Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 1/2017

26-11-2015 | Original Article

Collaboration in implicit memory: evidence from word-fragment completion and category exemplar generation

Auteurs: Clelia Rossi-Arnaud, Vincenzo Cestari, Valeria Rezende Silva Marques, Giulia Bechi Gabrielli, Pietro Spataro

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Recent studies have begun to investigate the effects of collaboration on explicit tests such as free recall, cued recall, and recognition. In contrast, little is known about the impact of this variable on implicit memory. To bridge this gap, the present study compared the performance of nominal and collaborative groups in two implicit memory tasks—word-fragment completion (WFCT) and category exemplar generation (CEGT). Both the disruption-of-individual-retrieval-strategies and the retrieval blocking hypotheses predicted no significant negative effects of collaboration on repetition priming; in contrast, the retrieval inhibition hypothesis predicted lower priming in collaborative than in nominal groups in both tasks. The results supported the former hypotheses, because priming scores in the WFCT and the CEGT did not differ between collaborative and individual groups. Interestingly; however, a significant collaborative inhibition was obtained in the CEGT (but not in the WFCT) when considering the raw proportions of studied and unstudied exemplars generated. The latter finding might indicate that the performance of collaborative groups can be significantly impaired by the disruption of within-category order resulting from the exposure to the exemplars generated by other group members, even when participants do not explicitly attempt to retrieve the stimuli presented at encoding.
Voetnoten
1
The conversations between the members of collaborative groups could not be recorded for technical reasons in the area in which participants were tested, and thus, we cannot judge the extent to which they adopted a turn-taking procedure.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1063–1087.CrossRefPubMed Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1063–1087.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Andersson, J., & Rönnberg, J. (1996). Collaboration and memory: effects of dyadic retrieval on different memory tasks. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 171–181.CrossRef Andersson, J., & Rönnberg, J. (1996). Collaboration and memory: effects of dyadic retrieval on different memory tasks. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 171–181.CrossRef
go back to reference Barber, S. J., Harris, C. B., & Rajaram, S. (2015). Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(2), 559–566.CrossRefPubMed Barber, S. J., Harris, C. B., & Rajaram, S. (2015). Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(2), 559–566.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Barber, S. J., Rajaram, S., & Aron, A. (2010). When two is too many: collaborative encoding impairs memory. Memory & Cognition, 38(3), 255–264.CrossRef Barber, S. J., Rajaram, S., & Aron, A. (2010). When two is too many: collaborative encoding impairs memory. Memory & Cognition, 38(3), 255–264.CrossRef
go back to reference Barca, L., Burani, C., & Arduino, L. S. (2002). Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behavior Research Methods, 34(3), 424–434.CrossRef Barca, L., Burani, C., & Arduino, L. S. (2002). Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behavior Research Methods, 34(3), 424–434.CrossRef
go back to reference Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Bryner, S., & Thomas, R. L, I. I. I. (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1176–1191.CrossRefPubMed Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Bryner, S., & Thomas, R. L, I. I. I. (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1176–1191.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Church, B. A., & Beaupre, P. (1991). Setting boundary conditions on the part-set cuing effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29(3), 213–216.CrossRef Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Church, B. A., & Beaupre, P. (1991). Setting boundary conditions on the part-set cuing effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29(3), 213–216.CrossRef
go back to reference Boccardi, M., & Cappa, S. F. (1997). Valori normativi di produzione categoriale per la lingua italiana [Normative values of categorical production for the Italian language]. Giornale Italiano di psicologia, 24(2), 425–438. Boccardi, M., & Cappa, S. F. (1997). Valori normativi di produzione categoriale per la lingua italiana [Normative values of categorical production for the Italian language]. Giornale Italiano di psicologia, 24(2), 425–438.
go back to reference Bowers, J. S., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Implicit memory and test awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 404–416.CrossRefPubMed Bowers, J. S., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Implicit memory and test awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 404–416.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Butler, K. M., Williams, C. C., Zacks, R. T., & Maki, R. H. (2001). A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(5), 1314–1319.CrossRefPubMed Butler, K. M., Williams, C. C., Zacks, R. T., & Maki, R. H. (2001). A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(5), 1314–1319.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Clark, S. E., Abbe, A., & Larson, R. P. (2006). Collaboration in associative recognition memory: Using recalled information to defend 'new' judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(6), 1266–1273. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1266. Clark, S. E., Abbe, A., & Larson, R. P. (2006). Collaboration in associative recognition memory: Using recalled information to defend 'new' judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition32(6), 1266–1273. doi:10.​1037/​0278-7393.​32.​6.​1266.
go back to reference Clark, S., Hori, A., Putnam, A., & Martin, T. P. (2000). Group collaboration in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1578–1588.CrossRef Clark, S., Hori, A., Putnam, A., & Martin, T. P. (2000). Group collaboration in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1578–1588.CrossRef
go back to reference Dasí, C., Soler, M. J., & Ruiz, J. C. (2004). Normative data on the familiarity and difficulty of 196 Spanish word fragments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 559–563.CrossRef Dasí, C., Soler, M. J., & Ruiz, J. C. (2004). Normative data on the familiarity and difficulty of 196 Spanish word fragments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 559–563.CrossRef
go back to reference Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 497.CrossRef Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 497.CrossRef
go back to reference Finlay, F., Hitch, G. J., & Meudell, P. R. (2000). Mutual inhibition in collaborative recall: evidence for a retrieval-based account. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1556–1567.CrossRefPubMed Finlay, F., Hitch, G. J., & Meudell, P. R. (2000). Mutual inhibition in collaborative recall: evidence for a retrieval-based account. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1556–1567.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Foley, M. A., Fried, A. R., Cowan, E., & Bays, R. B. (2014). Collaborative encoding and memory accuracy: examining the effects of interactive components of co-construction processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(1), 25.CrossRefPubMed Foley, M. A., Fried, A. R., Cowan, E., & Bays, R. B. (2014). Collaborative encoding and memory accuracy: examining the effects of interactive components of co-construction processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(1), 25.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Franks, J. J., Bilbrey, C. W., Lien, K. G., & McNamara, T. P. (2000). Transfer-appropriate processing (TAP). Memory & Cognition, 28(7), 1140–1151.CrossRef Franks, J. J., Bilbrey, C. W., Lien, K. G., & McNamara, T. P. (2000). Transfer-appropriate processing (TAP). Memory & Cognition, 28(7), 1140–1151.CrossRef
go back to reference Harris, C. B., Keil, P. G., Sutton, J., Barnier, A. J., & McIlwain, D. J. (2011). We remember, we forget: collaborative remembering in older couples. Discourse Processes, 48(4), 267–303.CrossRef Harris, C. B., Keil, P. G., Sutton, J., Barnier, A. J., & McIlwain, D. J. (2011). We remember, we forget: collaborative remembering in older couples. Discourse Processes, 48(4), 267–303.CrossRef
go back to reference Harris, C. B., Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2008). Collaborative recall and collective memory: what happens when we remember together? Memory, 16(3), 213–230.CrossRefPubMed Harris, C. B., Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2008). Collaborative recall and collective memory: what happens when we remember together? Memory, 16(3), 213–230.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hyman, I. E., Cardwell, B. A., & Roy, R. A. (2013). Multiple causes of collaborative inhibition in memory for categorised word lists. Memory, 21(7), 875–890.CrossRefPubMed Hyman, I. E., Cardwell, B. A., & Roy, R. A. (2013). Multiple causes of collaborative inhibition in memory for categorised word lists. Memory, 21(7), 875–890.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Light, L. L., Prull, M. W., & Kennison, R. F. (2000). Divided attention, aging, and priming in exemplar generation and category verification. Memory & Cognition, 28(5), 856–872.CrossRef Light, L. L., Prull, M. W., & Kennison, R. F. (2000). Divided attention, aging, and priming in exemplar generation and category verification. Memory & Cognition, 28(5), 856–872.CrossRef
go back to reference Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations. Memory & Cognition, 37(7), 962–975.CrossRef Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations. Memory & Cognition, 37(7), 962–975.CrossRef
go back to reference Mulligan, N. W. (2012). Differentiating between conceptual implicit and explicit memory a crossed double dissociation between category-exemplar production and category-cued recall. Psychological Science, 23(4), 404–406.CrossRefPubMed Mulligan, N. W. (2012). Differentiating between conceptual implicit and explicit memory a crossed double dissociation between category-exemplar production and category-cued recall. Psychological Science, 23(4), 404–406.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mulligan, N. W., & Besken, M. (2013). Implicit memory. In D. Reisberg & D. Reisberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 220–231). New York: Oxford University Press. Mulligan, N. W., & Besken, M. (2013). Implicit memory. In D. Reisberg & D. Reisberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 220–231). New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Mulligan, N. W., & Hartman, M. (1996). Divided attention and indirect memory tests. Memory & Cognition, 24, 453–465.CrossRef Mulligan, N. W., & Hartman, M. (1996). Divided attention and indirect memory tests. Memory & Cognition, 24, 453–465.CrossRef
go back to reference Nelson, D. L., Canas, J. J., Bajo, M. T., & Keelean, P. D. (1987). Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(4), 542.CrossRefPubMed Nelson, D. L., Canas, J. J., Bajo, M. T., & Keelean, P. D. (1987). Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(4), 542.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nickerson, R. S. (1984). Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: a persisting enigma in memory research. Memory & Cognition, 12(6), 531–552.CrossRef Nickerson, R. S. (1984). Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: a persisting enigma in memory research. Memory & Cognition, 12(6), 531–552.CrossRef
go back to reference Perfect, T. J., Moulin, C. A., Conway, M. A., & Perry, E. (2002). Assessing the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting with implicit-memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(6), 1111–1119.CrossRefPubMed Perfect, T. J., Moulin, C. A., Conway, M. A., & Perry, E. (2002). Assessing the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting with implicit-memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(6), 1111–1119.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Peynırcıoğlu, Z., & Moro, C. (1995). Part-set cuing in incidental and implicit memory. The American Journal of Psychology, 108(1), 1–11.CrossRefPubMed Peynırcıoğlu, Z., & Moro, C. (1995). Part-set cuing in incidental and implicit memory. The American Journal of Psychology, 108(1), 1–11.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rajaram, S. (2011). Collaboration both hurts and helps memory a cognitive perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 76–81.CrossRef Rajaram, S. (2011). Collaboration both hurts and helps memory a cognitive perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 76–81.CrossRef
go back to reference Rajaram, S., & Pereira-Pasarin, L. P. (2007). Collaboration can improve individual recognition memory: evidence from immediate and delayed tests. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 95–100.CrossRef Rajaram, S., & Pereira-Pasarin, L. P. (2007). Collaboration can improve individual recognition memory: evidence from immediate and delayed tests. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 95–100.CrossRef
go back to reference Rajaram, S., & Pereira-Pasarin, L. P. (2010). Collaborative memory: cognitive research and theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 649–663.CrossRefPubMed Rajaram, S., & Pereira-Pasarin, L. P. (2010). Collaborative memory: cognitive research and theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 649–663.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63–131). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63–131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
go back to reference Roediger, H. L., Weldon, M. S., Stadler, M. L., & Riegler, G. L. (1992). Direct comparison of two implicit memory tests: word fragment and word stem completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(6), 1251.CrossRefPubMed Roediger, H. L., Weldon, M. S., Stadler, M. L., & Riegler, G. L. (1992). Direct comparison of two implicit memory tests: word fragment and word stem completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(6), 1251.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rossi-Arnaud, C., Pieroni, L., Spataro, P., & Cestari, V. (2011). Effects of pair collaboration and word-frequency in recognition memory: a study with the remember-know procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 516–523.CrossRefPubMed Rossi-Arnaud, C., Pieroni, L., Spataro, P., & Cestari, V. (2011). Effects of pair collaboration and word-frequency in recognition memory: a study with the remember-know procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 516–523.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sloman, S. A. (1991). Part-set cuing inhibition in category-instance and reason generation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29(2), 136–138.CrossRef Sloman, S. A. (1991). Part-set cuing inhibition in category-instance and reason generation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29(2), 136–138.CrossRef
go back to reference Spataro, P., Cestari, V., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2011). The relationship between divided attention and implicit memory. Acta Psychologica, 136, 329–339.CrossRefPubMed Spataro, P., Cestari, V., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2011). The relationship between divided attention and implicit memory. Acta Psychologica, 136, 329–339.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Spataro, P., Mulligan, N. W., Longobardi, E., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2012). Effects of age of acquisition in the word fragment completion task: evidence for an orthographic locus in implicit memory. Experimental Psychology, 59, 22–29.CrossRefPubMed Spataro, P., Mulligan, N. W., Longobardi, E., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2012). Effects of age of acquisition in the word fragment completion task: evidence for an orthographic locus in implicit memory. Experimental Psychology, 59, 22–29.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Spataro, P., Mulligan, N., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2010). Effects of divided attention in the word-fragment completion task with unique and multiple solutions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(1), 18–45.CrossRef Spataro, P., Mulligan, N., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2010). Effects of divided attention in the word-fragment completion task with unique and multiple solutions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(1), 18–45.CrossRef
go back to reference Thorley, C., & Dewhurst, S. A. (2007). Collaborative false recall in the DRM procedure: Effects of group size and group pressure. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(6), 867–881. doi:10.1080/09541440600872068. Thorley, C., & Dewhurst, S. A. (2007). Collaborative false recall in the DRM procedure: Effects of group size and group pressure. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(6), 867–881. doi:10.​1080/​0954144060087206​8.
go back to reference Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247(4940), 301–306.CrossRefPubMed Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247(4940), 301–306.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., & Stark, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 336–342.CrossRef Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., & Stark, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 336–342.CrossRef
go back to reference Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352.CrossRef Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352.CrossRef
go back to reference Watkins, M. J., & Allender, L. E. (1987). Inhibiting word generation with word presentations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(4), 564–568.CrossRefPubMed Watkins, M. J., & Allender, L. E. (1987). Inhibiting word generation with word presentations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(4), 564–568.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Weldon, M. S. (1993). The time course of perceptual and conceptual contributions to word fragment completion priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1010.CrossRefPubMed Weldon, M. S. (1993). The time course of perceptual and conceptual contributions to word fragment completion priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1010.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Weldon, M. S., & Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1160–1175.CrossRefPubMed Weldon, M. S., & Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1160–1175.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Weldon, M. S., Blair, C., & Huebsch, P. D. (2000). Group remembering: does social loafing underlie collaborative inhibition? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1568.CrossRefPubMed Weldon, M. S., Blair, C., & Huebsch, P. D. (2000). Group remembering: does social loafing underlie collaborative inhibition? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1568.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Collaboration in implicit memory: evidence from word-fragment completion and category exemplar generation
Auteurs
Clelia Rossi-Arnaud
Vincenzo Cestari
Valeria Rezende Silva Marques
Giulia Bechi Gabrielli
Pietro Spataro
Publicatiedatum
26-11-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0725-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2017

Psychological Research 1/2017 Naar de uitgave