Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

03-03-2020 | Uitgave 7/2020

Commentary on Application of the Bifactor S-1 Model to Multisource Ratings of ADHD/ODD Symptoms: An Appropriate Bifactor Model for Symptom Ratings

Tijdschrift:: Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology > Uitgave 7/2020

Auteur:: Michael T. Willoughby

» Toegang tot de volledige tekst krijgen

Belangrijke opmerkingen

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

My commentary is organized into four sections. First, I summarize the reasons for the original interest in fitting symmetric bifactor models to ADHD data. Second, I summarize the concerns that Burns and colleagues raised with respect to fitting symmetric bifactor models to ADHD item-level data and describe their recommended alternative approach. Third, I raise two concerns that I had with their manuscript. Fourth, I conclude with a caveat and a general question about the merits of the continued study of the factor structure of ADHD symptoms.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Hier inloggen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijft u als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen uw vak. Met het online abonnement heeft u toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kunt u op uw gemak en wanneer het u het beste uitkomt verdiepen in uw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

Arias, V. B., Ponce, F. P., & Nunez, D. E. (2018). Bifactor models of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): An evaluation of three necessary but underused psychometric indexes. Assessment, 25(7), 885–897. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116679260. CrossRefPubMed

Capdevila-Brophy, C., Artigas-Pallares, J., Navarro-Pastor, J. B., Garcia-Nonell, K., Rigau-Ratera, E., & Obiols, J. E. (2014). ADHD predominantly inattentive subtype with high sluggish cognitive tempo: A new clinical entity? Journal of Attention Disorders, 18(7), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054712445483. CrossRefPubMed

De Los Reyes, A., Augenstein, T. M., Wang, M., Thomas, S. A., Drabick, D. A. G., Burgers, D. E., et al. (2015). The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 858–900. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038498. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Eid, M., Geiser, C., Koch, T., & Heene, M. (2017). Anomalous results in G-factor models: Explanations and alternatives. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 541–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000083. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Heinrich, M., Zagorscak, P., Eid, M., & Knaevelsrud, C. (2018). Giving G a meaning: An application of the bifactor-(S-1) approach to realize a more symptom-oriented modeling of the Beck depression inventory-II. Assessment, 1073191118803738, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118803738.

Lahey, B. B., Pelham, W. E., Schaughency, E. A., Atkins, M. S., Murphy, H. A., Hynd, G., Russo, M., Hartdagen, S., & Lorys-Vernon, A. (1988). Dimensions and types of attention deficit disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(3), 330–335. CrossRef

Lahey, B. B., Zald, D. H., Perkins, S. F., Villalta-Gil, V., Werts, K. B., Van Hulle, C. A., et al. (2018). Measuring the hierarchical general factor model of psychopathology in young adults. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1593.

Martel, M. M., von Eye, A., & Nigg, J. T. (2010). Revisiting the latent structure of ADHD: Is there a 'g' factor? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(8), 905–914. CrossRef

McGee, R., Williams, S. M., & Silva, P. A. (1985). Factor structure and correlates of ratings of inattention, hyperactivity, and antisocial behavior in a large sample of 9-yr-old children from the general population. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 53(4), 480–490. CrossRef

Milich, R., Balentine, A. C., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). ADHD combined types and ADHD predominately inattentive type are distinct and unrelated disorders. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8(4), 463–488.

Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Murray, A. L., Ribeaud, D., Eisner, M., Murray, G., & McKenzie, K. (2019). Should we subtype ADHD according to the context in which symptoms occur? Criterion validity of recognising context-based ADHD presentations. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 50(2), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-018-0842-4. CrossRefPubMed

Pelham Jr., W. E. (2001). Are ADHD/I and ADHD/C the same or different? Does it matter? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8(4), 502–506.

Taylor, E., & Sandberg, S. (1984). Hyperactive behavior in English schoolchildren: A questionnaire survey. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00913466. CrossRefPubMed

Toplak, M. E., Pitch, A., Flora, D. B., Iwenofu, L., Ghelani, K., Jain, U., & Tannock, R. (2009). The unity and diversity of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity in ADHD: Evidence for a general factor with separable dimensions. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(8), 1137–1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9336-y. CrossRefPubMed

Willcutt, E. G., Nigg, J. T., Pennington, B. F., Solanto, M. V., Rohde, L. A., Tannock, R., Loo, S. K., Carlson, C. L., McBurnett, K., & Lahey, B. B. (2012). Validity of DSM-IV attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptom dimensions and subtypes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(4), 991–1010. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027347. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Commentary on Application of the Bifactor S-1 Model to Multisource Ratings of ADHD/ODD Symptoms: An Appropriate Bifactor Model for Symptom Ratings
Auteur:: Michael T. Willoughby
Publicatiedatum: 03-03-2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-020-00629-4
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Tijdschrift: Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology An official publication of the International Society for Research in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
Uitgave 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0091-0627
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2835

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Publisher’s Note

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2020

Correction to: Coercive Parenting Mediates the Relationship between Military Fathers’ Emotion Regulation and children’s Adjustment

Physiological Correlates of Sluggish Cognitive Tempo in Children: Examining Autonomic Nervous System Reactivity during Social and Cognitive Stressor Tasks

Promises and Pitfalls of Latent Variable Approaches to Understanding Psychopathology: Reply to Burke and Johnston, Eid, Junghänel and Colleagues, and Willoughby

Affective Prosody Perception and the Relation to Social Competence in Autistic and Typically Developing Children

Applying the Bifactor S-1 Model to Ratings of ADHD/ODD Symptoms: A Commentary on Burns et al. (2019) and a Re-Analysis

Parental Presence Impacts a Neural Correlate of Anxiety (the Late Positive Potential) in 5–7 Year Old Children: Interactions with Parental Sensitivity to Child Anxiety