The average difference in scores was small (range 0.22–0.77 on 11-point scale) and less than 0.5 standard deviations. For some items, the difference was positively associated with the variation in daily reports. The discriminant ability was comparable.

Conclusions

In this study population, a questionnaire with 7-day recall provided information consistent with a daily diary measure of the average week-long experience of T2D symptoms and impacts.
vorige artikel Psychometric validation of the S-QoL Chinese (Taiwan) version for patients with schizophrenia
volgende artikel Health-related quality of life in preschool children in five health conditions
Literatuur
1.
Revicki, D. A., Osoba, D., Fairclough, D., Barofsky, I., Berzon, R., Leidy, N. K., et al. (2000). Recommendations on health-related quality of life research to support labeling and promotional claims in the United States. Quality of Life Research, 9(8), 887–900.PubMedCrossRef
2.
FDA. (2009). Patient reported outcome (PRO) measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Federal Register, 74(235), 65132–65133.
3.
Stull, D. E., Leidy, N. K., Parasuraman, B., & Chassany, O. (2009). Optimal recall periods for patient-reported outcomes: Challenges and potential solutions. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 25(4), 929–942.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Hufford, M. R., & Shiffman, S. (2003). Assessment methods for patient-reported outcomes. Disease Management and Health Outcomes, 11(2), 77–86.CrossRef
5.
Homma, Y., Ando, T., Yoshida, M., Kageyama, S., Takei, M., Kimoto, K., et al. (2002). Voiding and incontinence frequencies: Variability of diary data and required diary length. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 21(3), 204–209.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Kenton, K., Fitzgerald, M. P., & Brubaker, L. (2006). What is a clinician to do-believe the patient or her urinary diary? Journal of Urology, 176(2), 633–635. (discussion 5).PubMedCrossRef
7.
Elser, D. M., Fantl, J. A., & McClish, D. K. (1995). Comparison of “subjective” and “objective” measures of severity of urinary incontinence in women. Program for Women Research Group. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 14(4), 311–316.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Richardson, M. T., Ainsworth, B. E., Jacobs, D. R., & Leon, A. S. (2001). Validation of the Stanford 7-day recall to assess habitual physical activity. Annals of Epidemiology, 11(2), 145–153.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Stel, V. S., Smit, J. H., Pluijm, S. M., Visser, M., Deeg, D. J., & Lips, P. (2004). Comparison of the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire with a 7-day diary and pedometer. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57(3), 252–258.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Gmel, G., & Daeppen, J. B. (2007). Recall bias for seven-day recall measurement of alcohol consumption among emergency department patients: Implications for case-crossover designs. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 68(2), 303–310.PubMed
11.
Hilton, M. E. (1989). A comparison of a prospective diary and two summary recall techniques for recording alcohol consumption. British Journal of Addiction, 84(9), 1085–1092.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Stone, A. A., Broderick, J. E., Kaell, A. T., DelesPaul, P. A., & Porter, L. E. (2000). Does the peak-end phenomenon observed in laboratory pain studies apply to real-world pain in rheumatoid arthritics? The Journal of Pain, 1(3), 212–217.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Stone, A. A., Broderick, J. E., Shiffman, S. S., & Schwartz, J. E. (2004). Understanding recall of weekly pain from a momentary assessment perspective: Absolute agreement, between- and within-person consistency, and judged change in weekly pain. Pain, 107(1–2), 61–69.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Shiffman, S. S. (2005). Variability of momentary pain predicts recall of weekly pain: A consequence of the peak (or salience) memory heuristic. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1340–1346.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Grootenhuis, P. A., Snoek, F. J., Heine, R. J., & Bouter, L. M. (1994). Development of a type 2 diabetes symptom checklist: A measure of symptom severity. Diabetic Medicine, 11(3), 253–261.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Ware, J. E., Jr., Kosinski, M., & Dewey, J. E. (2000). How to score version 2 of the SF-36 health survey. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric, Incorporated.
17.
Ware, J. E, Jr., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36 Health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute.
18.
American Diabetes Association. (2009). Standards of medical care in diabetes–2009. Diabetes Care, 32(Suppl 1), S13–S61.CrossRef
19.
Lin, L. I. (1989). A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics, 45(1), 255–268.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Deyo, R. A., Diehr, P., & Patrick, D. L. (1991). Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Controlled Clinical Trials, 12(4 Suppl), 142S–158S.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Bennett, A. V., Patrick, D. L., Lymp, J. F., Edwards, T. C., & Goss, C. H. (2010). Comparison of 7-day and repeated 24-hour recall of symptoms of cystic fibrosis (in press). doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcf.​2010.​08.​008.
Metagegevens
Titel
Comparison of 7-day and repeated 24-h recall of type 2 diabetes
Auteurs
A. V. Bennett
D. L. Patrick
D. M. Bushnell
C. F. Chiou
P. Diehr
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2011
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9791-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2011

Predictors of quality of life in carers for people with a progressive neurological illness: a longitudinal study

Assessing the factor structure of a role functioning item bank

Self-rated health as a tool for estimating health-adjusted life expectancy among patients newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer: a preliminary study

The prevalence of urinary incontinence and its burden on the quality of life among older adults with medicare supplement insurance

Patterns of reporting health-related quality of life outcomes in randomized clinical trials: implications for clinicians and quality of life researchers

Psychometric properties of the Spanish form of the schedule for meaning in life evaluation (SMiLE)

  • Brief Communication